Effectiveness of a nurse-led one-to-one education programme in addition to standard care in children with atopic dermatitis: a multicentre randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic patient education (TPE) is recommended for children with atopic dermatitis (AD), but no consensus has been reached on the optimal tailoring of delivery. While repeated multidisciplinary group education sessions have shown effectiveness, the benefits of one-on-one educational interventions led by nurses for children with AD have not yet been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits of additional, well-structured, 1-h nurse-led individual TPE interventions in children with AD and their families compared with standard care alone. METHODS: Children with moderate-to-severe AD and their parents were randomized to receive a 1-h nurse-led education session in addition to standard care vs. standard care alone. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis index (SCORAD) from baseline to week 24 (lower AUC values represent better long-term control of the disease). RESULTS: In our study, 176 patients were randomized across 11 centres, and 153 were included in the full analysis set. The mean (SD) age was 4.47 (4.57) years. By week 24, there were no significant differences in the AUCs of the SCORAD between the two groups (P = 0.3). Secondary outcomes including patient-reported severity and quality of life [AUCs of the patient-oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD) and Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDLQI), Children's Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (CDLQI) and Family Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (FDLQI)] were not significantly different between the two groups. The only significant change observed in the intervention group, when compared with the one receiving standard care, was a decrease in topical steroid phobia, as assessed by the topical corticosteroid phobia (TOPICOP) score. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed that disease severity in the intervention group was significantly lower throughout the study, compared with the standard-care group when participants had moderate AD at baseline (n = 47); while participants with severe AD at baseline (n = 106) did not show benefit from the intervention. Participants showed no additional benefit from the intervention regardless of age group. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any additional effectiveness, in long-term severity control, of a 1-h nurse-led TPE intervention in children with AD treated with standard care, compared with those treated with standard care alone. However, it should be noted that the intervention reduced the fear of using topical steroids and may be beneficial for patients in the subgroup with moderate AD.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as atopic eczema, is a chronic relapsing disease that affects 7­15% of children worldwide. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) is recommended for children with AD, but no agreement has been reached on the best way to tailor delivery. While repeated multidisciplinary group education sessions in a hospital setting have been found effective, this type of intervention requires a lot of resources and is time-consuming. To assess the benefits of TPE in children with AD, researchers in France carried out this study with children with moderate-to-severe AD, to compare a 1-hour nurse-led education session in addition to standard care vs. standard care alone. The main aim of this research was to assess the effectiveness of a TPE intervention over a period of 6 months, using a measurement tool called the SCORAD (SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis index). We found no additional benefits in terms of long-term severity control and quality of life at 6 months of a 1-hour nurse-led education intervention in children with AD treated with standard care. However, it should be noted that the intervention reduced the fear of using topical steroids and may be beneficial for people in the moderate AD subgroup.

Effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis: An analysis of real-life data from the BiPe cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis is a frequent clinical subtype of childhood psoriasis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis using data from the two Biological treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis (BiPe) cohorts. METHODS: Data for all 170 patients included in the BiPe cohorts were analyzed. Data on the effectiveness (PGA, PASI between baseline and 3 months of treatment) of biologic therapies were then compared between children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (n = 20) and those with generalized plaque psoriasis (n = 136). Clinical and demographic data were also analyzed. RESULTS: Children in the palmoplantar group were more likely to be male (p = .04), with an earlier age of psoriasis onset (p < .001), and more frequent nail involvement (p < .001). After 3 months of biologic treatment, mean PGA scores were higher in the palmoplantar group than in the generalized plaque psoriasis group (p = .004). In the palmoplantar group, continuation rates were higher for adalimumab than for etanercept or ustekinumab (p = .01). Primary inefficacy was a more frequent reason for stopping biologic therapies in the palmoplantar group (p = .01), and disease remission was less frequent (p = .05). Combined systemic and biologic therapies were more frequently used in palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the treatment-resistant nature of palmoplantar plaque psoriasis and indicated that adalimumab could be the most effective biologic treatment. Larger studies are needed to allow therapeutic algorithms for palmoplantar plaque psoriasis to be proposed in pediatric psoriasis management guidelines.

Switching biologics in children with psoriasis: Results from the BiPe cohort.

BACKGROUND: There is currently little information on switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world clinical practice and safety of switching biologics in the "Biological Treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis" (BiPe) cohort. METHODS: Data for all 134 patients included in the BiPe cohort were analyzed. A further evaluation of the subpopulation of patients who switched from a first-line biologic to a second-line biologic was then conducted. Drug survival rates were also compared between biologics given as first-line or second-line agents. RESULTS: Overall, 29 patients (female: 55%; mean age: 16.6 ± 3.0 years) switched between two biologics. Etanercept (ETN) was the first-line biologic used in 23 patients: 16 (69.6%) switched to adalimumab (ADA) and seven (30.4%) to ustekinumab (UST). Six patients received first-line ADA and switched to UST. Loss of efficacy (62.1%), primary inefficacy (20.7%), and parental choice (6.9%) were the main reasons for switching biologics. One (3.4%) of the switches was performed because of adverse events or intolerance. For UST and ADA, the 18-month drug survival rate did not differ according to whether the agent was given as a first-line or second-line biologic (UST: P = .24; ADA: P = .68). No significant differences in drug survival rates were observed between the three different switches (ADA to UST, ETN to ADA, and ETN to UST). CONCLUSION: Our study provided key insights into the real-life clinical practice of switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis patients. However, more information and guidance on switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis are needed to improve real-life practice and outcomes.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort. METHODS: We included patients treated during March 2017-April 2018. Efficacy outcomes, including Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, were collected at baseline and 3 months when available. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at follow-up. RESULTS: We included 241 patients. The median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up time was 3.8 ± 3.7 months. A ≥75% improvement in SCORAD was achieved in 27 of 163 (16.6%) patients, and a ≥75% improvement in EASI was achieved in 40 of 82 (48.8%) patients. The median SCORAD and EASI scores at 3 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (SCORAD ± IQR, 25 ± 21 vs 56 ± 27.4, P < 10-9 and EASI ± IQR, 4.1 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 15.4, P < 10-9, respectively). Conjunctivitis was reported in 84 of 241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion with eosinophilia (>500 cells/mm3) during follow-up (57%) was higher than that at baseline (33.7%) (n = 172, P < 10-6). Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases; 27 patients stopped because of AEs. LIMITATIONS: No control group, missing data. CONCLUSION: This real-life study demonstrated a similar dupilumab effectiveness as that seen in clinical trials, but it also revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.

Clinical Profile of Methotrexate-resistant Juvenile Localised Scleroderma.

Methotrexate has demonstrated its efficiency for the treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma but some patients may be resistant. The aim of our study was to define the profile of such patients. We performed an observational retrospective multicenter study between 2007 and 2016 and included all children seen in the French Paediatric Dermatology and Rheumatology departments with active localized scleroderma treated by methotrexate for a minimum of 4 months. Metho-trexate efficacy was assessed clinically and/or by imaging between the fourth to twelfth months of treatment. A total of 57 patients were included. Metho-trexate dosage ranged from 7 to 15 mg/m2/week. Only 4 patients were resistant. No common features could be identified between these 4 patients. Children with localized scleroderma are rarely resistant to metho-trexate and we did not identify a clinical profile for those resistant patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab, Etanercept and Ustekinumab for Severe Psoriasis in Children Under 12 Years of Age: A French-Italian Daily Practice Cohort (BiPe Jr).

INTRODUCTION: Biological therapies are valuable treatments for severe psoriasis. Children aged under 12 years are underrepresented in therapeutic trials for these drugs. The objective of the 'BiPe Jr' cohort study was to evaluate the drug survival, effectiveness, tolerance and switching patterns of biological therapies in children under 12 years of age with psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of children with psoriasis who received at least one injection of a biological agent, even off-licence, before the age of 12 years in France and Italy, collecting the data between April and August 2021. The data collected were from March 2012 up to August 2021. RESULTS: In total, 82 children (mean age: 9.1 years; females: 61.0%) received 106 treatments. The drugs administered were adalimumab (n = 49), etanercept (n = 37), ustekinumab (n = 15), anakinra (n = 2), infliximab (n = 2) and secukinumab (n = 1). The most common form of psoriasis was plaque psoriasis (62.9%). The Physician Global Assessment and the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after treatment initiation for the three main biological drugs; PASI went from 14.1 ± 9.4 to 4.1 ± 11.3 for adalimumab (p = 0.001), 14.9 ± 9.3 to 5.1 ± 4.0 for etanercept (p = 0.002) and 11.6 ± 8.3 to 2.6 ± 2.2 for ustekinumab (p = 0.007). A trend towards higher 2-year maintenance rates was observed for ustekinumab and adalimumab, compared with etanercept (p = 0.06). 52 children discontinued their biological therapy, most frequently due to inefficacy (n = 28) and remission (n = 14). Seven serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported, including four severe infections. DISCUSSION: Our analyses of drug survival and treatment patterns, combined with those of previous studies conducted in older children, indicate that there is a trend towards higher 2-year survival rates of ustekinumab and adalimumab. The SAEs identified were rare, but highlight the need for increased vigilance concerning infections. Overall, the biological therapies showed good effectiveness and safety profiles when used in daily practice for the treatment of young children with psoriasis.

Ocular Surface Diseases Induced by Dupilumab in Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

We report 10 cases of conjunctivitis in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab from November 2017 to November 2018 in our institution, who were referred to the ophthalmology department for diagnosis and management of conjunctivitis. We also describe ocular surface findings in these patients before the first injection of dupilumab. During the first 6 months post initiation of dupilumab, incidence of conjunctivitis was 27% (5/18) in patients treated from November 2017 to April 2018 who had not had ocular examination previously. This rate dropped to 12% (3/25) after systematic ophthalmological referral before initiation of dupilumab. Patients who developed conjunctivitis had mean SCORAD score (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) of 60.4 ± 20 (35-88) and mean EASI score (Eczema Area and Severity Index) of 37 ± 17 (14.6-56). Mean age was 36 years (20-51). Most patients had a long history of AD (> 10 years). Mean delay of ocular surface inflammation was 3.5 months, ranging from 1 to 8 months. One patient had to discontinue dupilumab because of severe follicular conjunctivitis. We observed two clinical patterns of ocular surface diseases: a mild non-specific conjunctivitis with dry eyes, which improved with warm compresses and artificial tears without any recurrence; and a severe dupilumab-induced follicular conjunctivitis without keratitis, which required specific ophthalmological management.

Evaluation of Children with Psoriasis from the BiPe Cohort: Are Patients Using Biotherapies in Real Life Eligible for Phase III Clinical Studies?

BACKGROUND: Phase III clinical trials of biotherapies for childhood psoriasis are designed for a selected population, which can differ from real-life patients. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the proportion of children with psoriasis that received biotherapy in the biological treatments for pediatric psoriasis (BiPe) cohort that would be excluded from phase III clinical trials of these treatments. METHODS: Data concerning initiation of the first biotherapy from all patients included in the BiPe cohort were analyzed. Ineligibility was assessed after applying the exclusion criteria used in the principal phase III trials of etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab for childhood psoriasis. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients included, 73 (54.5%) were ineligible for at least one randomized controlled trial based on one or more exclusion criteria. Amongst the 63 children treated with etanercept, 35 (55.5%) were ineligible: 22 because of the type of psoriasis, 12 because of concomitant treatment, and six because of psoriasis severity based on psoriasis assessment severity index (PASI) and physician global assessment (PGA) scores (PASI < 12 and PGA < 3). Amongst the 44 children treated with adalimumab, 32 (72.7%) were ineligible: 17 because of the clinical type of psoriasis, 12 because of psoriasis severity (PASI < 20 and PGA < 4), and seven because of concomitant treatment. Amongst the 27 children patients treated with ustekinumab, 12 (44.4%) were ineligible: eight because of psoriasis severity (PASI < 12 and PGA < 3), five because of the clinical type of psoriasis, and one because of concomitant treatment. Drug survival and the frequency of serious adverse events did not differ between eligible and ineligible patients. CONCLUSION: The majority of children treated with biotherapies in real-life practice differ from those in phase III trials, most commonly because of the clinical type of their psoriasis, the disease severity being lower than required and the use of prior or concomitant psoriasis treatment. Efficacy and safety results from phase III clinical trials in selected populations may not sufficiently reflect what is seen in real life, thus results from real-life cohort studies are necessary.

Influence of heat stress on human monocyte-derived dendritic cell functions with immunotherapeutic potential for antitumor vaccines.

Mild heat stress can modulate the activities of immune cells, including dendritic cells (DC) and theoretically, would constitute an innovative approach capable of enhancing the antitumor functions of DC. Therefore, we tested the effects of mild heat stress on the physiology and viability of human monocyte-derived DC, the major type of DC used in tumor immunotherapy trials. We first designed a heat-stress protocol consisting of repetitive, sublethal heat shocks throughout the generation of DC. Using this protocol, we observed that heat stress did not perturb the morphology and the phenotype of immature or mature DC or the capacities of immature DC to uptake antigens efficiently. It is noteworthy that in response to heat stress, mature DC produced higher levels of IL-12p70 and TNF-alpha, which are two cytokines involved in the stimulation of inflammatory reaction, whereas IL-10 production remained low. After heat-stress exposure, mature DC have the full ability to stimulate naive T cells with Th1 response polarization (high IFN-gamma and low IL-4 production) in an allogeneic MLR. It is interesting that heat stress enhanced the migratory capacities of DC in response to MIP-3beta/CCL19. Finally, heat stress partly protected DC from apoptosis induced by cytokine withdrawal. Overall, these findings validate the feasibility of improving immune response by heating human monocyte-derived DC and provide a strong rationale for using mild heat stress in combination with DC vaccination to increase antitumor response.