RESUMO
Endogenous agonists of the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) such as the indolic uremic toxin, indoxyl sulfate (IS), accumulate in patients with chronic kidney disease. AHR activation by indolic toxins has prothrombotic effects on the endothelium, especially via tissue factor (TF) induction. In contrast, physiological AHR activation by laminar shear stress (SS) is atheroprotective. We studied the activation of AHR and the regulation of TF by IS in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells subjected to laminar fluid SS (5 dynes/cm2). SS and IS markedly increased the expression of AHR target genes PTGS2 (encoding for COX2), AHRR, CYP1A1, and CYP1B1, as well as F3 (encoding for TF), in an AHR-dependent way. IS amplified SS-induced TF mRNA and protein expression and upregulation of AHR target genes. Interestingly, tyrosine kinase inhibition by genistein decreased SS- but not IS-induced TF expression. Finally, the increase in TF expression induced by laminar SS was not associated with increased TF activity. In contrast, IS increased TF activity, even under antithrombotic SS conditions. In conclusion, IS and SS induce AHR activation and AHR-dependent TF upregulation by different mechanisms. Impairment of the antithrombotic properties of shear stressed endothelium by toxic AHR agonists could favor cardiovascular diseases in CKD.
Assuntos
Células Endoteliais da Veia Umbilical Humana/metabolismo , Indicã/agonistas , Indicã/toxicidade , Receptores de Hidrocarboneto Arílico/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Hidrocarboneto Arílico/metabolismo , Tromboplastina/efeitos dos fármacos , Tromboplastina/metabolismo , Fatores de Transcrição Hélice-Alça-Hélice Básicos , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A1/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP1B1/genética , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Técnicas de Silenciamento de Genes , Humanos , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/metabolismo , Estresse MecânicoRESUMO
Many hypotheses could explain the mortality decrease observed using hemodiafiltration, such as reduction of intradialytic hypotension and more efficient toxin removal. We led a systematic analysis of representative uremic toxin removal with hemodialysis (HD), online postdilution hemodiafiltration (postHDF) and online predilution hemodiafiltration (preHDF), in a single-center crossover and prospective observational study. The primary outcome was the reduction ratio of uremic toxins of the three categories defined by the Eutox group. Twenty-six patients were treated by those three techniques of extra renal epuration. Mean Kt/Vurea was not different between the treatment methods. Mean reduction ratio of beta2microglobulin was significantly higher for both HDF treatments than for HD (p < 0.001). Myoglobin, kappa, and lambda free light chain reduction ratio was significantly different between the modes: 37.75 ± 11.95%, 45.31 ± 11% and 61.22 ± 10.56%/57.21 ± 12.5%, 63.53 ± 7.93%, and 68.40 ± 11.79%/29.12 ± 8.44%, 34.73 ± 9.01%, and 45.55 ± 12.31% HD, preHDF, and postHDF, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean protein-bound solutes reduction ratio was not different between the different treatments except for PCS with a higher reduction ratio during HDF treatments. Mean albumin loss was always less than 2 g. HDF improved removal of middle molecules but had no effect on indoles concentration without any difference between synthetic dialysis membranes.