Quality of life of patients and caregivers affected by bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To synthesize evidence on the impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) on the Quality of Life (QoL) of affected individuals from three perspectives: (i) QoL of caregiver; (ii) caregiver's perception of BPD patient's QoL; and (iii) BPD patient's self-reported QoL. METHODS: Quantitative studies (case-control, cohort, and case series) on the QoL of BPD patients or their caregivers were considered. We conducted a systematic literature search of 6 databases (PubMed, Embase, World of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure) for relevant studies. All databases were searched from the date of inception of the databases to 31 March 2022. Populations of interest were caregivers with preterm babies with BPD, or children/adults who were born premature and diagnosed with BPD. The main outcome measures were total and subdomain QoL scores, and factors affecting QoL. RESULTS: A total of 1078 articles were found; 10 were eligible for analysis, which included 247 caregivers and 1632 patients with BPD. The QoL of patients differed by domains-some were poorer or similar, but none of the QoL domains was better than QoL of healthy controls. Poor sleep and acute care needs of BPD patients negatively affected caregiver's QoL, while increasing illness acuity negatively affected the QoL of BPD patients. The QoL of BPD patients and their caregivers was most adversely affected during the immediate post-discharge period and tended to improve with time. The physical QoL of BPD patients was similar to that of preterm babies without BPD when assessed during late childhood and early adulthood. CONCLUSION: QoL assessment should be performed as an outcome measure and incorporated in the care plan for BPD patients and their caregivers. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO CRD42021292253.

The influence of the environment and lifestyle on myopia.

BACKGROUND: Myopia, commonly known as near-sightedness, has emerged as a global epidemic, impacting almost one in three individuals across the world. The increasing prevalence of myopia during early childhood has heightened the risk of developing high myopia and related sight-threatening eye conditions in adulthood. This surge in myopia rates, occurring within a relatively stable genetic framework, underscores the profound influence of environmental and lifestyle factors on this condition. In this comprehensive narrative review, we shed light on both established and potential environmental and lifestyle contributors that affect the development and progression of myopia. MAIN BODY: Epidemiological and interventional research has consistently revealed a compelling connection between increased outdoor time and a decreased risk of myopia in children. This protective effect may primarily be attributed to exposure to the characteristics of natural light (i.e., sunlight) and the release of retinal dopamine. Conversely, irrespective of outdoor time, excessive engagement in near work can further worsen the onset of myopia. While the exact mechanisms behind this exacerbation are not fully comprehended, it appears to involve shifts in relative peripheral refraction, the overstimulation of accommodation, or a complex interplay of these factors, leading to issues like retinal image defocus, blur, and chromatic aberration. Other potential factors like the spatial frequency of the visual environment, circadian rhythm, sleep, nutrition, smoking, socio-economic status, and education have debatable independent influences on myopia development. CONCLUSION: The environment exerts a significant influence on the development and progression of myopia. Improving the modifiable key environmental predictors like time spent outdoors and engagement in near work can prevent or slow the progression of myopia. The intricate connections between lifestyle and environmental factors often obscure research findings, making it challenging to disentangle their individual effects. This complexity underscores the necessity for prospective studies that employ objective assessments, such as quantifying light exposure and near work, among others. These studies are crucial for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of how various environmental factors can be modified to prevent or slow the progression of myopia.