Clinical evidence for high-risk CE-marked medical devices for glucose management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, within the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices (CORE-MD) project, evaluating CE-marked high-risk devices for glucose management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified interventional and observational studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of eight automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, two implantable insulin pumps, and three implantable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices. We meta-analysed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID systems with other treatments. RESULTS: A total of 182 studies published between 2009 and 2024 were included, comprising 166 studies on AID systems, six on insulin pumps, and 10 on CGM devices; 26% reported industry funding; 18% were pre-market; 37% had a comparator group. Of the studies identified, 29% were RCTs, 24% were non-randomized trials, and 47% were observational studies. The median (interquartile range) sample size was 48 (28-102), age 34.8 (14-44.2) years, and study duration 17.5 (12-26) weeks. AID systems lowered glycated haemoglobin by 0.5 percentage points (absolute mean difference [MD] = -0.5; 21 RCTs; I2 = 86%) and increased time in target range for sensor glucose level by 13.4 percentage points (MD = 13.4; 14 RCTs; I2 = 90%). At least one safety outcome was assessed in 71% of studies. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk devices for glucose monitoring or insulin dosing, in particular AID systems, improve glucose control safely, but evidence on diabetes-related end-organ damage is lacking due to short study durations. Methodological heterogeneity highlights the need for developing standards for future pre- and post-market investigations of diabetes-specific high-risk medical devices.

Assessing the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease in tertiary care: a SwissDiab Study.

INTRODUCTION: The overall aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) among patients in tertiary care with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The cross-sectional analysis was based on outpatients in tertiary diabetes care enrolled in the Swiss Diabetes Registry with T2DM and a study visit January 1, 2020-March 31, 2021. Prevalence of CKD was ascertained as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or persistent albuminuria as defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes, and the proportion of patients prescribed SGLT2i was determined. Documented reasons for non-treatment with SGLT2i were extracted by a retrospective review of the medical records. RESULTS: Of 368 patients with T2DM, 1.1% (n=4) were excluded due to missing data. Of the remaining 364 patients, 47.3% (n=172) had CKD of which 32.6% (n=56) were prescribed SGLT2i. The majority (75%) of these patients were on treatment already in 2018, before the renoprotective effects of SGLT2i were established. Among the 116 patients without SGLT2i, 19.0% had known contraindications, 9.5% stopped treatment due to adverse events, 5.2% had other reasons, and no underlying reason for non-treatment could be identified for 66.4%. CONCLUSIONS: A divergence between recommended standard of care and implementation in daily clinical practice was observed. Although treatment should always consider patient-specific circumstances, the results highlight the need to reinforce current treatment recommendations to ensure patients benefit from the best available care.

Depression and anxiety symptoms are underestimated risk factors for postoperative prognosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease undergoing partial foot amputation: Results from a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of depression and anxiety symptoms on post-operative prognosis and 1-year all-cause mortality in a large unique cohort of patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) after partial foot amputation (PFA). METHODS: Prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up of 785 consecutive patients (mean age 60.9 ± 9.1 years; 64.1% males) with T2D and PAD after PFA. Depressive symptoms were assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association of depression and anxiety with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: One-year all-cause mortality was 16.9% (n = 133). 331 (42.1%) patients had PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 indicating major depressive disorder. After adjusting for confounders, PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 was associated with an increased risk of 1-year all-cause mortality (HR = 1.68 (95%CI[1.16-2.44], p = 0.006). Depression dimensions of negative self-feeling and suicidal ideations were independently associated with 1-year mortality (HR = 1.26 (95%CI[1.24-1.55], p = 0.029 and HR = 2.37 (95%CI[1.89-2.96], p < 0.001, respectively). Compared to no depression, severe depressive symptoms (cut-off≥20) were associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR = 3.9 (95%CI [1.48-10.29], p = 0.006). Compared to no anxiety, severe anxiety symptoms (cut-off>30) were associated with increased 1-year mortality (HR = 2.25(95%CI [1.26-4.05], p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Depressive symptoms and severe anxiety have shown independently increased risk of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with T2D and PAD requiring PFA. Our results indicate that screening for anxiety and depression should be considered under these circumstances to identify patients at increased risk to allow appropriate intervention.

Glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes transitioning towards advanced automated insulin delivery systems - a real-world analysis at a Swiss tertiary centre.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess glucose levels in adults with diabetes at a Swiss tertiary hospital when transitioning from insulin delivery with a sensor-augmented pump with (predictive) low-glucose suspend ([P]LGS) to a hybrid-closed loop (HCL) and from a HCL to an advanced hybrid-closed loop (AHCL). METHODS: Continuous glucose monitoring data for 44 adults with type 1 diabetes transitioning from (P)LGS to hybrid-closed loop and from hybrid-closed loop to advanced hybrid-closed loop were analysed, including the percentage of time spent within, below, and above glucose ranges. In addition, a subgroup analysis (n = 14) of individuals undergoing both transitions was performed. RESULTS: The transition from a (P)LGS to a hybrid-closed loop was associated with increased time in range (6.6% [2.6%-12.7%], p <0.001) and decreased time above range (5.6% [2.3%-12.7%], p <0.001). The transition from a hybrid-closed loop to an advanced hybrid-closed loop was associated with increased time in range (1.6% [-0.5%-4.5%], p = 0.046) and decreased time above range (1.5% [-1.8%-5.6%], p = 0.050). Both transitions did not change the time below range. In the subgroup analysis ([P]LGS → HCL → AHCL), the time in range increased from 69.4% (50.3%-79.2%) to 76.5% (65.3%-81.3%) and 78.7% (69.7%-85.8%), respectively (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Glucose levels significantly improved when transitioning from a (P)LGS to a hybrid-closed loop. Glucose levels improved further when switching from a hybrid-closed loop to an advanced hybrid-closed loop. However, the added benefit of an advanced hybrid-closed loop was comparably smaller. This pattern was also reflected in the subgroup analysis.