Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using banana-shaped and straight cages: meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

PURPOSE: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery rate increased over the last decade. There is no consensus about the better shape of cage to use in TLIF. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the shape focusing on bony union, lordosis restoration as well as perioperative complications. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till September 2022. The clinical outcomes consisted of the bony union, segmental and lumbar lordosis restoration, quality of life, and operation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Only 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Straight-shaped cages tended to have a lower subsidence rate compared to banana-shaped cages (p = 0.10), had a better restoration of segmental lordosis (p < 0.0001), better disc height restoration (p = 0.01), as well as a higher Oswestry Disability Index decrease (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Straight-shaped cages had a better restoration of lumbar lordosis, disc height, and a lower subsidence rate when compared to banana-shaped cages. This may be explained by the absence of the optimal placement of the curved cages, which is at the most anterior part of the disc space. Better conducted randomized controlled trial could strengthen these findings.

Clinical predictive model of lumbar curve Cobb angle below selective fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal multicenter descriptive study.

PURPOSE: To implement a clinically applicable, predictive model for the lumbar Cobb angle below a selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: A series of 146 adolescents with Lenke 1 or 2 idiopathic scoliosis, surgically treated with posterior selective fusion, and minimum follow-up of 5 years (average 7) was analyzed. The cohort was divided in 2 groups: if lumbar Cobb angle at last follow-up was, respectively, ≥ or < 10°. A logistic regression-based prediction model (PredictMed) was implemented to identify variables associated with the group ≥ 10°. The guidelines of the TRIPOD statement were followed. RESULTS: Mean Cobb angle of thoracic main curve was 56° preoperatively and 25° at last follow-up. Mean lumbar Cobb angle was 33° (20; 59) preoperatively and 11° (0; 35) at last follow-up. 53 patients were in group ≥ 10°. The 2 groups had similar demographics, flexibility of both main and lumbar curves, and magnitude of the preoperative main curve, p > 0.1. From univariate analysis, mean magnitude of preoperative lumbar curves (35° vs. 30°), mean correction of main curve (65% vs. 58%), mean ratio of main curve/distal curve (1.9 vs. 1.6) and distribution of lumbar modifiers were statistically different between groups (p < 0.05). PredictMed identified the following variables significantly associated with the group ≥ 10°: main curve % correction at last follow-up (p = 0.01) and distal curve angle (p = 0.04) with a prediction accuracy of 71%. CONCLUSION: The main modifiable factor influencing uninstrumented lumbar curve was the correction of main curve. The clinical model PredictMed showed an accuracy of 71% in prediction of lumbar Cobb angle ≥ 10° at last follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Longitudinal comparative study.

Toward understanding the underlying mechanisms of pelvic tilt reserve in adult spinal deformity: the role of the 3D hip orientation.

PURPOSE: To explore 3D hip orientation in standing position in subjects with adult spinal deformity (ASD) presenting with different levels of compensatory mechanisms. METHODS: Subjects with ASD (n = 159) and controls (n = 68) underwent full-body biplanar X-rays with the calculation of 3D spinopelvic, postural and hip parameters. ASD subjects were grouped as ASD with knee flexion (ASD-KF) if they compensated by flexing their knees (knee flexion ≥ 5°), and ASD with knee extension (ASD-KE) otherwise (knee flexion < 5°). Spinopelvic, postural and hip parameters were compared between the three groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then computed between spinopelvic and hip parameters. RESULTS: ASD-KF had higher SVA (67 ± 66 mm vs. 2 ± 33 mm and 11 ± 21 mm), PT (27 ± 14° vs. 18 ± 9° and 11 ± 7°) and PI-LL mismatch (20 ± 26° vs - 1 ± 18° and - 13 ± 10°) when compared to ASD-KE and controls (all p < 0.05). ASD-KF also had a more tilted (34 ± 11° vs. 28 ± 9° and 26 ± 7°), anteverted (24 ± 6° vs. 20 ± 5° and 18 ± 4°) and abducted (59 ± 6° vs. 57 ± 4° and 56 ± 4°) acetabulum, with a higher posterior coverage (100 ± 6° vs. 97 ± 7° for ASD-KE) when compared to ASD-KE and controls (all p < 0.05). The main determinants of acetabular tilt, acetabular abduction and anterior acetabular coverage were PT, SVA and LL (adjusted R2 [0.12; 0.5]). CONCLUSIONS: ASD subjects compensating with knee flexion have altered hip orientation, characterized by increased posterior coverage (acetabular anteversion, tilt and posterior coverage) and decreased anterior coverage which can together lead to posterior femoro-acetabular impingement, thus limiting pelvic retroversion. This underlying mechanism could be potentially involved in the hip-spine syndrome.

A new classification for coronal malalignment in adult spinal deformity: a validation and the role of lateral bending radiographs.

PURPOSE: Coronal malalignment (CM) causes pain, impairment of function and cosmetic problems for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients in addition to sagittal malalignment. Certain types of CM are at risk of insufficient re-alignment after correction. However, CM has received minimal attention in the literature compared to sagittal malalignment. The purpose was to establish reliability for our recently published classification system of CM in ASD among spine surgeons. METHODS: Fifteen readers were assigned 28 cases for classification, who represented CM with reference to their full-length standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The assignment was repeated 2 weeks later, then a third assignment was done with reference to additional side bending radiographs (SBRs). Intra-, inter-rater reliability and contribution of SBRs were determined. RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability was calculated as 0.95, 0.86 and 0.73 for main curve types, subtypes with first modifier, and subtypes with two modifiers respectively. Inter-rater reliability averaged 0.91, 0.75 and 0.52. No differences in intra-rater reliability were shown between the four expert elaborators of the classification and other readers. SBRs helped to increase the concordance rate of second modifiers or changed to appropriate grading in cases graded type A in first modifier. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate intra- and inter-rater reliability was shown in the Obeid-CM classification with reference to full spine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. While side bending radiographs did not improve the classification reliability, they contributed to a better understanding in certain cases. Surgeons should consider both the sagittal and coronal planes, and this system may allow better surgical decision making for CM.

Posterior-only versus combined anterior/posterior fusion in Scheuermann disease: a large retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The literature shows controversies concerning surgical treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis between posterior-only fixation and combined anterior/posterior fusion. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological results and the rate of complications between these two techniques. METHODS: We performed a multicentric retrospective review of 131 patients who underwent primary fusion for Scheuermann's kyphosis divided into two groups: 67 patients operated via posterior approach only and 64 operated via combined anterior/posterior approach. Classical clinical, surgical and radiological data were collected. A descriptive and statistical analysis was performed between the two groups to evaluate the influence of the surgical procedure on the rate of complications, the functional results and radiological correction. RESULTS: The average age was 23 and the average kyphosis was 77 degrees. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range 0.1-27.3). There was no difference regarding demographic data, preoperative radiographic data and length of fusion between the two groups. Functional results were good in 81% of cases. Kyphosis correction was on average 15° and the correction of the compensatory lumbar lordosis was 20°. The correction was stable at final follow-up. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of functional results, the complications rate and radiological correction. CONCLUSION: Surgery for Scheuermann's kyphosis gives good and stable functional and radiological results. Given the fact that the two surgical strategies give the same results, it appears that the anterior/posterior fusion technique to treat Scheuermann's kyphosis should be reserved for major deformations. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Cervical and postural strategies for maintaining horizontal gaze in asymptomatic adults.

PURPOSE: To investigate the different cervical strategies for maintaining horizontal gaze in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: One hundred and forty-four asymptomatic adults filled the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire and underwent full-body biplanar radiographs. Chin brow vertical angle (CBVA) and postural and cervical parameters were measured. Subjects were grouped according to cervical spine curvature (C2-C7 angle): kyphotic (< - 5°), straight [- 5°, 5°], lordotic (> 5°). Demographics, SF-36 component scores and CBVA were compared between groups. All other parameters were compared between groups, while controlling for confounding factors (ANCOVA). A correlation test was conducted between all cervical parameters. RESULTS: 32% of subjects had kyphotic (- 12° ± 7°), 27% straight (0° ± 3°) and 41% lordotic (12° ± 7°) cervical spines. While demographic and SF-36 data did not differ between groups, CBVA differed between lordotic and kyphotic groups (2° vs. 6.5°, p = 0.002). Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) were lower in the kyphotic group (SVA: K = - 26 ± 20 mm vs. L = - 2 ± 21 mm, p < 0.001; TK: K = 40° ± 6° vs. L = 51° ± 8°, p < 0.001). C2 slope (K = 29° ± 6° vs. L = 18° ± 6°, p < 0.001), C0-C2 (K = 42° ± 8° vs. L = 30° ± 8°, p < 0.001) and C1-C2 (K = 33° ± 6° vs. L = 28° ± 6°, p = 0.004) were higher in the kyphotic group. Significant correlations were found between almost all cervical parameters and C2-C7 angle. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with cervical kyphosis presented with more posterior global alignment and lower TK than subjects with lordosis. In order to maintain horizontal gaze, subjects with cervical kyphosis presented with a more lordotic upper cervical spine than subjects with cervical lordosis. Subjects with straight cervical curvature presented with an intermediate sagittal alignment. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of the Cervical Spine in Children: A Review and a Focus on Available Treatment Options.

OBJECTIVE: To present a series of pediatric cervical spine (CS) aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC), to review the literature, and to propose a treatment algorithm. MATERIAL: We present a series of 4 cases of ABC and review the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google scholar. RESULTS: Only 51 cases are documented. The mean age at diagnosis is 11.5 years, and there is a small female predominance (F:M ratio=1.6). Most of ABC occurs in the upper CS (41%), are located in the posterior component (75%), and extends in 40% of the vertebral body. A single treatment modality was used in 56.9%, whereas combination of surgery with other treatment modalities was used in the rest. Of the total number of cases, 56.8% were managed with marginal resection, and instrumentation was used in 80%. Mean follow-up was 72.5 months, with the majority of patients disease free. Pain is the most common symptom present at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ABC of the spine is a pediatric tumor occurring rarely in the CS. Treatment options vary from simple curettage to total resection with or without instrumentation. Recurrence after surgery is highest after curettage alone. The main indications for surgery are rapid progression, despite intracystic injection, and/or the presence of neurological signs or symptoms.

Approaches in Anterior Column Support in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in terms of postoperative complications, improvement in radiographic parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases were searched up to June 2023. The studied outcomes were the rate of rod failures, rod failures requiring revision surgery, all complications, all revision surgeries, the change in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, the postoperative pelvic incidence-LL, and LL, and the improvement in back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. ALIF showed higher postoperative lordosis (P = 0.003) and better improvement in ODI (P = 0.0001). No difference was seen in the remaining outcomes between ALIF and TLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Although ALIF had better improvement in ODI, the mean difference was 6.5 points, which is below the minimal clinically important difference, stripping this result of any clinical value. Furthermore, even though ALIF had better postoperative lordosis, the change in LL postoperatively was not different between ALIF and TLIF. With no difference in complications, sagittal and coronal alignment, and patient-reported outcomes, TLIF was shown in this study to be favored instead of ALIF in adult spinal deformity surgery to avoid all the double approach-related comorbidity.

Hybrid vs all pedicle screws constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a metaanalysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects around 1 to 3% of young individuals, leading to spinal deformities typically exceeding a Cobb angle of 10 degrees without congenital or neuromuscular causes. Advances in treatment now include various surgical techniques such as posterior fusion utilizing all-pedicle screw constructs or hybrid constructs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2024. Comparative studies in which the cohort was separated into two groups (HC and PSC) were included. Data consisting of, surgery-related outcomes, sagittal radiographic outcomes, coronal radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes, was extracted and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies including 3435 patients were included. Higher rates of complications (Odds-Ratio = 1.99, p < 0.00001) and reoperations (Odds-Ratio = 2.82, p < 0.00001) were seen in the hybrid group. Better radiographic coronal correction was seen in the PSC group in both the major curve (Mean Difference = 5.97, p < 0.00001) and the secondary curve (Mean Difference = - 10.73, p < 0.0001). However, restoration of sagittal alignment was better in the HC group when assessing thoracic kyphosis (Mean Difference = 2.97, p = 0.02) and lumbar lordosis (Mean Difference = 3.17, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: While all-pedicle screw constructs demonstrated greater stability in AIS compared to hybrid constructs, resulting in reduced rates of reoperations and complications, as well as improved correction of major and secondary curves, they were unable to fully restore optimal sagittal alignment.

Acute unexplained T1-T2 fracture-dislocation following posterior instrumentation and fusion for paralytic scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Upper thoracic fracture-dislocation following posterior instrumentation and fusion is rare, with potentially devastating neurologic consequences. The recommended treatment is an open reduction, spinal cord decompression, and a proximal extension of spinal instrumentation. To report the diagnosis and management of an acute non-traumatic T1-T2 fracture-dislocation, occurring in the early postoperative course of a posterior instrumentation and fusion for neurogenic scoliosis. CASE REPORT: A 12-year-old spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (CP) male patient, who underwent an uneventful T2-S1 instrumentation for scoliosis, presented to the emergency department (ED) 2 weeks later, with mild fever, urinary retention, fecaloma and hypotonia of the 4 limbs, of few days duration. His parents reported no history of trauma and denied epileptic seizures. Atypical cervicothoracic spastic movements the night preceding his symptoms were the only relevant events of the patient's history. CT and MRI were both suggestive of a complete T1-T2 fracture-dislocation and spinal cord compromise. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient underwent immediate posterior decompression with wide lamino-arthrectomy, open reduction and proximal extension of his posterior instrumentation to C5. One year following surgery, there was only mild sensorimotor and bladder and bowel function recovery. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of an acute non-traumatic unexplained T1-T2 fracture-dislocation following posterior instrumentation and fusion. Despite a proper management, only very mild recovery was observed one year following surgery.

Traumatic spine fractures and concomitant venous thromboembolism: A systematic review.

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with bony fractures have been documented in the literature. However, the literature is not very exhaustive when it comes to VTE associated with traumatic spine fractures. Thus the purpose of this systematic review analyzing the incidence of VTE associated with spinal trauma. Methods: An electronic search strategy was elaborated in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (page 1-20) since inception till November 2023. Results: Twelve studies were included with three prospective clinical studies, seven retrospective studies, one observational cohort study, and one propensity-matched analysis. These involved 256,107 subjects with 6039 concomitant VTE (2.4 %). Potential risk factors included age, D-dimer levels, length of hospital stay, associated spinal cord injury, location of the vertebral trauma and other baseline patient-dependent characteristics. Conclusion: This review found that the rate VTE in spinal trauma patients was 2.4 % (6039/256107). To optimize care, clinical decision making should be tailored to each patient using a combined approach of imaging, laboratory findings, and serial physical examinations.

Will ChatGPT be Able to Replace a Spine Surgeon in the Clinical Setting?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates ChatGPT's performance in diagnosing and managing spinal pathologies. METHODS: Patients underwent evaluation by two spine surgeons (and the case was discussed and a consensus was reached) and ChatGPT. Patient data, including demographics, symptoms, and available imaging reports, were collected using a standardized form. This information was then processed by ChatGPT for diagnosis and management recommendations. The study assessed ChatGPT's diagnostic and management accuracy through descriptive statistics, comparing its performance to that of experienced spine specialists. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with various spinal pathologies participated in the study, with a gender distribution of 40 males and 57 females. ChatGPT achieved a 70% diagnostic accuracy rate and provided suitable management recommendations for 95% of patients. However, it struggled with certain pathologies, misdiagnosing 100% of vertebral trauma and facet joint syndrome, 40% of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and scoliosis, and 22% of disc-related pathologies. Furthermore, ChatGPT's management recommendations were poor in 53% of cases, often failing to suggest the most appropriate treatment options and occasionally providing incomplete advice. CONCLUSIONS: While helpful in the medical field, ChatGPT falls short in providing reliable management recommendations, with a 30% misdiagnosis rate and 53% mismanagement rate in our study. Its limitations, including reliance on outdated data and the inability to interactively gather patient information, must be acknowledged. Surgeons should use ChatGPT cautiously as a supplementary tool rather than a substitute for their clinical expertise, as the complexities of healthcare demand human judgment and interaction.

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral cages are often used for interbody fusion. However, this procedure may not be possible in some cases making unilateral cages a reasonable alternative. The literature remains divided on the clinical and radiological distinctions when comparing unilateral to bilateral cages in lumbar interbody fusion. Thus, this meta-analysis will analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes between these 2 groups. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the incidence of adverse events, surgery-related parameters, and patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Lower rates of pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, were reported in the bilateral cages group (P = 0.01, P = 0.001, respectively) whereas shorter operative time (OR time), and lower estimated blood loss were seen in unilateral cage group (P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in the remaining analyzed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral cages were shown to be superior due to their reduced OR time and estimated blood loss. As for the higher rate of pseudoarthrosis, this outcome may not be related to the cage numbers and it did not affect clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, one must consider other factors such as radiographic sagittal parameters before making a surgical decision.

Titanium Cages versus Polyetheretherketone Cages in Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The most widely adopted materials for interbody fusion implants are titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), both of which have potential advantages and disadvantages. Despite the differences between PEEK and titanium, there is no consensus on which material provides better clinical and radiological outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the 2 cages. METHODS: Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar) were queried since December 2001 up until December 2023. Clinical outcomes evaluated included rates of adverse events, radiographic outcomes, and patient-related outcomes. RESULTS: Higher rates of subsidence and revision were reported in PEEK cages in the lumbar spine (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.006, respectively). In the cervical spine, no difference was observed between PEEK and titanium in any analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the lumbar spine, titanium cages were shown to have a lower rate of subsidence and revision compared with PEEK cages. In the cervical spine, the difference between cages did not reach statistical significance in any of the analyzed outcomes.

Intensive Care Unit Admission After Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions constitute a substantial financial challenge for health care systems and patients and are linked to various potentially life-altering complications. A wide range of patient-related, surgical, and medical factors are associated with an increased risk of ICU admission following spine surgery. DISCUSSION: The most notable examples include lung, heart, and kidney disease, as well as estimated blood loss and length of surgery. Various scores that include the most significant patient- and procedure-related factors have been described to assess the risk associated with surgery for individual patients. To date, the fusion risk score and the American Society of Anesthesiologists score have been the most useful in predicting postoperative complications and admission to the ICU. However, other risk factors have also been implicated in ICU admission and length of stay. The current scores must further adapt by using the available evidence to fulfill their intended purpose. Moreover, a handful of measures have shown efficacy in decreasing ICU admission and length of stay, with their benefits still to be demonstrated by future research. CONCLUSION: This review underscores the risk factors predictive of ICU admission following spine surgery and will help surgeons and clinicians in patient stratification. However, future studies are needed to validate the role of protective measures in preventing ICU admissions and the significance of certain risk factors.

Implant density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 1-3% of adolescents, and treatment approaches, including the density of constructs in surgical fusion, vary among orthopedic surgeons. Studies have sought to establish whether high-density or low-density constructs offer superior clinical and radiological outcomes, yet conclusive results are lacking. This meta-analysis aims to provide a definitive answer to the controversial and ambiguous question surrounding the efficacy of different pedicle screw densities in treating AIS. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till December 2023. The studied outcomes were Major Cobb angle, major curve correction, lumbar curve, kyphosis (T5-T12), lumbar lordosis, coronal balance, LIV Tilt angle, TAV translation, LAV translation, apical trunk rotation, trunk shift, SRS-22, operative time, blood loss, complications and cost. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (total of 1985 patients, 1045 in LD group and 940 in HD group) were included in this meta-analysis. A statistically significant better improvement in ATR (p = 0.02) and LIV tilt angle (p = 0.02) was seen in the high-density group. On the other hand, longer operative time (p = 0.002), blood loss (p = 0.0004) and costs (p = 0.02) were seen in the high-density group. No difference was seen in the remaining radiographic and clinical outcomes between both surgeries. CONCLUSION: Both low-density (LD) and high-density (HD) screw constructs show comparable and satisfactory radiographic and QOL for AIS patients. Furthermore, HD constructs had increased costs, operative time, and blood loss associated. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be made and more studies taking into account multiple additional variables are necessary to do so.

Dual Versus Single Attending Surgeon Performance of Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of 2 surgeons in spinal deformity surgery is considered beneficial by some. In fact, select studies indicate advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss. Another observed decreased patient morbidity with a dual-surgeon approach, attributed to shorter operative times and reduced intraoperative blood losses. Therefore, this meta-analysis will assess the benefits of a having 2 surgeons compared to 1 surgeon during spine surgeries. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of transfusion, reoperation, and surgery-related parameters such as operative room time, length of stay (LOS), and estimated blood loss. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. A greater rate of complications was seen in patients operated upon by 1 surgeon (odds ratio = 0.50; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.25-0.99, P = 0.05). Furthermore, operative room time (mean differences = -82.73; 95% CI: -111.42 to -54.03, P < 0.001) and LOS (mean differences = -0.91; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.71, P < 0.001) were reduced in the dual surgeon scenario. No statistically significant difference was shown in the remaining analyzed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of 2 surgeons in the odds ratiowas shown to reduce complications, operative room time, and LOS. More cost-effectiveness studies are needed in order to substantiate the financial advantages associated with the dual-surgeon approach.

[Predictors of osteoarticular problems in a cohort of computer users in Lebanon: about 810 employees]. / Facteurs prédictifs des troubles ostéo-articulaires chez les utilisateurs d'ordinateurs au Liban: a propos d'une cohorte de 810 employés.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is the analysis of osteoarticular problems (OAP) occurring in a group of computer users (CU) in search of correlation between symptoms and different etiological factors. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Questionnaire of 31 items dealing with personal data, the activity of the CU, stress, the occurrence of osteoarticular problems during the last month (Oaplm) and last twelve months (Oaptm) and a checklist of 17 items covering the physical characteristics of the workplace. RESULTS: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS * 810 respondents of mean age 36 +/- 9 years and predominantly female (69%) * FEATURES: seniority at the workplace (12.5 +/- 9 years), pace of work (825 +/- 1.5 hours/day and 5.5 +/- 1 days/ week), number of breaks (13 +/- 1.04/d), duration of breaks (35 min +/- 25/d), 44.5% in sports activities, work stress in 92% of participants * OAP described:--Osteoarticular problems last month (62%), neck pain (68%), shoulder (46%) and lumbar spine (62%) pain. Tingling hands (40%). Headache (55.5%). Temporomandibular disorders (18.5%)--Osteoarticular problems the last twelve months (46%). UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS: Detection of risk factors * RISK FACTORS and Oaplm relationship: female, weight gain, secretary, stress, pain during labor and work stoppages withp < 0.05 * RISK FACTORS and Oaptm relationship: the position of secretary, stress, pain at work, work stop-pages for Oaplm withp < 0.05 * Protection factor: sports more than one time per week. MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS: Oaplm occurrent factors: weight gain, Oaptm withp < 0.05. Protection factor: well designed workstation * Oaptm occurrent factors: age, stress and Oaplm with p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Significant prevalence of osteoarticular problems in Lebanese computer users. RISK FACTORS: age, Oaptm, weight gain, stress, work-break cycle not respected and poor layout of the workstation. Ergonomic interventions are necessary and indispensable to reduce the cost of occupational diseases related to the CU, and ensure good mental and physical health.

Vertebroplasty versus Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: One of the most frequent consequences of osteoporosis is osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, which makes it one of the most prevalent health care crises in the world. Two things are needed to manage them: 1) pain management, and 2) fracture stabilization. To take care of both, 2 methods are commonly used: 1) vertebroplasty and 2) kyphoplasty (KP) without a clear consensus on which is the better one. A meta-analysis was done comparing both techniques in the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched updated to October 2022. Two reviewers determined the eligibility of the studies independently. Only 8 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The clinical outcomes consisted of the complications (cement leakage, adjacent level fractures), the visual analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index, kyphotic wedge angle, and vertebral body height restoration. RESULTS: KP was shown to be superior to vertebroplasty in terms of reducing cement leakage, and increasing postoperative vertebral body height. The comparison of the rest of the outcomes was statistically insignificant between both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Although KP could significantly increase postoperative vertebral body height and decrease the risk of cement leakage, the fact that it is more costly and has a longer operative time raises the question about the cost effectiveness of the procedure.

Exceptional Spinal Mobility Caused by Charcot Disease: Case Description with Several Years of Follow-Up.

A spinal cord injury is now the most common cause of Charcot Spinal Arthropathy (CSA). Paraplegia, loss of pain sensation, laminectomies, and spinal fusions involving more than 5 levels are all risk factors for developing this condition. Low back pain and spinal abnormalities are common symptoms. Circumferential arthrodesis is the chosen treatment. Implant failure and new-onset CSA, which necessitates re-instrumentation, are some of the risks associated with this treatment. This is the case of a patient with a post-traumatic spinal cord injury presenting with spinal Charcot disease with a very long follow-up. We report a unique complication with the replacement of the discal space and portions of the vertebral bodies by fibrotic tissue with an extraordinary spinal movement in the coronal and sagittal planes. Recurrent Charcot disease at the same level or at a caudal level is a devastating complication in spinal surgery. Since this disease naturally exposes the patient to iterative surgeries, it would be wise to limit the extent of the arthrodesis to an optimal number of levels sufficient to ensure perfect stability of the construct and not to be very extensive from the first surge. The risk would increase the fused levels which limit the availability of mobile buffer levels and increase the stress on the remaining levels. Regular follow-ups to the patient should be done to detect recurrence at the same site or distal to the instrumentation.