A phase II study of UFT with leucovorin administered as a twice daily schedule in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Prolonged infusions have been shown to be safer and potentially more effective than bolus regimens of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, infusional 5-FU requires central venous access and costly infusion pumps. Oral fluoropyrimidines enable longer exposures to 5-FU with increased convenience. Tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) given thrice daily has improved safety plus comparable survival and response rates to bolus 5-FU/LV. We conducted a phase II clinical study in 98 patients with mCRC to evaluate if UFT with LV given twice daily provided comparable time to progression (TTP), efficacy and tolerability to that reported for thrice daily in two phase III clinical studies. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Median TTP was 3.8 months, when compared with 3.5 months for thrice daily. The ORR (11%) and median OS (12.8 months) with twice daily administration were similar to that of thrice daily administration (12% and 12.4 months). The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related diarrhoea was 30% on the twice daily and 21% on the thrice daily schedule. These results suggest that twice daily administration has similar efficacy and tolerability to thrice daily administration and is an acceptable alternative for patients who would benefit from UFT with LV therapy.

Phase I study of preoperative oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin and radiation therapy in rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative combined-modality therapy for rectal cancer may allow for sphincter preservation, while decreasing recurrence rates and improving the overall prognosis. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may reduce costs and complications associated with protracted infusions of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with preoperative radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of UFT plus LV in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage II or III rectal cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 250mg/m(2)/d, with 50-mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). The UFT and LV combination was given 5 days per week concurrently with a 5-week course of preoperative radiation totaling 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after radiation and was followed by four 35-day cycles of fixed doses of UFT and LV (28 days of therapy each cycle). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated, and 13 received the full preoperative chemotherapy. All planned radiation was delivered successfully. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 350 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhea was the DLT. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 12 of 14 patients. One patient had progressive disease before surgery. Pathologic evaluation of 14 resected specimens showed a complete response in three cases. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated.

Phase II trial of uracil and tegafur plus oral leucovorin: an effective oral regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration (UFT; Taiho Pharmaceutical Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) plus oral calcium leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with advanced, bidimensionally measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled onto the trial. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy or biologic therapy for advanced disease. Patients received either 350 or 300 mg/m2/d UFT plus 150 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided daily doses every 8 hours for 28 days followed by a 7-day rest period. Response was evaluated after two courses of therapy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (three treated at 350 mg/m2/d and 15 at 300 mg/m2/d) had partial responses, and one patient had a complete response (response rate, 42.2%; 95% confidence interval, 28% to 58%). Responses were observed in sites that included liver (n = 18), lung (n = 6), and bone (n = 1). Of seven patients who received 350 mg/m2 UFT, prolonged grade 3 diarrhea developed in five; this resulted in a reduction in the UFT starting dose to 300 mg/m2/d in the remaining 38 patients. Grade 1 or 2 toxic effects included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, anorexia, fatigue, oral mucositis, excessive lacrimation, and rash. Among 38 patients who received the 300-mg/m2/d dose, grade 3 toxic reactions included diarrhea (n = 4), vomiting (n = 2), abdominal cramping (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 2). CONCLUSION: UFT 300 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 150 mg/d administered for 28 days demonstrated significant activity against metastatic colorectal carcinoma. This oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of the neutropenia or significant oral mucositis that complicates intravenous schedules of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin. The results of this clinical trial will serve as the basis for a randomized phase III study to compare this oral schedule of UFT plus leucovorin with intravenous 5-FU plus leucovorin to determine the relative efficacy, impact on quality of life, and cost of the two regimens.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f): a novel camptothecin analog.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and recommended phase II dose of Exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) when administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks to patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with advanced solid tumors, all previously treated, and with performance status < or = 2, were entered. The starting dose of DX-8951f was 0.15 mg/m(2); the dose was escalated according to the modified continual reassessment method. The drug was administered until disease progression or until unacceptable toxic effects occurred. RESULTS: Seven dose escalations were completed, and a total of 53 courses were delivered (median, two courses; range, one to eight courses) during the study. At doses 1.2 mg/m(2) and lower, toxicities were mostly grade 1, primarily hematologic. In the initial cohort of three patients treated at 2.4 mg/m(2), grade 2 hematologic toxicity was observed. Of the six additional patients entered at 2.4 mg/m(2), three had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. At doses higher than 2.4 mg/m(2), DLT granulocytopenia was observed. Nonhematologic toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, and alopecia, were mild to moderate. Neither complete nor partial responses were observed, but four patients had stable disease. The PK profile of DX-8951f seemed linear at the doses administered. The plasma clearance, total volume of distribution, and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 3 L/h, 40 L, and 14 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DLT of this DX-8951f schedule was granulocytopenia for minimally pretreated patients, and both granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia for heavily pretreated patients. The MTD for both minimally and heavily pretreated patients was 2.4 mg/m(2). DX-8951f seems to have a linear PK profile on the basis of single-dose administration. The recommended phase II dose with this schedule is 2.4 mg/m(2) for minimally pretreated patients. A lower dose should be used for heavily pretreated patients.

Comparison of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics in patients receiving continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion and oral uracil plus N1-(2'-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil.

Plasma 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) levels were compared in the same patients after approximately equimolar doses (1.9 mmol/ m2/day) of 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5-FU (CIFU) and oral administration of a formulation of two combined pharmacological agents, uracil (U) plus N1-(2'-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (ftorafur or FT), a prodrug of 5-FU. Ten patients received CIFU for 5 days, then, after a week wash-out period, began the 28-day oral UFT regimen, which was given in three daily divided doses. Following 1 h of CIFU, the plasma 5-FU levels reached a steady state of 0.6+/-0.2 microM (mean+/-SD; day 1), which was maintained for the entire 5-day infusion period (0.6+/-0.1 microM). In contrast, the maximum 5-FU concentrations (Cpmax) generated from oral UFT at 1 h after dose administration on days 1 and 5 were 2.1+/-1.5 microM and 2.3+/-1.9 microM, respectively, which were higher than the steady-state levels during CIFU. These high 5-FU levels disappeared with an apparent elimination half-life (tl/2,beta) of 5.2+/-2.4 h (day 1) and 7.2+/-3.9 h (day 5). On day 1 of both regimens, CIFU patients had significantly larger 5-FU area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC0-8h) values (4.4+/-1.3 microM.h) than the AUC value when they received the UFT regimen (2.6+/-1.7 microM.h; P = 0.02). However, by day 5, there were no significant differences between AUC0-8 h values in patients receiving CIFU and UFT, respectively (4.8+/-1.5 microM.h versus 3.8+/-2.2 microM.h; P = 0.30)]. On day 5, the average concentration of the metabolite 5-FU at steady-state (Css,aver) within dose interval of 8 h (0.48+/-0.28 microM) for the oral UFT treatment is comparable with the Cpss values of 5-FU from CIFU-treated patients. The post-UFT generated 5-FU pharmacokinetic parameters (higher Cp(mx, comparable Css,aver, equal AUC values, and longer apparent t1/2,beta of 5-FU) may make oral UFT a preferred method of delivering this fluoropyrimidine over CIFU. In addition, oral UFT would eliminate the incidence of venous thrombosis and catheter-related infections sometimes seen in patients treated with CIFU. Furthermore, the convenience and decreased cost of oral administration may be preferable for many patients, particularly those receiving 5-FU for palliation.

Tegafur/uracil + calcium folinate in colorectal cancer: double modulation of fluorouracil.

The oral chemotherapeutic agent tegafur/uracil (UFT) is the first of a new class of anticancer drugs called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines. Tegafur/uracil combines uracil with the fluorouracil prodrug tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio. Uracil competitively inhibits the degradation of fluorouracil, which results in the concentration of fluorouracil remaining at sustained levels in both plasma and tumour. Tegafur/uracil has been commercially available in Japan since 1983 and examined extensively in various tumours. Trials conducted in the US have focused on the combination of tegafur/uracil plus calcium folinate (calcium leucovorin) [ORZEL]. Several phase I and II trials have evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of this combination in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Results have shown that tegafur/uracil at 300 mg/m2/day in divided doses given every 8 hours for 28 days provides prolonged exposure to fluorouracil. Furthermore, tegafur/uracil + calcium folinate is well tolerated, with dose-limiting toxicity manifesting as diarrhoea. Compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus folinic acid (leucovorin) regimens, tegafur/uracil + calcium folinate has similar efficacy with less toxicity and is more convenient because it is an oral regimen. Early studies have also shown potential cost savings because of fewer complications.

Oral uracil and Ftorafur plus leucovorin: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with metastatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of Ftorafur (tegafur, FT), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and uracil in 31 cancer patients who were enrolled in phase I studies of oral uracil and FT (UFT). The correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxic effects of UFT was evaluated. METHODS: Uracil and FT were orally administered in a 4:1 molar ratio at FT doses of 200-400 mg/m2 per day. Patients also received leucovorin at 150 mg/day. Daily doses were divided into three doses and administered at 8-h intervals for 28 consecutive days. Plasma FT concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and plasma 5-FU and uracil concentrations were determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. National Institutes of Health Common Toxicity Criteria were used for assessment of toxicity. RESULTS: The concentrations of FT, 5-FU, and uracil showed wide interpatient variations. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cp(max)) of all three compounds were achieved in 0.3 to 4.0 h. At the various study doses, the terminal half-life (t 1/2beta) of FT ranged from 3.9 to 5.9 h, the area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC0-6h) ranged from 16,220 to 52,446 (ng/ml)h, the total clearance (ClT) ranged from 100 to 175 ml/min, and the steady-state volume of distribution (Vd(ss)) ranged from 18.3 to 28.7 l. The 5-FU generated from FT had an apparent distribution half-life (t 1/2alpha) and an apparent elimination half-life (t 1/2beta) of 0.3-1.3 h and 4.9-7.0 h, respectively. The AUC0-6h of 5-FU ranged from 120 to 325 (ng/ml)h. Uracil had a t 1/2alpha of 0.2-0.5 h and the level quickly returned to the endogenous level. The AUC0-6h for uracil ranged from 605 to 3764 (ng/ml)h, the ClT ranged from 3225 to 7748 ml/min, and the Vd(ss) ranged from 341 to 1354 l. The Cp(max) and AUC0-6h of both FT and uracil were significantly correlated with FT doses (P-values of 0.0244 and 0.0112) and with uracil doses (P-values of 0.0346 and 0.0083), respectively. In addition to interpatient variations, intrapatient variations were also observed in six patients who had pharmacology studies done on days 1 and 26+/-2 at the same study dose. We found that the repeated treatment with UFT caused cumulative increases in the values of Cp(max), Ctrough, and AUC0-6h of FT and 5-FU. The major toxic effects observed were diarrhea and nausea and vomiting. The occurrence of these toxic effects correlated significantly with the Cp(max) and AUC0-6h of 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacology studies showed that FT and uracil were readily absorbed orally and that FT was rapidly converted to 5-FU. The preliminary findings suggest that determination of plasma levels of 5-FU after oral administration of UFT may help predict subsequent toxic effects.

Preoperative UFT and calcium folinate and radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Protracted infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with pelvic radiotherapy have been associated with improved survival and decreased local and distant metastases in the adjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. However, this method of 5-FU infusion requires the inconvenience and expense of central venous line placement and care, infusion pumps, and treatment of catheter-related complications. We previously demonstrated that a completely oral therapy with UFT (uracil plus tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) can achieve pharmacokinetic parameters similar to those associated with protracted 5-FU infusions. This trial examines the feasibility of using UFT plus oral calcium folinate both during preoperative pelvic radiation and postoperatively, and shows that patients can be treated safely and effectively with a completely oral chemotherapy program combining UFT plus oral calcium folinate with pelvic radiation therapy.

Phase I trial of uracil-tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin: 14-day schedule.

We previously reported results of a Phase II trial of UFT [Taiho Pharmaceutical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; (BMS-200604) Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ], an oral 4:1 molar concentration of uracil and tegafur, plus oral leucovorin for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (Pazdur et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 12:2296-2300, 1994]. Our results demonstrated that a 28-day schedule of this combination produced a response rate similar to that obtained with conventional intravenous fluorouracil (5-FU)-plus-leucovorin regimens but without the severe or life-threatening neutropenia or oral mucositis that complicates intravenous 5-FU regimens. The current Phase I trial examines the dose-limiting toxic effects and maximum tolerated dose of a 14-consecutive-day schedule of UFT plus oral leucovorin in 14 patients who had histologically proven cancer and had received prior chemotherapy. The daily UFT plus leucovorin dose was divided into three doses administered orally every 8 hours. In this study, the UFT dose was escalated while the leucovorin dose remained at 150 mg/day. Of the 14 patients, 4 were initially treated at the 350-mg/m2/day UFT level for 14 days without any dose-limiting toxic reactions. Subsequently, another 7 patients were treated at the 400-mg/m2/day level; grade 3 diarrhea developed in 3 of these 7 (with severe abdominal cramping in 2 cases and severe nausea and vomiting unresponsive to antiemetics in the third). To better define the starting dose for phase II studies, an additional 3 patients were treated at the 350-mg/m2/day dose level. Of the total 7 patients treated at 350 mg/m2/day, grade 3 toxic events (diarrhea) developed in 2 patients. Grade 1-2 toxic effects noted at this level included fatigue, stomatitis, skin rash, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Neither partial nor complete responses were observed in this trial. The maximum tolerated dose of this schedule is 350 mg/m2/day UFT plus 150 mg/day oral leucovorin. However, because of this schedule's inferior dose intensity compared with that of the 28-day schedule of UFT plus leucovorin, subsequent development of UFT in the United States has focused on the 28-day regimen.

Phase I trials of uracil-tegafur (UFT) using 5 and 28 day administration schedules: demonstration of schedule-dependent toxicities.

We conducted two consecutive phase I clinical trials to identify the qualitative and quantitative toxic effects of uracil-tegafur (UFT) [Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan; (BMS-200604) Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ] administered either on a 5 or 28 day schedule and to determine the phase II trial starting doses for both schedules. Nineteen patients were entered in the 5 day schedule and 23 patients were entered on the 28 day schedule; a minimum of three patients were entered at each dose level studied. In both phase I trials, the daily UFT dose was divided into three doses administered every 8 h. Dose levels examined with the 5 day schedule were 360, 720, 900 and subsequent de-escalation to 800 mg/m2/day. Dose levels studied with the 28 day schedule were 180, 360, 450 and subsequent de-escalation to 400 mg/m2/day. With the 5 day schedule, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was granulocytopenia, with four of five patients experiencing grade 4 granulocytopenia at the 900 mg/m2/day dose level. With the 28 day schedule, the DLT was diarrhea, which was noted in three of eight patients treated at 400 mg/m2/day and in three of six patients treated at 450 mg/m2/day. At these dose levels, four of these patients required prolonged hospitalizations for their diarrhea. The toxic effects of UFT are schedule dependent, with marked differences in the toxic effect profile (neutropenia versus diarrhea). With the 5 day schedule, the phase II UFT starting dose is 800 mg/m2/day. On the 28 day schedule, the suggested phase II UFT starting dose is 360 mg/m2/day. Future clinical trials examining the combination the UFT plus oral folinic acid are being conducted to develop oral regimens of therapy for advanced colorectal carcinoma and adjuvant therapy for colon carcinoma.

Phase I trial of uracil-tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin: 28-day schedule.

UFT [Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; (BMS-200604), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ], a fluorouracil prodrug, is an oral 4:1 molar concentration of uracil plus tegafur. This study examined the dose-limiting toxic effects and maximum tolerated dose of UFT plus leucovorin administered for 28 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period. A course of therapy was repeated every 35 days. UFT dose levels examined were 200 mg/m2/day, with planned escalations to 250, 300, 350, and 400 mg/m2/day; the leucovorin dose remained at 150 mg/day. Three patients were initially enrolled at each UFT dose level. The total daily doses of both UFT and leucovorin were divided into three doses administered every 8 hr. Diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at 400 mg/m2/day UFT, with grade 3 diarrhea noted in 2 of the 3 patients receiving that dose. To further define a phase II UFT starting dose, 3 additional patients were entered at the 350 mg/m2 level; 3 of the 6 patients treated at this level developed grade 3 nonhematological toxic effects. No partial or complete responses were observed. The recommended phase II UFT starting dose is 300 mg/m2/day plus 150 mg/day leucovorin. Since neutropenia, significant mucositis, and "hand-foot syndrome" were not observed with UFT plus leucovorin, the toxicity profile of this regimen appears favorable compared with that of intravenous regimens of fluorouracil plus leucovorin. This phase I trial of UFT served as the basis for a phase II trial, current phase III trials, and a national adjuvant therapy trial of UFT for high-risk colon cancer patients.

Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere) is prepared from a noncytotoxic precursor extracted from the needles of the Taxus baccata. Preclinical investigations have demonstrated that docetaxel is very active in colon adenocarcinoma murine models. Phase I studies revealed granulocytopenia to be the dose-limiting toxicity. Initial clinical trials also demonstrated docetaxel's activity in ovarian, breast, and non-small cell lung cancer. Because of this encouraging preclinical and clinical activity, we initiated a phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 21 days. Nineteen patients were entered on the trial. All patients had measurable disease and had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. RESULTS: No complete or partial responses were observed. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect. Seventeen patients had grade 4 granulocytopenia; 8 of these patients received antibiotics for neutropenic fevers. Twelve patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions, and 15 patients experienced cutaneous toxic reactions. One patient demonstrated evidence of fluid retention. CONCLUSIONS: Administered at the stated dose and schedule, docetaxel has little activity against metastatic colorectal carcinomas. The toxicity profile, consisting of granulocytopenia, hypersensitivity reactions, cutaneous reactions, and edema, has been previously described in patients receiving docetaxel.