The Influence of Patient and Surgeon Characteristics on Press Ganey Provider Ratings in Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although patient satisfaction ratings are increasingly used as hospital and provider performance metrics, these ratings may be affected by factors extraneous to surgeon performance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether outpatient Press Ganey ratings for plastic surgery providers were tied more to provider or patient characteristics. METHODS: All Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) responses for plastic surgery providers from 2017 to 2023 from a single institution were analyzed. Ordered logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with provider ratings. RESULTS: In total, 6442 surveys from 4594 patients representing 29 plastic surgery providers were analyzed. Across the patient cohort, 23.2% (N = 1492) rated plastic surgery providers lower than a 10/10. After adjustment, provider characteristics including provider gender, patient-provider gender concordance, and years in practice were not associated with overall provider ratings (all P > .05). In contrast, patient characteristics were associated with provider ratings. Older patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; P < .001) was associated with higher ratings. Finally, self-reported overall health and mental health were associated with lower provider ratings (both P < .05); specifically, mental health categories lower than "Excellent" were associated with significantly lower provider ratings (overall mental health "Very Good': OR, 0.57; "Good": OR, 0.53; "Fair": OR, 0.59; "Poor": OR, 0.55; all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Press Ganey ratings for plastic surgeons are influenced by patient characteristics, including age and mental health. Because satisfaction ratings are increasingly used as performance metrics in plastic surgery, adjusted rating models may be needed to more accurately reflect surgeon performance.

Air or Saline? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on the Effect of Tissue Expander Fill on Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expander fill medium and volume have implications for the pressure exerted on mastectomy skin flaps. This study evaluated the influence of initial fill medium (air vs. saline) on complications in immediate breast reconstruction within a propensity score-matched cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing immediate tissue expander-based breast reconstruction with initial intraoperative fill with air were propensity score matched 1:2 to those with saline initial fill based on patient and tissue expander characteristics. Incidence of overall and ischemic complications were compared by fill medium (air vs. saline). RESULTS: A total of 584 patients were included, including 130 (22.2%) with initial fill with air, 377 (64.6%) with initial fill with saline, and 77 (13.2%) with 0 cc of initial fill. After multivariate adjustment, higher intraoperative fill volume was associated with increased risk of mastectomy skin flap necrosis [regression coefficient (RC) 15.7; p = 0.049]. Propensity score matching was then conducted among 360 patients (Air: 120 patients vs. Saline: 240 patients). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the incidences of mastectomy skin flap necrosis, extrusion, reoperation, or readmission between the air and saline cohorts (all p > 0.05). However, initial fill with air was associated with lower incidence of infection requiring oral antibiotics (p = 0.003), seroma (p = 0.004), and nipple necrosis (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Within a propensity score-matched cohort, initial fill with air was associated with a lower incidence of complications, including ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Initial fill with air and lower fill volumes may be strategies to reducing risk of ischemic complications among high-risk patients.

Mapping Patient Encounters in Breast Cancer Care: An Analysis of 8800 Clinical Encounters Among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transitions toward value-based systems require a comprehensive definition of the complexity and duration of provider effort required for a given diagnosis. This study modeled the numbers of clinical encounters involved in various treatment pathways among breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: Clinical encounters with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, breast surgeons, or plastic surgeons ≤4 years after diagnosis among all patients undergoing mastectomy from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed. Relative encounter volumes were modeled each 90-day period after diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 8807 breast cancer-related encounters from 221 patients were analyzed, with mean (SD) encounter volume 39.9 (27.2) encounters per patient. Most encounters occurred in the first year after diagnosis (70.0%), with years 2, 3, and 4 representing 15.8%, 9.1%, and 3.5% of encounters, respectively. Overall stage was associated with encounter volume, with higher encounter volume with increasing stage (stages 0: 27.4 vs I: 28.5 vs II: 48.4 vs III: 61.1 vs IV: 80.8 mean encounters). Body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 0.22), adjuvant radiation (OR, 6.8), and receipt of breast reconstruction (OR, 3.5) were also associated with higher encounter volume (all P 's < 0.01). Duration of encounter volume varied by treatment phases, with medical oncology and plastic surgery sustaining high clinical encounter volume 3 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Encounter utilization in breast cancer care persists 3 years after index diagnosis and is influenced by overall stage and treatment characteristics, including receipt of breast reconstruction. These results may inform the design of episode durations within value-based models and institutional resource allocation for breast cancer care.

Consequences and Predictors of Prolonged Tissue Expander Duration in Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expanders (TEs) are temporary devices used in breast reconstruction, which are generally removed within 1 year. There is a paucity of data regarding the potential consequences when TEs have longer indwelling times. Thus, we aim to determine whether prolonged TE implantation length is associated with TE-related complications. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent TE placement for breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2021. Complications were compared between patients who had a TE for >1 year and <1 year. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to evaluate predictors of TE complications. RESULTS: A total of 582 patients underwent TE placement and 12.2% had the expander for >1 year. Adjuvant chemoradiation, body mass index (BMI), overall stage, and diabetes predicted the duration of TE placement (p ≤ 0.006). Rate of return to the operating room was higher in patients who had TEs in place >1 year (22.5 vs 6.1%, p < 0.001). On multivariate regression, prolonged TE duration predicted an infection requiring antibiotics, readmission, and reoperation (p < 0.001). Reasons for longer indwelling times included need for additional chemoradiation (79.4%), TE infections (12.7%), and requesting a break from surgery (6.3%). CONCLUSION: Indwelling TEs for >1 year are associated with higher rates of infection, readmission, and reoperation even when controlling for adjuvant chemoradiation. Patients with diabetes, a higher BMI, advanced cancer stage, and those requiring adjuvant chemoradiation should be advised they may require a TE for a longer time interval prior to final reconstruction.

Evaluating Disparities in Pathways to Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Rates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction have been shown to vary by racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors. In this study, we evaluated disparities across pathways toward breast reconstruction. METHODS: All women who underwent mastectomy for breast cancer at a single institution from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed. Rates of discussions about reconstruction with breast surgeons, plastic surgery referrals, plastic surgery consultations, and ultimate decisions to pursue reconstruction were compared by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included, with the racial/ethnic demographic of 56% white, 28% Black, 1% American Indian/Native Alaskan, 4% Asian, and 4% Hispanic/Latina. The overall incidence of postmastectomy breast reconstruction was 48%, which varied by race (white: 58% vs. Black: 34%; p < 0.001). Plastic surgery was discussed by the breast surgeon with 68% of patients, and referrals were made in 62% of patients. While older age (p < 0.001) and nonprivate insurance (p < 0.05) were associated with lower rates of plastic surgery discussion and referral, it did not vary by race/ethnicity. The need for an interpreter was associated with lower rates of discussion (p < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, a lower reconstruction rate was associated with the Black race (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; p = 0.014) and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 (OR = 0.14; p < 0.001). Elevated BMI did not disproportionately lower breast reconstruction rates in Black versus white women (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Despite statistically equivalent rates of plastic surgery discussions and referrals, black women had lower breast reconstruction rates versus white women. Lower rates of breast reconstruction in Black women likely represent an amalgamation of barriers to care; further exploration within our community is warranted to better understand the racial disparity observed.

The Influence of Age on Complications After Correction of Congenital Breast Deformities: A National Analysis of the Pediatric and Adult NSQIP Data Sets.

BACKGROUND: Timing of surgical intervention is controversial among patients seeking correction of congenital breast deformities. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the influence of age on 30-day complications and unplanned healthcare utilization after reconstruction of congenital breast deformities. METHODS: Female patients undergoing breast reconstruction for congenital breast deformities and Poland syndrome were identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in the 2012 to 2021 pediatric and adult National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) data sets. Complications based on age at correction were compared, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of overall and wound healing complications. RESULTS: Among 528 patients meeting inclusion criteria, mean (SD) age at surgical correction was 30.2 (13.3) years. Patients most commonly underwent implant placement (50.5%), mastopexy (26.3%), or tissue expander placement (11.6%). Across the cohort, overall incidence of postoperative complications was 4.4%, most commonly superficial surgical site infection (1.0%), reoperation (1.1%), or readmission (1.0%). After multivariate adjustment, increasing age at time of correction was associated with higher incidence of wound complications [odds ratio (OR) 1.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0003-1.002; P = .009], in addition to BMI (OR 1.002; 95% CI 1.0007-1.004; P = .006) and tobacco use (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.11; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction for congenital breast deformities may be safely undertaken at a young age with a low associated risk of postoperative complications. Large, multi-institutional studies are needed to assess the influence of surgical timing on psychosocial outcomes in this population.

Microsurgery Fellowship Website and Social Media Presence: Are Programs Optimizing Recruitment Strategy?

BACKGROUND: Microsurgery fellowship applicants make decisions for future training based on information obtained from colleagues, mentors, and microsurgery fellowship program Websites (MFWs). In this study, we sought to evaluate the accessibility and quality of available information by microsurgery programs by analyzing the most commonly used web resources and social media outlets for applicants. METHODS: The San Francisco (SF) Match and American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery Websites were queried in April 2020 for microsurgery fellowship programs (MFPs) participating in the SF Match. Twenty-two independent variables of information were assessed on MFWs based on previously published data. Social media presence was also assessed by querying Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter for official hospital, plastic surgery residency, and microsurgery fellowship accounts. RESULTS: All 24 MFWs participating in the SF Match had a webpage. Program description, faculty listing, operative volume, and eligibility requirements were listed for all programs (100%). The majority of MFWs listed affiliated hospitals (75%), provided a link to the fellowship application (66.7%), listed interview dates (66.7%), and highlighted research interests (50%). A minority of MFWs provided information on conference schedule (37.5%), current fellow listing (25%), previous fellow listing (16.67%), and positions held by previous fellows (8.33%). No MFWs (0%) presented information on selection process, or rotation schedule.All hospitals with an MFP had a Facebook page and nearly all had Instagram (83.3%) and Twitter accounts (95.8%). Plastic surgery residency programs at the same institution of an MFP had social media presence on Facebook (38.9%), Twitter (38.9%), and Instagram (66.7%). Only three MFPs had Facebook accounts (12.5%) and none had Instagram or Twitter accounts. CONCLUSION: As the field of microsurgery continues to grow, the need for effective recruitment and training of microsurgeons continues to be essential. Overall, we conclude that both the accessibility and quality of information available to applicants are limited, which is a missed opportunity for recruitment.

Scapholunate Ligament: Comparing the Native Strength of the Ligament to an All-suture Anchor Construct.

Our aim was to compare the tensile strength of the native scapholunate ligament (SLL) with that of an all-suture anchor construct in a cadaveric model. The scaphoid and lunate were isolated, preserving all segments of the SLL. Using a servohydraulic testing machine, we increased the load until peak load-to-failure of the native SLL was reached in nine specimens (mean ± standard deviation, 273 ± 132 N). Using the same specimens, two JuggerKnot 1.4-mm suture anchors (Zimmer Biomet) were placed into the lunate and tensioned through transosseous tunnels in the scaphoid. Sutures were tied over the radial nonarticular aspect of the scaphoid. Load-to-failure testing was repeated. The mean peak load-to-failure for the all-suture anchor constructs was 172 ± 59 N versus 231 ± 117 N for the native group (p = 0.157). This represents approximately 75% of the native ligament strength. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(3):169-172, 2020).

Efficacy of Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the utility of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in tissue expander (TE)-based breast reconstruction. This study evaluated the risk of surgical-site infection between patients receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone versus prolonged postoperative antibiotics within a propensity score-matched cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone were propensity score-matched 1:3 to patients receiving postoperative antibiotics based on demographics, comorbidities, and treatment factors. Incidence of surgical-site infection was compared based on duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of a total of 431 patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction, postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in 77.2%. Within this cohort, 348 were included for propensity matching (no antibiotics, 87 patients; antibiotics, 261 patients). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in incidence of infection requiring intravenous (no antibiotics, 6.9%; antibiotics, 4.6%; P = 0.35) or oral antibiotics (no antibiotics, 11.5%; antibiotics, 16.1%; P = 0.16). In addition, rates of unplanned reoperation ( P = 0.88) and 30-day readmission ( P = 0.19) were similar. After multivariate adjustment, prescription of postoperative antibiotics was not associated with a reduction in surgical-site infection (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.3; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Within a propensity score-matched cohort accounting for patient comorbidities and receipt of adjuvant therapies, prescription of postoperative antibiotics after TE-based breast reconstruction conferred no improvement in rates of TE infection, reoperation, or unplanned health care use. These data underscore the need for multicenter randomized trials on the utility of antibiotic prophylaxis in TE-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Educational Podcasts in Plastic Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Content, Metrics, and Target Audiences.

BACKGROUND: Podcasts provide an efficient means for asynchronous learning. However, no study to date has thoroughly assessed the landscape of educational podcasts in plastic surgery. Thus, this study aims to evaluate and characterize current educational plastic surgery podcasts to ultimately inform future efforts. METHODS: Three platforms were queried for educational plastic surgery podcasts: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. Podcast descriptions and episodes were then independently reviewed to determine primary target audiences, performance metrics, and content categories. RESULTS: There were a total of 163 plastic surgery podcasts. 145 of these 163 podcasts were targeted toward a nonmedical audience. The remaining 18 podcasts met inclusion criteria as educational plastic surgery podcasts. Of all educational podcast episodes, 8.8% targeted a medical student audience, 33.8% targeted trainees (residents/fellows), and 57.4% targeted practicing surgeons or emphasized recent research in the field. Episode content categories included breast (14.2%), cosmetic (11.8%), experimental (0.5%), hand/peripheral nerve (8.6%), pediatric/craniofacial (8.2%), reconstructive (15.6%), practice management (14.8%), residency (6.6%), and others (19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the large number of plastic surgery podcasts available, few podcasts focus on educating a medical audience. Within this small subset, there is a paucity of content targeted towards medical students interested in plastic surgery. While there is a wide breadth of content available, there is significant room for growth and refinement in the podcast sector for plastic surgery education.

Comparison of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Versus Conventional-Dose Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common upper extremity fractures and often require surgical fixation when they are intraarticular. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a surgical planning tool to evaluate intraarticular DRFs. Although CT affords additional details, patients receive higher radiation doses than standard radiographs. We aim to develop a low-dose CT (LDCT) protocol, relative to the institutional standard-dose CT wrist for intraarticular DRFs although providing adequate detail for surgical decision-making. METHODS: A single-institution prospective study was conducted on patients with intraarticular DRFs who underwent closed reduction and below-elbow splinting who otherwise would undergo wrist CT. Observations were defined as total measurements taken, with each view undergoing 44 measurements. Patients underwent 2 scans with a standard dose and a 10× dose reduction. Articular step and gap measurements were recorded in the sagittal and coronal images. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled (7 women and 4 men). The mean age was 55 years (SD = 20.1). There were a total of 4 reviewers: 1 attending surgeon, 2 resident physicians, and 1 student. When comparing LDCT and conventional-dose CT (CDCT), there were no significant differences in step and gap measurements across all reviewers. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that LDCT provides comparable imaging quality for surgical planning as a CDCT without significant diagnostic decay in the setting of DRFs. This comes with the added benefit of a 10-fold reduction in radiation exposure. These results suggest that LDCT is an opportunity to reduce effective radiation in patients although providing beneficial preoperative imaging.

Recalcitrant Neuropathies in the Upper Extremity.

Carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome can cause debilitating pain and weakness in the hand and upper extremities. Although most patients have a resolution of their symptoms after primary decompression, managing those with recalcitrant neuropathies is challenging. The etiology of persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms is not always clear and requires careful attention to the history and physical examination to confirm the diagnosis or consider other causes prior to committing to surgery. Nevertheless, revision surgery is often needed in the setting of recalcitrant neuropathies in order to improve patients' symptoms. Revision surgery typically entails wide exposure and neurolysis to release residual compression. In addition, vascularized tissue and nerve wraps have been routinely used to create a favorable perineural environment that decreases recurrent scar formation. This review discusses the etiologies of recalcitrant upper extremity neuropathies, the current treatment options, and surgical outcomes.

Management of Complex Hand and Wrist Ligament Injuries.

Ligamentous injuries in the hand and wrist are often underdiagnosed and can present with significant functional limitations if there is untimely recognition of injury. Adequate repair or reconstruction is critical in restoring joint stability and mobility. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the metacarpophalangeal joint, scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL), and non-SLIL carpal ligament anatomy, diagnosis, imaging, treatment consideration and options, as well as surgical techniques encompassing repair, reconstruction, and fusion.

Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exists in prepectoral reconstruction. This study aims to identify pertinent TE characteristics and evaluate their correlations with PI size for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. Methods: This study analyzed patients who underwent two-stage prepectoral tissue expansion for breast reconstruction followed by implant placement. Patient demographics and oncologic characteristics were recorded. TE and PI features were evaluated. Significant predictors for PI volume were identified using linear and multivariate regression analyses. Results: We identified 177 patients and 296 breast reconstructions that met inclusion criteria. All reconstructions were performed in the prepectoral plane with the majority using acellular dermal matrix (93.8%) and primarily silicone implants (94.3%). Mean TE size was 485.4 cm3 with mean initial fill of 245.8 cm3 and mean final fill of 454.4 cm3. Mean PI size was 502.9 cm3 with a differential fill volume (PI-TE) of 11.7 cm3. Multivariate analysis identified significant features for PI size prediction, including TE size (R2 = 0.60; P < 0.0001) and TE final fill volume (R2 = 0.57; P < 0.0001). The prediction expression for TE final fill and TE size was calculated as 26.6 + 0.38*(TE final fill) + 0.61*(TE size). Conclusions: TE size and final expansion volume were significant variables for implant size prediction. With prepectoral implant placement gaining popularity, the predictive formula may help optimize preoperative planning and decision-making in prepectoral reconstructions.

Who's Auditioning Who? Applicant-Reported Elements of the Best and Worst Plastic Surgery Subinternships.

BACKGROUND: Many integrated plastic surgery applicants choose to complete one or more visiting subinternships or "away rotations" at programs outside of their home institution. As these rotations are so critical on both sides of the application process, the authors sought to identify the factors that influence subinternship experiences for plastic surgery applicants. METHODS: A survey was used to collect information about demographics, the subinternship experience, and interview preferences. The survey was distributed to current plastic surgery interns and applicants who applied to Duke Plastic Surgery in the 2019/2020 application cycle. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two responses were received (response rate, 35.2 percent). The mean number of subinternships completed was 4.47. The defining feature of respondents' best subinternship most often included engagement from faculty and residents, autonomy, and integration with the team. The worst feature of respondents' worst subinternship experience most often included a sense of disinterested or "malignant" residents and faculty, lacking operative/educational opportunities, and disorganization of the rotation. The majority of applicants (60.3 percent) would prefer to return for a standard interview day over interviewing while on rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The subinternship experience remains a critical part of the applicant experience when applying to integrated plastic surgery residency programs. The experience on these rotations leaves a lasting impression that is highly variable and influences future recommendations to peers. Rotating students value inclusivity and case volume, and they take note of negative interactions they witness among residents and faculty. These results can help as programs design their subinternship experience for visiting students in the future.

Vein Grafts in Free Flap Reconstruction: Review of Indications and Institutional Pearls.

SUMMARY: Vein grafts enable soft-tissue reconstruction in cases of insufficient pedicle length, a lack of nearby recipient vessels, and a wide zone of injury caused by trauma or radiation therapy. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of vein grafts in free flap reconstruction focusing on the timing of arteriovenous loops, complications, and surgical technique. Vein graft indications, types of vein grafts, and location-specific considerations are also reviewed. Three reconstructive microsurgeons at high-volume centers were asked to offer institutional pearls on the order of anastomosis, selection of donor veins, and timing of arteriovenous loops. In terms of gap length, vessel gaps less than 10 cm may be reconstructed with an interposition or transposition vein graft. For longer gaps, surgeons should consider the use of arteriovenous loops, transposition arteriovenous loops, or flow-through flaps. Both one and two-stage arteriovenous loops are used, depending on patient comorbidities, potential exposure of critical structures, and surgeon preference. Although one-stage arteriovenous loops expedite the reconstructive process, two-stage arteriovenous loops require shorter operations and help identify patients at risk of flap failure. Although whether the use of vein grafts increases flap failure rates is controversial, complications are highest in lower extremity reconstruction, cases of a prolonged interval between stages in two-stage arteriovenous loops, and unplanned vein grafts.

Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials.

Cranioplasty for acquired cranial defects can be complex and challenging. Benefits include improved cosmesis, protection of intracranial structures, and restoration of neurocognitive function. These defects can be reconstructed with preserved craniectomy bone flaps, split autografts, or alloplastic materials. When alloplastic cranioplasty is planned, the material should be carefully selected. There is confusion on which material should be used in certain scenarios, particularly in composite defects. Methods: The PubMed database was used to conduct a nonsystematic review of literature related to these materials and the following factors: time required in preoperative planning and fabrication, intraoperative time, feasibility of intraoperative modification, fixation method (direct or indirect), implant cost, overall complication rate, and surgical revision rates. Results: Surgical revision rates for alloplastic materials range from 10% to 23%. Retention of titanium mesh at 4 years is 85% in composite reconstruction with free fasciocutaneous and free myocutaneous flaps. In composite reconstruction with locoregional and free muscle flaps, the retention of titanium mesh at 4 years is 47%. The retention of nontitanium and nonpreserved autogenous reconstruction is 72% and 82%, respectively. Conclusions: Alloplastic materials should be considered for reconstruction of large (>100 cm2) cranial defects, especially for adult patients younger than 30 years, and all patients with bone flaps that are fragmented or have been cryopreserved for an extended period. Preformed titanium mesh provides a favorable primary reconstructive option when a staged reconstruction is not possible or indicated but should be avoided in composite defects reconstructed with locoregional scalp and free muscle flaps.

Which Factors Are Important to Women When Choosing a Breast Reconstruction Surgeon?

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing breast reconstruction often research their health care provider options. The authors studied which factors may influence how a woman selects a plastic surgeon for breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS: An online survey was distributed by means of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk; Amazon Web Services, Inc., Seattle, Wash.) to 1025 adult women. Participants were asked to imagine a scenario in which they had breast cancer, needed to undergo mastectomy, and were choosing a reconstructive surgeon. They were then asked to rank factors influencing this decision on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Two-sample t tests were used to compare Likert scores between dichotomized categories based on participant characteristics. RESULTS: Women assigned the highest scores [mean (standard deviation)] to online reviews on Vitals or WebMD [6.1 (1.2)], years of experience [5.7 (1.4)], recommendations from another surgeon [5.7 (1.3)] or family/friend [4.9 (1.7)], and attending a top medical school [4.7 (1.7)]. Lowest ranked factors were online advertising and surgeon demographics, including having a sex concordant (female) surgeon. After amalgamation into attribute subsections, mean (standard deviation) rated relative importance of surgeon reputation [0.72 (0.13)] was higher than that of appearance [0.46 (0.19)] and demographics [0.31 (0.13)]. Patient demographics influenced relative importance of certain attributes; older, educated, and higher-income patients placed higher value on surgeon appearance (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When selecting a breast reconstruction surgeon, women place the highest value on surgeons' online, educational, and personal reputations. Though most show no strong preferences for surgeon demographics or physical attributes, specific features may be important for some patients. Cognizance of these preferences may enable providers to more effectively understand patient expectations.

Defining the Value of Breast Reconstruction Surgeons: Quantifying Clinical Encounter and Operative Volume at an Academic Center.

Despite growing rates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction, the time contribution of breast reconstruction surgeons in comprehensive breast cancer care is often poorly accounted for by hospital and healthcare systems. This study models encounter volume and operative time utilization of breast reconstruction surgeons among patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Methods: All clinical encounters and operative time from a consecutive sample of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction were analyzed. Encounter volume and operative time utilization less than or equal to 4 years after diagnosis were modeled over time. Results: A total of 5057 breast cancer encounters were analyzed. Mean (SD) clinical encounter volume was 45.9 (28.5) encounters per patient, with encounter volume varying by specialty [plastic surgery: 16.5; medical oncology: 15.9; breast surgery: 7.2; radiation oncology: 6.3 mean encounters]. Receipt of adjuvant radiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and major complications during reconstruction predicted higher encounter volume. Mean (SD) operative time utilization was 702 (317) minutes per patient [plastic surgery: 547 (305); breast surgery: 155 (71) minutes]. While both encounter volume and operative time for radiation oncologists and breast surgeons, respectively, were concentrated in the first year after diagnosis, medical oncologists and plastic surgeons sustained high clinical and operative time utilization 3 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Encounter volume and operative time utilization with breast reconstruction surgeons persist 3 years after a breast cancer diagnosis and are tied to treatment characteristics and incidence of reconstruction complications. Institutional- and system-level resource allocation must account for the complex and lengthy duration of care inherent to breast reconstruction care.