RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Familial IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has been widely reported. However, its clinicohistologic characteristics and long-term prognosis are not clear. METHODS: A total of 348 familial IgAN cases from 167 independent families were recruited and their clinicohistologic characteristics as well as lifetime risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were compared to 1116 sporadic IgAN patients from the same geographic region. RESULTS: Of all familial IgAN patients, 60 (17%) came from 32 single-generation (SG; all affected individuals are siblings) families, whereas 286 (82%) came from 134 multiple-generation (MG; affected individuals were present in at least 2 consecutive generations) families. The lifetime ESRD risk was significantly higher in familial patients than sporadic ones after adjusting by gender (hazard ratio [HR]=1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.74, P = 0.004), with 5 years younger in median ESRD age (60 years vs. 65 years in familial and sporadic cases separately). Interestingly, among familial patients, we found cases from SG families (vs. MG families: HR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.59-4.31, P < 0.001) or with early onset (onset age <30 years) (vs. late onset: HR = 4.79, 95% CI: 3.16-7.26, P < 0.001) had higher lifetime ESRD risk. Furthermore, among sporadic patients, men had lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), higher urine protein, higher Oxford T score, and higher risk for life span ESRD compared with women (male vs. female, 25% vs. 17%, P = 0.003) whereas these gender differences were not seen in familial patients. CONCLUSION: Familial IgAN cases had poorer renal outcomes and less gender differences compared with sporadic cases. These findings provide evidence that familial disease represent a distinct subtype of more progressive IgAN. Early diagnosis could improve the prognosis of cases with familial IgAN.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A large proportion of patients with COVID-19 develop acute kidney injury (AKI). While the most severe of these cases require renal replacement therapy (RRT), little is known about their clinical course. METHODS: We describe the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients in the ICU with AKI requiring RRT at an academic medical center in New York City and followed patients for outcomes of death and renal recovery using time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: Our cohort of 115 patients represented 23% of all ICU admissions at our center, with a peak prevalence of 29%. Patients were followed for a median of 29 days (2542 total patient-RRT-days; median 54 days for survivors). Mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use were common (99% and 84%, respectively), and the median Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score was 14. By the end of follow-up 51% died, 41% recovered kidney function (84% of survivors), and 8% still needed RRT (survival probability at 60 days: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.36-0.56])). In an adjusted Cox model, coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with increased mortality (HRs: 3.99 [95% CI 1.46-10.90] and 3.10 [95% CI 1.25-7.66]) as were angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (HR 2.33 [95% CI 1.21-4.47]) and a SOFA score >15 (HR 3.46 [95% CI 1.65-7.25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our analysis demonstrates the high prevalence of AKI requiring RRT among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with a high mortality, however, the rate of renal recovery is high among survivors and should inform shared-decision making.