Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Psychosoc Oncol ; 33(6): 703-23, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26600242

RESUMO

Two preliminary studies assessed whether telephone counseling (TC) is a feasible smoking cessation intervention following lung cancer screening. Seven older smokers undergoing lung cancer screening (pack years = 61.5) completed three TC sessions, which incorporated the screening result as motivation to quit. Participation (87.5%) and retention (85.7%) rates were good, and four smokers quit smoking (three of whom received abnormal results). We conducted four focus groups with 16 current and former older smokers (pack years = 55). Most believed that an abnormal scan would motivate them to quit and expressed interest in TC. TC may be feasible and potentially efficacious within lung screening programs.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Telefone , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
2.
J Thorac Dis ; 13(8): 4947-4955, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34527333

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is mixed evidence regarding whether undergoing computed tomography lung cancer screening (LCS) can serve as a "teachable moment" that impacts smoking behavior and attitudes. The study aim was to assess whether the standard procedures of undergoing LCS and receiving free and low-cost evidence-based cessation resources impacted short-term smoking-related outcomes. METHODS: Participants were smokers (N=87) who were registered to undergo lung screening and were enrolled in a cessation intervention trial. We conducted two phone interviews, both preceding trial randomization: the first interview was conducted prior to lung screening, and the second interview followed lung screening (median =12.5 days post-screening) and participants' receipt of their screening results. The interviews assessed demographic characteristics, interest in evidence-based cessation intervention methods, and tobacco-related characteristics, including cigarettes per day and readiness to quit. Participants received minimal evidence-based cessation resources following the pre-lung screening interview. RESULTS: Participants were 60.3 years old, 56.3% female, and reported a median of 40 pack-years. Participants were interested in using several evidence-based strategies, including counseling from a healthcare provider (76.7%) and receiving nicotine replacement therapy (69.8%). Pre-lung screening, 25.3% smoked ≤10 cigarettes per day, and 29.9% were ready to quit in the next 30 days. We conducted two McNemar binomial distribution tests to assess change from pre- to post-screening. At the post-lung screening assessment, approximately three-quarters reported no change on these variables. However, 23.3% reported smoking fewer cigarettes per day, whereas 4.7% reported smoking more cigarettes per day (McNemar P=0.002), and 17.2% reported increased readiness to quit, whereas 6.9% reported decreased readiness to quit (McNemar P=0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Following receipt of cessation resources and completion of lung screening, most participants reported no change in smoking outcomes. However, there was a significant reduction in cigarettes per day, and there was a trend for increased readiness to quit. This setting may provide a potential "teachable moment" and an opportunity to assist smokers with quitting. However, more proactive and intensive interventions will be necessary to capitalize on these changes and to support abstinence in the long-term.

3.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 11(4): 407-410, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33604100

RESUMO

New graduate advanced practice providers (APPs) who accept jobs within the hematology-oncology field face many challenges when beginning their careers. Specific challenges include a lack of specialty-specific training, expedited orientation periods, and a large patient volume. These challenges can lead to dissatisfaction within the role, unsafe patient care, and ultimately costly job turnover. In order to better prepare APPs for the specialty workforce, the hematology-oncology fellowship program at Levine Cancer Institute has worked to develop and cultivate a comprehensive curriculum to meet the many needs identified. The hematology-oncology APP fellowship program is a 12-month curriculum that includes both didactic as well as clinical requirements. The fellowship program provides guidance in a structured practice setting and has ultimately offered APPs the opportunity to successfully transition into their specialty care role.

4.
Lung Cancer ; 108: 242-246, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28216065

RESUMO

Incorporating effective smoking cessation interventions into lung cancer screening (LCS) programs will be essential to realizing the full benefit of screening. We conducted a pilot randomized trial to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a telephone-counseling (TC) smoking cessation intervention vs. usual care (UC) in the LCS setting. In collaboration with 3 geographically diverse LCS programs, we enrolled current smokers (61.5% participation rate) who were: registered to undergo LCS, 50-77 years old, and had a 20+ pack-year smoking history. Eligibility was not based on readiness to quit. Participants completed pre-LCS (T0) and post-LCS (T1) telephone assessments, were randomized to TC (N=46) vs. UC (N=46), and completed a final 3-month telephone assessment (T2). Both study arms received a list of evidence-based cessation resources. TC participants also received up to 6 brief counseling calls with a trained cessation counselor. Counseling calls incorporated motivational interviewing and utilized the screening result as a motivator for quitting. The outcome was biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence cessation at 3-months post-randomization. Participants (56.5% female) were 60.2 (SD=5.4) years old and reported 47.1 (SD=22.2) pack years; 30% were ready to stop smoking in the next 30 days. TC participants completed an average of 4.4 (SD=2.3) sessions. Using intent-to-treat analyses, biochemically verified quit rates were 17.4% (TC) vs. 4.3% (UC), p<.05. This study provides preliminary evidence that telephone-based cessation counseling is feasible and efficacious in the LCS setting. As millions of current smokers are now eligible for lung cancer screening, this setting represents an important opportunity to exert a large public health impact on cessation among smokers who are at very high risk for multiple tobacco-related diseases. If this evidence-based, brief, and scalable intervention is replicated, TC could help to improve the overall cost-effectiveness of LCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02267096, https://clinicaltrials.gov.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Telefone , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Intervenção Educacional Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA