The Overall Survival Benefit for Patients with T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma after Nephron-Sparing Surgery Depends on Gender and Age.

Due to the recommendations in the urological guidelines to perform nephron-sparing surgery in patients with organ-confined renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the customary therapy regimen changed, but it is not well studied yet whether partial nephrectomy (PN) especially in the elderly is beneficial. From 2000 to 2015, 3,592 patients from 7 clinics undergoing surgery in RCC were identified; 2,323 had T1 tumours. We retrospectively compared the overall survival benefit of patients with T1 RCC who underwent either PN or radical nephrectomy (RN) and studied effects of age and gender. RESULTS: In T1 RCC, PN was beneficial in male patients (p = 0.0006) independent of age, especially in those men ≤75 years of age (p = 0.0005); but PN was not beneficial for female patients (p = 0.0629) regardless of age and male patients older than 75 years (p = 0.736). The OS of female patients after RN and male patients after PN is the same, regardless of age. A life expectancy of more than 45 months at least is necessary to experience an overall survival benefit after PN. CONCLUSIONS: There should be harder proven indications for PN in female patients and especially in all patients older than 75 years, particularly with regard to perioperative risk factors.

[The nightmare of calciphylaxis]. / Albtraum Kalziphylaxie.

Calciphylaxis, also known as "calcific uremic arteriolopathy", is an extremely rare and complex disorder, commonly found in patients with end-stage renal disease. Due to a calcium-phosphate balance disorder, there is a process of calcification in the tunica media of peripheral blood vessels resulting in vascular dysfunction. This, in turn, leads to severe wound healing disorders resulting in sepsis. We report the rare case of a 53-year-old patient with the simultaneous presence of Fournier's gangrene and calciphylaxis, placing a special focus on diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Challenging the prognostic impact of the new WHO and TNM classifications with special emphasis on HPV status in penile carcinoma.

The evidence concerning prognostic parameters for clinical decision-making in penile cancer is either weak or missing. We therefore analysed the prognostic value of the revised TNM and WHO classification systems on relapse and survival with special emphasis on HPV status. We collected clinical data and tissue samples of 121 patients from centres in Germany and Russia. HPV genotyping and p16INK4a immunostaining were performed. The histological subtype and TNM were reclassified by two experienced uropathologists. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed by Cox proportional hazard model and Fisher's exact test for contingency analysis. HPV status was not found to be an independent prognostic factor. Histological subtypes differ in prognosis with the best outcome found in warty and the worst in basaloid carcinomas. Patients with pT1b defined by poor differentiation or lymphovascular invasion (LVI) had the shortest metastasis-free survival compared with pT1a (log-rank, p = 0.02). Lymph node metastasis and LVI were significantly associated with poor metastasis-free, cancer-specific and overall survival and could be identified as the only independent prognostic parameters. Prognostic value of TNM could not be improved using the 8th versus the 7th edition. In contrast to HPV status, histological subtypes are of prognostic value and should be an essential part of pathologic reports. The impact of the HPV status needs to be analysed in a subtype-specific manner. Parameters describing lymphatic dissemination have the highest impact on prognosis. Inclusion of tumour grade and LVI into a single T-category (pT1b) seems questionable.