Proximal Hypospadias-Isolated Genital Condition or Marker of More?

PURPOSE: The prevalence of endocrine/genetic anomalies in boys with proximal hypospadias is unknown. We describe an endocrine/genetic evaluation for boys with proximal hypospadias to determine who may have a difference/disorder of sex development and/or benefit from additional testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed boys with hypospadias seen at our hospital between January 2013 and October 2018. Those with proximal (penoscrotal, scrotal, perineal) hypospadias who presented before age 6 months and underwent endocrine/genetic testing were included. Demographics, test results, testicular examination at presentation, comorbidities and diagnoses were abstracted. RESULTS: A total of 1,789 boys with hypospadias were identified. Of 131 boys with proximal hypospadias all 60 who underwent endocrine/genetic evaluation were included. Most of these patients had bilateral palpable testes (52, 86%) that were fully descended (41, 68%). Associated anatomical anomalies were found in 53% of patients. All boys underwent endocrine testing, which was completely typical for a male infant in most (41, 68%). Common genetic tests included karyotyping (100%), microarray (38%) and multigene panel (13%). Genetic anomalies were found in 17 boys (28%), including 7 of 41 (17%) with bilateral descended testes and 10 of 19 (53%) with 1 or more undescended testes (p=0.01). Six of 8 boys with at least 1 nonpalpable testis had a genetic anomaly vs 11 of 52 with bilateral palpable testes (p=0.005). Differences/disorders of sex development were found in 9 patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Of 60 boys with proximal hypospadias 53% had nongenital anomalies, 28% had genetic anomalies and 15% had a difference/disorder of sex development. Although endocrine testing was clinically useful, genetic testing was most diagnostically revealing. Endocrine/genetic evaluation should be considered for boys with proximal hypospadias.

Impact of cell-free DNA screening on parental knowledge of fetal sex and disorders of sex development.

OBJECTIVE: Discrepancies between cfDNA and ultrasound predicted fetal sex occur, possibly indicating disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs). Among expectant/recent parents, this study assessed cfDNA knowledge/use, fetal sex determination attitudes/behaviors, general knowledge of DSD, and possible psychological impact of discrepancy between fetal sex on cfDNA and ultrasound. METHOD: Parents were surveyed about fetal sex determination methods, knowledge of cfDNA and DSD, distress related to possible cfDNA inaccuracy. RESULTS: Of 916 respondents, 44% were aware of possible discrepancy between cfDNA and ultrasound, 22% were aware of DSD. 78% and 75% would be upset and worried, respectively, with results showing fetal sex discrepancy. Most (67%) revealed predicted fetal sex before delivery. 38% were offered cfDNA. Of those revealing fetal sex, 24% used cfDNA results, 71% ultrasound, and 7% both. cfDNA users were more frequently aware of possible discrepancy between cfDNA and ultrasound (76% vs 41%, P < .0001), but not of DSD (29% vs 23%, P = .29). CONCLUSION: Fetal sex determination is favored, and cfDNA is frequently used for predicting fetal chromosomal sex. Many parents are unaware of possible discrepancies between cfDNA and ultrasound, and potential for DSD. Most would be distressed by discordant results. Accurate counseling regarding limitations cfDNA for fetal sex determination is needed.

Prenatal detection and evaluation of differences of sex development.

INTRODUCTION: Differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) can be detected at different ages, including prenatally. The recent implementation of prenatal genetic testing (including cell-free DNA) may affect the frequency and impact of prenatal diagnosis of DSD. Our aims were to (1) describe prenatal detection and evaluation of differences of sex development presenting to a multidisciplinary DSD clinic and (2) explore possible parental distress accompanying this evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of mothers presenting prenatally, and patients presenting during infancy, to a multidisciplinary DSD clinic from 2013 to 2017 was conducted. Data extracted included demographics, final diagnoses, prenatal screening, prenatal evaluation, postnatal endocrine, genetic and radiologic testing, and clinician's notes on parent/patient distress. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were identified; ten (15%) had prenatal detection of a suspected DSD. Of those, 4/10 were detected prenatally in the last study year alone. Within the prenatal group, 6/10 had cell-free DNA results discordant with ultrasound, 2/10 were detected by atypical genitalia on ultrasound, and 2/10 were detected through karyotyping performed for other indications. After birth, 3/10 patients were found to not have a DSD. Final diagnoses for the full study cohort are shown in the Summary Table, comparing prenatal versus postnatal presentation to our DSD clinic. Clinicians noted distress for most parents during the prenatal evaluation of a possible DSD, including one mother who reported suicidal thoughts. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal suspicion of DSD can occur through discordant prenatal testing and has been observed at our clinic in recent years, in line with other recent studies. Contributing factors to these prenatal presentations could be increased referrals to the clinic, and increased use of non-invasive prenatal testing, which can lead to inaccurate or discordant sex identification. The prenatal suspicion of a potential DSD can be associated with parental distress, underscoring the need for adequate counseling for tests that determine fetal sex, including cell-free DNA.

Incidental Findings: The Importance of Pretest Counseling.

Researchers at the University of Bourgogne in Dijon, France surveyed French geneticists who were members of the "Association Français des Généticiens" on incidental findings (IF) found on array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) technology retrospectively over a seven-year period.

Geographic and temporal analysis of folate-sensitive fetal malformations.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential geographic and temporal clustering of folate-sensitive fetal malformations as a prelude to a targeted preconception curriculum in folic acid supplementation. METHODS: Our comprehensive prenatal anomaly database was queried to select fetal malformations presumed to be sensitive to preconception folate insufficiency. Evidence of geographic clustering was evaluated by distribution of individual cases using zip codes of maternal residence. Potential temporal clustering of anomalies was sought by tabulating the frequency of each anomaly category during 5 consecutive 2-year intervals between 1992 and 2001. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, approximately 2000 fetal anomalies were identified, of which 400 (20%) were considered potentially folate sensitive. We found geographic clustering of ventral wall defects as well as obstructive uropathy by zip code analysis. Significant increases in the frequencies of cardiac defects (P <.001) and obstructive uropathy (P <.001) were noted during the epoch of this study. A moderate increase in anomaly frequency was also seen in the diagnostic subcategory of gastroschisis, in which 15 of 27 total gastroschisis cases occurred in 2000-2001. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic clustering and temporal trends in anomaly rates were noted in certain folate-sensitive malformation categories. Identification of specific, high-incidence regions may provide an opportunity for targeted interventions designed to supplement the national folic acid campaign.

Antenatal detection of skeletal dysplasias.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. METHODS: All antenatally detected anomalies are coded in our ultrasound database, which is linked with a genetics database that includes outcomes. A final diagnosis is sought on the basis of radiographic studies, molecular testing, or both. Our ultrasound and genetics databases were queried for "skeletal dysplasias." All cases were reviewed specifically for the degree of bone shortening and other distinguishing characteristics on antenatal sonography. RESULTS: Thirty-seven cases of skeletal dysplasia were antenatally diagnosed over an 8-year period. Complete follow-up was available in 31 cases. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 22.7 weeks (range, 14-32.3 weeks). Twenty-one cases were diagnosed before 24 weeks. A final diagnosis was obtained in 80% of cases. The antenatal diagnosis was correct in 20 (65%) of 31 cases. There were 2 false-positive diagnoses. Specific final diagnoses included thanatophoric dysplasia (8), osteogenesis imperfecta (6), Roberts syndrome (2), achondroplasia (3), Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (1), metaphyseal dysplasia (1), spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (1), distal arthrogryposis (1), caudal regression (1), and glycogen storage disorder (1). The condition was correctly thought to be lethal in 16 of the fetuses on the basis of early severe long bone shortening (13), femur length-abdominal circumference ratio of less than 0.16 (12), hypoplastic thorax (10), marked bowing or fractures (4), short ribs (4), caudal regression (1), and cloverleaf skull (1). The ability to predict lethality was 100%. There were no false-positive findings with respect to lethality. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate antenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias is problematic; in this series, only 20 of 31 cases were correctly diagnosed. However, the antenatal prediction of lethality was highly accurate. The most common predictors of lethal skeletal dysplasias included early and severe shortening of the long bones, femur length-abdominal circumference ratio of less than 0.16, hypoplastic thorax, and certain distinguishing characteristics.