Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
J Urol ; 193(2): 570-8, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25219699

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We present the 1-year results of the GOLIATH prospective randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate to GreenLight XPS for the treatment of men with nonneurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms due to prostate enlargement. The updated results at 1 year show that transurethral resection of the prostate and GreenLight XPS remain equivalent, and confirm the therapeutic durability of both procedures. We also report 1-year followup data from several functional questionnaires (OABq-SF, ICIQ-SF and IIEF-5) and objective assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 291 patients were enrolled at 29 sites in 9 European countries. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo GreenLight XPS or transurethral resection of the prostate. The trial was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that GreenLight XPS is noninferior to transurethral resection of the prostate on the International Prostate Symptom Score at 6 months. Several objective parameters were assessed, including maximum urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine volume, prostate volume and prostate specific antigen, in addition to functional questionnaires and adverse events at each followup. RESULTS: Of the 291 enrolled patients 281 were randomized and 269 received treatment. Noninferiority of GreenLight XPS was maintained at 12 months. Maximum urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine volume, prostate volume and prostate specific antigen were not statistically different between the treatment arms at 12 months. The complication-free rate at 1 year was 84.6% after GreenLight XPS vs 80.5% after transurethral resection of the prostate. At 12 months 4 patients treated with GreenLight XPS and 4 who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate had unresolved urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Followup at 1 year demonstrated that photoselective vaporization of the prostate produced efficacy outcomes similar to those of transurethral resection of the prostate. The complication-free rates and overall reintervention rates were comparable between the treatment groups.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia
3.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 55(11): 2717-2732, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37528247

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ChatGPT (Open AI) artificial intelligence platform's utility and accuracy as a patient education tool in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ChatGPT 3.5 interface ( https://chat.openai.com/chat ) was interrogated and asked the 14 questions related to the frequency of complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy as listed on British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) patient information leaflet "Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)" published July 2021. The AI's responses to each question were tabulated, and compared alongside the official figures quoted from the BAUS information leaflet. A global assessment of the AI's response was also made for accuracy and relevance to patients. RESULTS: Of the 14 questions asked, 11/14 (78.6%) of ChatGPT's quoted figures were considered concordant and comparable to those quoted by the BAUS patient information leaflet. 13/14 (92.9%) of ChatGPT's responses were globally assessed to contain accurate information, appropriate, and pertinent to a patient's potential enquiry. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT is a powerful tool and is able to generate accurate and helpful information for patients seeking information regarding urological procedures and their potential complications. It is not, however, infallible, and urologists should remain vigilant in their patient interactions to any potential misinformation a patient may have gathered from it in their personal research prior to surgery.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Prostatectomia , Urologistas
4.
Eur Urol ; 69(1): 94-102, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26283011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The GOLIATH study is a 2-yr trial comparing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) to photoselective vaporization with the GreenLight XPS Laser System (GL-XPS) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Noninferiority of GL-XPS to TURP was demonstrated based on a 6-mo follow-up from the study. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment effects observed at 6 mo between GL-XPS and TURP was maintained at the 2-yr follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective randomized controlled trial at 29 centers in nine European countries involving 281 patients with BPO. INTERVENTION: Photoselective vaporization using the 180-W GreenLight GL-XPS or conventional (monopolar or bipolar) TURP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the International Prostate Symptom Score for which a margin of three was used to evaluate the noninferiority of GL-XPS. Secondary outcomes included Qmax, prostate volume, prostate specific antigen, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form, occurrence of surgical retreatment, and freedom from complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were treated using GL-XPS and 133 using TURP. Noninferiority of GL-XPS on International Prostate Symptom Score, Qmax, and freedom from complications was demonstrated at 6-mo and was sustained at 2-yr. The proportion of patients complication-free through 24-mo was 83.6% GL-XPS versus 78.9% TURP. Reductions in prostate volume and prostate specific antigen were similar in both arms and sustained over the course of the trial. Compared with the 1(st) yr of the study, very few adverse events or retreatments were reported in either arm. Treatment differences in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form observed at 12-mo were not statistically significant at 24-mo. A limitation was that patients and treating physicians were not blinded to the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four-mo follow-up data demonstrated that GL-XPS provides a durable surgical option for the treatment of BPO that exhibits efficacy and safety outcomes similar to TURP. PATIENT SUMMARY: The long-term effectiveness and safety of GLP-XLS was similar to conventional TURP for the treatment of prostate enlargement.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Próstata/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Tamanho do Órgão , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Hiperplasia Prostática/sangue , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
5.
Eur Urol ; 65(5): 931-42, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24331152

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the GOLIATH study was to evaluate the noninferiority of 180-W GL XPS (XPS) to TURP for International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax) at 6 mo and the proportion of patients who were complication free. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective randomised controlled trial at 29 centres in 9 European countries involving 281 patients with BPO. INTERVENTION: 180-W GL XPS system or TURP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Measurements used were IPSS, Qmax, prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR) and complications, perioperative parameters, and reintervention rates. Noninferiority was evaluated using one-sided tests at the 2.5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparisons was assessed at the (two-sided) 5% level. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The study demonstrated the noninferiority of XPS to TURP for IPSS, Qmax, and complication-free proportion. PV and PVR were comparable between groups. Time until stable health status, length of catheterisation, and length of hospital stay were superior with XPS (p<0.001). Early reintervention rate within 30 d was three times higher after TURP (p=0.025); however, the overall postoperative reintervention rates were not significantly different between treatment arms. A limitation was the short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: XPS was shown to be noninferior (comparable) to TURP in terms of IPSS, Qmax, and proportion of patients free of complications. XPS results in a lower rate of early reinterventions but has a similar rate after 6 mo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01218672.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Próstata/patologia , Prostatectomia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Prostatismo/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Europa (Continente) , Seguimentos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hiperplasia Prostática/sangue , Prostatismo/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Cateterismo Urinário , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Urodinâmica
6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20122012 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22669880

RESUMO

A 46-year-old man presented with urethral trauma following the unusual sexual practice of urethral sounding. He was able to urinate freely and was treated conservatively. He did not require any follow-up. Urethral sounding is uncommon sexual practice, where commonly a metal object is inserted per urethra for gratification. This practice is actively discouraged because of the long-term risks from urethral trauma.


Assuntos
Hemorragia/etiologia , Uretra/lesões , Doenças Uretrais/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Seguimentos , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Uretrais/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA