RESUMO
In vitro and in vivo models were developed to evaluate the efficacy of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against three serotype 3 pneumococcal strains with different susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones (wild-type, parC mutant, and parC, parE and gyrA mutant). Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin reduced the bacterial burden in the in vitro pharmacodynamic and animal models for the wild-type strain but had very little activity against the fully resistant strain (parC, parE and gyrA mutant). Levofloxacin showed very little activity both in the in vitro pharmacodynamic model and in the animal model for the strain having a mutation in parC (levofloxacin and moxifloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations, 2mg/L and 0.25mg/L, respectively). However, moxifloxacin still had a significant in vitro and in vivo activity against this strain.
Assuntos
Compostos Aza/farmacologia , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacologia , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/farmacologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Quinolinas/farmacologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Compostos Aza/farmacocinética , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , DNA Girase/genética , DNA Topoisomerase IV/genética , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Modelos Biológicos , Moxifloxacina , Ofloxacino/farmacocinética , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Anti-TNF drugs have proven to be effective against spondyloarthritis (SpA), although 30% of patients fail to respond or experience adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. In rheumatoid arthritis, the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against the first TNF inhibitor influences the outcome after switching. Our aim was to assess whether the response to a second anti-TNF drug is related to the previous development of ADA to the first anti-TNF drug SpA patients. METHODS: Forty-two SpA patients began a second anti-TNF drug after failing to respond to the first anti-TNF therapy. Clinical activity was assessed by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at baseline (at the beginning of the first and second anti-TNF therapy) and at 6 months after switching. The drug and ADA levels were measured by ELISA before each administration. RESULTS: All patients were treated with anti-TNF drugs and mainly due to inefficacy were switched to a second anti-TNF drug. Eleven of 42 (26.2%) developed ADA during the first biologic treatment. At baseline, no differences in ASDAS were found in patients with or without ADA to the first anti-TNF drug (3.52 ± 1.03 without ADA vs. 3.14 ± 0.95 with ADA, p = 0.399) and to the second anti-TNF drug (3.36 ± 0.94 without ADA vs. 3.09 ± 0.91 with ADA, p = 0.466). At 6 months after switching, patients with previous ADA had lower disease activity (1.62 ± 0.93 with ADA vs. 2.79 ± 1.01 without ADA, p = 0.002) and most patients without ADA had high disease activity state by the ASDAS (25 out of 31 (80.6%) without ADA vs. 3 out of 11 (27.3%) with ADA, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In SpA the failure to respond to the first anti-TNF drug due to the presence of ADA predicts a better clinical response to a second anti-TNF drug.