Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(1): 61-66, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32702773

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to describe sequential compression device (SCD) adherence and its associations with SCD education in hospitalized antepartum women. STUDY DESIGN: This study included antepartum, nonlaboring women admitted from 2016 to 2018, 1 year before and after an SCD education intervention. SCD use was assessed through the Kendall SCD 700 series compliance meter, which tracks the time the SCD machine takes within the monitoring interval. Recruitment occurred after 60 to 80 hours of monitoring, at which time a patient survey was completed. SCD use was the percentage of time the machine was on during monitoring. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used to compare associations between SCD use, education, and pharmacologic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Among 125 recruited women, 123 provided adherence data, 69 before and 54 after the education. Median SCD use was 17.3% before and 20.7% after (p = 0.71). Pharmacologic prophylaxis use was similar between the two periods and was not associated with SCD use. Among 121 surveys, the most common reason as to why SCDs were not worn was prevention of walking (52/121 [43.0%]). CONCLUSION: Using a novel monitoring technique, we found low-SCD use among antepartum inpatients, which was neither affected by education nor concurrent pharmacologic prophylaxis. Improving mobility with SCDs may improve use in this population. KEY POINTS: · SCD use was low in this cohort of hospitalized antepartum patients.. · A patient/nursing education intervention was not associated with SCD adherence.. · Concurrent pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not associated with SCD adherence..


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Compressão Pneumática Intermitente , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Educação em Enfermagem , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal
2.
J Perinat Med ; 48(8): 811-818, 2020 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32706752

RESUMO

Objectives Short interpregnancy intervals (IPI) have been linked to multiple adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, but less is known about prolonged IPI, including its relationship with labor progression. The objective of the study was to investigate whether prolonged IPIs are associated with longer second stages of labor. Methods A perinatal database from Kaiser Permanente Hawaii was used to identify 442 women with a prolonged IPI ≥60 months. Four hundred forty two nulliparous and 442 multiparous women with an IPI 18-59 months were selected as comparison groups. The primary outcome was second stage of labor duration. Perinatal outcomes were compared between these groups. Results The median (IQR) second stage of labor duration was 76 (38-141) min in nulliparous women, 15 (9-28) min in multiparous women, and 18 (10-38) min in women with a prolonged IPI (p<0.0001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly different second stage duration in the nulliparous group compared to both the multiparous and prolonged IPI groups, but no difference between the multiparous and prolonged IPI groups. There was a significant association with the length of the IPI; median duration 30 (12-61) min for IPI ≥120 months vs. 15 (9-27) min for IPI 18-59 months and 16 (9-31) min for IPI 60-119 months (p=0.0014). Conclusions The second stage of labor did not differ in women with a prolonged IPI compared to normal multiparous women. Women with an IPI ≥120 months had a significantly longer second stage vs. those with a shorter IPI. These findings provide a better understanding of labor progression in pregnancies with a prolonged IPI.


Assuntos
Intervalo entre Nascimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Segunda Fase do Trabalho de Parto/fisiologia , Tempo , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Paridade/fisiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 140(2): 174-180, 2022 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35852266

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) reduces opioid use after cesarean birth. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TENS after cesarean birth, with the primary outcome of opioid use during the first 60 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and satisfaction with pain control on each postoperative day, duration of postoperative hospitalization, and adverse effects of TENS. We estimated 60 patients in each arm for 80% power to detect a 25% decrease in opioid use, assuming 10% attrition. To assess for a placebo effect, an additional 60 patients were randomized to no TENS during recruitment for secondary analyses comparing opioid use, pain scores, and pain control satisfaction between no TENS and placebo TENS. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: From January 2020 through March 2021, we enrolled 180 participants-60 per group. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in the first 60 hours postoperatively, in morphine milligram equivalents, was 7.5 (0-30) with active TENS and 0 (0-22.5) with placebo TENS (P=.31). There were no significant differences in pain scores, satisfaction with pain control, or postoperative length of stay. In the no TENS group, median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in the first 60 hours postoperatively was 7.5 (0-21.9), similar to that in the placebo group (P=.57). There were also no significant differences in pain scores or pain control satisfaction between participants allocated to no TENS and those allocated to placebo TENS. CONCLUSION: Use of TENS after cesarean birth did not change hospital opioid consumption, pain scores, or length of postoperative stay. There was no evidence for a placebo effect of TENS on opioid use or pain scores. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04399707. FUNDING SOURCE: Cardinal Health.


Assuntos
Dor do Parto , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Dor do Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA