Density matters: comparison of array platforms for detection of copy-number variation and copy-neutral abnormalities.

PURPOSE: A combination of oligonucleotide and single-nucleotide polymorphism probes on the same array platform can detect copy-number abnormalities and copy-neutral aberrations such as uniparental disomy and long stretches of homozygosity. The single-nucleotide polymorphism probe density in commercially available platforms varies widely, which may affect the detection of copy-neutral abnormalities. METHODS: We evaluated the ability of array platforms with low (Oxford Gene Technology CytoSure ISCA uniparental disomy), mid-range (Agilent custom array), and high (Affymetrix CytoScan HD) single-nucleotide polymorphism probe density to detect copy-number variation, mosaicism, uniparental isodisomy, and absence of heterozygosity in 50 clinical samples. RESULTS: All platforms reliably detected copy-number variation, mosaicism, and uniparental isodisomy; however, absence-of-heterozygosity detection varied significantly. The low-density array called absence-of-heterozygosity regions not confirmed by the other platforms and also overestimated the length of true absence-of-heterozygosity regions. Furthermore, the low- and mid-density platforms failed to detect some small absence-of-heterozygosity regions that were identified by the high-density platform. CONCLUSION: Variation in single-nucleotide polymorphism density can lead to major discrepancies in the detection of and confidence in copy-neutral abnormalities. Although suitable for uniparental disomy detection, copy-number plus single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays with 30,000 or fewer unique single-nucleotide polymorphism probes miscall absence-of-heterozygosity regions due to identity by descent.

An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities.

PURPOSE: Copy number variants have emerged as a major cause of human disease such as autism and intellectual disabilities. Because copy number variants are common in normal individuals, determining the functional and clinical significance of rare copy number variants in patients remains challenging. The adoption of whole-genome chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with unexplained developmental disabilities provides a unique opportunity to obtain large copy number variant datasets generated through routine patient care. METHODS: A consortium of diagnostic laboratories was established (the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays consortium) to share copy number variant and phenotypic data in a central, public database. We present the largest copy number variant case-control study to date comprising 15,749 International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays cases and 10,118 published controls, focusing our initial analysis on recurrent deletions and duplications involving 14 copy number variant regions. RESULTS: Compared with controls, 14 deletions and seven duplications were significantly overrepresented in cases, providing a clinical diagnosis as pathogenic. CONCLUSION: Given the rapid expansion of clinical chromosomal microarray analysis testing, very large datasets will be available to determine the functional significance of increasingly rare copy number variants. This data will provide an evidence-based guide to clinicians across many disciplines involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients and their families.