Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Is Feasible in Infants with Caudal Anesthesia and Spontaneous Respiration.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (i.e., laparoscopy) and minimally invasive anesthesia (i.e., caudal anesthesia with spontaneous respiration) have separately shown benefits for inguinal hernia repair in infants, yet to what degree these techniques can be combined remains unknown. This study investigated whether laparoscopy impacts the feasibility of performing caudal anesthesia with spontaneous respiration in infants. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of all infants less than 12 months old and over 3 kg weight who underwent laparoscopic indirect hernia repair (LAP) at our department from 2019 to 2021 were compared with a historical control-matched group of infants who underwent open repair (OPEN) from 2017 to 2021. We assessed the patients' characteristics, anesthesia, and surgical data as well as intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 87 infants were included (LAP n = 29, OPEN n = 58). Caudal anesthesia with spontaneous respiration was feasible in 62.1% of cases (LAP n = 55.2%, OPEN n = 65.5%; nonsignificant). Neither group registered anesthetic intra- or postoperative complications. Sedatives were utilized in 97% of LAP patients versus 56.9% of OPEN patients (p < 0.00001). The airway was secured with a laryngeal mask in 89.7% of patients during LAP versus 41.4% during OPEN (p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found regarding the use frequency of opioids (48.3% LAP vs. 34.5% OPEN; nonsignificant) or neuromuscular blockers (6.9% LAP vs. 5.2% OPEN; nonsignificant). CONCLUSION: This is the first comparative study on caudal anesthesia and spontaneous respiration in infants undergoing laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia surgery. Laparoscopy increased the need for ventilatory support and sedatives but did not significantly impair the feasibility of caudal anesthesia and spontaneous respiration.

The Impact of Thrombophilic Factors on Disease Progression in Children with Biliary Atresia-A Single-Centre Cohort Study.

Epidemiological evidence suggests that thrombophilic factors, including male sex, non-O blood type, MTHFRnt677TT mutation, factor V Leiden G1691A mutation, and prothrombin G20210A polymorphism, may contribute to the progression of fibrosis and occurrence of portal vein thrombosis in liver disease. We retrospectively investigated the effect of potentially thrombophilic factors on native liver survival as a patient-relevant endpoint of disease progression in a cohort of 142 children being followed up for biliary atresia at Hannover Medical School from April 2017 to October 2019. No significant association could be determined. There was no evidence for relevant differences in native liver survival for the Factor V Leiden G1691A mutation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-1.98, p = 0.73), prothrombin G20210A polymorphism (HR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.24-3.65, p = 0.96), non-O blood type (HR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.51-1.21, p = 0.28) or MTHFRnt677TT mutation (HR = 1.24, 95%CI 0.60-2.56, p = 0.56). A certain, albeit not strong, evidence of reduced native liver survival in male patients after Kasai hepatoportoenterostomy, particularly during the first 2000 days (42%; HR = 1.41, 95%CI 0.92-2.18, p = 0.11) was found. All children with pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis (n = 7) had non-O blood types. Larger multi-centre studies are necessary to show if the male sex or other thrombophilic factors could be potentially associated with reduced native liver survival.

Detection of hepatotropic viruses has no impact on the prognosis after Kasai procedure.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A viral origin of biliary atresia (BA) is discussed, and several studies have demonstrated different viral strains in liver biopsies of patients undergoing Kasai portoenterostomy. We hypothesized that the presence of hepatotropic viruses in patients undergoing portoenterostomy contributes to the progression of the disease and negatively affect the outcome. METHODS: Liver biopsies were prospectively taken from 70 patients undergoing portoenterostomy in our department from April 1996 to April 2004. Samples were screened by polymerase chain reaction for all common hepatic viruses. Primary outcome parameter was survival with the native liver. Secondary parameters were postoperative serum activity of liver enzymes and serum bilirubin levels at different time points. Patients underwent regular follow-up until October 2008. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (40%) were positive for 1 or more hepatotropic viruses. Four patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 66 patients, there was no significant difference in survival with their native liver between virus-positive and virus-negative patients. After a mean follow-up of 7.7 years (range, 4.6-16.1 years), 15 (23%) of 66 patients still lived with their native liver. There was no difference in liver enzymes, C-reactive protein, or bilirubin at any time point between both groups. CONCLUSION: A significant number of our patients tested positive for hepatotropic viruses in liver biopsies at the time of the Kasai procedure, but the presence of virus had no influence on the course of BA. This suggests that the ongoing inflammatory process of BA leading to liver cirrhosis in most Kasai-treated patients is not affected by hepatotropic viruses. Our data question the necessity to aggressively screen for and treat viral infections in patients with BA.

Normalization of serum bile acids after partial external biliary diversion indicates an excellent long-term outcome in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The surgical treatment for patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is either liver transplantation (LTX) or partial external biliary diversion (PEBD). Both procedures achieve a good short-term outcome. However, the treatment strategy for these children remains controversial because the long-term outcome after PEBD is unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term outcome and complications after PEBD in our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of all patients with PFIC undergoing PEBD in our department from 1994 to 2008. The course of serum bile acids, pruritus, and liver enzymes was assessed in a regular follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent PEBD. Thirteen patients (54%) improved significantly, with a normalization of serum bile acids (P < .001 vs postoperatively) and lessened pruritus (P < .05 vs preoperatively) at 12 months after PEBD. None of these patients showed progression of cholestasis during a median follow-up of 9.8 years (range, 1.6-14.3 years). Partial external biliary diversion failed to normalize bile acids in 11 patients, of whom 9 required secondary LTX at a 1-year follow-up, with a median interval of 1.9 years (range, 0.5-3.8 years). All 7 patients (100%) with liver cirrhosis at the time of PEBD and 2 of 17 patients without cirrhosis (12%) required secondary LTX (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical improvement with normalization of serum bile acids within 1 year was associated with an excellent long-term outcome in patients with PEBD. The presence of liver cirrhosis at the time of PEBD indicated an unfavorable outcome. Thus, we recommend primary LTX only in PFIC patients with liver cirrhosis.