Functional and safety outcomes after benign prostatic enlargement surgeries in men with detrusor underactivity compared with normal detrusor contractility: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Men with detrusor underactivity (DUA) and concomitant bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) may present poorer functional outcomes after surgical desobstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BPE surgery in men with DUA compared with those with normal detrusor contractility (NC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was performed according to the 2020 PRISMA framework. A comprehensive literature search was performed until May 7, 2023, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database. No date limits were imposed. Only comparative studies were accepted. The primary endpoint was to assess if there was any difference in short- and long-term functional outcomes after BPE surgery in men with DUA and NC. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the differences in perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications between the two groups. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software. RESULTS: There were 5 prospective nonrandomized studies and 12 retrospective studies, including 1701 DUA and 1993 NC patients. Regarding surgical procedures, there were eight TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) studies, four GreenLight PVP (photoselective vaporization of the prostate) studies, two HoLEP (Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) studies, one GreenLight PVP/HoLEP study, one Holmium laser incision of the prostate study, and one study did not report the type of surgery. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of perioperative outcomes, including postoperative catheterization time, hospitalization time, urinary retention, need to recatheterization, transfusion rate, or urinary tract infections. Also, we found no significant differences in long-term complications, such as bladder neck stenosis or urethral stenosis. Posttreatment bladder recatheterization and retreatment rate for BPE regrowth could not be evaluated properly, because only one study reported these findings. When we analyzed functional outcomes at 3 months, those with NC had lower International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), lower quality-of-life (QoL) score, better maximum flow rate (Qmax), and lower post-voiding residual (PVR) of urine. These results were maintained at 6 months postoperatively, with exception of PVR that showed no difference. However, at 12 and more than 12 months the functional outcomes became similar regarding IPSS and QoL. There were few data about Qmax and PVR at longer follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, data suggest that BOO surgical treatment in patients with concomitant BPE and DUA appears to be safe. Despite patients with DUA may present worse functional outcomes in the short postoperative term compared with the NC population, IPSS and QoL scores become comparable again after a longer follow-up period after surgery.

Infection Rate after Transperineal Prostate Biopsy with and without Prophylactic Antibiotics: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review comparing the incidence of infectious complications following transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) in cases utilizing antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) vs cases not utilizing antibiotic prophylaxis (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model and expressed as risk ratio (RR). RR higher than 1 indicates an increased risk of complication in patients undergoing TPB without antibiotics. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05 and 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 1,748 papers were retrieved. After the screening process, 8 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (4 retrospective, and 4 prospective and nonrandomized), reporting on 3,662 patients. A total of 2,368 patients underwent TPB utilizing AP and 1,294 underwent TPB utilizing NAP. The pooled rates of post-biopsy fever from 6 available studies reporting this parameter were 0.69% in the AP group and 0.47% in the NAP group (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.02-44.55, p=0.99). The pooled rates of post-biopsy genitourinary infections from 8 available studies reporting this parameter were 0.11% in the AP group and 0.31% in the NAP group (RR: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.54-8.10, p=0.29). The pooled rates of post-biopsy sepsis over 8 studies reporting this parameter were 0.13% in the AP group and 0.09% in the NAP group (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.21-5.61, p=0.92). The pooled rates of post-biopsy readmission for infections over 8 studies reporting this parameter were 0.13% in the AP group and 0.23% in the NAP group (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.31-5.29, p=0.73). Death due to post-biopsy sepsis did not occur in any study. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found no significant difference in infection rate, fever, sepsis or readmission rate after TPB between those cases utilizing AP and those cases without AP.

Rezum to the rescue: Early outcomes of Rezum on patients with recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms after surgical interventions for benign prostatic enlargement.

We aim to report the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing Rezum as a re-treatment intervention for recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms after prior surgical treatment for benign prostate enlargement. Data from two institutions for baseline International Prostatic Symptom Score with Quality of life item, prostate size, and maximum flow-rate was acquired. Patients were assessed 3-month post-treatment. Outcomes were compared with unpaired t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. Nineteen patients were included. Prior surgical interventions included transurethral resection of the prostate (31.6%, n = 6), Urolift (26.3%, n = 5), transurethral bladder neck incision (15.8%, n = 3), prostate artery embolization (10.5%, n = 2), transurethral needle ablation, greenlight photovaporization of prostate and Rezum (5.3%, n = 1 each). Median age was 69.0 years (IQR 14; range 59-87 years) with a median prostate volume of 65.0 ml (IQR 63; range 22-160 ml). The median time to Rezum treatment was 48 months (IQR 78; range 9-240 months). 63.1% (n = 12) were re-started on benign prostatic enlargement medication and 36.8% (n = 7) had recurrent bothersome symptoms before re-treatment with Rezum. At 3-month follow up, median International Prostatic Symptom Score decreased from 23 to 9 (p < 0.001) and Quality of life from 4 to 2 (p < 0.001). Median maximum flow-rate improved after treatment from 8.6 to 14.8 ml/s (p < 0.001). None of the patients were required to restart medication for benign prostate enlargement.

Choosing the best way for urinary decompression and developing a novel predictive model for septic shock using SOFA in these patients.

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictive factors for the development of sepsis/septic shock postdecompression of calculi-related ureteric obstruction using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and to compare clinical outcomes and odd risk ratios of patients developing sepsis/septic shock following the insertion of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus insertion of retrograde ureteral stenting (RUS). METHODS: Clinico-epidemiological data of patients who underwent PCN and/or RUS in two institutions for calculi-related ureteric obstruction were retrospectively collected from January 2014 to December 2020. RESULTS: 537 patients (244 patients in PCN group, 293 patients in RUS group) from both institutions were eligible for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with PCN were generally older, had poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and larger obstructive ureteral calculi compared to patients with RUS. Patients with PCN had longer durations of fever, the persistence of elevated total white cell and creatinine, and longer hospitalization stays compared with patients who had undergone RUS. RUS up-front has more unsuccessful interventions compared with PCN. There were no significant differences in the change in SOFA score postintervention between the two interventions. In multivariate analysis, the higher temperature just prior to the intervention (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.039, p = 0.003) and Cardiovascular SOFA score of 1 (adjusted OR:4.037, p = 0.012) were significant independent prognostic factors for the development of septic shock postdecompression of ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that both interventions have similar overall risk of urosepsis, septic shock and mortality rate. Despite a marginally higher risk of failure, RUS should be considered in patients with lower procedural risk. Patients going for PCN should be counseled for a longer stay. Post-HDU/-ICU monitoring, inotrope support postdecompression should be considered for patients with elevated temperature within 1 h preintervention and cardiovascular SOFA score of 1.

Nephrostomy tube versus double J ureteral stent in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

PURPOSE: We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess perioperative outcomes, complications, and survival in studies comparing ureteral stent and percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant ureteral obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. Meta-analyses were performed on procedural data; outcomes; complications (device-related, accidental dislodgement, febrile episodes, unplanned device replacement), dislodgment, and overall survival. Continuous variables were pooled using the inverse variance of the mean difference (MD) with a fixed effect, and 95% confidence interval (CI). The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model and reported as Odds Ratio (OR), and 95% CI. Statistical significance was set two-tail p-value < 0.05 Results: Ten studies were included. Procedure time (MD -10.26 minutes 95%CI -12.40-8.02, p< 0.00001), hospital stay (MD -1.30 days 95%CI -1.69 - -0.92, p< 0.0001), number of accidental tube dislodgments (OR 0.25 95% CI 0.13 - 0.48, p< 0.0001) were significantly lower in the stent group. No difference was found in mean fluoroscopy time, decrease in creatinine level post procedure, overall number of complications, interval time between the change of tubes, number of febrile episodes after diversion, unplanned device substitution, and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis favors stents as the preferred choice as these are easier to maintain and ureteral stent placement should be recommended whenever feasible. If the malignant obstruction precludes a stent placement, then PCN is a safe alternative.

Defining prostate cancer size and treatment margin for focal therapy: does intralesional heterogeneity impact the performance of multiparametric MRI?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of intralesional heterogeneity on the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in determining cancer extent and treatment margins for focal therapy (FT) of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified men who underwent primary radical prostatectomy for organ- confined prostate cancer over a 3-year period. Cancer foci on whole-mount histology were marked out, coding low-grade (LG; Gleason 3) and high-grade (HG; Gleason 4-5) components separately. Measurements of entire tumours were grouped according to intralesional proportion of HG cancer: 0%, <50% and ≥50%; the readings were corrected for specimen shrinkage and correlated with matching lesions on mpMRI. Separate measurements were also taken of HG cancer components only, and correlated against entire lesions on mpMRI. Size discrepancies were used to derive the optimal tumour size and treatment margins for FT. RESULTS: There were 122 MRI-detected cancer lesions in 70 men. The mean linear specimen shrinkage was 8.4%. The overall correlation between histology and MRI dimensions was r = 0.79 (P < 0.001). Size correlation was superior for tumours with high burden (≥50%) compared to low burden (<50%) of HG cancer (r = 0.84 vs r = 0.63; P = 0.007). Size underestimation by mpMRI was more likely for larger tumours (51% for >12 mm vs 26% for ≤12 mm) and those containing HG cancer (44%, vs 20% for LG only). Size discrepancy analysis suggests an optimal tumour size of ≤12 mm and treatment margins of 5-6 mm for FT. For tumours ≤12 mm in diameter, applying 5- and 6-mm treatment margins would achieve 98.6% and 100% complete tumour ablation, respectively. For tumours of all sizes, using the same margins would ablate >95% of the HG cancer components. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric MRI performance in estimating prostate cancer size, and consequently the treatment margin for FT, is impacted by tumour size and the intralesional heterogeneity of cancer grades.

Differences in surgical and functional outcomes in benign prostate hyperplasia patients with only lower urinary tract symptoms versus those in retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To evaluate outcomes after benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) surgery among men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) only versus those with urinary retention (UR). METHODS: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID#232253. Eligible studies identified from four electronic databases. Search, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Studies with perioperative, functional, early and late complication outcomes included. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies, 14 593 patients including 1 randomized controlled trial, 11 prospective and 13 retrospective studies included for meta-analysis. This showed higher risk of immediate transient recatherization (risk ratio [RR]: 5.29, p < 0.00001), longer days to trial-off-catheter (mean difference [MD]: 0.25, p < 0.00001), longer hospitalization stay in the UR group (MD: 0.35, p < 0.00001), and higher risk of intraoperative blood transfusions (RR: 1.90, p = 0.002), postoperative urinary tract infections (RR: 1.49, p < 0.00001) and sepsis (RR: 8.15, p = 0.009) too. Failure of surgery like permanent recatheterization (RR: 5.27, p < 0.00001) was more in preoperative UR group. Negligible differences seen in long term functional outcomes between the two groups (International Prostate Symptom Score at 12 months, MD: -0.06, p = 0.68; Quality of Life at 12 months, MD: 0.20, p < 0.00001; maximum urinary flow rate at 12 months, MD: -0.33, p = 0.10; and postvoid residual volume at 12 months, MD: 4.32, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative UR patients undergoing surgery for BPH have higher risk of postoperative complications versus LUTS only group including the need for permanent catheterization. Both groups had similar long-term functional outcomes. We could infer that patients with UR on whom surgery is successful, with time may recover bladder function akin to patients with LUTS alone.

Cardiovascular risks of androgen receptor targeted agents in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTA) have increasingly been incorporated into treatment regimens for various stages of prostate cancer. Patients are living longer with prostate cancer, and thus have a higher cumulative exposure to the treatment and its accompanying side effects, especially those of cardiovascular disease. We aim to assess the differences in the incidence of cardiac-related adverse events after treatment of prostate cancer with ARTA versus placebo. METHODS: Three databases were thoroughly searched for relevant articles. The PICOS model was used to frame our clinical question, with which 2 independent authors went through several rounds of screening to select the final included studies. Meta-analysis was done using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method. Quality assessment was carried out with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool RoB 2. RESULTS: The use of ARTA in prostate cancer increases the incidence of cardiac-related adverse events (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.29-1.90, p < 0.00001), such as hypertension (RR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.46-1.97, p < 0.00001), ischaemic heart disease (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p < 0.0001), and arrhythmia (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.71, p = 0.004), although this did not manifest in an increased incidence of cardiac arrests/deaths (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.87-1.88, p = 0.21). DISCUSSION: ARTA increases the risk of cardiac-related adverse events, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and arrhythmia. Armed with this knowledge, we will be better poised to manage cardiac risks accordingly and involve a cardiologist as required when starting patients on ARTA.

Convective Water Vapour Energy Ablation (Rezum®) versus Prostatic Urethral Lift (Urolift®); A 2-Year Prospective Study.

Introduction To compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates of Convective Water Vapour Energy Ablation (Rezum®) and Prostatic Urethral Lift (Urolift®). To identify predictive factors for treatment failures in both treatments. Materials & Methods Prospective clinico-epidemiological data of patients who underwent Urolift® or Rezum® in a single institution for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) was collected. The choice of intervention depended on the preference of the patients after patient-centric discussions. Results From October 2019 to October 2022, 86 patients underwent Rezum® and 62 patients underwent Urolift®. Rezum® involved a longer indwelling catheter duration (12.38±5.548 versus 1.39±3.010 days, p<0.001) compared to Urolift®. Rezum® was associated with more complications compared to Urolift® (36 (41.9%) versus 10 (16.1%) cases, p<0.001). Rezum® had more cases of hematuria (17 (19.8%) versus 4 (6.5%) cases (p=0.022)) and urinary tract infections (27 (31.4%) versus 3 (4.8%) cases, p<0.001)), compared to Urolift®. There were no significant differences in Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-5 complications between the interventions. Urolift® was associated with higher re-operation rates (5 (8.1%) versus 0 (0%) cases, p=0.010) compared Rezum®. Rezum® had higher anti-cholinergic usage rates compared to Urolift® post-operation (22 (25.6%) versus 8 (12.9%) cases, p=0.024). Both interventions showed improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life score, and peak velocity flow over the 2 years with no significant difference between the two. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve, pre-operation IPSS ≥ 16 had 95.7% sensitivity and 38.4% specificity to predict the probability of treatment failures after the interventions. Conclusions There was no difference in clinical outcomes of patients who underwent Rezum® and Urolift®. However, patients who had undergone Rezum® faced more minor complications and more required anti-cholinergic medications. Lastly, physicians should note that patients with IPSS≥16 would unlikely benefit from either intervention.

Use of metallic ureteric stents for chronic ureteric obstruction and its association with value-based care.

Introduction: We aimed to compare the real-world data and our clinical experience with metallic stents (MSs) and conventional polymeric stents (PSs) in the management of both malignant and benign chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO), in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: Clinical data from our institution, including outcomes for all ureteric stents inserted for long-term management of CUO from all causes from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the MS and PS episodes. Results: A total of 247 stents were placed in 63 patients with CUO over the 4-year study period. Of these, 45 stents were MSs. There was no significant difference in all baseline characteristics between the MS and PS groups, except for the aetiology of obstructive cause. Mean indwelling stent duration was significantly greater for MS than for PS (228.6 ± 147.0 vs. 146.1 ± 66.0 days, P < 0.001), thereby leading to lower average number of stent changes per year in the MS group compared to the PS group (1.4 vs. 6.3 times, respectively). Despite the higher unit cost of MS compared to PS, there was no significant mean cost difference overall (cost per dwelling day SGD 7.82 ± SGD 10.44 vs. SGD 8.23 ± SGD 20.50, P = 0.888). Conclusion: Resonance MS is a better option than PS to manage CUO from malignant and benign causes because its significantly longer indwelling time mitigates the higher unit cost of the stent. It potentially reduces the number of procedures and operations in patients. Thus, it should be considered for all patients with CUO requiring long-term ureteric drainage.

Does addition of aromatherapy and music help to reduce pain and anxiety during shockwave lithotripsy compared to standard analgesia alone? A randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of aromatherapy with lavender oil alone, and in combination with music, on pain and anxiety during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial. The subjects were block randomised into 3 study groups, Group 1: Control; Group 2: Aromatherapy only; Group 3: Aromatherapy and music. All subjects were given patient-controlled intravenous alfentanil as standard analgesia. The primary outcome measures were pain and anxiety scores using visual analogue scale (VAS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: Ninety patients were recruited and randomised prospectively into Group 1 (n = 30), Group 2 (n = 30), and Group 3 (n = 30). For pain outcome, both Group 2 and Group 3 showed a trend towards lower mean VAS pain scores of 2.73 in both groups compared to the control with a mean VAS score of 3.50, but it was not statistically significant (p = 0.272). There was no significant difference in anxiety scores between groups post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study was unable to show a significant improvement in pain relief and anxiety when aromatherapy with lavender oil was added to standard analgesia alone during shockwave lithotripsy. There was also no difference when aromatherapy was combined with music.

Does using a laser improve outcomes of conventional circumcision in adult and children populations? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Male circumcision is a well-known old surgery, and several recently developed techniques have been scaled up, including the introduction of laser technology, as alternative approaches to overcome morbidity of conventional surgery scalpel/suture method OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laser circumcision versus conventional circumcision technique in terms of perioperative outcomes and efficacy (complications, unacceptable appearance, reoperation rate) both in children and adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review was performed following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. Continuous variables were analyzed using the inverse variance of the mean difference with a random effect, 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-value. The incidence of complications, unacceptable appearance, and reoperation rate were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method with the random effect model and reported as odds ratio (OR), 95% CI, and p-value. Significance was set at p-value ≤0.05 and 95%CI. RESULTS: Seven studies were included. In comparison to the conventional circumcision, laser circumcision shoved lower visual analogue score at 24-h, and 7 days after surgery, a lower rate of overall complication rate (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.24-0.47, p < 0.001), scarring (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02, 0.41, p = 0.002), and unacceptable appearance (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05, 0.15, p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant difference in surgical time, and incidence of bleeding, infection, wound dehiscence, and reoperation rate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our review infers that laser-assisted circumcision is certainly a safe and strong contender as the procedure of choice in both children and adult populations.

Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the influence of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) using indocyanine green (ICG) with standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with a kidney tumor (KT). METHODS: We performed a literature search on 12 September 2023 through PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. The analysis included observational studies that examined the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with a KT who underwent RAPN with NIRF. RESULTS: Overall, eight prospective studies, involving 535 patients, were eligible for this meta-analysis, with 212 participants in the ICG group and 323 in the No ICG group. For warm ischemia time, the ICG group showed a lower duration (weighted Mean difference (WMD) = -2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.30--0.80, p = 0.011). The postoperative eGFR also favored the ICG group (WMD = 7.67, 95% CI = 2.88-12.46, p = 0.002). No difference emerged for the other perioperative outcomes between the two groups. In terms of oncological radicality, the positive surgical margins and tumor recurrence rates were similar among the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that NIRF with ICG during RAPN yields a favorable impact on functional outcomes, whereas it exerts no such influence on oncological aspects. Therefore, NIRF should be adopted when preserving nephron function is a paramount concern.

A Small Group Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Daily Pentoxifylline in the Management of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction with Suboptimal Treatment Response to Sildenafil.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reaffirmed the use of regular pentoxifylline therapy in increasing the penile brachial pressure index in men affected by erectile dysfunction when compared to placebo. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline as an adjunctive treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction. METHODS: This study was a single center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were recruited between April 2014 and November 2016 from the National University Hospital, Singapore. The combination therapy group was given pentoxifylline 400 mg thrice daily orally and the monotherapy group was given placebo capsules thrice daily orally. Both groups continued their on-demand 100 mg sildenafil. The treatment duration was 8 weeks. Efficacy was measured via the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire at the eighth week. Differences in mean IIEF-5 score and the domains of the IIEF at 8 weeks between the 2 treatment groups were compared using independent sample t-test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Baseline IIEF-5 and the IIEF-15 score vs post-therapy IIEF-5 and the IIEF-15 score. RESULTS: 50 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients in the 2 groups were comparable in terms of the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and baseline IIEF-5 scores. The mean IIEF-5 score post-therapy of the combination therapy group vs the monotherapy group was 14.11 and 14.87, respectively. There was no significant difference between the outcomes of these 2 groups (unadjusted mean difference -0.76; 95% CI -4.01 to 2.49; P = .641) and the outcomes are the same even after adjusting for baseline IIEF-5 scores. There was a significant improvement in the "overall satisfaction" portion of the IIEF score for the combination therapy group as compared to the monotherapy group (unadjusted mean difference 0.12; 95% CI -1.49 to 1.25) and even after adjustment for baseline scores (adjusted mean difference 1.11; 95% CI 0.10 to 2.12; P = .032) the improvement is significant. CONCLUSION: Our trial suggests that the use of combination therapy does not improve the management of patients compared to monotherapy. Law YXT, Tai BC, Tan YQ et al. A Small Group Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Daily Pentoxifylline in the Management of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction with Suboptimal Treatment Response to Sildenafil. Sex Med 2019;8:14-20.

Is transurethral needle ablation of prostate out of fashion? Outcomes of single session office-based transurethral needle ablation of prostate in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Purpose: Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), office-based TUNA is an attractive alternative as it is minimally invasive and avoids general anaesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of single session office-based TUNA. Materials and Methods: Data of 121 patients who had undergone TUNA was retrieved from June 2008 to March 2017. Patients were followed-up with visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12-months with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) scoring and uroflowmetry. Results: Patients were 39 to 85 years old. The prostate volumes were 20.00 to 96.90 mL with a median of 26.95 mL. The median IPSS score pre-TUNA was 19, median QOL score pre-TUNA was 4 and median maximum urinary flow (Qmax) pre-TUNA was 10.3 mL/s. There is 65% improvement of IPSS post-TUNA (p<0.001). There is 75% improvement of QOL post-TUNA QOL (p<0.001). There is 35% improvement of Qmax post-TUNA Qmax (p<0.001). The mean relapse-free survival for TUNA is 6.123 years. The 1st, 3rd, and 5th year relapse-free survival rate were 91.7%, 76.6% and 63.7% respectively. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the use of a single-setting office-based TUNA requiring minimal sedation in the Asian community. Complication rates were low in our series, with no associated mortality. When applied to selected patients, TUNA is an effective and reasonably safe alternative for the treatment of symptomatic BPH.

Nephrostomy tube versus double J ureteral stent in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

ABSTRACT Purpose: We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess perioperative outcomes, complications, and survival in studies comparing ureteral stent and percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant ureteral obstruction. Materials and Methods: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. Meta-analyses were performed on procedural data; outcomes; complications (device-related, accidental dislodgement, febrile episodes, unplanned device replacement), dislodgment, and overall survival. Continuous variables were pooled using the inverse variance of the mean difference (MD) with a fixed effect, and 95% confidence interval (CI). The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model and reported as Odds Ratio (OR), and 95% CI. Statistical significance was set two-tail p-value <0.05 Results: Ten studies were included. Procedure time (MD −10.26 minutes 95%CI −12.40-8.02, p<0.00001), hospital stay (MD −1.30 days 95%CI −1.69 − −0.92, p<0.0001), number of accidental tube dislodgments (OR 0.25 95% CI 0.13 - 0.48, p<0.0001) were significantly lower in the stent group. No difference was found in mean fluoroscopy time, decrease in creatinine level post procedure, overall number of complications, interval time between the change of tubes, number of febrile episodes after diversion, unplanned device substitution, and overall survival. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis favors stents as the preferred choice as these are easier to maintain and ureteral stent placement should be recommended whenever feasible. If the malignant obstruction precludes a stent placement, then PCN is a safe alternative.