Minimally displaced clavicle fracture after high-energy injury: are they likely to displace?

BACKGROUND: Nondisplaced or minimally displaced clavicle fractures are often considered to be benign injuries. These fractures in the trauma patient population, however, may deserve closer follow-up than their low-energy counterparts. We sought to determine the initial assessment performed on these patients and the rate of subsequent fracture displacement in patients sustaining high-energy trauma when a supine chest radiograph on initial trauma survey revealed a well-aligned clavicle fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of trauma alert patients who sustained a midshaft clavicle fracture (AO/OTA type 15-B) with less than 100% displacement treated at a single level 1 trauma centre between 2005 and 2010. We compared fracture displacement on initial supine chest radiographs and follow-up radiographs. Orthopedic consultation and the type of imaging studies obtained were also recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients with clavicle fractures met the inclusion criteria. On follow-up, 57 (60.0%) had displacement of 100% or more of the shaft width. Most patients (63.2%) in our study had an orthopedic consultation during their hospital admission, and 27.4% had clavicle radiographs taken on the day of admission. CONCLUSION: Clavicle fractures in patients with a high-energy mechanism of injury are prone to fracture displacement, even when initial supine chest radiographs show nondisplacement. We recommend clavicle films as part of the initial evaluation for all patients with clavicle fractures and early follow-up within the first 2 weeks of injury.

CONTEXTE: Les fractures de la clavicule accompagnées d'un déplacement minime voire nul sont souvent considérées comme des blessures mineures. Toutefois, ces fractures méritent probablement un suivi plus étroit chez le patient polytraumatisé que chez le patient dont la blessure résulte d'un impact à faible énergie. Nous avons voulu analyser l'évaluation initiale de ces patients et le degré de déplacement subséquent des fractures chez les victimes d'un traumatisme à forte énergie dont la première radiographie du thorax en position couchée a initialement révélé une fracture de la clavicule présentant un bon alignement. MÉTHODES: Nous avons passé en revue de façon rétrospective les dossiers de patients polytraumatisés ayant fait l'objet d'une alerte, atteints d'une fracture de la clavicule (type 15-B selon la classification AO/OTA) accompagnée d'un déplacement inférieur à 100 % et traités dans un seul centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 entre 2005 et 2010. Nous avons comparé le déplacement des fractures entre les radiographies thoraciques initiales en position couchée et les radiographies de suivi. Les consultations en orthopédie et les types d'épreuves d'imagerie ont aussi été consignés. RÉSULTATS: Quatre-vingt-quinze patients atteints d'une fracture de la clavicule répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. Au moment du suivi, 57 (60 %) présentaient un déplacement de 100 % ou plus du corps de la clavicule. La plupart des patients (63 %) de notre étude ont eu une consultation en orthopédie au cours de leur hospitalisation et 27 % avaient subi une radiographie de la clavicule le jour de leur admission. CONCLUSION: Les fractures de la clavicule chez des patients victimes d'un traumatisme à forte énergie sont sujettes au déplacement, et ce, même si les radiographies thoraciques initiales en position couchée ne montrent aucun déplacement. Nous recommandons la prise de clichés de la clavicule dans le cadre de l'évaluation initiale de tous les patients victimes d'une fracture de la clavicule et un suivi rapproché dans les 2 premières semaines suivant la fracture.

Intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures--does malreduction matter?

INTRODUCTION: Subtrochanteric femur fractures remain challenging injuries to treat. Historically, varus malreduction has been linked to the development of nonunion; however, there is a paucity of literature evaluating the impact of sagittal plane malreduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of coronal and sagittal plane malreductions on time to union of subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with an intramedullary device. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of all sub-trochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 32) treated at a single institution. Inclusion criteria consisted of: 1. 18 or more years of age, and 2. fracture stabilization using an intramedullary device. All patients included were followed to union or revision surgery. Radiographic evidence of healing was defined as bridging callus on three of four cortices on AP and lateral views. Delayed union was defined as lack of radiographic healing by 4 months postoperatively and nonunion as lack of healing by 6 months. The definition of malreduction was coronal or sagittal plane deformity greater than 10° at the fracture site. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 20 men and 15 women with an average age of 55 years (range 19 to 100 years). Mean clinical follow up was 7 months (range 3 to 18 months). Thirty-four of 35 fractures (97%) healed without need for additional surgery. Twenty-one of the 35 fractures (60%) healed within 4 months of surgery. Thirteen fractures (37%) had delayed union, and 1 (2.9%) developed nonunion requiring reoperation. Seven of 35 fractures (20.0%) had a malreduction of greater than 10°, defined as varus (2 fractures), flexion (4 fractures), or both (1 fracture). Of the seven fractures with a malreduction, all (100%) developed a delayed (6) or nonunion (1). Of the 28 fractures without malreduction, 21 (75%) healed within 4 months, 7 (25%) had a delayed union, and none had a nonunion. The presence of a malreduction greater than 10° in any plane resulted in a significantly higher rate of delayed or nonunion (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: For patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with an intramedullary device, malreduction in any plane of greater than 10° resulted in a significantly increased rate of delayed or nonunion or both.