Patterns of sexual and erectile dysfunction and response to treatment in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of patient-reported erectile (ED) and sexual dysfunction and response to treatment in men after the induction of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer, as ADT-induced changes in serum testosterone can result in changes in libido and sexual function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving ADT for prostate cancer at our institution between January 1989 and July 2005; those receiving only neoadjuvant ADT were excluded. Variables included age, race, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen level before ADT, Gleason sum, clinical stage, ADT type (medical vs surgical) and schedule (continuous vs intermittent), previous treatment for prostate cancer, presence of pre-existing or new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM), and presence of ED before ADT. After ADT induction, charts were reviewed for reporting of ED, changes in libido, and initiation of ED therapy (medical or surgical). RESULTS: In all, 395 patients (mean age of 71.7 years; 59.0% African-American, 41.0% Caucasian/other, at initiation ADT) were analysed. At mean follow-up of 87.4 months, 57 (14.4%) patients reported ED; 40 of these (70%) reported new-onset ED, while 17 (30%) reported ED before ADT. Response rates were 33-80% with medical therapy, including 44% receiving phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor monotherapy. On multivariate analysis, age <70 years (P < 0.001) and the absence of DM (P = 0.024) were associated with reporting ED after ADT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving ADT for prostate cancer have variable degrees of ED. Successful outcomes are possible, particularly when implementing multimodal therapy. Younger patients and those with no DM are more likely to report ED after ADT induction.

Osteoporosis and fractures after androgen deprivation initiation for prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely utilized for treatment of localized and advanced prostate cancer (CaP). ADT is associated with increased rates of osteoporosis; however, its impact on fracture risk is not completely understood. We investigated incidence and predisposing factors for osteoporosis and fractures in a large, contemporary, single institution series of patients treated with ADT for CaP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients who received ADT for CaP between 1/1989 and 7/2005. Primary endpoints of investigation were osteoporosis and non-pathologic fractures. Independent variables included age, race, body mass index (BMI), pretreatment serum PSA, Gleason sum, clinical stage, ADT type (medical versus surgical) and schedule (continuous versus intermittent), and receipt of calcium, vitamin D or bisphosphonate supplementation. Data were analyzed by Chi-square test, Student's t-test, Linear Regression, and Logistic Regression (p < 0.05 significant). RESULTS: A total of 395 patients were analyzed (mean age 71.7 years, 59% African American, 41% Caucasian/other). At mean follow-up of 66.1 months, 92 (23%) patients developed osteoporosis and 27 (7%) patients developed non-pathologic fractures. On univariate analysis, age, race, BMI, and ADT duration were significantly associated with osteoporosis development, while BMI, ADT duration, and presence of osteoporosis were significantly associated with fracture incidence. Regression analysis revealed that age > 70 at ADT initiation, continuous ADT, and increased treatment duration predicted osteoporosis development, while only osteoporosis was independently predictive of fracture development. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving continuous ADT for CaP are at increased risk for developing osteoporosis which may lead to fractures, with an incidence of 7% in our study population.

Risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus and worsening glycaemic variables for established diabetes in men undergoing androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) and of worsening glycaemic control in established DM after starting androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer, as ADT is associated with altered body composition, potentially influencing insulin sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving ADT for prostate cancer at our institution between January 1989 and July 2005; those with incomplete information and those receiving only neoadjuvant ADT were excluded. Variables examined included age, race, body mass index (BMI), pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, Gleason sum, clinical stage, ADT type (medical vs surgical) and schedule (continuous vs intermittent), presence of pre-existing DM, serum glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels before and after ADT, and receipt of vitamin D or bisphosphonate supplementation. Data were analysed statistically and P < 0.05 considered to indicate significance. RESULTS In all, 396 patients (median age 73.2 years; median BMI of 26.7 kg/m(2) at ADT initiation) were analysed. Of these, 59.1% were African-American and 40.9% were Caucasian/other. At a median follow-up of 60.1 months, 36 (11.3%) patients developed NODM. In 77 patients with pre-existing DM, there was an increase of >/=10% in serum HbA1c or fasting glucose levels in 15 (19.5%) and 22 (28.6%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, a BMI of >/=30 kg/m(2) was associated with an increased risk of developing NODM (odds ratio 4.65, P = 0.031). Receipt of vitamin D had a protective effect (odds ratio 5.75, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving ADT for prostate cancer with or with no history of DM should have routine surveillance of glycaemic control, particularly when their BMI is >/= 30 kg/m(2), with appropriate preventive and treatment measures.