Optic Nerve and Perioptic Sheath Diameter (ONSD), Eyeball Transverse Diameter (ETD) and ONSD/ETD Ratio on MRI in Large Middle Cerebral Artery Infarcts: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent progress in the multidisciplinary management of large middle cerebral artery infarcts, the neurological prognosis remains worrying in a non-negligible number of cases. The objective of this study is to analyze the contribution of optic nerve and perioptic sheath measurement on MRI to the acute phase of large middle cerebral artery infarcts. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study between January 2008 and December 2019 in a single academic medical center was performed. Cases and controls were selected by interrogation of International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10th edition, with ischemic stroke as criterion (code I64). Decompressive hemicraniectomy was a criterion for large middle cerebral artery infarcts (cases). Cases were matched with controls (1:3) based on age (± 5 years), sex, and year of hospitalization (± 2 years) The examinations were performed on 3T MRI (Siemens IRM 3T Magnetom).Optic nerve and perioptic sheath diameter was calculated using electronic calipers, 3 mm behind retina and in a perpendicular vector with reference to the orbit in axial 3D TOF sequence. RESULTS: Of 2612 patients, 22 patients met all the criteria of large middle cerebral artery infarcts and they were paired with 44 controls. Patients were mainly women, mean age of 53.6 years. There is a significant difference in the size of the optic nerve and perioptic sheath diameter measured on MRI at patient's admission (right: 5.13 ± 0.2 mm vs. 4.80 mm ± 0.18, p <0. 0001, left: 5.16 ± 0.17 vs 4.78 ± 0.20, p<0.0001). The AUC of optic nerve and perioptic sheath diameter was 0.93 (95%IC [0.85-1.00]), for a threshold at 5.03 mm, the sensitivity was 0.82 (95%IC [0.6-0.93]), specificity 0.94 (95%IC [0.85-0.98]). The Odds Ratio of large middle cerebral artery infarcts was 46.4 for optic nerve and perioptic sheath diameter the (95%IC [6.15-350.1] p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Optic nerve and perioptic sheath diameter in the first MRI can predict the risk of developing large middle cerebral artery infarcts requiring a decompressive hemicraniectomy.

Electrodiagnostic accuracy in polyneuropathies: supervised learning algorithms as a tool for practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: The interpretation of electrophysiological findings may lead to misdiagnosis in polyneuropathies. We investigated the electrodiagnostic accuracy of three supervised learning algorithms (SLAs): shrinkage discriminant analysis, multinomial logistic regression, and support vector machine (SVM), and three expert and three trainee neurophysiologists. METHODS: We enrolled 434 subjects with the following diagnoses: chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (99), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (124), hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (46), diabetic polyneuropathy (67), and controls (98). In each diagnostic class, 90% of subjects were used as training set for SLAs to establish the best performing SLA by tenfold cross validation procedure and 10% of subjects were employed as test set. Performance indicators were accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: SVM showed the highest overall diagnostic accuracy both in training and test sets (90.5 and 93.2%) and ranked first in a multidimensional comparison analysis. Overall accuracy of neurophysiologists ranged from 54.5 to 81.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This proof of principle study shows that SVM provides a high electrodiagnostic accuracy in polyneuropathies. We suggest that the use of SLAs in electrodiagnosis should be exploited to possibly provide a diagnostic support system especially helpful for the less experienced practitioners.

Early Management of Transient Ischemic Attack in Emergency Departments in France.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments play a key role in the diagnosis and treatment of transient ischemic attacks, but limited data are available about the early management of such patients in emergency wards. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate emergency physicians' management of transient ischemic attack and analyze variations factors. METHODS: A multicenter survey among emergency physicians of the Grand Est region network (Est-RESCUE) was conducted from January 28th to March 28th, 2019. Medical and administrative data were collected by the same network and the national directory of medical resources. RESULTS: Among 542 emergency physicians recipients, 78 answered (14%) and 71 were finally included, practicing in 25 public hospitals homogeneously distributed across the territory, including 3 university hospitals. A cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was obtained for 75%-100% of patients by 4.3% of responders, 36.4% of which were performed within more than 24 hours. A cardiac monitoring was prescribed in 75%-100% of cases by 32.4% of responders. A neurologic consultation was routinely requested by 84.6% of responders practicing in a university hospital and 36.8% of responders practicing in a community hospital (P = .02). Patients were hospitalized in a neurovascular unit in 75%-100% of cases by 17.4% of responders, which happened more likely in university hospitals (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Transient ischemic attack suffers from management disparities across territories, due to limited access to technical facilities and neurologic consultations. Therefore, international recommendations are too often not followed. Implementation of territorial neurovascular tracks may help to standardize the management of these patients.

Comparison of clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies with or without pain.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) is a rare neuropathy with a heterogeneous clinical profile. Painless recurrent palsies are the usual presentation, but neuropathic pain could be predominant or inaugural. Browsing the medical literature, we only found two articles reffering to this important clinical feature. Whether there are differences between patients with or without pain is unclear. The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical and electrophysiological features of these patients and to evaluate the impact on their disability. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with HNPP at the Limoges University Hospital Centre were included and separated into two groups according to the presence or absence of neuropathic pain. In each case, the clinical, genetic, electrodiagnostic, therapeutic features and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 23 patients, 52% presented with neuropathic pain. There was no difference between groups regarding to clinical and electrophysiological features, except for the amplitude of the ulnar sensory nerve (p < 0,003). The amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) seemed to be higher in patients with pain, but were below the lower limit of normal. Patients with pain had a higher mRS than patients without pain (p < 0,007). CONCLUSION: This study supports previous published results and highlights a trend for higher sensory amplitudes in HNPP patients with pain. We found a prevalence of neuropathic pain of 52% in patients with HNPP, underlining the need to systematically assess pain in such patients in order to improve their management.

Immunohistochemical Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Meningiomas and Their Mimics.

The differential diagnosis between meningioma and others tumors can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate different immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between meningioma and their morphological mimics. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarray with antiepithelial membrane antigen (EMA), progesterone receptor, somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A), CD34, STAT6, S100, SOX10, HMB45, MelanA, GFAP, inhibin, and BCL2 antibodies. One hundred and twenty-seven meningiomas, 26 solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytomas (SFT/HPC), 39 schwannomas, 17 hemangioblastomas, 21 melanomas, 9 gliosarcomas, 5 neurofibromas, 9 peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors, 7 synovial sarcomas, and 5 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors were included in the microarray. SSTR2A was the most sensitive (95.2%) and specific (92%) marker of meningiomas. In combination, SSTR2A and/or EMA positivity reached maximal sensitivity (100%). Coexpression of SSTR2A and EMA was the most specific (94.8%) for the diagnosis of meningioma, regardless of the grade or subtype, with the exception of the differential diagnosis with synovial sarcoma. All synovial sarcomas were EMA-positive and 6/7 SSTR2A-positive. STAT6 showed optimum sensitivity and specificity (100%) for SFT/HPC. SOX10 was the most sensitive (94.3%) and specific (100%) marker to discriminate meningiomas from schwannomas. In conclusion, SSTR2A, STAT6, and SOX10 were the most sensitive and specific markers to distinguish meningiomas from their morphological mimics.