Determination of a fragment of the c-erbB-2 translational product p185 in serum of breast cancer patients.

Concentrations of a fragment of the c-erbB-2 translational product (p185 fragment) were measured in serum of 70 breast cancer patients, 19 healthy blood donors, and 18 pregnant women using a heterogenic enzyme immunoassay. The serum concentrations of blood donors and pregnant women were below 30 kU/l. Breast cancer patients showed serum concentrations up to 578 kU/l. All 9/70 patients with serum concentrations higher than 30 kU/l had clinical evidence of metastatic disease and the serum levels of all 35/70 patients without metastasis lay within the normal range. From 9/37 patients with p185 overexpression of the primary tumor in immunohistochemical analysis 3/9 patients with metastatic disease had elevated serum levels higher than 30 kU/l. In all, 6/9 patients without metastasis serum levels were below 30 kU/l. The data of the present study suggest that determination of serum p185 fragment concentrations may be useful as a diagnostic tool in postoperative follow-up of breast cancer patients with c-erbB-2 overexpression of the primary tumor.

Alterations of the c-erbB2 gene in human breast cancer.

DNA amplification, RNA overexpression and p185 protein expression of the c-erbB2 oncogene were investigated in 109 cases of breast cancer with the aim of evaluating any correlation between the different methods. A correlation between Southern blotting and immunohistochemical analysis of paraffin-embedded material was found. Thus, amplification of the c-erbB2 oncogene leads to overexpression of the p185 protein. By contrast, no statistical correlation could be shown between RNA overexpression, measured by Northern blotting, and immunohistochemical p185 membrane stainings. It is of special interest that most of the cases that are positive for Northern blotting and negative for immunochemistry are negative for Southern blotting as well. Contradictory findings between RNA overexpression and lack of immunohistochemical staining of p185 give rise to the assumption that a defective protein is encoded, which cannot be incorporated into the substructures of the tumour cell membrane. When screening for point mutations in the transmembrane domain of the c-erbB2 oncogene, no point mutation could be detected, either by using the endonuclease FokI, which cuts at position 2012 (the point mutation in the neu gene of the rat), or by direct sequencing.

No synergistic activity of epirubicin and interferon-alpha 2b in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Single-agent activity for anthracyclines reflected by response rates of 10%-30% has been reported in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preclinical data indicate that alpha-interferon could enhance the cytotoxic activity of the anthracycline Adriamycin or its analog epirubicin. In a phase I/II study, 31 patients with biopsy-proven inoperable HCC were treated with interferon-alpha 2b given s.c. at a dose of 3 x 10(6) units/m2 per day for 5 days per week plus weekly epirubicin given at 25 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus. The protocol called for 4 consecutive weeks of treatment followed by 1 week off treatment. In all, 15 patients had been previously treated; 6 patients had failed hormonal therapy (tamoxifen), 5 patients had failed prior anthracycline treatment, and 4 patients had received chemoembolization of the tumor and had subsequently progressed. A total of 30 patients were evaluable for response. In all, 1 patient (3%) achieved a partial response for 8+ months and 11 patients (35%) achieved stabilization of disease. Six patients had a fall in alphafetoprotein (AFP) values of > 50% during therapy. The median survival for all patients was 9.5 months (range, 3-34+ months). The main side effects were hematological toxicity and fever, both of which were considered tolerable. As an indicator of the immunostimulatory effects of interferon, an elevation in serum markers of inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP), beta 2-microglobulin] was found in 15%-20% of patients. All patients had measurable Mx protein production during therapy, but these effects were not correlated to the clinical response. The clinical response rate achieved in this trial indicates that the combination of interferon and epirubicin, at least when used on the schedule reported herein, is not superior to treatment with either agent alone for patients with advanced HCC. However, single patients achieved a prolonged progression-free interval (8-10+ months) on this therapy, and it may therefore be an option for patients who have failed prior hormonal or single-agent anthracycline therapy.

Hematopoietic growth factors and treatment of testicular cancer: biological interactions, routine use and dose-intensive chemotherapy.

With the use of aggressive cis-platinum-based combination chemotherapy the majority of patients with metastatic testicular cancer will be cured. Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs), particularly G- and GM-CSF, have been investigated for the treatment of testicular cancer in order to (a) ameliorate chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression, (b) increase the dose intensity of treatment, or (c) generate peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as hematopoietic support for mega-dose chemotherapy. Results from in vitro and animal models have excluded a significant influence of both factors, G-CSF and GM-CSF, on tumor growth and response to cytotoxic treatment. For the group of 'good-risk' patients with metastatic testicular cancer, 85-90% of whom will reach long-term survival, the incidence of granulocytopenic infections after standard chemotherapy regimens appears to be lower than 20%. The prophylactic use of HGFs for these patients is not routinely recommended but may be considered in case of an increased risk for infections. For 'poor risk' patients, who will achieve 50% survival following standard chemotherapy, different attempts of treatment intensification have been investigated. The use of aggressive multidrug regimens is associated with granulocytopenic infections in 20-70% of patients. A randomized trial has demonstrated that the prophylactic use of G-CSF significantly reduces granulocytopenia, the number of septic infections, and the infection-related death rate. For 'poor risk' patients the prophylactic use of HGFs, particularly G-CSF due to its favorable side effect profile, is recommended. The availability of G- and GM-CSF has made it possible to develop dose-intensified chemotherapy regimens. Demonstrated particularly for GM-CSF, a 1.5 fold dose increase can be achieved by the use of a myeloid growth factor alone, and thrombocytopenia and other organ toxicity will become dose limiting. Mobilization of PBSC, either after stimulation with HGFs alone or with HGFs, following chemotherapy has been successfully used in patients with testicular cancer. For the treatment of patients with relapsed disease PBSC support followed by HGFs has allowed the use of mega-dose therapy in multiple phase-II studies. This has prompted the investigation of high-dose therapy as first-line treatment for 'poor-risk' patients. In these patients sequential high-dose treatment with cis-platinum, etoposide, and ifosfamide for four consecutive cycles, each supported by G- or GM-CSF and PBSC, is currently being investigated by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. HGFs have substantially reduced treatment-associated morbidity and mortality in patients receiving chemotherapy for testicular cancer. They make it possible for the first time to clinically explore the true value of dose-intensified chemotherapy regimens in testis cancer, serving as a model of a highly chemotherapy sensitive disease. Enrollment of patients in prospective clinical trials evaluating the role of high-dose therapy is strongly recommended.

Comparison of 5 vs 10 micrograms/kg per day of GM-CSF following dose-intensified chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide in patients with advanced testicular cancer.

Despite the increasing use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, few studies have focused on the activity and toxicity of the different clinically used dosages of GM-CSF. Forty-four patients with "poor-risk" (advanced disease, according to the Indiana University classification) testicular cancer were treated with a dose-intensified chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin (30 mg/m2), etoposide (200 mg/m2), and ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2), given on days 1-5 for a total of four cycles at planned intervals of 21 days. Patients (pts) received GM-CSF, either 10 (22 pts; 70 cycles evaluable) or 5 micrograms/kg body wt. daily s.c. (22 pts; 72 cycles evaluable), starting the first day after chemotherapy for 10 consecutive days. Overall, 34 patients (78%) achieved a favorable response (CR or PR with negative tumor markers), six patients (14%) failed this chemotherapy regimen, and four patients (9%) died of therapy-related complications. The durations of both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia increased with the number of treatment cycles given. The duration of granulocytopenia after the fourth PEI cycle was significantly shorter for patients receiving 10 micrograms/kg than for those with 5 micrograms/kg per day of GM-CSF (9 vs 13 days; p < 0.05). The median duration of thrombocytopenia < 20,000/microliters after the fourth cycle of PEI was also significantly reduced in favor of patients receiving 10 micrograms/kg of GM-CSF (4 vs 9 days; p < 0.02). However, there were no differences in the frequency of severe infections or in the achieved dose intensity. Five patients (11%) discontinued GM-CSF due to side effects (three anaphylactoid-type reactions, one myalgia and fever, one cutaneous toxicity). No difference in the frequency of side effects was seen between patients receiving 5 and those receiving 10 micrograms/kg per day of GM-CSF. The dose of 5 micrograms/kg per day of GM-CSF may be sufficient to ameliorate neutropenia following standard-dose chemotherapy, while higher dosages of GM-CSF may be advantageous in patients receiving repetitive cycles of dose-intensified chemotherapy.