The Multiple-Slit Technique (MUST) for Penile Length and Girth Restoration.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) and penile size issues, especially seen in Peyronie's disease (PD), are candidates for more invasive penile prosthesis insertion techniques that aim for penile length and girth reconstruction. AIM: To present the feasibility and safety of penile length and girth restoration based on the so-called multiple-slit technique (MUST) for patients with severe ED and significant penile shortening with or without PD. METHODS: From July 2013 through January 2016, 138 patients underwent the MUST. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction were completed. OUTCOMES: Outcome analysis was focused on penile length restoration, penile curvature correction, intra- and postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 138 patients underwent the procedure (103 malleable and 35 inflatable devices). Etiologies of penile shortening and narrowing were PD, severe ED, post-radical prostatectomy, and androgen-deprivation therapy with or without brachytherapy or external radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and post-penile fracture in 60.1%, 24.6%, 10.1%, 3.6%, and 2.2%, respectively. In PD cases, the mean deviation of the penile axis was 55° (range = 0-90°). Mean subjective penile length loss reported was 3.2 cm (range = 1-5 cm), and shaft constriction was present in 44.9%. Median follow-up was 15.2 months (range = 6-36 months). Mean penile length gain was 3.1 cm (range = 2-5 cm). No penile prosthesis infection caused device explantation. One glans necrosis was encountered. The average IIEF score increased from 22 points at baseline to 66 points at 6-month follow-up. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The MUST helps address penile size issues in cases of severe ED with concomitant conditions that impair penile length or girth. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The strength of the study is its applicability to provide surgeons with a solution for cases in which patients have severe ED and penile size impairment owing to underlying conditions such as PD. The study is limited by the relatively short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The MUST is an effective, safe, and viable treatment option for a selected patient cohort. Because of the potential complications, proper counseling should take place and only experienced surgeons should perform this type of surgery. Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. The Multiple-Slit Technique (MUST) for Penile Length and Girth Restoration. J Sex Med 2018;15:261-269.

Penile lengthening and widening without grafting according to a modified 'sliding' technique.

OBJECTIVE: To present the feasibility and safety of penile length and girth restoration based on a modified 'sliding' technique for patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) and significant penile shortening, with or without Peyronie's disease (PD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2014, 143 patients underwent our modified 'sliding' technique for penile length and girth restoration and concomitant penile prosthesis implantation. It is based on three key elements: (i) the sliding manoeuvre for penile length restoration; (ii) potential complementary longitudinal ventral and/or dorsal tunical incisions for girth restoration; and (iii) closure of the newly created rectangular bow-shaped tunical defects with Buck's fascia only. RESULTS: In all, 143 patients underwent the procedure. The causes of penile shortening and narrowing were: PD in 53.8%; severe ED with unsuccessful intracavernosal injection therapy in 21%; post-radical prostatectomy 14.7%; androgen-deprivation therapy, with or without brachytherapy or external radiotherapy, for prostate cancer in 7%; post-penile fracture in 2.1%; post-redo-hypospadias repair in 0.7%; and post-priapism in 0.7%. In patients with ED and PD, the mean (range) deviation of the penile axis was 45 (0-100)°. The mean (range) subjective penile shortening reported by patients was 3.4 (1-7) cm and shaft constriction was present in 53.8%. Malleable penile prostheses were used in 133 patients and inflatable penile prostheses were inserted in 10 patients. The median (range) follow-up was 9.7 (6-18) months. The mean (range) penile length gain was 3.1 (2-7) cm. No penile prosthesis infection caused device explantation. The average International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score increased from 24 points at baseline to 60 points at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Penile length and girth restoration based on our modified sliding technique is a safe and effective procedure. The elimination of grafting saves operative time and, consequently, decreases the infection risk and costs associated with surgery.

International multicentre psychometric evaluation of patient-reported outcome data for the treatment of Peyronie's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of surgical correction of Peyronie's disease (PD) with the Nesbit procedure, plaque incision and grafting, and the insertion of a malleable penile implant after surgical correction of penile curvature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of men who underwent surgical correction of PD between January 2010 and December 2012 at six international centres. Treatment-related PROs and satisfaction were evaluated with a non-validated questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate to the questionnaire was 70.9%, resulting in a study cohort of 206 patients. The Nesbit procedure, plaque incision with grafting, or implantation of a malleable penile prosthesis was performed in 50, 48, and 108 patients, respectively. Overall, 79.1% reported a subjective loss of penile length due to PD preoperatively (range 2.1-3.2 cm). Those patients treated with a malleable penile implant reported the greatest subjective penile length loss, due to PD. A subjective loss of penile length of >2.5 cm resulted in reduced preoperative sex ability. Postoperatively, 78.0%, 29.2% and 24.1% patients in the Nesbit, grafting, and implant groups reported a postoperative, subjective loss of penile length (range 0.4-1.2 cm), with 86.3%, 78.6%, and 82.1% of the patients in each group, respectively, being bothered by the loss of length. CONCLUSIONS: Penile length loss due to PD affects most patients. Further penile length loss due to the surgical correction leads to bother among the affected patients, irrespective of the magnitude of the loss. The Nesbit procedure was associated with the highest losses in penile length. In patients with PD and severe erectile dysfunction, a concomitant lengthening procedure may be offered to patients to help overcome the psychological burden caused by the loss of penile length.

Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized comparative study of performance with novices in a dry laboratory.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) technique as compared to an established laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) technique (Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery, SPLS) and conventional laparoscopy (CLS) in a surgical simulator model. METHODS: Sixty-three medical students without previous laparoscopic experience were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (SITUS, SPLS and CLS). Subjects were asked to perform five standardized tasks of increasing difficulty adopted from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum. Statistical evaluation included task completion times and accuracy. RESULTS: Overall performances of all tasks (except precision cutting) were significantly faster and of higher accuracy in the CLS and SITUS groups than in the SPLS group (p = 0.004 to p < 0.001). CLS and SITUS groups alone showed no significant difference in performance times and accuracy measurements for all tasks (p = 0.048 to p = 0.989). CONCLUSIONS: SITUS proved to be a simple, but highly effective technique to overcome restrictions of SPLS. In a surgical simulator model, novices were able to achieve task performances comparable to CLS and did significantly better than using a port-assisted LESS technique such as SPLS. The demonstrated advantages of SITUS may be attributed to a preservation of the basic principles of conventional laparoscopy, such as the use of straight instruments and an adequate degree of triangulation.

Diagnosis of renal tumors by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of choline measurements by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MR spectroscopy) for diagnosis of renal masses. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with 29 renal lesions underwent prospectively preoperative 3 T MR spectroscopy of renal masses before diagnostic tissue confirmation. A respiratory-triggered single-voxel MR spectroscopy was performed in these masses using the point-resolved spectroscopy (TR, 2,000 ms, TE, 135 ms) sequence. The spectra were analyzed for choline resonances at 3.23 ppm, which were normalized by the noise outside the diagnostic range of the spectra. Image and spectra analyses were conducted blinded to all patient-related data. Histological results of the surgical resection or image-guided biopsy specimen were defined as the standard of reference. Appropriate statistical tests were used. RESULTS: Seventeen lesions were histopathologically malignant, and 12 lesions were benign. Mean choline SNR in malignant lesions was 2.9 and 1.33 in benign lesions (P = 0.019). ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.721 and SE 0.0763 with a P value of 0.0038. A Cho SNR ≥2 as cutoff for malignancy resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 52.9 % (95 % CI 27.8-77.0 %) and 91.7 % (61.5-99.8 %), respectively. Although not significant, choline was observed more regularly in G3 (4 out of 5) compared with G2 (5 out of 12) RCC (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate the potential role of in vivo MR spectroscopy as a tool for differentiating benign from malignant masses with a high positive predictive value of 90 %. Furthermore, choline may be a biomarker of RCC aggressiveness.

Penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie's disease using circular and longitudinal grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To report patient outcomes and satisfaction with our technique for penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie's disease (PD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2006 and November 2011, 105 men with severe PD and erectile dysfunction (ED) underwent surgical correction using our new approach. The technique consists of penile prosthesis implantation with concomitant penile lengthening and girth restoration through circular and longitudinal incisions in the tunica albuginea according to geometric principles. RESULTS: The overall patient satisfaction rate was 89.4%. The mean (sd; range) functional penile length gain was 3.6 (0.7; 2-5) cm. Patient satisfaction with penile length gain was 95.2%. Three patients (2.9%) developed retraction with residual curvature of up to 30°, but no re-operation was necessary. In one (1%) patient, the prosthesis had to be removed because of wound infection. At a mean (sd; range) follow-up of 18.2 (5.9; 6-46) months, 104 patients (99%) were able to have sexual intercourse. CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical approach for penile length and girth restoration leads to high patient satisfaction rates and excellent functional outcomes. Our surgical approach is a safe and valid therapeutic method for the treatment of severe PD associated with ED.

Distal penile shaft reconstruction and reinforcement: the "double-windsocks" technique.

INTRODUCTION: The management of penile prosthesis protrusion and the implantation of a prosthesis in fibrotic penile corporal bodies represents a challenging task even for experienced surgeons. AIM: To demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of a new technique for distal shaft reconstruction and reinforcement in cases of penile prosthesis protrusion or cases of penile prosthesis implantation in corporal fibrosis. METHODS: Between August 2007 and August 2012, 69 patients underwent surgery for penile prosthesis protrusion (45 patients) or severe distal corporal fibrosis (24 patients). The mean age at the time of surgery was 56 years (range 38-69). All patients underwent distal shaft reconstruction using our technique, involving the creation of two neocorpora ("double windsocks"). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated with item numbers 1 and 7 of the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. Furthermore, clinical data concerning the early postoperative outcome were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 22.5 months (range 6-48). Based on answers to EDITS questionnaire item 1, 42 patients (60.9%) were very satisfied and 19 patients (27.5%) were somewhat satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. Furthermore, answers to the self-confidence domain question (EDITS item 7) revealed that 63 patients (91.3%) felt that the treatment had a positive effect with respect to their ability to engage in sexual activity. No patient exhibited device extrusion, postoperative infection, or skin dehiscence, and glans sensation as well as orgasmic ability were also preserved in all cases. Neuropraxia was reported in five cases (3.4%) immediately after the operation. The recovery of orgasmic ability was delayed in 17 (24.6%) patients. All patients were able to perform sexual intercourse postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The "double-windsocks" technique is an effective option for difficult cases of distal penile shaft reconstruction and reinforcement.

Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: the patient perspective.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the commonly used 0-1 pad definition of urinary continence for postoperative functional outcome after radical prostatectomy and the correlation with self-reported urinary continence and to determine whether a patient questionnaire can deliver more accurate continence status rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of 873 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at the General Hospital in Vienna between 1998 and 2006. Patients were surveyed with a questionnaire regarding their postoperative outcome and postoperative urinary incontinence. Baseline and pathological factors were examined to determine whether or not they had an impact on the continence status. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 65.2% of men (n = 337) reported themselves to be continent, in contrast 85.1% were continent if the pad definition was applied. Of those using no pads, 93.4% considered themselves continent, while 24.5% of patients using one pad/day did. Overall, 86.5%, 9.8% and 3.7% of continent patients regained continence within 6 months, 6 to 12 months and after 1 year of RP, respectively. A total of 71.5% of men under 65 years old reported full urinary continence, while only 57.0% of men older than 65 considered themselves continent. Men < 65 years recovered full urinary control significantly faster than men older than 65 years- 3.6 versus 4.7 months. Neurovascular bundle resection has a negative effect on continence. CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate continence status should be measured with self-administered disease specific questionnaires at 24 months after RP, as it differs from standard physician reported methods. Age and neurovascular bundle resection are variables affecting continence. We believe that patients' subjective reports of their continence are crucial and that multiple outcomes should be objectively measured. Therefore we suggest that validated questionnaires dealing with the patients' perspective postoperatively should be included in routine follow up.

Is Nonoperative Management the Best First-line Option for High-grade Renal trauma? A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: The management of high-grade (Grade IV-V) renal injuries remains controversial. There has been an increase in the use of (NOM) but limited data exists comparing outcomes with open surgical exploration. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to determine if NOM is the best first-line option for high-grade renal trauma in terms of safety and effectiveness. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant publications, without time or language limitations. The primary harm outcome was overall mortality and the primary benefit outcome was renal preservation rate. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and complication rate. Single-arm studies were included as there were few comparative studies. Only studies with more than 50 patients were included. Data were narratively synthesised in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seven nonrandomised comparative and four single-arm studies were selected for data extraction. Seven hundred and eighty-seven patients were included from the comparative studies with 535 patients in the NOM group and 252 in the open surgical exploration group. A further 825 patients were included from single-arm studies. Results from comparative studies: overall mortality: NOM (0-3%), open surgical exploration (0-29%); renal preservation rate: NOM (84-100%), open surgical exploration (0-82%); complication rate: NOM (5-32%), open surgical exploration (10-76%). Overall mortality and renal preservation rate were significantly better in the NOM group whereas there was no statistical difference with regard to complication rate. Length of hospital stay was found be significantly reduced in the NOM group. Patients in the open surgical exploration group were more likely to have Grade V injuries, have a lower systolic blood pressure, and higher injury severity score on admission. CONCLUSIONS: No randomised controlled trials were identified and significant heterogeneity existed with regard to outcome reporting. However, NOM appeared to be safe and effective in a stable patient with a higher renal preservation rate, a shorter length of stay, and a comparable complication rate to open surgical exploration. Overall mortality was higher in the open surgical exploration group, though this was likely due to selection bias. PATIENT SUMMARY: The data of this systematic review suggest nonoperative management continues to be favoured to surgical exploration in the management of high-grade renal trauma whenever possible. However, comparisons between both interventions are difficult as patients who have surgery are often more seriously injured than those managed nonoperatively, and existing studies do not report on outcomes consistently.

Outcomes of Early Endoscopic Realignment Versus Suprapubic Cystostomy and Delayed Urethroplasty for Pelvic Fracture-related Posterior Urethral Injuries: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: The evidence base for optimal acute management of pelvic fracture-related posterior urethral injuries needs to be reviewed because of evolving endoscopic techniques. The current standard of care is suprapubic cystostomy followed by delayed urethroplasty. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence base comparing early endoscopic realignment with cystostomy and delayed urethroplasty regarding stricture rate, the need for subsequent procedures, and functional outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, and www.clinicaltrials.gov without time or language limitations. Both medical subject heading and free text terms as well as variations of root word were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies and single-arm case series were included, as long as ≥10 patients were enrolled. Data were narratively synthesised in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: No RCTs were found. Six nonrandomised comparative studies and met inclusion criteria and were selected for data extraction. Noncomparative studies with more than 10 participants were included resulting in seven eligible studies. From the comparative papers the results of 219 patients were reported: 142 in the realignment group and 77 in the group undergoing cystostomy with delayed repair. The noncomparative studies reported on a further 150 cases. An overall stricture rate of 49% was evident in the endoscopic realignment group. Of these patients, 50% (28.1% overall) could be managed by endoscopic procedures and 40.3% (18.5% of intervention group) required anastomotic repair. CONCLUSIONS: No RCTs were found and the included nonrandomised studies have heterogeneous populations and a high degree of bias. About half of the patients were free of stricture and thus did not undergo delayed urethroplasty in case early endoscopic realignment had been performed. PATIENT SUMMARY: This systematic review of literature of urethral trauma revealed there are no well conducted comparative studies of newer endoscopic treatments versus standard treatments which include more extensive surgery. The results of the reports we selected based on specific characteristics are often influenced by variable factors. After careful analysis of these results we can conclude that the newer endoscopic techniques might resolve the risk of urethral injury due to pubic fractures in about half of the patients. Because of various confounders we cannot identify those patients who would benefit from this procedure or who might be possibly harmed.

Long-Term Results of Reconstructive Surgery for Peyronie's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease (PD) is an acquired benign connective tissue disorder that involves the tunica albuginea of the penis and can cause penile deformity and shortening. Because this condition is frequently associated with cardiovascular risk factors, a degree of erectile dysfunction is frequently present. The surgical management of PD should be offered once the acute phase of the disease has settled and the deformity is stable. AIM: To critically review the most recent literature published on the surgical management of PD. METHODS: A nonstructured PubMed-based review of the literature published in the last 10 years, searching for the words "Peyronie's disease," "erectile dysfunction," "plication," "grafting," "plaque," and "penile prosthesis," has been carried out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome of the various surgical procedures is reported. RESULTS: Surgery represents at present the gold standard treatment for PD. The type of procedure should be decided according to the degree of deformity, the quality of the erection, and penile length. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery still represents the gold standard treatment in patients with PD and aims at obtaining a penis straight, rigid, and long enough for penetrative sexual intercourse. Adequate preoperative patient's selection, counselling and the choice of the right type of procedure according to the degree of penile shortening, the type of deformity and the quality of the erection are paramount to achieving satisfactory results. Garaffa G, Kuehhas FE, De Luca F, and Ralph DJ. Long-term results of reconstructive surgery for Peyronie's disease. Sex Med Rev 2015;3:113-121.

Review of the current management of lower urinary tract injuries by the EAU Trauma Guidelines Panel.

CONTEXT: The most recent European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urologic trauma were published in 2014. OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of the 2014 version of the EAU guidelines on urologic trauma of the lower urinary tract with an emphasis on diagnosis and treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The EAU Trauma Panel reviewed the English-language literature via a Medline search for lower urinary tract injury (LUTI) up to November 2013. The focus was on newer publications and reviews, although older key references could be included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A full version of the guidelines is available in print (EAU Guidelines 2014 edition, ISBN/EAN 978-90-79754-65-6) and online (www.uroweb.org). Blunt trauma is the main cause of LUTI. The preferred diagnostic modality for bladder and urethral injury is cystography and urethrography, respectively. In the treatment of bladder injuries, it is important to distinguish between extra- and intraperitoneal ruptures. Treatment of male anterior urethral injuries depends on the cause (blunt vs penetrating vs penile-fracture-related injury). Blunt posterior urethral injuries can be corrected by immediate/early endoscopic realignment. If this is not possible, such injuries are managed by suprapubic urinary diversion and deferred (>3 mo) urethroplasty. Treatment of female urethral injuries depends on the location of the injury and is usually surgical. CONCLUSIONS: Correct treatment of LUTIs is important to minimise long-term urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction. This review performed by the EAU trauma panel summarises the current management of LUTIs. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with trauma to the lower urinary tract benefit from accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment according to the nature and severity of their injury.

Review of the current management of upper urinary tract injuries by the EAU Trauma Guidelines Panel.

CONTEXT: The most recent European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urological trauma were published in 2014. OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of the 2014 version of the EAU guidelines on upper urinary tract injuries with the emphasis upon diagnosis and treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The EAU trauma guidelines panel reviewed literature by a Medline search on upper urinary tract injuries; publication dates up to December 2013 were accepted. The focus was on newer publications and reviews, although older key references could be included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A full version of the guidelines is available in print and online. Blunt trauma is the main cause of renal injuries. The preferred diagnostic modality of renal trauma is computed tomography (CT) scan. Conservative management is the best approach in stable patients. Angiography and selective embolisation are the first-line treatments. Surgical exploration is primarily for the control of haemorrhage (which may necessitate nephrectomy) and renal salvage. Urinary extravasation is managed with endourologic or percutaneous techniques. Complications may require additional imaging or interventions. Follow-up is focused on renal function and blood pressure. Penetrating trauma is the main cause of noniatrogenic ureteral injuries. The diagnosis is often made by CT scanning or at laparotomy, and the mainstay of treatment is open repair. The type of repair depends upon the severity and location of the injury. CONCLUSIONS: Renal injuries are best managed conservatively or with minimally invasive techniques. Preservation of renal units is feasible in most cases. This review, performed by the EAU trauma guidelines panel, summarises the current management of upper urinary tract injuries. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with trauma benefit from being accurately diagnosed and treated appropriately, according to the nature and severity of their injury.

Treatments for fibrosis of the corpora cavernosa.

INTRODUCTION: Corporal fibrosis usually occurs after explantation of an infected penile prosthesis, severe penile trauma, refractory low-flow priapism, Peyronie's disease, or the chronic intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs. METHODS: We analysed current treatmentss for penile fibrosis. We searched PubMed using the keywords 'penile corporal fibrosis', 'treatment' and 'penile fibrosis', resulting in 63 matches, of which 19 articles met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This review covers conservative medical therapy for corporal fibrosis and surgical therapeutic methods. The roles of phosphodiesterase- 5 inhibitors and pentoxifylline are analysed. Surgical therapy includes implantation of a penile prosthesis and corporal reconstruction, and these are reviewed. Corporal fibrosis is a major problem for patients, and is associated with severe erectile dysfunction. Conservative treatment options can be applicable in the early phase, but simultaneous corporal reconstruction procedures with concomitant implantation of a penile prosthesis should be attempted in severe cases of corporal fibrosis.

A prospective evaluation of pain associated with stone passage, stents, and stent removal using a visual analog scale.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perception of colicky pain due to ureteral stones and double-J (DJ)-associated discomfort and to evaluate the role of clinical parameters that might influence the perception of pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2011 to May 2012, 124 consecutive patients with colicky pain due to ureteral stones and ureteroscopic stone extraction underwent DJ stent placement. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain at ureteral colic, during indwelling DJ stent, and at DJ stent removal. The association of clinical data with pain scores was also analyzed. RESULTS: Pain perception at the time of colic did not vary according to sex (P = .804), age (P = .674), or DJ stent length (P = .389). Stone size (<4 mm) was a predictor of a high VAS score (P = .001). Patients with recurrent stone formation had significantly less pain at the time of colic (P = .004), and DJ stent removal (P = .004) than those with the first instance of stone formation. The clinical experience at cystoscopic DJ stent removal influenced pain perception (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Using a VAS for the evaluation of pain perception is a valid method for the objectification of subjective discomfort. The VAS is an easy to administer scale and provides accurate information on the patients' status. Additional studies with larger cohorts focusing on pain perception using the VAS and other validated questionnaires are recommended to produce more consistent data.

Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes of partial ureterectomy vs radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes in an international cohort of patients who underwent either partial ureterectomy (PU) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: A subgroup of patients from the UTUC Collaboration with operation classified as PU or RNU was used (n = 835). Clinicopathologic outcomes were evaluated. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression addressed recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: Median age and follow-up were 69 years (range 32-97 years) and 34 months (range 1-246 months), respectively. Relapse occurred in 28.5% of patients (19.6% local, 8.9% systemic). At analysis, 180 patients (21.6%) died of UTUC. Eighty-one patients (9.7%) underwent PU and 754 (90.3%) underwent RNU. High tumor grade (77.3% vs 55.6%, P <.001) and advanced T stage (>T1, 41.7% vs 30.9%, P <.001) were significantly more common in the RNU cohort. Significantly more patients in the PU group received adjuvant chemotherapy than the RNU arm (25.9% vs 16.8%, respectively, P = .05). Kaplan-Meier median 5-year survival probabilities for RFS (69.4% vs 75.9%, P = .06) and CSS (67.5% vs 72.1%, P = .06) were not significantly different between PU and RNU. On multivariable analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, tumor stage, tumor necrosis, and lymph node (LN) status were significantly associated with CSS. CONCLUSION: In patients with UTUC, PU seems to provide oncologic efficacy equal to RNU. Ability to maximize global renal function with utilization of PU is an attractive strategy in carefully selected patients.

Solitary osteoclast-like giant cell tumor of the kidney: a case report.

Osteoclast-like giant cell tumors are very uncommon and originate in osseous and tendinous tissues. However, they are also very rarely found in visceral organs. The kidney is extremely rarely affected by this tumor entity; usually osteoclast-like giant cell tumors are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma. We present the third case in the literature of a solitary osteoclast-like giant cell tumor in the kidney of an 89-year-old man and give a short overview of the current literature.

Postureteroscopic lesion scale: a new management modified organ injury scale--evaluation in 435 ureteroscopic patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Objective parameters for the classification of ureteral injuries and resulting indications for ureteral stent placement after ureteroscopy are lacking. We hereby present a new classification system including proof of interrater reliability and validation of recommendations for postoperative ureteral stent placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) was applied in 435 patients undergoing ureteroscopy. Interrater reliability between three surgeons (junior resident, senior resident, and specialist) was evaluated in 112 patients. Postoperative ureteral stent placement was performed according to PULS. For follow-up with ultrasonography, we assumed hydronephrosis to be an indirect sign for significant postoperative ureteral obstruction. RESULTS: No ureteral lesion was seen in 46.2% of patients (grade 0). A grade 1, 2, or 3 lesion was seen in 30.8%, 19.1%, and 3.9% of patients, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 lesions were observed in our series. Interrater reliability was high (Kendall W=0.91; mean Spearman Rho=0.86). This was particularly true between senior resident and specialist (Rho=0.95), compared with junior resident and senior resident or specialist (Rho=0.83, Rho=0.79, respectively). All patients with documented lesions had a Double-J stent placed. Indwelling time varied according to PULS. Results of a postoperative ultrasonographic follow-up could be obtained in 95.6% of cases. No patient showed clinical or sonographic signs of upper urinary tract obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: According to these preliminary data for the clinical application of PULS, interrater reliability is high. Standardized empiric recommendations for the use and duration of postoperative stent placement after ureteroscopy might be useful in guiding urologists in this conversely discussed issue, ultimately preventing ureteral strictures as a late complication of ureteroscopy. These will have to be confirmed, however, by controlled trials in the future.

Infantile Enuresis: Current State-of-the-Art Therapy and Future Trends.

Enuresis nocturna is a widespread problem among children, with up to 25% of all children possibly suffering from this condition. Several therapeutic modalities are currently available. This article reviews current state-of-the-art therapies, highlights current literature, and provides an update on recent developments within the field of enuresis nocturna.

Peyronie's Disease: Nonsurgical Therapy Options.

Peyronie's disease (PD) is a fibrous inelastic scar of the tunica albuginea, leading to penile deformity, penile curvature, shortening, narrowing, and painful erections that subsequently lead to painful or unsatisfying sexual intercourse. No consensus exists yet on the ideal management of PD. This fact is a result of our limited knowledge of its etiology and causative factors. The acute presentation of PD is treated conservatively, and surgical approaches are only attempted if severe curvature, narrowing, or indentation persists for more than 1 year; PD stability exists for at least 3 months; curvature impedes sexual intercourse; and severe penile shortening occurs. This review focuses on new developments for conservative treatment strategies for PD.