Quality of life in patients after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

AIM: To evaluate the most important factors of quality of life in patients after vestibular schwannoma surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unilateral sporadic occurrence of vestibular schwannoma who underwent surgery via suboccipital-retrosigmoid approach were included in the prospective study (2018-2021). Patients after previous Leksell gamma knife irradiation (or other methods of stereotactic radiosurgery) were excluded. Quality of life was assessed using 10 validated questionnaires that were distributed preoperatively, 3 months and 1 year after the surgery. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included in the study, complete data were analysed in 43 of them (response rate 57%). Grade III and IV represented up to 70% of all tumors. Patients with larger tumors had a significantly higher risk of postoperative facial nerve paresis, liquorrhea and lower probability of hearing preservation. Patients with smaller tumors and those, who suffered from headaches before surgery had more frequent and severe headaches after surgery. Postoperative headaches were associated with higher incidence of anxiety and tinnitus. More frequent anxiety was also identified in patients with preoperative serviceable hearing who became deaf after surgery. Nevertheless, tinnitus and hearing impairment appeared to have less impact on overall quality of life compared to headaches and facial nerve function. CONCLUSION: According to our results, tumor size, postoperative function of the facial nerve and occurrence of postoperative headaches had the greatest influence on the overall postoperative quality of life in patients after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Which Epidemiological Characteristics Drive Decision Making in the Management of Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma?

The incidence of sporadic vestibular schwannoma has significantly increased over the past few decades. However, there is no method currently available to accurately predict the risk of subsequent tumor growth. The difference in the management of five patient groups has been evaluated: wait and scan, conversion to microsurgery, conversion to stereoradiotherapy, sterioradiotherapy, and microsurgery. In total, 463 patients with vestibular schwannoma have been consulted in our department from 2010 through 2016. Of the 250 patients initially indicated for observation, 32.4% were later indicated for active treatment. Younger patients were more frequently indicated for surgery (mean age 48 years) compared to older patients, who were more often indicated for stereoradiotherapy (mean age 62 years). Tumor growth was observed more often in patients under 60 years of age and in patients with tumors greater than 10 mm. In elderly patients, including those with larger tumors, a conservative approach is the optimal solution. If tumor growth occurs in the wait-and-scan strategy, it is still possible to continue with a conservative approach in some situations. The duration of follow-up scans is still a matter of debate, as tumors can begin to grow after 5 years from the initial diagnosis.

Hearing After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Is It Preserved Forever?

INTRODUCTION: Currently, it is possible to preserve the auditory nerve in a large number of cases, but the preservation of the hearing itself is unpredictable. Apart from wait and scan strategy and stereoradiotherapy, hearing after vestibular schwannoma surgery is considered to remain stable even in long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients had preserved hearing after retrosigmoid suboccipital microsurgery of the vestibular schwannoma between 2008 and 2014. A standard audiological protocol was performed together with an magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the fluid content of the inner ear. RESULTS: The mean difference in pure-tone average between the direct and final postsurgical examination was 12.758 dB ( p = 2.5E - 06). The word recognition score deteriorated by 17.45% ( p = 0.03516). The mean American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery score on the second examination was 2.5, and that on the second examination was 3.111 ( p = 0.00483). There was no significant deterioration in the healthy ear.The signal intensity ratio in the basal turn of the cochlea increased by an average of 0.13 points ( p < 0.05).Patients with persistent tumor or nodular enhancement in the internal acoustic meatus deteriorated significantly in hearing according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery scale compared with patients without any finding in the meatus ( p = 0.01299). CONCLUSIONS: There is a discrete but gradual deterioration of the hearing in the postoperative period. Hearing impairment is more pronounced in patients with a nodular process in the internal acoustic meatus, regardless of whether it is growth active. After surgery, the pathological content of the inner ear normalizes (evaluated on T2 magnetic resonance imaging sequences).

Hearing improvement after vestibular schwannoma surgery in the era of the hearing preservation rule - case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery remains a surgical challenge. In some patients with preserved inner ear function, hearing improvement is achievable. As it is currently impossible to determine which patients will present this outcome, predictions must rely on previously published reports. Our case report describes a patient who experienced hearing improvement from an unuseful level to a useful one after vestibular schwannoma surgery. METHODS: Surgery was performed via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. The patient underwent a basic audiovestibular protocol before and after the surgery - pure tone and speech audiometry, otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem responses, electronystagmography - together with a detailed questionnaire study. Usefulness of hearing was evaluated using the AAO-HNS guidelines, supplemented by a frequency of 4 kHz. RESULTS: Hearing was preserved and even improved from an unuseful level to a useful one. Based on the available literature, the most informative predictive factors for such a result seem to be: sudden sensorineural hearing loss prior to surgery, elicitable otoacoustic emissions and the origin from the superior vestibular nerve. CONCLUSION: There are a limited number of studies on this topic and it is still impossible to regularly improve hearing in properly selected patients. Furthermore, the importance of postoperative hearing quality compared to other symptoms and complications remains debatable.