PD-L1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinoma: prevalence and prognostic significance in relation to the IASLC grading system.

AIMS: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for adjuvant immunotherapy and has been linked to poor differentiation in lung adenocarcinoma. However, its prevalence and prognostic role in the context of the novel histologic grade has not been evaluated. METHODS: We analysed a cohort of 1233 patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma where PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (22C3 assay) was reflexively tested. Tumour PD-L1 expression was correlated with the new standardized International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) histologic grading system (G1, G2, and G3). Clinicopathologic features including patient outcome were analysed. RESULTS: PD-L1 was positive (≥1%) in 7.0%, 23.5%, and 63.0% of G1, G2, and G3 tumours, respectively. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with male sex, smoking, and less sublobar resection among patients with G2 tumours, but this association was less pronounced in those with G3 tumours. PD-L1 was an independent risk factor for recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.25, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.93-5.48, P < 0.001) and death (adjusted HR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.13-6.40, P = 0.026) in the G2 group, but not in the G3 group (adjusted HR for recurrence = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.64-1.40, P = 0.778). CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression differs substantially across IASLC grades and identifies aggressive tumours within the G2 subgroup. This knowledge may be used for both prognostication and designing future studies on adjuvant immunotherapy.

Lung cancer-specific symptoms and fear of cancer recurrence among recurrence-free non-small cell lung cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer survivors have more psychosocial problems, including depression and anxiety disorder, than other cancer survivors. Lung cancer-specific symptoms, such as cough, dyspnea, or pain in chest, might increase FCR among survivors. We aimed to evaluate the association between lung cancer-specific symptoms and FCR among recurrence-free non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survivors. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Recurrence-free NSCLC survivors were recruited from January to October 2020 at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. We measured FCR using the Korean version of FCRI-SF and categorized them into three groups: non-clinical FCR (nFCR, < 13), subclinical FCR (sFCR, 13 to 21), and clinical FCR (cFCR, ≥ 22). Lung cancer-specific symptoms were measured using the Korean version of EORTC QLQ-LC13 and EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS: A total of 727 survivors were enrolled. One-third (30.8%) of survivors reported sFCR, and 19.7% had cFCR. In a multivariate analysis, survivors with severe pain in chest were 4.7 times (95% CI: 2.4-9.0) more likely to experience cFCR compared to those without it. Mild dyspnea (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.7) and mild dysphagia (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.4) were associated with cFCR. Survivors with sFCR (Coef. - 6.3, 95% CI: - 9.8, - 2.8) and cFCR (Coef. - 11.3, 95% CI: - 15.5, - 7.2) had poorer quality of life compared to survivors with nFCR. CONCLUSION: NSCLC survivors were experiencing lung cancer-specific symptoms even a few years after treatment, which were associated with cFCR, resulting in poor HRQoL. It is necessary to develop a lung cancer-specific symptom checklist and use it during even long-term surveillance.

Adjustment to "new normal" after cancer among non-small cell lung cancer survivors: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer is a life-changing experience, and side effects from treatment can make it difficult for survivors to return to their pre-cancer "normal life." We explored the "new normal" and barriers to achieving it among lung cancer survivors who underwent surgery. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 recurrence-free non-small cell lung cancer survivors. We asked survivors how life had changed; how they defined the "new normal"; barriers that prevent them from achieving a "normal" life; and unmet needs or support for normalcy. Thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Defining "new normal" subjectively depends on an individual's expectation of recovery: (1) being able to do what they want without pain or discomfort; (2) being able to do activities they could accomplish before their surgery; and (3) being able to work, earn money, and support their family. We found that (1) persistent symptoms, (2) fear of cancer recurrence, (3) high expectations in recovery, and (4) psychosocial stress and guilty feelings were barriers to achieving a "new normal." The needs and support for normalcy were information on expected trajectories, postoperative management, and support from family and society. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Survivors defined the "new normal" differently, depending on their expectations for recovery. Informing survivors about the "new normal" so they could expect possible changes and set realistic goals for their life after cancer. Health professionals need to communicate with survivors about expectations for "normality" from the beginning of treatment, and it should be included in comprehensive survivorship care.

Validation of the IASLC Residual Tumor Classification in Patients With Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed By Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) residual tumor classification in patients with stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) followed by surgery. BACKGROUND: As adequate nodal assessment is crucial for determining prognosis in patients with clinical N2 NSCLC undergoing nCCRT followed by surgery, the new classification may have better prognostic implications. METHODS: Using a registry for thoracic cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea, between 2003 and 2019, we analyzed 910 patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC who underwent nCCRT followed by surgery. We classified resections using IASLC criteria: complete (R0), uncertain (R[un]), and incomplete resection (R1/R2). Recurrence and mortality were compared using adjusted subdistribution hazard model and Cox-proportional hazards model, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 96.3% (n = 876) patients who were R0 by Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) criteria, 34.5% (n = 3O2) remained R0 by IASLC criteria and 37.6% (n = 329) and 28% (n = 245) migrated to R(un) and R1, respectively. Most of the migration from UICC-R0 to lASLC-R(un) and IASLC-R1/R2 occurred due to inadequate nodal assessment (85.5%) and extracapsular nodal extension (77.6%), respectively. Compared to R0, the adjusted hazard ratios in R(un) and R1/R2 were 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.52), 1.50 (1.17-1.52) ( P fortrend = .001) for recurrence and 1.18 (0.93-1.51) and 1.51 (1.17-1.96) for death ( P for trend = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The IASLC R classification has prognostic relevance in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC undergoing nCCRT followed by surgery. The IASLC classification will improve the thoroughness of intraoperative nodal assessment and the completeness of resection.

Different prognostic role of EGFR mutation according to the IASLC histological grade in patients with resected early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

AIMS: The prognostic role of EGFR mutations remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of EGFR mutation in consideration of the IASLC histological grade in patients with resected early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3297 patients with stages I-IIA resected lung adenocarcinoma who had had EGFR mutation tests between January 2014 and December 2019 at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared by EGFR mutation status (EGFR-M+ versus EGFR-WT) and IASLC histological grade (G1, G2 and G3). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted HRs (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Compared to the EGFR-WT group, the EGFR-M+ group had a significantly lower proportion of G3 tumour (16 versus 33%, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 376 patients experienced recurrence. After adjusting for histological grade, the aHR for recurrence comparing the EGFR-M+ to the EGFR-WT was 1.30 (95% CI = 1.04-1.62, P = 0.022). The EGFR-M+ group had a significantly lower 5-year RFS than the EGFR-WT group among G3 patients (58.4 versus 71.5%, P < 0.001), but not among G1 and G2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutation status was associated with a risk of recurrence after consideration of the IASLC histological grading, especially in G3 tumours. The results of this study would be useful for developing a new staging system and identifying a subset of patients who may benefit from adjuvant targeted therapy.

Factors associated with failure of cardiopulmonary function recovery after lung cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal changes in cardiopulmonary function (CPF) and identify predictors of cardiopulmonary recovery failure after lung cancer surgery. METHODS: Data was obtained from a prospective CATCH-LUNG cohort study, where patients were divided into two groups based on 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at baseline and 6 months after surgery. CPF recovery failure was defined as a participant whose 6MWD dropped over 50 m from baseline to 6 months after surgery. Patients with a baseline 6MWD less than 400 m were excluded. The analysis was investigated using mixed effects models, and the relative estimates for the predictors were expressed relative risk (RR) and 95% CI using a Poisson regression. RESULTS: Among 419 patients, 24.1% and 17.7% showed failure of CPF recovery at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, baseline step count [RR per 1000 steps lower = 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01-1.09)], baseline dyspnoea [RR per 10 points higher = 1.15(1.07-1.23)], decreased FEV1 % predicted from baseline to 2 weeks after surgery [RR per 10% lower = 1.30(1.10-1.53)] and decreased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from baseline to 2 weeks [RR = 1.95(1.22, 3.11)] or persistent low MVPA at baseline and 2 weeks after surgery [RR = 1.63(1.04, 2.54)] were significant factors for loss of CPF. CONCLUSION: The inability to recover CPF at 6 months after surgery was linked to reduction of lung function and MVPA from baseline to 2 weeks as well as baseline physical activity (PA) and dyspnoea. These results imply that engagement of perioperative PA is necessary to facilitate recovery of CPF after lung cancer surgery.

Conditional Survival of Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze conditional survival estimates of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Conditional survival reflects dynamic prognosis updated to the current status and is a more relevant indicator for current healthcare and life decisions. METHODS: This study included 1883 patients who underwent complete resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at a tertiary cancer center from 1994 to 2016. We calculated 5-year (5Y) conditional overall survival (COS), conditional recurrence-free survival (CRFS), and conditional relative survival (CRS) estimates from diagnosis to 5 years of survival. RESULTS: The 5Y COS, CRFS, and CRS increased from 63.7%, 65.2%, and 70.2% at diagnosis to 75.8%, 91.9%, and 86.4 at 5 years after diagnosis, respectively. While there were large differences with different stages (stage I, II, III) at diagnosis (81.2%, 64.9%, and 37.3% for COS; 85.1, 65.1%, and 67.9% for CRFS; 89.2%, 72.1%, and 41.1% for CRS), the gap decreased with time; rates were similar after 5 years (77.1%, 75.7%, and 72.6% for COS; 91.7%, 90.6%, and 94.5% for CRFS, and 89.3%, 85.4%, and 78.3% in CRS, respectively). The 5Y COS, CRFS, and CRS were persistently lower in older patients even after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Conditional survival estimates generally increase over time, and the largest improvements were observed for patients with advanced stage. Availability of updated prognosis at various time points allows clinicians to better guide their patients. Our results also imply substantial residual risk of recurrence and sustained excess mortality compared to the general population even after 5 years.

Role of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Lymph Node Dissection in Surgery of Early-Stage Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In esophageal cancer surgery, it is difficult to perform thorough dissection of lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN-LN). However, there are limited data regarding the necessity of RLN-LN dissection in surgery for superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma (focused on T1b tumor) and its role in locoregional control and accurate nodal staging. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2016, 567 patients with pT1N0 and 927 patients with cT1N0 squamous cell carcinoma were identified in a prospectively maintained, single institution esophagectomy registry. Sufficient or insufficient RLN-LN assessment group was defined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the number of RLN-LN harvested. To mitigate bias, inverse probability weighting adjustment and several sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the pT1N0 cohort, patients with sufficient (≥ 4) harvested RLN-LNs showed significantly superior 5-year recurrence-free survival (89.1% versus 74.8%, log-rank P < 0.001). Patients with insufficient RLN-LN dissection mainly developed locoregional failure at the upper mediastinal or cervical area (87% of total recurred cases). The survival impact of sufficient RLN-LN dissection was more prominent in subsets of upper-middle thoracic tumors or with deep submucosal invasion. In the analysis on cT1N0 cohort, sufficient RLN-LN assessment conferred a 1.5-fold increase in the discovery of positive-nodal disease (19.4% versus 27.8%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate RLN-LN dissection during surgery may help reduce the risk of recurrence and enhance the accuracy of nodal staging in early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, meticulous surgical evaluation for this region should not be underrated, particularly in the high-risk subset with lymph node metastasis. Visual Abstract Graphical summary of key study findings. T wo cohorts (pT1 and cT1 ; both mainly comprised T1b ) were analyzed for separate purposes; the former controlled for pathologic stage was primarily analyzed in terms of survival and recurrence hazard, whereas the latter (controlled for clinical was used for stage migration ( and intention to treat analysis. Th e results show the significance of adequate bilateral RLN LN in the surgery for early stage ESCC (particularly those with T1b)T1b), in terms of accurate nodal staging, effective nodal clearance, and reduced regional.

Longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes after lung cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, but the decline in pulmonary function after surgery is noticeable and requires attention. This study aimed to evaluate longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after lung cancer surgery. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective cohort study, the Coordinate Approach to Cancer Patients' Health for Lung Cancer. Changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, and the corresponding modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and chronic obstructive lung disease assessment test (CAT) scores were evaluated. Mixed effects model was used to investigate changes in pulmonary function and PROs. RESULTS: Among 620 patients, 477 (76.9%) underwent lobectomy, whereas 120 (19.4%) and 23 (3.7%) were treated with wedge resection/segmentectomy and bilobectomy/pneumonectomy, respectively. Both FVC and FEV1 markedly decreased 2 weeks after surgery and improved thereafter; however, they did not recover to baseline values. The corresponding mMRC dyspnea scale and CAT scores worsened immediately after surgery. The dyspnea scale of the mMRC was still higher, while CAT scores returned to baseline one year after surgery, although breathlessness and lack of energy persisted. Compared to the changes from baseline of FVC and FEV1 in patients who underwent lobectomy, patients who underwent bilobectomy/pneumonectomy showed a greater decrease in FVC and FEV1, while wedge resection/segmentectomy patients had smaller decreases in FVC and FEV1 at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Bilobectomy/pneumonectomy patients had the highest mMRC dyspnea grade among the three groups, but the difference was not statistically significant one year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After lung cancer surgery, pulmonary function and PROs noticeably decreased in the immediate post-operative period and improved thereafter, except for dyspnea and lack of energy. Proper information on the timeline of changes in lung function and symptoms following lung cancer surgery could guide patient care approaches after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03705546; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin after surgery in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter randomized phase III trial.

There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to assess whether adjuvant capecitabine and cisplatin improve survival compared to surgery alone among patients with locally advanced ESCC. This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were eligible if they underwent curative resection for ESCC staged T2-4 or N1 and M0 according to the TNM cancer staging system sixth edition. The intervention group received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine: 1,000 mg/m 2 b.i.d for 14 days, and intravenous cisplatin: 75 mg/m2 at day 1, every 3 weeks). A total of 136 patients were randomly assigned to either the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 68) or surgery-alone group (n = 68). Seven patients who rejected chemotherapy after randomization were excluded from the final analysis. The cumulative incidence of recurrence within 18 months after surgery was significantly lower in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the surgery-alone group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.95]. However, the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.53-1.34 and HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.50-1.18, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in patients with locally advanced ESCC reduced early recurrence but had no statistically significant increase in the long-term disease-free survival. Due to the limited sample size of this study, additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are necessary.

Impact of diffusing lung capacity before and after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation on postoperative pulmonary complications among patients with stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) before and after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) among stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 324 patients with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 2009 and 2016. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to DLco before and after neoadjuvant CCRT; normal-to-normal (NN), normal-to-low (NL), low-to-low (LL), and low-to-very low (LVL). Low DLco and very low DLco were defined as DLco < 80% predicted and DLco < 60% predicted, respectively. RESULTS: On average, DLco was decreased by 12.3% (±10.5) after CCRT. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for any PPC comparing patients with low DLco to those with normal DLco before CCRT was 2.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-3.36). Moreover, the IRR for any PPC was 3.78 (95% CI = 1.68-8.49) in LVL group compared to NN group. The significant change of DLco after neoadjuvant CCRT had an additional impact on PPC, particularly after bilobectomy or pneumonectomy with low baseline DLco. CONCLUSIONS: The DLco before CCRT was significantly associated with risk of PPC, and repeated test of DLco after CCRT would be helpful for risk assessment, particularly in patients with low DLco before neoadjuvant CCRT.

A retrospective comparative analysis of elderly and younger patients undergoing pulmonary resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Age has been a critical predictor for immediate postoperative and long-term results after the pulmonary resection for lung cancer. In this study, we evaluated and compared surgical outcome of stage I non-small cell lung cancer and associated predictive factors between elderly and younger groups. METHODS: Short- and long-term outcomes of elderly group (≥70 years) who were surgically treated and pathologically diagnosed as stage I non-small cell lung cancer from 2004 to 2010 were compared to the results of younger group (<70 years). RESULTS: Total of 1340 patients were included in this study, and the patients were divided into the elderly group (n=285) and the younger group (n=1055). The proportions of squamous cell carcinoma (36.8 vs. 20.0%, p<0.001) and stage IB cancer (58.3 vs. 40.6%, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the elderly group than the younger group. The 30-day and 90-day mortalities were significantly higher in the elderly group (1.8 vs. 0%; p=0.014, 3.9 vs. 0.5%; p<0.001, respectively). The elderly patients also had significantly worse long-term outcomes than the younger group (5-year overall survival rate, 69.0 vs. 91.1%; p<0.001, 5-year disease-free survival rate, 53.3 vs. 80.2%; p<0.001). Decreased diffusion capacity less than 70% was an important predictive factor for short- and long-term outcomes in both the younger and the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with low diffusion capacity are at risk for significantly worse outcome, indicating that patient selection should include assessment of pulmonary function, including diffusion capacity.

Clinical Significance of the Proposed Pathologic Criteria for Invasion by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer in Resected Nonmucinous Lung Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnostic criteria for tumor invasion are essential for precise pathologic tumor (pT) staging. Recently, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Pathology Committee suggested a new set of criteria for assessing tumor invasion, but the clinical usefulness of the proposed criteria has not been evaluated. METHODS: The study included 1295 patients with resected part-solid lung adenocarcinoma from January 2017 to December 2019 at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. The revised pT stage was determined by the extent of the newly measured invasive component using the IASLC criteria. The primary outcome was to compare the performance of the revised pT stage with the original pT stage in predicting recurrence-free survival and proof of invasion status (i.e., recurrence or lymph node metastasis). The secondary outcome was the correlation with radiologic surrogates of tumor invasiveness (consolidation-to-tumor ratio and maximum standardized uptake value) and pathologic risk factors. RESULTS: The re-evaluation resulted in a 22% downstaging and 2.5% upstaging of pT, which improved the correlation with radiologic (consolidation-to-tumor ratio and maximum standardized uptake value) and pathologic risk factors. The revised pT staging allowed for more accurate discrimination of recurrence-free survival than the original pT staging (c-index = 0.794 versus 0.717). Moreover, the revised pT staging significantly improved the prediction of recurrence or lymph node metastasis (area under the curve = 0.818 versus 0.741, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the clinical significance of the IASLC-proposed criteria for invasion. The proposed IASLC criteria offered better alignment with clinicopathologic risk factors and improved prognostication. Further studies are warranted to assess the impact of the IASLC criteria on treatment decisions and patient outcomes.

Supporting Life Adjustment in Patients With Lung Cancer Through a Comprehensive Care Program: Protocol for a Controlled Before-and-After Trial.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer diagnosis affects an individual's quality of life as well as physical and emotional functioning. Information on survivorship care tends to be introduced at the end of treatment, but early intervention may affect posttreatment adjustment. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has explored the effect of early information intervention on the return to work, family, and societal roles of lung cancer survivors. OBJECTIVE: We report the study protocol of a comprehensive care prehabilitation intervention designed to facilitate lung cancer survivors' psychological adjustment after treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive care program was developed based on a literature review and a qualitative study of patients with lung cancer and health professionals. The Lung Cancer Comprehensive Care Program consists of educational videos and follow-up visits by a family medicine physician. To prevent contamination, the control group received routine education, whereas the intervention group received routine care and intervention. Both groups completed questionnaires before surgery (T0) and at 1-month (T1), 6-month (T2), and 1-year (T3) follow-up visits after surgery. The primary outcome was survivors' psychological adjustment to cancer 6 months after pulmonary resection. RESULTS: The historical control group (n=441) was recruited from September 8, 2021, to April 20, 2022, and the intervention group (n=350) was recruited from April 22, 2022, to October 17, 2022. All statistical analyses will be performed upon completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study examined the effectiveness of an intervention that provided general and tailored informational support to lung cancer survivors, ranging from before to the end of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05078918; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05078918. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54707.

Practice pattern and risk of not receiving planned surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Unlike the initial plan, some patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cannot or do not receive surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to report the epidemiology of patients not receiving surgery after nCRT and to evaluate the potential risk of refusing surgery. METHODS: We analysed patients with clinical stage T3-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1-N3M0 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent nCRT as an initial treatment intent between January 2005 and March 2020. Patients not receiving surgery were categorized using predefined criteria. To evaluate the risk of refusing surgery, a propensity-matched comparison with those who received surgery was performed. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was compared between groups, according to clinical response to nCRT. RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 715), 105 patients (14.7%) eventually failed to reach surgery. There were three major patterns of not receiving surgery: disease progression before surgery (n = 25), functional deterioration at reassessment (n = 47), and patient's refusal without contraindications (n = 33). After propensity-score matching, the RFS curves of the surgery group and the refusal group were significantly different (P < 0.001), while OS curves were not significantly different (P = 0.069). In patients who achieved clinical complete response on re-evaluation, no significant difference in the RFS curves (P = 0.382) and in the OS curves (P = 0.290) was observed between the surgery group and the refusal group. However, among patients who showed partial response or stable disease on re-evaluation, the RFS and OS curves of the refusal group were overall significantly inferior compared to those of the surgery group (both P < 0.001). The 5-year RFS rates were 10.3% for the refusal group and 48.2% for the surgery group, and the 5-year OS rates were 8.2% for the refusal group and 46.1% for the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Patient's refusal remains one of the major obstacles in completing the trimodality therapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Refusing surgery when offered may jeopardize oncological outcome, particularly in those with residual disease on re-evaluation after nCRT. These results provide significant implications for consulting patients who are reluctant to oesophagectomy after nCRT.

Preoperative DLco and FEV1 are correlated with postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after esophagectomy.

Limited information is available regarding the association between preoperative lung function and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients with esophageal cancer who undergo esophagectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified into low and high lung function groups by the cutoff of the lowest fifth quintile of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) %predicted (%pred) and diffusing capacity of the carbon monoxide (DLco) %pred. The PPCs compromised of atelectasis requiring bronchoscopic intervention, pneumonia, and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Modified multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression model using robust error variances and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to assess the relative risk (RR) for the PPCs. A joint effect model considered FEV1%pred and DLco %pred together for the estimation of RR for the PPCs. Of 810 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy, 159 (19.6%) developed PPCs. The adjusted RR for PPCs in the low FEV1 group relative to high FEV1 group was 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.00) and 1.98 (95% CI = 1.46-2.68) in the low DLco group relative to the high DLco group. A joint effect model showed adjusted RR of PPCs was highest in patients with low DLco and low FEV1 followed by low DLco and high FEV1, high DLco and low FEV1, and high DLco and high FEV1 (Reference). Results were consistent with the IPTW. Reduced preoperative lung function (FEV1 and DLco) is associated with post-esophagectomy PPCs. The risk was further strengthened when both values decreased together.

Unmet Supportive Care Needs after Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection at a Tertiary Hospital in Seoul, South Korea.

The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence and predictors of unmet needs of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing surgical resection in Seoul, South Korea. A total of 949 patients who completed survey questionnaires that included the Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs Korean version (CaSUN-K), fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) inventory-short form, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were recruited from January to October 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the potential correlation of significant unmet needs, defined as any moderate or strong need, for each domain of CaSUN-K. Of the 949 participants, the mean age was 63.4 ± 8.8 years old, and 529 (55.7%) were male. Overall, 91.8% of participants reported one or more unmet need. The highest domains of moderate-to-strong unmet needs were existential survivorship (59.1%), comprehensive cancer care (51.2%), and information (49.7%). High FCR and poor emotional function were associated with moderate-to-strong unmet needs across all domains of CaSUN-K. NSCLC survivors with a recent diagnosis had more frequent disease-related unmet needs. Interventions to reduce the unmet needs of NSCLC patients should focus on relieving FCR and improving emotional functioning. Furthermore, emphasis should be placed on decreasing disease-related needs, particularly for early survivors of lung cancer during the re-entry phase.

Psychometric Validation of the Korean Version of the Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs (CaSUN) Scale among Korean Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to validate the Korean version of Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs (CaSUN) scale among non-small cell lung cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, from January to October 2020. Participants completed a survey questionnaire that included the CaSUN. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson's correlations were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the CaSUN (CaSUN-K). We also tested known-group validity using an independent t test or ANOVA. RESULTS: In total, 949 provided informed consent and all of which completed the questionnaire. Among the 949 patients, 529 (55.7%) were male; the mean age and median time since the end of active treatment (standard deviation) was 63.4±8.8 years and the median was 18 months. Although the factor loadings were different from those for the original scale, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the six domains in the CaSUN-K ranged from 0.68 to 0.95, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. In the CFA, the goodness-of-fit indices for the CaSUN-K were high. Moderate correlations demonstrated the convergent validity of CaSUN-K with the relevant questionnaire. More than 60% of the participants reported information-related unmet needs, and the CaSUN-K discriminated between the needs reported by the different subgroups that we analyzed. CONCLUSION: The CaSUN-K is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the unmet needs in a cancer population, thus this tool help population to receive timely, targeted, and relevant care.

Reclassifying the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Residual Tumor Classification According to the Extent of Nodal Dissection for NSCLC: One Size Does Not Fit All.

INTRODUCTION: The extent of nodal assessment may require risk-based adjustments in NSCLC. We reclassified the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Residual tumor classification according to the extent of nodal dissection and evaluated its long-term prognosis by tumor stage and histologic subtype. METHODS: We reclassified 5117 patients who underwent resection for clinical stages I to III NSCLC and had complete or uncertain resection by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer classification into the following 3 groups according to compliance with three components (N1, N2, and subcarinal node) of systematic nodal dissection criteria: fully compliant group (FCG), partially compliant group (PCG), and noncompliant group (NCG). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Of the 5117 patients, 2806 (55%), 1959 (38%), and 359 (7%) were FCG, PCG, and NCG, respectively. PCG and NCG were more likely to be of lower clinical stage and adenocarcinoma with lepidic component than FCG. The 5-year RFS and OS were significantly better in NCG than in FCG or PCG (RFS, 86% versus 70% or 74%, p < 0.001; OS, 90% versus 80% or 83%, p < 0.001). In particular, NCG had better RFS and OS than FCG or PCG in clinical stage I and in lepidic-type adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: In early stage NSCLC with low-risk histologic subtype, a less rigorous nodal assessment was not associated with a worse prognosis. Although surgeons should continue to aim for complete resection and thorough nodal assessment, a uniform approach to the extent and invasiveness of nodal assessment may need to be reconsidered.

Supportive Care Needs and Health-Related Quality of Life of Esophageal Cancer Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is (1) to describe the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs among esophageal cancer survivors (ECS) in Korea and (2) to identify the association between unmet needs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: We used a cross-sectional descriptive study design. Participants were 118 ECS from a hospital in Korea who received surgery at least 12 months before participating. We collected data including the Supportive Care Needs Survey-short form 34 and to measure HRQOL, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 with a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 65.2 years, and 92.4% were male. Among five domains of supportive care needs, unmet need prevalence ranged from 0.8% to 50%. The most commonly reported domains of unmet needs were Health System and Information and Physical and Daily Living. Participants with unmet needs in Psychological Needs, Physical and Daily Living Needs, and Patient Care and Support Needs demonstrated significantly poorer HRQOL in almost all measured domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that Korean ECS had substantial unmet needs, especially in the Health System and Information domain. Psychological, Patient Care and Support, and Physical and Daily Living Needs were related to HRQOL. The study can advance understanding of priority issues in ECS.