Evaluation of clinical outcomes according to HER2 detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization in women with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the influence of HER2 gene amplification, as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), on clinical outcomes (objective response rates, time to disease progression, and overall survival time) in women with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab in 3 clinical trials. Breast cancer tissue specimens were evaluated using a direct labeled, dual-probe FISH assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of > or = 2:0 were considered positive for gene amplification. All specimens had previously demonstrated overexpression of HER2 protein at the 2+ or 3+ level by immunohistochemistry using the Clinical Trials Assay. Response rate, time to disease progression, and survival times were then compared between the FISH-positive and FISH-negative cohorts in each of the 3 clinical trials. RESULTS: Informative FISH results were obtained in 765 (96%) of the 799 patients enrolled in the 3 clinical trials. Overall, 596 (78%) were FISH-positive and 169 (22%) were FISH-negative. The proportion of FISH-positive patients was comparable in all 3 trials. Clinical benefit from trastuzumab therapy appeared to be restricted to patients with FISH-positive metastatic breast cancer. In each clinical trial, the cohort of FISH-positive patients had higher overall response rates and longer durations of survival compared with FISH-negative patients. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that assessment of HER2 amplification by FISH is the preferred method to select patients for trastuzumab therapy.

Determination of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and concordance with the clinical trials immunohistochemical assay in women with metastatic breast cancer evaluated for treatment with trastuzumab.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the concordance between HER2 gene amplification, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and HER2 protein overexpression assessed by an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay. The IHC protocol used was a research assay, known as the Clinical Trial Assay (CTA), developed to select women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for three pivotal clinical trials of trastuzumab therapy. METHODS: A direct-labeled, dual-probe FISH assay was used to determine HER2 amplification in 623 fixed breast cancer tissue specimens. These specimens had been stored as paraffin-embedded sections for 25 years. All specimens had been analyzed for HER2 protein expression by the CTA. To assess the reproducibility of FISH results in archived material, we evaluated a separate group of 617 breast cancer tissue specimens at two different laboratories. RESULTS: Informative FISH results were available for 529 (85%) of the 623 specimens. Overall concordance between FISH and IHC results was 82% (95% CI; 7885%). Assay agreement between FISH results and specimens with immunostaining scores of 0, 1+, and 3+ were 97, 93 and 89%, respectively. However, only 24% of specimens with 2+ immunostaining scores had HER2 amplification by FISH; there was assay disagreement in 76% of specimens in this IHC subgroup. Interlaboratory FISH concordance was 92% (95% CI; 8994%), indicating very good assay reproducibility in these archived specimens. CONCLUSION: HER2 status determined by CTA-IHC and FISH are significantly correlated; however, differences between these two assays can a ect patient selection for trastuzumab therapy.