A randomized study of botulinum toxin versus botulinum toxin plus physical therapy for treatment of cervical dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) for cervical dystonia is not well studied, and the underlying physiological effects are not known. METHODS: We enrolled 26 subjects comprising of 16 cervical dystonia and 10 healthy controls for normative physiological data. We randomized cervical dystonia patients who reported suboptimal benefits on botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections to BoNT alone (BoNT arm) or BoNT plus PT (PT-BoNT arm). PT-BoNT arm received manual PT on the injection day followed by six weeks of home-exercise program. Home-exercise program comprised of stretching, range-of-motion and isometric exercises. The primary outcome was change from baseline in Toronto Western spasmodic torticollis rating scale (TWSTRS) that was recorded six weeks after exercise program. TWSTRS was video evaluated by blinded raters. We probed sensorimotor plasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a paired associative stimulation (PAS) paradigm. RESULTS: TWSTRS score improved (severity 31%, p = 0.002; pain 28%, p = 0.01) and PAS plasticity decreased (p = 0.01) in PT-BoNT arm compared to BoNT arm. PAS values for PT-BoNT arm were found to approach values of healthy control values. Change in PAS measure correlated significantly with TWSTRS change (severity, r = 0.56, p = 0.04; pain, r = 0.61, p = 0.03. TWSTRS disability score only approached significance (p = 0.14) when comparing the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION: PT is a potential adjunct in patients with cervical dystonia who report suboptimal benefits with BoNT therapy. PT related benefits in cervical dystonia are likely mediated through modulation of sensorimotor plasticity.

Impact of an Interdisciplinary Deep Brain Stimulation Screening Model on Post-Surgical Complications in Essential Tremor Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of our interdisciplinary screening process on post-operative unintended hospitalizations and quality of life. BACKGROUND: There are currently no standardized criteria for selection of appropriate Deep Brain Stimulation candidates and little hard data exists to support the use of any singular method. METHODS: An Essential Tremor cohort was selected from our institutional Deep Brain Stimulation database. The interdisciplinary model utilized seven specialties who pre-operatively screened all potential Deep Brain Stimulation candidates. Concerns for surgery raised by each specialty were documented and classified as none, minor, or major. Charts were reviewed to identify unintended hospitalizations and quality of life measurements at 1 year post-surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent (44/51) of the potential screened candidates were approved for Deep Brain Stimulation. Eight (18%) patients had an unintended hospitalization during the follow-up period. Patients with minor or major concerns raised by any specialty service had significantly more unintended hospitalizations when compared to patients without concerns (75% vs. 25%, p < 0.005). The rate of hospitalization revealed a direct relationship to the "level of concern"; ranging from 100% if major concerns, 42% if minor concerns, and 7% if no concerns raised, p = 0.001. Quality of life scores significantly worsened in patients with unintended hospitalizations at 6 (p = 0.046) and 12 months (p = 0.027) when compared to baseline scores. No significant differences in tremor scores between unintended and non-unintended hospitalizations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The number and level of concerns raised during interdisciplinary Deep Brain Stimulation screenings were significantly related to unintended hospitalizations and to a reduced quality of life. The interdisciplinary evaluation may help to stratify risk for these complications. However, data should be interpreted with caution due to the limitations of our study. Further prospective comparative and larger studies are required to confirm our results.