Tucatinib promotes immune activation and synergizes with programmed cell death-1 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibition in HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have poor efficacy in patients with trastuzumab-resistant advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Tucatinib is a potent, selective anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with proven clinical benefit in the advanced setting in patients with trastuzumab resistance. We investigated if tucatinib can alter the tumor microenvironment and if this could be harnessed for therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: We investigated the antitumor efficacy and contribution of the immune response of tucatinib using 2 immunocompetent, HER2-positive murine breast cancer models (trastuzumab-sensitive H2N113; trastuzumab-resistant Fo5) and the efficacy of tucatinib with trastuzumab and PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. RESULTS: In both models, tucatinib statistically significantly inhibited tumor growth and demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy. Ex vivo analysis by flow cytometry of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in mice treated with tucatinib showed increased frequency, higher proliferation, and enhanced effector function of CD8+ effector memory T cells. Tucatinib treatment also increased frequency of CD8+PD-1+ and CD8+TIM3+ T cells, CD49+ natural killer cells, monocytes, and major histocompatibility complex II expression on dendritic cells and macrophages and a decrease in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Gene expression analysis revealed statistically significant enrichment in pathways associated with immune activation, type I and II interferon response, adaptive immune response, and antigen receptor signaling. In vivo, tucatinib and α-PD-L1 or α-PD-1 demonstrated statistically significantly increased efficacy and improved survival of mice compared with tucatinib alone. CONCLUSION: Tucatinib modulates the immune microenvironment favorably, and combination treatment with α-PD-L1 or α-PD-1 demonstrated increased efficacy in preclinical HER2-positive tumor models. These findings provide a rationale for investigation of tucatinib and immune checkpoint inhibition in the clinic.

Loss of SMAD4 Is Sufficient to Promote Tumorigenesis in a Model of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops from its precursor Barrett's esophagus through intermediate stages of low- and high-grade dysplasia. However, knowledge of genetic drivers and molecular mechanisms implicated in disease progression is limited. Herein, we investigated the effect of Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4) loss on transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) signaling functionality and in vivo tumorigenicity in high-grade dysplastic Barrett's cells. METHODS: An in vivo xenograft model was used to test tumorigenicity of SMAD4 knockdown or knockout in CP-B high-grade dysplastic Barrett's cells. RT2 polymerase chain reaction arrays were used to analyze TGF-ß signaling functionality, and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing was performed to detect copy number alterations upon SMAD4 loss. RESULTS: We found that SMAD4 knockout significantly alters the TGF-ß pathway target gene expression profile. SMAD4 knockout positively regulates potential oncogenes such as CRYAB, ACTA2, and CDC6, whereas the CDKN2A/B tumor-suppressor locus was regulated negatively. We verified that SMAD4 in combination with CDC6-CDKN2A/B or CRYAB genetic alterations in patient tumors have significant predictive value for poor prognosis. Importantly, we investigated the effect of SMAD4 inactivation in Barrett's tumorigenesis. We found that genetic knockdown or knockout of SMAD4 was sufficient to promote tumorigenesis in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus cells in vivo. Progression to invasive EAC was accompanied by distinctive and consistent copy number alterations in SMAD4 knockdown or knockout xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, up-regulation of oncogenes, down-regulation of tumor-suppressor genes, and chromosomal instability within the tumors after SMAD4 loss implicates SMAD4 as a protector of genome integrity in EAC development and progression. Foremost, SMAD4 loss promotes tumorigenesis from dysplastic Barrett's toward EAC.