RESUMO
A case report, focused on vasopressor use and presented in this article, is likely to resonate with many critical care nurses. In this article the authors describe opportunities to enhance safety with vasopressor therapy. Specifically, the goal of improving communication among physicians, nurses, and pharmacists around desired endpoints for vasopressor therapy, triggers for reassessment of the therapeutic strategy and cause of the patient's shock was identified as an area for improvement. A form piloted within an organization for use during multidisciplinary rounds and key findings is shared. Vasopressors constitute the mainstay of therapy for nearly every hemodynamically unstable patient in critical care. It is hoped that the lessons and information shared help empower critical care nurses to facilitate vasopressor stewardship within their facilities and, ultimately, enhance patient safety.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/enfermagem , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Segurança do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High-dose vitamin C is increasingly used for sepsis and more recently for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections. Proponents argue that the low cost and near perfect safety profile of vitamin C support its early adoption. Yet, adverse events might be underreported and underappreciated. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 73-year-old non-diabetic white man with end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock that was suspected to be due to peritonitis. The patient was enrolled in LOVIT (Lessening Organ Dysfunction with VITamin C; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03680274), a randomized placebo-controlled trial of high-dose intravenous vitamin C. He developed factitious hyperglycemia, as measured with a point-of-care glucometer, that persisted for 6 days after discontinuation of the study drug, confirmed to be vitamin C after unblinding. He also had short-lived iatrogenic coma because of hypoglycemia secondary to insulin administration. These events triggered a protocol amendment. CONCLUSIONS: Although factitious hyperglycemia has been reported before using certain glucometers in patients treated with high-dose vitamin C, the persistence of this phenomenon for 6 days after the discontinuation of the therapy is a distinguishing feature. This case highlights the importance of monitoring glucose with a core laboratory assay for up to a week in specific populations, such as patients on peritoneal dialysis.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hiperglicemia , Diálise Peritoneal , Idoso , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , VitaminasRESUMO
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is an increasing nosocomial problem in North America and Western Europe, where outbreaks caused by a more virulent, toxin-hyperproducing strain have been recently reported. Clostridium difficile infection is now characterized by a higher incidence, more frequent relapses, and a higher case-fatality ratio. As a consequence, fulminant cases requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) are much more common than previously. In recent years, metronidazole has appeared to lose some of its effectiveness in CDI management and vancomycin is now recognized as the first-line treatment of severe cases. Rapid diagnosis and institution of infection control measures are critical components of CDI management. The current review focuses on recent changes in the epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment of CDI, with special emphasis on complicated cases managed in the ICU.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Colectomia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/tratamento farmacológico , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/cirurgia , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Vancomicina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Vasodilatory hypotension is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients; vasopressors are considered standard of care. However, optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets for vasopressor titration are unknown. The objective of the Optimal VAsopressor TitraTION in patients 65 years and older (OVATION-65) trial is to ascertain the effect of permissive hypotension (vasopressor titration to achieve MAP 60-65 mm Hg) versus usual care on biomarkers of organ injury in hypotensive patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: OVATION-65 is an allocation-concealed randomised trial in 7 Canadian hospitals. Eligible patients are ≥65 years of age, in an ICU with vasodilatory hypotension, receiving vasopressors for ≤12 hours to maintain MAP ≥65 mm Hg during or after adequate fluid resuscitation, and expected to receive vasopressors for ≥6 additional hours. Patients are excluded for any of the following: active treatment for spinal cord or acute brain injury; vasopressors given solely for bleeding, ventricular failure or postcardiopulmonary bypass vasoplegia; withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments expected within 48 hours; death perceived as imminent; previous enrolment in OVATION-65; organ transplant within the last year; receiving extracorporeal life support or lack of physician equipoise. Patients are randomised to permissive hypotension versus usual care for up to 28 days. The primary outcome is high-sensitivity troponin T, a biomarker of cardiac injury, on day 3. Secondary outcomes include biomarkers of injury to other organs (brain, liver, intestine, skeletal muscle); lactate (a biomarker of global tissue dysoxia); resource utilisation; adverse events; mortality (90 days and 6 months) and cognitive function (6 months). Assessors of biomarkers, mortality and cognitive function are blinded to allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved at all sites. Consent is obtained from the eligible patient, the substitute decision-maker if the patient is incapable, or in a deferred fashion where permitted. End-of-grant dissemination plans include presentations, publications and social media platforms and discussion forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03431181.
Assuntos
Hipotensão , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Canadá , Cuidados Críticos , Hidratação , Humanos , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/tratamento farmacológico , PandemiasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Vasopressors are not recommended by current trauma guidelines, but recent reports indicate that they are commonly used. We aimed to describe the early hemodynamic management of trauma patients outside densely populated urban centers. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in a Canadian regional trauma center. All adult patients treated for traumatic injury in 2013 who died within 24 hours of admission or were transferred to the intensive care unit were included. A systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, a mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg, the use of vasopressors or ≥2 L of intravenous fluids defined hemodynamic instability. Main outcome measures were use of intravenous fluids and vasopressors prior to surgical or endovascular management. RESULTS: Of 111 eligible patients, 63 met our criteria for hemodynamic instability. Of these, 60 (95%) had sustained blunt injury and 22 (35%) had concomitant severe traumatic brain injury. The subgroup of patients referred from a primary or secondary hospital (20 of 63, 32%) had significantly longer transport times (243 vs. 61 min, p<0.01). Vasopressors, used in 26 patients (41%), were independently associated with severe traumatic brain injury (odds ratio 10.2, 95% CI 2.7-38.5). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, most trauma patients had suffered multiple blunt injuries. Patients were likely to receive vasopressors during the early phase of trauma care, particularly if they exhibited signs of neurologic injury. While these results may be context-specific, determining the risk-benefit trade-offs of fluid resuscitation, vasopressors and permissive hypotension in specific patients subgroups constitutes a priority for trauma research going forwards.
Assuntos
Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ressuscitação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicaçõesAssuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Dermatopatias Vesiculobolhosas/induzido quimicamente , Doença Aguda , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Biópsia , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pele/patologia , Picada de Aranha/tratamento farmacológico , Volume Sistólico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/induzido quimicamente , Taquicardia Sinusal/induzido quimicamente , CefprozilRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Without robust clinical evidence to guide titration of vasopressors in septic shock, it is unclear how dosing of these potent medications occurs. We sought to measure the proportion of vasopressor prescriptions for septic shock that were missing explicit targets and to describe the targets that we identified. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective cohort study involving 9 intensive care units (ICUs) located at 3 academic hospitals in Canada and Australia. We reviewed charts of consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the ICU for a presumptive diagnosis of sepsis. Other inclusion criteria were hypotension (systolic arterial pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≤ 65 mm Hg) and continuous infusion of vasopressors for at least 1 hour within the initial 48 hours of ICU stay, the period of observation for this study. RESULTS: We included data from 369 patient charts. At least 1 target was specified in 99% of charts. The most common targets were MAP measurements (73%). The median initial MAP target was 65 (range 55-90) mm Hg. In multivariable regression models, hospital site and older age of the patient, but not comorbidities of the patient, were associated with MAP targets. In 40% of patients, the treating team modified the initial target at least once. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that an explicit blood pressure target accompanies nearly every vasopressor prescription and that patient characteristics have little influence on its value. Identification of a titration strategy that will maximize benefit and minimize harm constitutes a research priority.