RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in the modes of delivery of twins in Victoria over 33 years. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All twin births in Victoria, 1 January 1983 - 31 December 2015. MAJOR OUTCOMES: Mode of birth (vaginal, planned or unplanned caesarean delivery); indications for caesarean delivery. RESULTS: During 1983-2015, 32 187 twin pregnancies ended in live or stillbirths in Victoria. The proportion of twins born by caesarean delivery increased from 24% (156 twin deliveries) in 1983 to 71% (782 deliveries) in 2015. The proportion of twin births by planned caesarean delivery with twin pregnancy as the sole indication for caesarean delivery increased across this period from 1.8% (12 twin deliveries) to 21% (231 deliveries). The proportion of twin births by caesarean delivery and the proportion of caesarean twin deliveries with twin pregnancy as the principal indication each differed between Victorian regions. CONCLUSION: During 1983-2015, the proportion of twins born in Victoria by caesarean delivery increased almost threefold, mostly because caesarean delivery has become the preferred mode of birth for twin pregnancies. Regional differences in the delivery of twins suggest that the number of caesarean deliveries can be reduced with appropriate system and training support.
Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea/tendências , Gravidez de Gêmeos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Parto , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitória , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the delivery indication (maternal or fetal) for patients with preterm preeclampsia and assess whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia (Mercy Hospital for Women). We assessed indication for delivery for participants presenting with preeclampsia from 23(+0) to 32(+6) weeks gestation. We compared baseline disease characteristics, disease features at delivery and postnatal outcomes between those delivered for maternal or fetal indications, or for both maternal and fetal indications. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty six participants presented with preterm preeclampsia and 108 were eligible for inclusion in our study. More participants were delivered for maternal indications at 65.7% compared to those requiring delivery on fetal grounds at 19.4% or for both indications at 14.8% (p < 0.0001). Maternal disease characteristics at presentation were similar between groups; however, there was a higher proportion of growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers among those delivered on fetal grounds. Participants delivered on maternal grounds gained less gestation, had higher blood pressure and higher incidence of abnormal liver function tests than those delivering for fetal indications at delivery. CONCLUSION: Participants with preterm preeclampsia were predominantly delivered due to maternal disease progression compared to fetal compromise.