Basiliximab therapy for immune-mediated bowel disease in a pediatric heart transplant patient.

In pediatric patients who undergo heart transplantation, severe immune-mediated bowel disease has been reported. Management is complex, and there are little data discussing the use of basiliximab for immune-mediated bowel disease. This case report discusses a pediatric patient who developed immune-mediated bowel disease following heart transplantation and was successfully managed with basiliximab.

Heart transplantation in neonatal Marfan syndrome: Saving life in a rare and fatal condition.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal Marfan syndrome is a rare disease with mortality in the first year of life reported as high as 95% predominantly due to progressive heart failure from valvar regurgitation and cardiomyopathy. Multisystem involvement and uncertain prognosis have historically precluded transplant candidacy, and current management options are of limited success. CASE REPORT: We present a baby girl with a postnatal diagnosis of neonatal Marfan syndrome who at 1 year of age underwent mitral valve and tricuspid valve repair with postoperative profound left ventricular and moderate right ventricular dysfunction necessitating biventricular assist device (BiVAD) support and subsequent heart transplant. A number of noncardiac issues persisted in our patient; however, she enjoyed a good quality of life for the initial 3 years posttransplant. Unfortunately, she subsequently developed rapidly progressive coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) with progressive deterioration in function and cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: To our best knowledge, this is only the second case of neonatal Marfan syndrome to undergo heart transplant reported in the literature and the first with BiVAD support as a bridge to candidacy. This is also the first case of neonatal Marfan syndrome associated with intragenic duplication. This case though demonstrating that earlier listing, ventricular assist device (VAD) support and even primary transplant as treatment in neonatal Marfan syndrome should all be considered viable options but also portends a cautionary tale given the spectrum of comorbidities in this rare and severe disorder.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: A review.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation has become the standard of care for pediatric patients with end-stage heart disease, and outcomes have consistently improved over the last few decades. CAV, however, remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in heart transplantation and is the leading cause of death beyond 3 years post-transplantation. We sought out to provide an in-depth overview of CAV in the pediatric heart transplant population. METHODS: Database searches were conducted in both Medline and Embase on the topic of cardiac vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant recipients. The search used five broad concept terms: heart transplant; pediatric; CAV; diagnosis, prognosis, and risk factors; and guidelines and reviews. References were captured if there was at least one term in each of the concepts. The search was limited to articles in the English language. RESULTS: A total of 148 articles were identified via the literature search with further articles identified via review of references. Pediatric data regarding the etiology and development of CAV remain limited although knowledge about the immune and non-immune factors playing a role are increasing. CAV continues to be difficult to detect with many invasive and non-invasive methods available, yet their effectiveness in the detection of CAV remains suboptimal. There remains no proven medical intervention to treat or reverse established CAV disease, and CAV is associated with high rates of graft loss once detected. However, several medications are used in hopes of preventing, slowing progression, or modifying the outcomes. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comprehensive overview of CAV, discusses its clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnostic tools used to identify CAV in the pediatric population, and highlights the current therapeutic options and the need for ongoing research.

Exploring the use of a digital therapeutic intervention to support the pediatric cardiac care journey: Qualitative study on clinician perspectives.

Pediatric heart disease currently effects over one million infants, children, and adolescents in the United States alone. Unlike the adult population, pediatric patients face a more uncertain path with factors relating to their growth and maturation creating levels of complexity to their care management. With mobile phones increasingly being utilized amongst adolescents, digital therapeutics tools could provide a platform to help patients and families manage their condition. This study explored clinicians' views on the use of a digital therapeutic program to support pediatric heart disease management. Using the principles from user-centered design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 4 cardiologists, 3 nurse practitioners and 1 cardiology fellow at the Hospital for Sick Children. All interview transcripts underwent inductive thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's iterative six-phase approach. To further contextualize the analytic interpretation of the study findings, Eakin and Gladstone's value-adding approach was used. Five themes were identified: (i) multidisciplinary model of care; (ii) patient care needs change over time; (iii) treatment burden and difficulties in care management; (iv) transition to adulthood; and (v) filling care gaps with digital health. Clinicians valued the opportunity to monitor a patient's health status in real-time, as it allowed them to modify care regimens on a more preventive basis. However, with adolescent care often varying according to the patient's age and disease severity, a digital therapeutic program would only be valuable if it was customizable to the patients changing care journey. Digital therapeutic programs can ease the process of self-care for adolescents with heart disease throughout the growth and maturation of their care journey. However, to ensure the sustained use of a program, there is a need to work collaboratively with patients, caregivers, and clinicians to ensure their lived experiences guide the design and delivery of the overall program.

Optimal Donor Allograft Function: The Search for the Lowest Acceptable Donor Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The availability of heart donors is limited by organ shortage. Due to concerns of reduced survival, donors with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) have been cautiously used in pediatric heart transplantation. One strategy to expand the donor pool is to re-evaluate whether lower donor LVEF may be acceptable for transplantation. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients <18 y receiving heart transplants from April 2007 to September 2021 using the United Network of Organ Sharing dataset. We excluded retransplants and multiorgan transplants. Cut-point analyses of LVEF was performed and Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare 1-y survival for new cut-points and the standard (LVEF >50%). RESULTS: The analytic sample consisted of 5255 patients. Recipients receiving hearts with lower LVEFs were more likely to be on ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Recipients did not differ in waitlist times or transplant status. Cut-point analysis identified LVEF 45% as a potentially new cutoff. One-year survival of recipients of donors with LVEF ≥45% (92.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3%-92.8%) was similar to that of LVEF >50% (92.1%; CI, 91.4%-92.9%). Survival for the LVEF 45%-49% (88.8%; CI, 72.9%-95.7%) cohort was slightly lower than the ≥50% cohort, albeit nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival among pediatric heart transplants using a donor heart LVEF threshold of 45% or 40% was similar to a threshold of 50%. However, the finding is based on a small number of patients with LVEF <50%, and future larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the findings of this study before a lower LVEF threshold is considered.

Survival analysis for pediatric heart transplant patients using a novel machine learning algorithm: A UNOS analysis.

BACKGROUND: Impact of pretransplantation risk factors on mortality in the first year after heart transplantation remains largely unknown. Using machine learning algorithms, we selected clinically relevant identifiers that could predict 1-year mortality after pediatric heart transplantation. METHODS: Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database for years 2010-2020 for patients 0-17 years receiving their first heart transplant (N = 4150). Features were selected using subject experts and literature review. Scikit-Learn, Scikit-Survival, and Tensorflow were used. A train:test split of 70:30 was used. N-repeated k-fold validation was performed (N = 5, k = 5). Seven models were tested, Hyperparameter tuning performed using Bayesian optimization and the concordance index (C-index) was used for model assessment. RESULTS: A C-index above 0.6 for test data was considered acceptable for survival analysis models. C-indices obtained were 0.60 (Cox proportional hazards), 0.61 (Cox with elastic net), 0.64 (gradient boosting), 0.64 (support vector machine), 0.68 (random forest), 0.66 (component gradient boosting), and 0.54 (survival trees). Machine learning models show an improvement over the traditional Cox proportional hazards model, with random forest performing the best on the test set. Analysis of the feature importance for the gradient boosted model found that the top 5 features were the most recent serum total bilirubin, the travel distance from the transplant center, the patient body mass index, the deceased donor terminal Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/Alanine transaminase (SGPT/ALT), and the donor PCO2. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of machine learning and expert-based methodology of selecting predictors of survival for pediatric heart transplantation provides a reasonable prediction of 1- and 3-year survival outcomes. SHapley Additive exPlanations can be an effective tool for modeling and visualizing nonlinear interactions.

Relieving bronchial compression due to cardiomegaly: The role of aortopexy when left ventricular assist device support just is not enough.

Enlarged cardiac structures, especially those on left side have the potential to cause airway compression in pediatric patients with chronic heart failure, owing to their proximity to and impact on the trachea-bronchial tree. Ventricular assist devices are effective in decompressing such hearts thereby alleviating airway problems. Aortopexy serves as an effective airway decompressive measure in cases with persistent airway compression despite effective cardiac decompression by ventricular assist devices. We report a case of 1-year-old male patient with dilated cardiomyopathy in whom airway compression persisted despite ventricular assist device implantation. Aortopexy was effective in relieving airway compression allowing for subsequent extubation and successful heart transplantation.

Low descending aorta flow is associated with adverse feeding outcomes in neonates with small left-sided structures.

Feeding intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) cause significant morbidity in neonates with duct-dependent systemic circulations. Whether these complications are associated with low blood flow to the bowel is unproven. The aim of this study was to determine whether low descending aortic (DAO) flow is associated with adverse feeding outcomes in neonates with small left-sided structures, including borderline left ventricle and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging studies and abdominal Doppler ultrasound profiles prior to any cardiac interventions in neonates with small left-sided structures were analyzed. Descending aortic flows, indexed to body surface area, were collected. Medical charts were reviewed for a composite outcome of feeding intolerance and/or NEC. Among the 51 enrolled study patients (mean age 4.6, SD 4.5 days), 13 experienced the composite outcome (feeding intolerance in 13, NEC in 2). The mean DAO flow in patients who experienced the composite outcome was 0.89 L/min/m2 (SD 0.33 L/min/m2), compared to 1.23 L/min/m2 (SD 0.41 L/min/m2) in those that did not (p = 0.007). A DAO flow of 0.91 L/min/m2 identified patients who experienced feeding intolerance or NEC with a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 76%. Doppler ultrasound metrics of DAO flow did not correlate with DAO flow or predict adverse feeding outcomes. Low DAO flow is associated with adverse outcomes, including feeding intolerance and NEC, in neonates with small left-sided structures. Heightened clinical vigilance towards feeding complications in patients with low DAO flow is recommended.

Reversal of adrenal suppression with ciclesonide.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal suppression secondary to high-dose inhaled corticosteroid use has been reported in children. METHODS: The authors report the use of ciclesonide to reverse adrenal suppression secondary to inhaled fluticasone use in four pediatric patients. RESULTS: In these four children, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function normalized after the patients were changed to ciclesonide, while good asthma control was maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Ciclesonide should be considered for the reversal of adrenal suppression secondary to the use of fluticasone, and perhaps other older inhaled corticosteroids as well.

Pediatric heart transplantation: long-term outcomes.

Pediatric heart transplant has become the standard of care for end-stage heart disease in children throughout the world. The number of transplants has grown dramatically since the first transplant was performed, and over the last two decades, outcomes have consistently improved with progression in knowledge enhancing the clinical course and outcomes of these patients. Short-term outcomes in the most recent era have been excellent resulting in a renewed focus towards medium- and long-term outcomes. This article will review the most up-to-date literature on overall heart transplantation outcomes and specific long-term outcomes including rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, graft failure, infection, renal dysfunction, malignancy, and the need for re-transplantation. The article also explores the post-transplantation outcomes of special populations, including Fontan patients, ABO-incompatible recipients, sensitized recipients, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and ventricular assist devices. The article concludes with a look at transition from pediatric to adult care and medication adherence, which are becoming major issues related to long-term outcomes as post-transplant survival increases.

A case series of left main coronary artery ostial atresia and a review of the literature.

Left main coronary artery ostial atresia (LMCAOA) is a rare congenital anomaly of the coronary arteries. The published literature regarding the current diagnostic and management recommendations are limited. We present three case series of LMCAOA from our institution, including one with a unique association with anomalous origin of left coronary artery (LCA) from pulmonary artery. In addition, this report includes a review of 50 pediatric and 43 adult cases from literature. The majority of the patients were symptomatic. Sudden cardiac death occurred in 10% of pediatric patients and 7% of adult patients. Almost half of pediatric patients had additional cardiac lesions. At the time of diagnosis, 82% of patients had abnormal exercise stress test and 73% had abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The diagnosis of LMCAOA was suspected by echocardiography in 47% of pediatric patients, while 26% were initially misdiagnosed as anomalous origin of LCA from pulmonary artery. Coronary angiography confirmed the diagnosis in most cases and 70.5% of pediatric patients had small collaterals, while 80.5% of adult patients had large collaterals. Nine pediatric patients had no revascularization surgery with five deaths. Revascularization surgery was performed in 39 pediatric patients with four deaths. After 2005, there is a gradual shift toward performing coronary osteoplasty rather than coronary artery bypass grafting. Eighteen adult patients had revascularization surgery and all survived. Fifteen adult patients had no revascularization surgery, of which there were five deaths. In patients with LMCAOA, revascularization surgery is currently recommended in the presence of symptoms, ischemic changes on electrocardiogram or exercise stress test, myocardial perfusion defect on MPI, global left ventricular systolic dysfunction on echocardiogram, severe mitral regurgitation, or small-sized collaterals in coronary angiography. Short-term and mid-term outcomes are encouraging.