Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gen Dent ; 51(5): 472-6; quiz 477, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15055639

RESUMO

Many commercial dental unit waterline cleaners are available. Results regarding the efficacy of these products vary and sampling methods and laboratory procedures can affect results. This study was conducted to test the efficacy of a continuous-use stabilized chlorine dioxide product and determine if two different sampling methods produced the same results. There was a statistically significant difference between the treated units and the control units (p < 0.05) but the two sampling methods revealed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.5). Treated units showed a decline in the mean number of colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) over the study period but the level was not consistently low enough to meet the ADA-recommended levels of 200 CFU/mL. The findings of this study indicate that it is not necessary to replace a continuous use product with fresh, untreated water when testing water quality.


Assuntos
Compostos Clorados/uso terapêutico , Desinfetantes de Equipamento Odontológico/uso terapêutico , Equipamentos Odontológicos/microbiologia , Óxidos/uso terapêutico , Microbiologia da Água , Abastecimento de Água , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA