Diagnosis and treatment of ischemia-producing coronary stenoses improves 5-year survival of patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures have poor long-term survival due to coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), which is often asymptomatic, undiagnosed, and undertreated. We sought to determine whether preoperative diagnosis of asymptomatic (silent) coronary ischemia using coronary computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) together with postoperative ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization can reduce adverse cardiac events and improve long-term survival following major vascular surgery METHODS: In this observational cohort study of 522 patients with no known CAD undergoing elective carotid, peripheral, or aneurysm surgery we compared two groups of patients. Group I included 288 patients enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved study of preoperative coronary CT angiography (CTA) and FFRCT testing to detect silent coronary ischemia with selective postoperative coronary revascularization in addition to best medical therapy (BMT) (FFRCT guided), and Group II included 234 matched controls with standard preoperative cardiac evaluation and postoperative BMT alone with no elective coronary revascularization (Usual Care). In the FFRCT group, lesion-specific coronary ischemia was defined as FFRCT ≤0.80 distal to a coronary stenosis, with severe ischemia defined as FFRCT ≤0.75. Results were available for patient management decisions. Endpoints included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [death, MI, or stroke]) during 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in age, gender, and comorbidities. In FFRCT, 65% of patients had asymptomatic lesion-specific coronary ischemia, with severe ischemia in 52%, multivessel ischemia in 36% and left main ischemia in 8%. The status of coronary ischemia was unknown in Usual Care. Vascular surgery was performed as planned in both cohorts with no difference in 30-day mortality. In FFRCT, elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization was performed in 103 patients 1 to 3 months following surgery. Usual Care had no elective postoperative coronary revascularizations. At 5 years, compared with Usual Care, FFRCT guided had fewer all-cause deaths (16% vs 36%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.60; P < .001), fewer cardiovascular deaths (4% vs 21%; HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.33; P < .001), fewer MIs (4% vs 24%; HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33; P < .001), and fewer MACE (20% vs 47%; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56; P < .001). Five-year survival was 84% in FFRCT compared with 64% in Usual Care (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia with ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization in addition to BMT following major vascular surgery was associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular events and improved 5-year survival compared with patients treated with BMT alone as per current guidelines.

Ischemia-Guided Coronary Revascularization Following Lower-Extremity Revascularization Improves 5-Year Survival of Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

PURPOSE: To determine whether diagnosis of asymptomatic (silent) coronary ischemia using coronary computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) together with targeted coronary revascularization of ischemia-producing coronary lesions following lower-extremity revascularization can reduce adverse cardiac events and improve long-term survival of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of CLTI patients with no cardiac history or symptoms undergoing elective lower-extremity revascularization. Patients with pre-operative coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and FFRCT evaluation with selective post-operative coronary revascularization (FFRCT group) were compared with patients with standard pre-operative evaluation and no post-operative coronary revascularization (control group). Lesion-specific coronary ischemia was defined as FFRCT≤0.80 distal to a coronary stenosis with FFRCT≤0.75 indicating severe ischemia. Endpoints included all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE=CV death, MI, stroke, or unplanned coronary revascularization) during 5 year follow-up. RESULTS: In the FFRCT group (n=111), FFRCT analysis revealed asymptomatic (silent) coronary ischemia (FFRCT≤0.80) in 69% of patients, with severe ischemia (FFRCT≤0.75) in 58%, left main ischemia in 8%, and multivessel ischemia in 40% of patients. The status of coronary ischemia in the control group (n=120) was unknown. Following lower-extremity revascularization, 42% of patients in FFRCT had elective coronary revascularization with no elective revascularization in controls. Both groups received guideline-directed medical therapy. During 5 year follow-up, compared with control, the FFRCT group had fewer all-cause deaths (24% vs 47%, hazard ratio [HR]=0.43 [95% confidence interval [CI]=0.27-0.69], p<0.001), fewer cardiac deaths (5% vs 26%, HR=0.18 [95% CI=0.07-0.45], p<0.001), fewer MIs (7% vs 28%, HR=0.21 [95% CI=0.10-0.47], p<0.001), and fewer MACE events (14% vs 39%, HR=0.28 [95% CI=0.15-0.51], p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ischemia-guided coronary revascularization of CLTI patients with asymptomatic (silent) coronary ischemia following lower-extremity revascularization resulted in more than 2-fold reduction in all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, and MACE with improved 5 year survival compared with patients with standard cardiac evaluation and care (76% vs 53%, p<0.001). CLINICAL IMPACT: Silent coronary ischemia in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is common even in the absence of cardiac history or symptoms. FFRCT is a convenient tool to diagnose silent coronary ischemia perioperatively. Our data suggest that post-surgery elective FFRCT-guided coronary revascularization reduces adverse cardiac events and improves long-term survival in this very-high risk patient group. Randomized study is warranted to finally test this concept.

Endovascular Transvenous versus Open Femoropopliteal Bypass.

Background and Objectives: Lower extremity arterial disease is one of the most prevalent manifestations of atherosclerosis. The results from numerous studies regarding the best revascularization method of an occluded superficial femoral artery have been conflicting. The aim of this study was to compare the patency of transvenous endovascular with open femoropopliteal bypass, both with vein and prosthetic grafts. To our knowledge, a direct patency comparison between transvenous endovascular and open femoropopliteal bypass has not been published. This could help elucidate which method is preferable and in which cases. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex TASC-C and D SFA lesions were offered endovascular transvenous or open bypass. A total of 384 consecutive patients with PAD requiring surgical treatment were evaluated for inclusion in this study. Three-year follow-up data were collected for 52 endovascular procedures, 80 prosthetic grafts, and 44 venous bypass surgeries. Bypass patency was investigated by Duplex US every 6 months. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency for endovascular transvenous, autovenous, and prosthetic bypasses. Results: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency in venous group at 3 years was 70.5%, 77.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. In the endovascular transvenous group, primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 3 years was 46.2%, 69.2%, and 76.9%, respectively. The lowest patency rates at 3 years were noted in the prosthetic graft group with 22.5% primary, 26.6% primary-assisted, and 28.2% secondary patency. Conclusions: The saphenous vein is the best graft to perform in above-the-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Transvenous endovascular bypass is a viable option with comparable primary-assisted and secondary patency. Primary patency is substantially lower for endovascular transvenous compared to venous bypass. Patients treated with endovascular transvenous bypass will require a significant number of secondary procedures to provide optimal patency. Prosthetic grafts should only be used if no other option for bypass is available.

First-in-human feasibility study of the aXess graft (aXess-FIH): 6-Month results.

OBJECTIVE: The creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is considered the most effective hemodialysis (HD) vascular access. For patients who are not suitable for AVF, arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are the best access option for chronic HD. However, conventional AVGs are prone to intimal hyperplasia, stenosis, thrombosis, and infection. Xeltis has developed an AVG as a potential alternative to currently available AVGs based on the concept of endogenous tissue restoration. The results of the first 6-month follow-up are presented here. METHODS: The aXess first-in-human (FIH) study [NCT04898153] is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter feasibility study that evaluates the early safety and performance of the aXess Hemodialysis Graft. A total of 20 patients with end-stage renal disease were enrolled across six European investigational sites. RESULTS: At 6-months follow-up, all grafts were patent with primary and secondary patency rates were 80% and 100%, respectively. Three patients required a re-intervention to maintain graft patency, while one re-intervention was required to restore patency. One graft thrombosis and zero infections were reported. CONCLUSION: The expected advantages of the novel aXess Hemodialysis Graft over conventional AVGs would be evaluated by the analysis on long-term safety and effectiveness during the 5-year follow-up of the currently ongoing trial.