Temporal correlation between postreperfusion complement deposition and severe primary graft dysfunction in lung allografts.

Growing evidence implicates complement in the pathogenesis of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). We hypothesized that early complement activation postreperfusion could predispose to severe PGD grade 3 (PGD-3) at 72 hours, which is associated with worst posttransplant outcomes. Consecutive lung transplant patients (n = 253) from January 2018 through June 2023 underwent timed open allograft biopsies at the end of cold ischemia (internal control) and 30 minutes postreperfusion. PGD-3 at 72 hours occurred in 14% (35/253) of patients; 17% (44/253) revealed positive C4d staining on postreperfusion allograft biopsy, and no biopsy-related complications were encountered. Significantly more patients with PGD-3 at 72 hours had positive C4d staining at 30 minutes postreperfusion compared with those without (51% vs 12%, P < .001). Conversely, patients with positive C4d staining were significantly more likely to develop PGD-3 at 72 hours (41% vs 8%, P < .001) and experienced worse long-term outcomes. In multivariate logistic regression, positive C4d staining remained highly predictive of PGD-3 (odds ratio 7.92, 95% confidence interval 2.97-21.1, P < .001). Hence, early complement deposition in allografts is highly predictive of PGD-3 at 72 hours. Our data support future studies to evaluate the role of complement inhibition in patients with early postreperfusion complement activation to mitigate PGD and improve transplant outcomes.

Predictors of Cytomegalovirus Recurrence Following Cessation of Posttransplant Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with a poor prognosis after lung transplantation, and donor and recipient CMV serostatus is a risk factor for reactivation. CMV prophylaxis is commonly administered in the first year following transplantation to reduce CMV infection; however, the risk factors for long-term reactivation remain unclear. We investigated the timing and risk factors of CMV infection after prophylactic administration. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of the institutional lung transplantation database from June 2014 to June 2022. Data on patient characteristics, pretransplantation laboratory values, postoperative outcomes, and CMV infection were collected. Donor CMV-IgG-positive and recipient CMV-IgG-negative groups were defined as the CMV mismatch group. RESULTS: During the study period, 257 patients underwent lung transplantation and received a prophylactic dose of valganciclovir hydrochloride for up to 1 y. CMV infection was detected in 69 patients (26.8%): 40 of 203 (19.7%) in the non-CMV mismatch group and 29 of 54 (53.7%) in the CMV mismatch group (P < 0.001). CMV infection after prophylaxis occurred at a median of 425 and 455 d in the CMV mismatch and non-CMV mismatch groups, respectively (P = 0.07). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative albumin level (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, P = 0.04), CMV mismatch (OR = 15.7, P < 0.001), and donor age (OR = 1.05, P = 0.009) were significantly associated with CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: CMV mismatch may have increased the risk of CMV infection after lung transplantation, which decreased after prophylaxis. In addition to CMV mismatch, low preoperative albumin level and donor age were independent predictors of CMV infection.

Early initiation of physical and occupational therapy while on extracorporeal life support improves patients' functional activity.

PURPOSE: Managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO), without sedation/neuromuscular blockade to allow physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT) participation, is untraditional. Here, we investigate the impact of early PT/OT initiation on discharge functional activity for ARDS patients managed on V-V ECMO. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 67 ARDS patients managed with V-V ECMO at a single academic center from February 2018 to June 2021. Data collected included patient characteristics, days of V-V ECMO support, day of PT/OT initiation, and ambulation distance and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AMPAC) Six-Clicks score on day of discharge. RESULTS: Patients with >7 days of V-V ECMO support had decreased ambulation and AMPAC scores compared to those with <7 days (70.5 vs. 162.1, p < 0.01 and 12.3 vs. 16.4, p = 0.01, respectively). PT/OT initiation within 7 days after starting V-V ECMO significantly improved ambulation and AMPAC scores (163.5 vs. 59.5, p < 0.001, and 16.6 vs. 11.8, p < 0.01, respectively). Additionally, in patients with >7 days of V-V ECMO support, those who began PT/OT within 8 days of V-V ECMO cannulation had significantly improved ambulation and AMPAC scores (151.8 vs. 44.2, p < 0.01, and 16.5 vs. 11.0, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early PT/OT initiation in severe ARDS patients managed on V-V ECMO is associated with improved patient functional activity on day of discharge. Our study further supports the use of V-V ECMO in treatment of severe ARDS without sedation/neuromuscular blockade and specifically demonstrates PT/OT should be started early following V-V ECMO cannulation.

Outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) support is increasingly used in the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the clinical decision-making to initiate V-V ECMO for severe COVID-19 still remains unclear. In order to determine the optimal timing and patient selection, we investigated the outcomes of both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients undergoing V-V ECMO support. METHODS: Overall, 138 patients were included in this study. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: those with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS. RESULTS: The survival in patients with COVID-19 was statistically similar to non-COVID-19 patients (p = .16). However, the COVID-19 group demonstrated higher rates of bleeding (p = .03) and thrombotic complications (p < .001). The duration of V-V ECMO support was longer in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients (29.0 ± 27.5 vs 15.9 ± 19.6 days, p < .01). Most notably, in contrast to the non-COVID-19 group, we found that COVID-19 patients who had been on a ventilator for longer than 7 days prior to ECMO had 100% mortality without a lung transplant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that COVID-19-associated ARDS was not associated with a higher post-ECMO mortality than non-COVID-19-associated ARDS patients, despite longer duration of extracorporeal support. Early initiation of V-V ECMO is important for improved ECMO outcomes in COVID-19 ARDS patients. Since late initiation of ECMO was associated with extremely high mortality related to lack of pulmonary recovery, it should be used judiciously or as a bridge to lung transplantation.

Fracture of dual lumen cannula leading to cerebrovascular accident in a patient supported with ECMO.

Extended duration extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), using dual-lumen cannulas, is being used with increased frequency to support patients, including those with COVID-19; both as a bridge to transplant and lung recovery. During such an extended duration of support, there are several factors that might lead to the attrition of the physical structure of the ECMO cannulas, predisposing them to the risk of fracture. Although rare, fracture of the ECMO cannula can be a potentially lethal event. Here, we present a case where fracture of a dual lumen cannula during veno-venous (VV) ECMO support resulted in a cerebrovascular accident. We discuss the potential contributing factors and suggest steps to mitigate the risks for such a complication.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Underwent Lung Transplant.

Importance: Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving treatment for patients who are critically ill due to COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but there is limited information about the long-term outcome. Objective: To report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS and underwent a lung transplant at a single US hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant at Northwestern University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, including 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS. The date of final follow-up was November 15, 2021. Exposures: Lung transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Outcomes of lung transplant, including postoperative complications, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and survival, were recorded. Results: Among the 102 lung transplant recipients, 30 patients (median age, 53 years [range, 27 to 62]; 13 women [43%]) had COVID-19-associated ARDS and 72 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 22 to 74]; 32 women [44%]) had chronic end-stage lung disease without COVID-19. For lung transplant recipients with COVID-19 compared with those without COVID-19, the median lung allocation scores were 85.8 vs 46.7, the median time on the lung transplant waitlist was 11.5 vs 15 days, and preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used in 56.7% vs 1.4%, respectively. During transplant, patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS received transfusion of a median of 6.5 units of packed red blood cells vs 0 in those without COVID-19, 96.7% vs 62.5% underwent intraoperative venoarterial ECMO, and the median operative time was 8.5 vs 7.4 hours, respectively. Postoperatively, the rates of primary graft dysfunction (grades 1 to 3) within 72 hours were 70% in the COVID-19 cohort vs 20.8% in those without COVID-19, the median time receiving invasive mechanical ventilation was 6.5 vs 2.0 days, the median duration of intensive care unit stay was 18 vs 9 days, the median post-lung transplant hospitalization duration was 28.5 vs 16 days, and 13.3% vs 5.5% required permanent hemodialysis, respectively. None of the lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS demonstrated antibody-mediated rejection compared with 12.5% in those without COVID-19. At follow-up, all 30 lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS were alive (median follow-up, 351 days [IQR, 176-555] after transplant) vs 60 patients (83%) who were alive in the non-COVID-19 cohort (median follow-up, 488 days [IQR, 368-570] after lung transplant). Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, survival was 100% in the 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS as of November 15, 2021.

Impact of Screening and Treatment of Ureaplasma species on Hyperammonemia Syndrome in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Infection with Ureaplasma species (spp) has been linked to fatal hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) in lung transplant recipients. We sought to characterize the epidemiology of Ureaplasma spp in candidates and donors and describe outcomes of antimicrobial therapy in preventing and treating HS. METHODS: Candidate testing for Ureaplasma spp was performed with urine culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) pretransplant. Positive candidates were treated with levofloxacin. Donor testing was performed with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture and PCR intraoperatively. From 7/2014 to 2/2017 patients were treated according to results; from 2/2017 to 10/2018 recipients received empiric levofloxacin and azithromycin at transplant until testing returned negative. HS was defined as new onset altered mental status after transplant with ammonia > 200 µmol/L. RESULTS: In total, 60 patients who underwent lung transplant were included. And 80% (n = 48) of patients had negative screening tests in donor and candidate pre-lung transplant, 8.3% (n = 5) of recipients had positive Ureaplasma spp testing in urine pre-transplant, and 13.3% (n = 8) had positive donor BAL testing at the time of lung transplant. Three patients developed HS a median of 7 days posttransplant; 2 died of HS. Recipients of organs with Ureaplasma spp who received empiric therapy did not develop HS. Donors with Ureaplasma spp were younger and more sexually active. CONCLUSIONS: Donor-derived Ureaplasma spp in lung transplant was associated with HS. Screening lung donors for Ureaplasma spp might allow for targeted therapy to reduce risk for development of HS, but future confirmatory studies are needed.

Lung donation following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

There have been over 177 million cases of COVID-19 worldwide, many of whom could be organ donors. Concomitantly, there is an anticipated increase in the need for donor lungs due to expanding indications. Given that the respiratory tract is most commonly affected by COVID-19, there is an urgent need to develop donor assessment criteria while demonstrating safety and "efficacy" of lung donation following COVID-19 infection. Accordingly, we report an intentional transplant using lungs from a donor with recent, microbiologically confirmed, COVID-19 infection into a recipient suffering from COVID-19 induced ARDS and pulmonary fibrosis. In addition to the standard clinical assays, both donor and recipient lungs were analyzed using RNAscope, which confirmed that tissues were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated colocalized KRT17+ basaloid-like epithelium and COL1A1+ fibroblasts, a marker suggestive of lung fibrosis in COVID-19 associated lung disease, in the explanted recipient lungs but absent in the donor lungs. We demonstrate that following a thorough assessment, lung donation following resolved COVID-19 infection is safe and feasible.

Pre-Intubation Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients at Risk for Respiratory Decompensation.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has emerged as a potential life-saving treatment for patients with acute respiratory failure. Given the accumulating literature supporting the use of VV-ECMO without therapeutic levels of anticoagulation, it might be feasible to use it for planned intubation before surgical procedures. Here, we report consecutive series of patients who underwent planned initiation of VV-ECMO, without anticoagulation, before induction of general anesthesia for anticipated difficult airways or respiratory decompensation. We describe the approach to safely initiate VV-ECMO in an awake patient. We retrospectively identified patients in a prospectively maintained database who underwent planned initiation of VV-ECMO before intubation. Standard statistical methods were used to determine post-procedure outcomes. Patients included were three men and one woman, with a mean age of 34.3 ± 10.4 years. Indications included mediastinal lymphoma, foreign body obstruction, hemoptysis, and tracheo-esophageal fistula. VV-ECMO was initiated electively for all patients, and no anticoagulation was used. The median duration of VV-ECMO support was 2.5 days (1-11 days), the median length of ventilator dependence and intensive care unit stay was 1 day (1-23 days) and 5 days (4-31 days), respectively. The median length of stay was 18.5 days (8-39 days). There were no thrombotic complications and no mortality at 30 days. Initiation of awake VV-ECMO is feasible and is safe before intubation and induction of anesthesia in patients at high risk for respiratory decompensation.

Effect of concomitant mitral valve procedures for severe mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation.

The effect of performing a concomitant mitral valve procedure (MVP) during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation has been reported for patients with moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR), but moderate MR is less of a clinical concern for CF-LVAD patients. There is a paucity of reports focusing on patients with severe MR. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of performing a concomitant MVP during CF-LVAD implantation in patients with severe preoperative MR. Between November 2003 and March 2016, 526 patients underwent primary implantation of a CF-LVAD at our center. Patients with severe MR who underwent a concomitant MVP were compared to those who did not in regard to overall survival, perioperative complications, postoperative echocardiography data, bridge-to-transplantation success, and CF-LVAD explantation. Of the 108 patients with severe MR, 26 underwent a concomitant MVP and 82 did not. These groups showed no difference in survival (p = 0.61). Additionally, the two groups had similar rates of postoperative right heart failure (p = 0.69) and readmissions (p = 0.42). The 24-month follow-up echocardiography results were also similar. Furthermore, the groups showed no difference in bridge-to-cardiac transplantation success (30.0% vs 25.0%, p = 0.80) or CF-LVAD explantation rates (0.0% vs 0.0%. p = 1.0). Our findings suggest that patients with severe MR who undergo a MVP during CF-LVAD implantation do not have superior outcomes to those who do not. However, assessments of other outcomes may show some benefits to performing concomitant MVPs.

Outcomes in patients who underwent a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure during left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Study findings have been inconsistent regarding whether a concomitant tricuspid valve replacement or repair performed concurrently with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation has additive clinical benefit in patients with severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR). AIM OF STUDY: To determine the effect of performing a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure (TVP) at the time of CF-LVAD implantation on patient outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our single-institution experience in 526 patients who underwent primary implantation of a CF-LVAD between November 2003 and March 2016. We identified 59 (11.2%) patients who had severe TR at the time of implantation and analyzed the effect of performing a concomitant TVP at the time of CF-LVAD implantation on the rate of survival, incidence of postoperative right heart failure (RHF), recurrence of TR, and incidence of 30-day readmission. RESULTS: We did not observe a significant difference in the overall survival rate (P = .51), incidence of postoperative RHF (P = .26), or recurrence of TR (P = .73) between patients with severe TR who underwent a TVP and those who did not at the time of CF-LVAD implantation. However, the incidence of 30-day readmission was significantly lower in patients who underwent a TVP than in those who did not (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Performing a concomitant TVP at the time of CF-LVAD implantation did not improve patient outcomes but reduced the incidence of 30-day readmission.

Severe LVAD-related infections requiring surgical treatment: Incidence, predictors, effect on survival, and impact of device selection.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are being used more frequently for treating refractory, advanced heart failure. However, infection remains a frequent complication. In this study, we analyzed the incidence of severe infections in LVAD recipients to determine its impact on survival. METHODS: From May 2009 through March 2016, 437 patients with advanced heart failure underwent implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD (n = 314, HeartMate II LVAD [Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL]; n = 123 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN]). We analyzed the rate of severe device infection requiring surgical intervention or involving sepsis and the impact of severe infection on outcomes in patients on long-term LVAD support. RESULTS: Infection occurred in 244 patients (HeartMate II, n = 186; HVAD, n = 58); severe infections developed in 160 patients (HeartMate II, n = 119; HVAD, n = 41). HeartMate II recipients had 344 severe infection events (0.63 events per patient-year [EPPY]), whereas HeartWare recipients had 89 severe infection events (0.42 EPPY; P = 0.047). HeartMate II recipients had a higher incidence of pump infections (P < 0.001). Severe infections did not significantly affect survival (P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Although HeartMate II patients had a significantly higher incidence of pump infections requiring surgical treatment, survival was not adversely affected. The difference in postoperative infection rates may be an important factor in device type selection.

Device exchange from Heartmate II to HeartWare HVAD.

BACKGROUND: Despite technological advancements, pump durability and pump-related complications continue to affect and adversely impact the lives of patients with end-stage heart failure on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. In an attempt to avoid recurrent LVAD-related complications, there may be circumstances where it is clinically advantageous to exchange a patient's device from HeartMate II to HeartWare HVAD. However, there is a paucity of data that describes the safety and feasibility of such an approach. OBJECTIVE: We present the largest single-center series of HeartMate II (HMII) to HeartWare (HVAD) device exchanges. METHODS: A retrospective review of 11 patients who underwent HMII to HVAD exchange from 2012 to 2017 was conducted to evaluate patient characteristics, incidence of postoperative complications, and survival. RESULTS: Eleven male patients (mean age 55 ± 14.4 years) underwent HMII to HVAD device exchange. One patient expired on postoperative day 7 secondary to sepsis. One patient was lost-to-follow-up after 23 months. An additional three patients died at 5, 7, and 24 months. Mean follow-up after device exchange was 1555 ± 311 days for the remaining six patients. None of the 11 study patients underwent LVAD explant, further device exchange, or heart transplant. CONCLUSION: Exchange of an HMII LVAD to an HVAD can be performed safely with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Can Successfully Support Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Lieu of Mechanical Ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is increasingly used in the management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. With extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, select patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome can be managed without mechanical ventilation, sedation, or neuromuscular blockade. Published experience with this approach, specifically with attention to a patient's respiratory drive following cannulation, is limited. DESIGN: We describe our experience with three consecutive patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome supported with right jugular-femoral configuration of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation without therapeutic anticoagulation as an alternative to lung-protective mechanical ventilation. Outcomes are reported including daily respiratory rate, vital capacities, and follow-up pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: Following cannulation, patients were extubated within 24 hours. During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, all patients were able to maintain a normal respiratory rate and experienced steady improvements in vital capacities. Patients received oral nutrition and ambulated daily. At follow-up, no patients required supplemental oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can provide a safe and effective alternative to lung-protective mechanical ventilation in carefully selected patients. This approach facilitates participation in physical therapy and avoids complications associated with mechanical ventilation.

Bridging to a Long-Term Ventricular Assist Device With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Implanting short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices as a bridge-to-decision is increasingly popular. However, outcomes have not been well studied in patients who receive short-term MCS before receiving long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. We analyzed outcomes in our single-center experience with long-term continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD recipients with pre-implantation short-term MCS. From November 2003 through March 2016, 526 patients (mean age, 54.7 ± 13.5 years) with chronic heart failure (mean ejection fraction, 21.7 ± 3.6%) underwent implantation of either the HeartMate II (n = 403) or the HeartWare device (n = 123). Before implantation, 269 patients received short-term MCS with the TandemHeart, the Impella 2.5/5.0, an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), or the CentriMag. The short-term MCS patients were compared with the CF-LVAD-only patients regarding preoperative demographics, incidence of postoperative complications, and long-term survival. The 269 patients received the following short-term MCS devices: 57 TandemHeart, 27 Impella, 172 IABP, 12 VA-ECMO, and 1 CentriMag. Survival at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 94.2, 87.2, 79.4, and 72.4%, respectively, for CF-LVAD-only patients versus 91.0, 78.1, 73.4, and 65.6%, respectively, for short-term MCS + CF-LVAD patients (P = 0.17). Within the short-term MCS group, survival at 24 months was poorest for patients supported with VA-ECMO or the TandemHeart (P = 0.03 for both), and survival across all four time points was poorest for patients supported with VA-ECMO (P = 0.02). Short-term MCS was not an independent predictor of mortality in multivariate Cox regression models (hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.84-1.49, P = 0.43). In conclusion, we found that using short-term MCS therapy-except for VA-ECMO-as a bridge to long-term CF-LVAD support was not associated with poorer survival.

HeartMate II implantation technique that spares the sternum and ascending aorta.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become the standard therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure, and the use of LVADs for long-term support has grown exponentially over the past decade. As the number of LVAD implantations has increased, surgeons have faced more challenging cases, such as those in which the patient has previously undergone a sternotomy. The HeartMate II is one of the most widely implanted LVADs. The standard procedure for HeartMate II implantation is median sternotomy and sewing the outflow graft to the ascending aorta. However, in patients with sternal comorbidities, it can be advantageous to use a less invasive approach that avoids this procedure. We describe the case of a 64-year-old man with a history of end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy who had previously undergone a median sternotomy and a coronary artery bypass grafting operation and had patent grafts. He required a HeartMate II LVAD (destination therapy), which was implanted via a left subcostal incision; the pump was placed subdiaphragmatically, and the outflow graft was sewed to the descending aorta to avoid a complicated redo cardiac operation via median sternotomy and to minimize the risk of injuring the patent bypass grafts. The patient survived for more than 500 days postoperatively. This approach is feasible and could be a safer method for implanting a HeartMate II device in patients with serious comorbidities that preclude the use of the traditional implantation techniques.

Outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure and small body size undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become a preferred treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure when used as a bridge to transplant or as a destination therapy. However, the association between small body size and postoperative outcomes for continuous-flow (CF) LVAD recipients is still being studied. We sought to determine whether body surface area (BSA) is associated with patient outcomes after CF-LVAD implantation. The study cohort of our single-center, retrospective review consisted of all patients (n = 526) who underwent CF-LVAD implantation (n = 403 HeartMate II, n = 123 HeartWare) between November 2003 and March 2016 regardless of indication. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts according to their BSA measurements: small BSA (<1.5 m2, n = 13) and non-small BSA (≥1.5 m2, n = 513). We compared the survival of the small-BSA cohort with that of the non-small-BSA cohort. Patients with a small BSA had lower survival rates at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months (76.9, 61.5, 53.8, and 38.5%, respectively) than did patients with a non-small BSA (90.4, 80.9, 74.7, and 67.6% respectively; overall, p = 0.004). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that a small BSA was an independent predictor of postoperative mortality (hazard ratio = 0.22, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.97, p < 0.04). These findings highlight the adverse impact of a small BSA on outcomes after CF-LVAD implantation.

Effect of obesity on outcomes in patients undergoing implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of obesity on outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 526 chronic heart failure patients who were implanted with the HeartMate II CF-LVAD (n = 403) or HeartWare HVAD (n = 123) between November 2003 and March 2016. Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on BMI: underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2, n = 18, 3.4%), normal-weight (18.5-25 kg/m2, n = 173, 32.9%), overweight (25-30 kg/m2, n = 182, 30.2%), and obese (> 30 kg/m2, n = 153, 33.5%). The underweight group was excluded because of its small sample size. Records were reviewed to determine the incidence of postoperative complications and survival. Survival at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months were similar among normal-weight (91.3, 84.4, 76.3, and 67.6%), overweight (90.4, 80.8, 76.5, and 69.6%), and obese patients (90.7, 74.7, 65.3, and 61.3%, p = 0.24). Additionally, obesity was not a significant predictor of mortality in Cox proportional hazard models (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.766-1.277, p = 0.13). These findings suggest that appropriately selected obese patients receive similar survival benefit from CF-LVADs compared to non-obese patients, and obesity should not serve as a contraindication to CF-LVAD implantation.