The problem with gentamicin: reducing administration and prescribing errors in neonates treated for early onset infection with gentamicin.

We describe a quality improvement (QI) project to reduce the number of administration and prescribing errors with gentamicin on a local neonatal unit in a district general hospital, from January 2017 to August 2019. Baseline data collected showed seven errors in the first 16 months of the project (from 1999 doses). The aim of this QI project was to have no low-level, moderate-level or severe level harm errors in the intervention period. A number of interventions were carried out including a change to local guidelines and teaching sessions for staff. All Datix reports for gentamicin were reviewed as well as data collected from the pharmacy team for a further 16 months. One low harm error was reported in this period (from 1938 doses). Education of the medical and nursing staff has been a key intervention in reducing our gentamicin errors as well as changing the way we prescribe gentamicin.

Pilot feasibility study of a digital technology approach to the systematic electronic capture of parent-reported data on cognitive and language development in children aged 2 years.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of language and cognition in children at risk of impaired neurodevelopment following neonatal care is a UK standard of care but there is no national, systematic approach for obtaining these data. To overcome these challenges, we developed and evaluated a digital version of a validated parent questionnaire to assess cognitive and language development at age 2 years, the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R). METHODS: We involved clinicians and parents of babies born very preterm who received care in north-west London neonatal units. We developed a digital version of the PARCA-R questionnaire using standard software. Following informed consent, parents received automated notifications and an invitation to complete the questionnaire on a mobile phone, tablet or computer when their child approached the appropriate age window. Parents could save and print a copy of the results. We evaluated ease of use, parent acceptability, consent for data sharing through integration into a research database and making results available to the clinical team. RESULTS: Clinical staff approached the parents of 41 infants; 38 completed the e-registration form and 30 signed the e-consent. The digital version of the PARCA-R was completed by the parents of 21 of 23 children who reached the appropriate age window. Clinicians and parents found the system easy to use. Only one parent declined permission to integrate data into the National Neonatal Research Database for approved secondary purposes. DISCUSSION: This electronic data collection system and associated automated processes enabled efficient systematic capture of data on language and cognitive development in high-risk children, suitable for national delivery at scale.