Risk of Malignancy in Adenomas Detected During Screening Colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A higher incidence of proximal interval cancers after colonoscopy has been reported in several follow-up studies. One possible explanation for this might be that proximally located adenomas have greater malignant potential. The aim of the present study was to assess the risk of malignancy in proximal versus distal adenomas in patients included in a large screening colonoscopy database; adenoma shape and the patients' age and sex distribution were also analyzed. METHODS: Data for 2007-2012 from the German National Screening Colonoscopy Registry, including 594,614 adenomas identified during 2,532,298 screening colonoscopies, were analyzed retrospectively. The main outcome measure was the rate of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in adenomas, used as a surrogate marker for the risk of malignancy. Odds ratios (ORs) for the rate of HGD found in adenomas were analyzed in relation to patient- and adenoma-related factors using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: HGD histology was noted in 20,873 adenomas (3.5%). Proximal adenoma locations were not associated with a higher HGD rate. The most significant risk factor for HGD was adenoma size (OR 10.36 ≥1 cm vs <1 cm), followed by patient age (OR 1.26 and 1.46 for age groups 65-74 and 75-84 vs 55-64 years) and sex (OR 1.15 male vs female). In comparison with flat adenomas as a reference lesion, sessile lesions had a similar HGD rate (OR 1.02) and pedunculated adenomas had a higher rate (OR 1.23). All associations were statistically significant (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this large screening database, it was found that the rates of adenomas with HGD are similar in the proximal and distal colon. The presence of HGD as a risk marker alone does not explain higher rates of proximal interval colorectal cancer. We suggest that certain lesions (flat, serrated lesions) may be missed in the proximal colon and may acquire a more aggressive biology over time. A combination of endoscopy-related factors and biology may therefore account for higher rates of proximal versus distal interval colorectal cancer.

Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality indicator of screening colonoscopy; it is inversely associated with risk of interval cancers and colorectal cancer mortality. We assessed trends in the ADR in the first 10 years of the German screening colonoscopy program. METHODS: We calculated age-adjusted and age-specific detection rates of nonadvanced adenomas and advanced adenomas for each calendar year based on 4.4 million screening colonoscopies conducted from 2003 through 2012 and reported to the German screening colonoscopy registry. RESULTS: We observed a steady and strong increase in rate of detection of nonadvanced adenomas in both sexes and all age groups. Age-adjusted rates of detection of nonadvanced adenomas increased from 13.3% to 22.3% among men and from 8.4% to 14.9% among women. This increase was mostly due to an increase in detection rates of adenomas <0.5 cm, and it is partly explained by an innovation effect (higher ADRs among incoming colonoscopists than among leaving colonoscopists, and relatively stable ADRs among continuing colonoscopists). Only modest increases were observed in detection rates of advanced adenomas (from 7.4% to 9.0% among men, and from 4.4% to 5.2% among women) and colorectal cancer. In 2012, overall ADR reached 31.3% and 20.1% in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a strong increase in ADRs from 2003 through 2012 in Germany. Although we cannot exclude the effects of secular trends in colorectal neoplasm prevalence, the observed increase was mainly the result of a steady increase in detection of nonadvanced adenomas (especially adenomas <0.5 cm). Further research should address potential implications for defining screening and surveillance intervals.

Measuring Stuttering in Preschool-Aged Children across Different Languages: An International Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are working in linguistically diverse communities and have to identify and measure stuttering in a language other than their own. The aim of the present study was to extend our understanding of how well SLPs can measure stuttering in other languages and to encourage collaboration between SLPs across cultures. METHODS: Speech samples consisted of seven preschool-aged children each speaking one of the following languages: Danish, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, and Persian (Farsi). The judges were classified in seven groups of SLPs (n = 170) each speaking one of the seven languages of the children and two more English-speaking groups. Each judge rated the severity of stuttering in each child using a 10-point scale. The study was conducted over the Internet. RESULTS: Overall, the judges' proficiency in a child's language was not systematically related to the variability and agreement of the severity ratings, accounting for maximally 4.6% of the variance. CONCLUSION: SLPs should not be overly concerned about the appropriateness of their severity ratings if they feel less proficient in the native language of the stuttering children. It may also be encouraging for beginning clinicians that the severity ratings were not systematically related to professional experience.

Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia 10 or More Years After a Negative Screening Colonoscopy in 120 000 Repeated Screening Colonoscopies.

Importance: Screening colonoscopy to prevent and early detect colorectal cancer is recommended to be repeated in 10-year intervals, which goes along with high demands of capacities and costs. Evidence of findings at screening colonoscopies conducted 10 or more years after a negative colonoscopy result is sparse, and it remains unclear whether screening colonoscopy intervals could possibly be prolonged. Objective: To assess the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms (ADNs) at least 10 years after a negative screening colonoscopy in a very large cohort of repeated screening colonoscopy participants in Germany. Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry-based cross-sectional study on screening colonoscopy findings reported to the German screening colonoscopy registry during January 2013 to December 2019 included data on screening colonoscopies that were offered to the German general population 55 years or older since 2002; virtually all screening colonoscopies among individuals covered by Statutory Health Insurance (approximately 90% of eligible adults) are reported to the national registry. A total of 120 298 repeat screening colonoscopy participants 65 years or older were identified who had a previous negative screening colonoscopy at least 10 years prior. The findings were compared with all screening colonoscopies conducted at 65 years or older during the same period (1.25 million). The data were analyzed from March to July 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of colorectal cancers and ADNs (advanced adenomas and cancers). Results: Of 120 298 participants, 72 349 (60.1%) were women. Prevalence of ADN was 3.6% and 5.2% among women and men 10 years after a negative screening colonoscopy and gradually increased to 4.9% and 6.6%, respectively, among those who had a negative colonoscopy 14 years or longer prior compared with 7.1% and 11.6% among all screening colonoscopies. Sex-specific and age-specific prevalence of ADNs at repeated colonoscopies conducted 10 or more years after a negative colonoscopy were consistently at least 40% lower among women than among men, lower at younger vs older ages, and much lower than among all screening colonoscopies (standardized prevalence ratios for cancers: 0.22-0.38 among women, 0.15-0.24 among men; standardized prevalence ratios for ADNs: 0.49-0.62 among women, 0.50-0.56 among men). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that ADN prevalence at screening colonoscopies conducted 10 or more years after a negative screening colonoscopy is low. Extension of the currently recommended 10-year screening intervals may be warranted, especially for female and younger participants without gastrointestinal symptoms.

Expected long-term impact of screening endoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence: a modelling study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening endoscopy reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence but the time course and magnitude of effects beyond 10 years after screening are unknown. We aimed to estimate the expected time course and magnitude of long-term impact of screening endoscopy on CRC incidence. METHODS: We used Markov models based on the natural history of the disease along with data from the German national screening colonoscopy registry to derive the expected impact of screening colonoscopy at age 55 or 60 on cumulative CRC incidence according to time of follow-up over a period of up to 25 years. RESULTS: After a single screening colonoscopy, cumulative CRC incidence is expected to be increased for approximately 4 to 5 years. This transient increase is expected to be followed by a steadily increasing reduction in cumulative CRC incidence for at least 25 years. Less than one third of this long-term reduction is expected to be seen within 10-12 years of follow-up, the length of follow-up reported on in RCTs on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening and in most cohort studies on both sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy screening. In relative terms, risk reduction is expected to reach its maximum approximately 15 years after a single screening colonoscopy and 20-25 years after the initial screening colonoscopy in case of repeat screening colonoscopy after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term impact of screening endoscopy on CRC prevention is expected to be much stronger than suggested by currently available evidence from RCTs and cohort studies with limited length of follow-up.