A single-dose, 3-way crossover pharmacokinetic comparison between immediate-release oxycodone hydrochloride with aversion technology (IRO-A, Oxecta), IRO-a with Niacin, and Oxycodone Hydrochloride (Roxicodone) in healthy adults under fasting conditions.

Snorting and intravenous use are common routes of administration for advanced opioid abusers. A tablet form of immediate-release oxycodone (IRO) developed using Aversion Technology combines immediate release (IR) oxycodone HCl with inactive functional excipients that are intended to discourage tampering associated with intranasal and intravenous abuse (IRO-A; Oxecta, Pfizer). The purpose of this single-dose, open-label, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of IRO-A to the marketed immediate-release oxycodone HCl (IRO; Roxicodone, Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc., Newport, KY). IRO-A was also compared with IRO-A with niacin, a product previously developed containing the same functional excipients plus niacin as an aversive agent to discourage oral overconsumption. Healthy adults (N = 40) aged 18-55 years received single 15-mg doses of IRO-A, IRO-A with niacin (60 mg), or IRO after fasting overnight. Naltrexone was administered to diminish opioid effects. Doses were separated by a ≥7-day washout. Plasma samples taken at designated time points were analyzed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios for ln-transformed parameters for IRO-A and IRO were 92%, 104%, and 104% for Cmax, AUClast (AUC is area under the concentration-time curve), and AUCinf; 90% confidence intervals were within the accepted 80%-125% range. IRO-A was also bioequivalent to IRO-A with niacin. Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and typical of opioid therapy (nausea, headache, vomiting). Flushing only occurred when the subjects received the IRO-A with niacin treatment (9/37 subjects). The results demonstrated that IRO-A is bioequivalent to IRO and IRO-A with niacin. With features designed to discourage tampering associated with common forms of abuse, IRO-A may provide an alternative to conventional immediate-release oxycodone formulations.

Single-dose administration of MK-0657, an NR2B-selective NMDA antagonist, does not result in clinically meaningful improvement in motor function in patients with moderate Parkinson's disease.

The glutamatergic system is thought to contribute to the motor disturbances observed in Parkinson's disease. Blockade of glutamatergic activity by a selective antagonist of the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is associated with improvement in motor symptoms in a preclinical model of Parkinson's disease. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study was conducted in patients with moderate Parkinson's disease to evaluate the pharmacologic activity of MK-0657, an NR2B-selective NMDA receptor antagonist. Patients (n=16) received single oral doses of MK-0657 7 mg, carbidopa/levodopa 25/250 mg (LD) as a positive control, and placebo, after which motor function was serially evaluated by means of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Motor Examination (UPDRS-ME). LD administration resulted in significant improvement in the UPDRS-ME relative to placebo (P=.025), confirming the sensitivity of the test paradigm; however, the UPDRS-ME change following MK-0657 administration showed no improvement compared with placebo (P=.110) despite exceeding the target MK-0657 plasma concentration of 400 nM. Although the administration of MK-0657 was generally well tolerated, it was associated with increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure relative to placebo. The results of this study do not support ongoing clinical development of MK-0657 as a novel monotherapy for Parkinson's disease.

Similarity of insulin detemir pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability profiles in healthy caucasian and Japanese american subjects.

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir in three ascending doses in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. This was an open-label, single-center, parallel-group design evaluating 30 subjects (15 Japanese and 15 Caucasians). Subjects received a total of three subcutaneous injections (one injection per visit) of insulin detemir (0.19, 0.38, 0.75 U/kg [1 U = 24 nmol]) in ascending order. Following drug administration, subjects received intravenous glucose in 0.5-mg/kg/min increments every 30 minutes, followed by a constant rate of 2.0 mg/kg/min for up to 12 hours. For pharmacokinetic evaluations, serial blood sampling was performed over a period of 30 hours after dosing. Of the subjects, 36 were enrolled, and 30 completed the study. There was a linear dose-response relationship between the three ascending insulin detemir doses and serum insulin detemir AUC values for both the Japanese and Caucasian subjects. The two dose-response regression lines had equivalent slopes but slightly different intercepts (although not statistically significant). This difference may be due to variation in AUC, body weight differences, or chance. Six subjects discontinued the study, 2 as a result of adverse events (blood draw-related ecchymosis and hypoglycemia). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were headache, dizziness, and reactions related to blood draws/infusion sites. All TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. The results show that an increase in insulin detemir dose will result in a similar increase in insulin detemir concentration in the two ethnic groups. Therefore, therapeutic dosing of insulin detemir is expected to be similar in both ethnic groups, with no special dose adjustment or algorithm based on race. Insulin detemir at 0.19, 0.38, and 0.75 U/kg was generally well tolerated in both Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 28-day, polysomnographic study of gabapentin in transient insomnia induced by sleep phase advance.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multiple doses of gabapentin 250 mg on polysomnography (PSG) and participant-reported sleep assessments in a 5-h phase advance insomnia model. METHODS: Adults reporting occasional disturbed sleep received gabapentin 250 mg (n = 128) or placebo (n = 128). On Days 1 and 28, participants received medication 30 min before bedtime and were in bed from 17:00 to 01:00, ∼5 h before their habitual bedtime. Sleep was assessed by PSG, a post sleep questionnaire, and the Karolinska Sleep Diary. Next-day residual effects and tolerability were evaluated. On Days 2-27, participants took medication at home 30 min before their habitual bedtime. RESULTS: Treatment-group demographics were comparable. Gabapentin resulted in significantly less PSG wake after sleep onset (WASO) compared with placebo on Day 1 (primary endpoint, mean: 107.0 versus 149.1 min, p ≤ 0.001) and Day 28 (113.6 versus 152.3 min, p = 0.002), and significantly greater total sleep time (TST; Day 1: 347.6 versus 283.9 min; Day 28: 335.3 versus 289.1 min) (p ≤ 0.001). Participant-reported WASO and TST also showed significant treatment effects on both days. Gabapentin was associated with less %stage1 on Day 1, and greater %REM on Day 28, versus placebo. During home use, gabapentin resulted in significantly less participant-reported WASO and higher ratings of sleep quality. Gabapentin was well tolerated (most common adverse events: headache, somnolence) with no evidence of next-day impairment. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin 250 mg resulted in greater PSG and participant-reported sleep duration following a 5-h phase advance on Day 1 and Day 28 of use without evidence of next-day impairment, and greater sleep duration during at-home use.