Diagnostic agreement and interobserver concordance with teledermoscopy referrals.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers are among the fastest increasing malignancies in many countries. With the help of new tools, such as teledermoscopy referrals between primary health care and dermatology clinics, the management of these patients could be made more efficient. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic agreement and interobserver concordance achieved when assessing referrals sent through a mobile teledermoscopic referral system as compared to referrals sent via the current paper-based system without images. METHODS: The referral information from 80 teledermoscopy referrals and 77 paper referrals were evaluated by six Swedish dermatologists. They were asked to answer questions about the probable diagnosis, the priority, and a management decision. RESULTS: Teledermoscopy generally resulted in higher diagnostic agreement, better triaging and more malignant tumours being booked directly to surgery. The largest difference between the referral methods was seen for invasive melanomas. Referrals for benign lesions were significantly more often correctly resent to primary health care with teledermoscopy. However, referrals for cases of melanoma in situ were also incorrectly resent five times. The interobserver concordance was moderate with both methods. CONCLUSION: By adding clinical and dermoscopic images to referrals, the triage process for both benign and dangerous skin tumours can be improved. With teledermoscopy, patients with melanoma especially can receive treatment more swiftly.

Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy in Bowen's disease: a retrospective observational study in 423 lesions.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-known technique that is often used for treating superficial precancerous and cancerous skin lesions. However, only a handful of studies, with a relatively small number of treated lesions, have been carried out on the effectiveness of PDT for Bowen's disease (BD). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and recurrence risk of PDT in the treatment of BD. The secondary objectives were to determine what factors affected the response rates and the cosmetic result of the treatment. METHOD: In this retrospective observational study, the electronic patient charts at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SUH) in Gothenburg, Sweden, were searched to find all patients diagnosed with BD who were treated with PDT between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2014. Data were collected regarding clinical response at the first follow-up visit, recurrences during later follow-up visits and other relevant patient and tumour characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 423 BD lesions in 335 patients were included in the study. The mean FU duration was 11.2 months (range 0.2-151 months). The complete response rate at the first FU visit was 77.5% for all BD lesions. During later FU visits, another 60 recurrences were observed, which resulted in a recurrence rate of 18.3%. Thus, the overall clearance rate after FU was 63.4% for all BD lesions. Significant risk factors for unsuccessful treatment in this study were large lesion size (>2 cm) and a single PDT session. CONCLUSION: This study shows that PDT is a relatively effective treatment modality for BD.

Aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate equally effective in topical photodynamic therapy for non-melanoma skin cancers.

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for superficial non-melanoma skin cancers. Two prodrugs, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL), are available for clinical use. There is, however, a lack of studies comparing the clinical effectiveness of these two prodrugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the clinical response between ALA- and MAL-PDT when treating actinic keratosis (AK), Bowen's disease (BD), nodular basal cell carcinoma (nBCC) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC). METHODS: During the period 2002-2009, patients with AK, BD, nBCC and sBCC were treated with ALA- and MAL-PDT at the Department of Dermatology at Karlskoga Hospital in Sweden using a fixed protocol. All patients were followed up approximately 6 months after treatment to evaluate the clinical results, which were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients with 203 tumours were treated with PDT during the study period. ALA- and MAL-PDT were used for 24 vs. 44 AK fields, 9 vs. 18 BD lesions, 19 vs. 25 nBCCs and 25 vs. 39 sBCCs. Response rates with ALA- and MAL-PDT, respectively, were 63% and 75% for AK, 89% and 78% for BD, 84% and 84% for nBCC and 88% and 87% for sBCC. There were no statistically significant differences in the complete clinical response rates for ALA- and MAL-PDT when used for any of the four lesion types. CONCLUSION: ALA- and MAL-PDT appear to be equally effective in the treatment of AK, BD, nBCC and sBCC. Nevertheless, larger, prospective, randomized and controlled studies should be carried out to confirm these results.

Merkel cell carcinoma incidence is increasing in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare aggressive neuroectodermal skin cancer with a high recurrence rate and a high mortality rate. Risk factors for MCC are reported to include high age, UV exposure, Caucasian skin type and immunosuppression. The incidence is reported to be increasing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe a Swedish cohort and calculate incidence. METHODS: The study design is a retrospective cohort study of population-based data for MCC collected by the Swedish Cancer Registry to determine the incidence of MCC in Sweden and the clinical characteristics of these tumours including demographics, TNM classification, body part distribution and overall survival after diagnosis. De-identified data were collected from 1993 to 2012. RESULTS: A total of 606 cases of MCC were identified during the study period. The median age was 81 years (range 21-99) and a majority, 54.4% were women but age-adjusted incidence is higher in men. The incidence (per 100,000) of MCC in Sweden in 1993-2012 increased from 0.09 to 0.20 for men and 0.12-0.17 for women, adjusted for age to the world standard population. For the both sexes, the increase was from 0.11 to 0.19 per 100 000, an increase of 73%. The most common site of the primary tumour was the head and neck, with 51.8% of the cases. The size of the tumour was <5 cm in 82.1% of the cases. The majority of the tumours (90.7%) had no known lymphatic spread and only a few patients had confirmed distant metastases (2.9%) when diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: MCC is a rare disease in Sweden, but the incidence is increasing. This study supports the finding that high age, male sex and UV exposure are risk factors for MCCs. Interventions are required to increase awareness of MCC among clinicians and the public.

Esomeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 15 mg in maintaining healed reflux oesophagitis: Metropole study results.

INTRODUCTION: Esomeprazole, the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an optical isomer, has demonstrated more effective healing vs. omeprazole and lansoprazole in patients with reflux oesophagitis (RO). However, RO recurs in a high proportion (approximately 80%) of these patients within 12 months of initial therapy, highlighting the importance of maintenance treatment. Previous studies have shown esomeprazole to be effective as maintenance therapy in healed RO patients. AIM: This study was conducted to compare esomeprazole 20 mg once daily (o.d.) with lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. for the prevention of recurrence of RO. METHODS: 1391 patients with endoscopically verified RO (LA classification) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial. During the initial healing phase of the study, all patients received 4-8 weeks' open treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg: 1236 healed (identified by endoscopy at 4 and 8 weeks) and symptom-free (i.e. no heartburn or acid regurgitation) patients were randomized to 6 months' maintenance treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. or lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. Time to relapse (relapse of RO and/or discontinuation due to symptom recurrence) was analysed using a log-rank test. RESULTS: Esomeprazole maintained a significantly higher proportion of patients in remission than lansoprazole over the 6-month course of treatment (P < 0.0001, intention-to-treat analysis). After 6 months' treatment, 83% of esomeprazole recipients were in remission compared with 74% of lansoprazole recipients (life-table estimates). Esomeprazole gave a longer time to relapse than lansoprazole irrespective of baseline LA Grade, significantly so for baseline LA Grades B, C and D (P < 0.05 for each comparison). Significantly more patients were free from heartburn in the esomeprazole group compared with the lansoprazole group at 1, 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05). Significant differences at 6 months between esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. and lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. were also observed for control of epigastric pain and acid regurgitation (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. is a more effective maintenance treatment than lansoprazole 15 mg o.d. for symptom-free patients with healed RO.

Esomeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 15 mg in maintaining healed reflux oesophagitis: Metropole study results.

AIM: To compare the efficacy of esomeprazole, 20 mg once daily, vs. lansoprazole, 15 mg once daily, for the maintenance treatment of patients with healed reflux oesophagitis. METHODS: During the initial open healing phase, 1391 patients with endoscopically verified reflux oesophagitis and a history of heartburn, with or without acid regurgitation, received esomeprazole 40 mg for 4-8 weeks. Patients who were healed (identified by endoscopy at 4 or 8 weeks) and symptom free were then randomized to receive 6 months of treatment with esomeprazole, 20 mg once daily, or lansoprazole, 15 mg once daily. RESULTS: Esomeprazole, 20 mg once daily, maintained a significantly higher proportion of patients in remission than lansoprazole, 15 mg once daily, over 6 months [83% (95% CI, 80-86%) of esomeprazole recipients compared with 74% (95% CI, 70-78%) of lansoprazole recipients; P < 0.0001; life table estimates]. When data were analysed according to baseline Los Angeles grade classification, esomeprazole, 20 mg once daily, achieved consistently higher remission rates across all grades of disease severity, whereas the efficacy of lansoprazole decreased to a greater extent with increasing severity of reflux oesophagitis. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole, 20 mg once daily, is more effective than lansoprazole, 15 mg once daily, in maintaining remission in patients with healed reflux oesophagitis.

One week of treatment with esomeprazole-based triple therapy eradicates Helicobacter pylori and heals patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy is commonly continued for 3 weeks after Helicobacter pylori eradication with PPI-based triple therapy regimens to ensure duodenal ulcer (DU) healing. This randomized, double-blind, multicentre study evaluated whether only 1 week of triple therapy with the new PPI esomeprazole was sufficient to ensure high rates of ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A total of 446 H. pylori-positive patients with active DU received twice daily treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 222) or omeprazole 20 mg (n = 224) in combination with amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). Patients in the OAC group then received 3 weeks' monotherapy with omeprazole 20 mg once daily; those treated with EAC received placebo. Ulcer healing was assessed by endoscopy on completion of therapy and H. pylori status was assessed by (13)C-urea breath testing and histology 4-6 weeks later. RESULTS: Ulcer healing rates (95% CI) for intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations were: EAC + placebo 91% (87-95%) and 94% (90-97%); OAC + omeprazole 92% (88-95%) and 96% (92-98%). Corresponding H. pylori eradication rates were: EAC + placebo 86% (81-90%) and 89% (84-93%); OAC + omeprazole 88% (83-92%) and 90% (85-93%). Both eradication regimens were well tolerated, and patient compliance was high. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week regimen of esomeprazole-based triple therapy is sufficient for DU healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with DU disease.