Incidence and predictors of thermal oesophageal and vagus nerve injuries in Ablation Index-guided high-power-short-duration ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective study.

AIMS: High-power-short-duration (HPSD) ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation but poses risks of thermal injuries to the oesophagus and vagus nerve. This study aims to investigate incidence and predictors of thermal injuries, employing machine learning. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Leipzig Heart Centre, Germany, excluding patients with multiple prior ablations. All patients received Ablation Index-guided HPSD ablation and subsequent oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. A machine learning algorithm categorized ablation points by atrial location and analysed ablation data, including Ablation Index, focusing on the posterior wall. The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05709756). Between February 2021 and August 2023, 238 patients were enrolled, of whom 18 (7.6%; nine oesophagus, eight vagus nerve, one both) developed thermal injuries, including eight oesophageal erythemata, two ulcers, and no fistula. Higher mean force (15.8 ± 3.9 g vs. 13.6 ± 3.9 g, P = 0.022), ablation point quantity (61.50 ± 20.45 vs. 48.16 ± 19.60, P = 0.007), and total and maximum Ablation Index (24 114 ± 8765 vs. 18 894 ± 7863, P = 0.008; 499 ± 95 vs. 473 ± 44, P = 0.04, respectively) at the posterior wall, but not oesophagus location, correlated significantly with thermal injury occurrence. Patients with thermal injuries had significantly lower distances between left atrium and oesophagus (3.0 ± 1.5 mm vs. 4.4 ± 2.1 mm, P = 0.012) and smaller atrial surface areas (24.9 ± 6.5 cm2 vs. 29.5 ± 7.5 cm2, P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The low thermal lesion's rate (7.6%) during Ablation Index-guided HPSD ablation for atrial fibrillation is noteworthy. Machine learning based ablation data analysis identified several potential predictors of thermal injuries. The correlation between machine learning output and injury development suggests the potential for a clinical tool to enhance procedural safety.

Power of computed-tomography-defined sarcopenia for prediction of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The goal of our study was to evaluate the current approach in prediction of postoperative major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), especially symptomatic pancreatic fistula (POPF), using parameters derived from computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Patients after PD were prospectively collected in a database of the local department of surgery and all patients with CT scans available were assessed in this study. CT parameters were measured at the level of the intervertebral disc L3/L4 and consisted of the areas of the visceral adipose tissue (AVAT), the diameters of the pancreatic parenchyma (DPP) and the pancreatic duct (DPD), the areas of ventral abdominal wall muscle (AMVEN), psoas muscle (AMPSO), paraspinal muscle (AMSPI), total muscle (AMTOT), as well as the mean muscle attenuation (MA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Mann-Whitney-U Test for two independent samples and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients (55 females, 84 males) were included. DPD was 2.9 mm (Range 0.7-10.7) on median and more narrow in patients with complications equal to or greater stadium IIIb (p < 0.04) and severe POPF (p < 0.01). DPP median value was 17 (6.9-37.9) mm and there was no significant difference regarding major complications or POPF. AVAT showed a median value of 127.5 (14.5-473.0) cm2 and was significantly larger in patients with POPF (p < 0.01), but not in cases of major complications (p < 0.06). AMPSO, AMSPI, AMVEN and AMTOT showed no significant differences between major complications and POPF. MA was both lower in groups with major complications (p < 0.01) and POPF (p < 0.01). SMI failed to differentiate between patients with or without major complications or POPF. CONCLUSION: Besides the known factors visceral obesity and narrowness of the pancreatic duct, the mean muscle attenuation can easily be examined on routine preoperative CT scans and seems to be promising parameter to predict postoperative complications and POPF.

Remote ischemic preconditioning in a setting of electrical cardioversion of early onset persistent atrial fibrillation (RIP CAF trial): Rationale and study design.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) on electrophysiological parameters resulting in lower inducibility and sustainability of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with paroxysmal AF has been recently demonstrated in a randomized trial. However, the potential clinical impact of RIP on persistent AF (CAF) has not been investigated. Therefore, we designed a randomized trial set in a setting of electrical cardioversion (CV) of early onset CAF. AIM: The aim of the study is to answer the following questions: I) Does RIP have impact on rate of spontaneous conversion into sinus rhythm (SR) within 24 h after first RIP intervention? II) Does RIP have the potential to improve the acute outcome of CV following a standardized protocol? METHODS: The presented study is a two-armed randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multi-center trial in a cohort of 588 patients with early onset CAF referred for electrical CV. The patients will undergo 3 sessions (immediately after randomization, the following morning, and directly before scheduled CV 24 h after randomization) of either RIP intervention or a sham procedure. The primary outcome of the study, i.e. documentation of SR 24 h after randomization as well secondary outcome i.e. stable SR first CV without usage of anti-arrhythmic drugs will be documented by 12-lead surface electrocardiography. CONCLUSION: Previously observed positive effect of RIP on atrial electrophysiology might be also implemented in a clinical setting of CV and therefore simplified and improve patient treatment.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on electrophysiological parameters in nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The RIPPAF Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most relevant arrhythmia with a prevalence of 2%. The treatment options are either highly invasive and cost-intensive or limited by potential side effects or insufficient efficacy. However, no direct means of prevention that could reduce the burden of AF have been tested. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has an impact on inducibility and sustainability of AF. METHODS: A total of 146 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing electrophysiology study were randomized to receive either RIPC, performed by short episodes of forearm ischemia, or sham intervention (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02779660). Effective refractory periods, conduction times, velocities, and conduction delays measured were analyzed by pacing from the coronary sinus (CS). End points of the study were the inducibility and sustainability of AF after prespecified rapid pacing sequences. RESULTS: RIPC significantly reduces the inducibility (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.71; P = .003) and sustainability (odds ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.81; P = .01) of AF. Furthermore, it decreased dispersion of atrial refractory periods (16.0 ± 14.0 ms vs 22.7 ± 19.0 ms; P = .021) as well as atrial conduction delays (49.2 ± 19.6 ms vs 56.2 ± 22.5 ms; P = .049 for proximal CS and 42.4 ± 16.6 ms vs 49.8 ± 22.2 ms; P = .029 for distal CS). In the whole cohort, longer atrial conduction delay (57.6 ± 22.2 ms vs 50.0 ± 20.5 ms; P = .044) and slower conduction velocity (1.74 ± 0.3 mm/ms vs 1.93 ± 0.5 mm/ms; P = .006) were associated with inducibility of AF whereas a wider dispersion of effective refractory periods (25.9 ± 18.3 ms vs 15.7 ± 11.6 ms; P = .028) maintained AF episodes. CONCLUSION: RIPC reduces the inducibility and sustainability of AF, which is possibly mediated by changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria. It may be used as a simple noninvasive procedure to reduce AF burden.