Sustainable implementation of antibiotic stewardship on a surgical intensive care unit evaluated over a 10-year period.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational study examined the implementation of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) on the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of a specialized academic teaching hospital. METHODS: Application density of antimicrobial agents (ADA), substance class change, development of resistance, and clinical outcomes were investigated with reference to ABS in three intervals over a 10-year period: the pre-intervention phase (2008-2010), the intervention phase (2011-2014), and the post-intervention phase (2015-2017). RESULTS: Following the introduction of ABS, ADA was reduced from 89.3 recommended daily doses/100 patient days (RDD/100 PD) at the pre-intervention phase to 68.0 RDD/100 PD at the post-intervention phase. The antibiotic ADA (AB-ADA) similarly showed a significant decrease from 83.3 to 62.0 RDD/100 PD (p < 0.0001). The case mix index (CMI), which describes the average case severity across patients and mortality on the SICU was not significantly different comparing intervention and post-intervention phase. It was also possible to achieve a substance class change following the introduction of ABS. There was no obvious change in bacterial resistance rates. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates a sustainable effect of the implementation of ABS, which was sustained through the post-intervention phase.

Improving hand hygiene compliance in the emergency department: getting to the point.

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) represents an environment with a high density of invasive, and thus, infection-prone procedures. The two primary goals of this study were (1) to define the number of hand-rubs needed for an individual patient care at the ED and (2) to optimize hand hygiene (HH) compliance without increasing workload. METHODS: Prospective tri-phase (6-week observation phases interrupted by two 6-week interventions) before after study to determine opportunities for and compliance with HH (WHO definition). Standard operating procedures (SOPs) were optimized for invasive procedures during two predefined intervention periods (phases I and II) to improve workflow practices and thus compliance with HH. RESULTS: 378 patient cases were evaluated with 5674 opportunities for hand rubs (HR) and 1664 HR performed. Compliance significantly increased from 21% (545/2603) to 29% (467/1607), and finally 45% (652/1464; all p<0.001) in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The number of HR needed for one patient care significantly decreased from 22 to 13 for the non-surgical and from 13 to 7 for the surgical patients (both p<0.001) due to improved workflow practices after implementing SOPs. In parallel, the number of HR performed increased from 3 to 5 for non-surgical (p<0.001) and from 2 to 3 for surgical patients (p=0.317). Avoidable opportunities as well as glove usage instead of HR significantly decreased by 70% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first detailed data on HH in an ED setting. Importantly, HH compliance improved significantly without increasing workload.

A prospective cluster trial to increase antibiotic prescription quality in seven non-ICU wards.

Aim: To evaluate general shortcomings and faculty-specific pitfalls as well as to improve antibiotic prescription quality (ABQ) in non-ICU wards, we performed a prospective cluster trial. Methods: An infectious-disease (ID) consulting service performed a prospective investigation consisting of three 12-week phases with point prevalence evaluation conducted once per week (=36 evaluations in total) at seven non-ICU wards, followed by assessment of sustainability (weeks 37-48). Baseline evaluation (phase 1) defined multifaceted interventions by identifying the main shortcomings. Then, to distinguish intervention from time effects, the interventions were performed in four wards, and the 3 remaining wards served as controls; after assessing effects (phase 2), the same interventions were performed in the remaining wards to test the generalizability of the interventions (phase 3). The prolonged responses after all interventions were then analyzed in phase 4. ABQ was evaluated by at least two ID specialists who assessed the indication for therapy, the adherence to the hospital guidelines for empirical therapy, and the overall antibiotic prescription quality. Results: In phase 1, 406 of 659 (62%) patients cases were adequately treated with antibiotics; the main reason for inappropriate prescription was the lack of an indication (107/253; 42%). The antibiotic prescription quality (ABQ) significantly increased, reaching 86% in all wards after the focused interventions (502/584; nDf=3, ddf=1,697, F=6.9, p=0.0001). In phase 2 the effect was only seen in wards that already participated in interventions (248/347; 71%). No improvement was seen in wards that received interventions only after phase 2 (189/295; 64%). A given indication significantly increased from about 80% to more than 90% (p<.0001). No carryover effects were observed. Discussion: ABQ can be improved significantly by intervention bundles with apparent sustainable effects.

Improving hand hygiene compliance rates in the haemodialysis setting: more than just more hand rubs.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis patients are at high risk for developing healthcare-associated infections as well as acquiring multidrug-resistant microorganisms. Hand hygiene is considered to be the single most effective tool to prevent healthcare-associated infections. The number of indications and the extent of indication-specific compliance with hand rubs in the haemodialysis setting are currently unknown. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, three-phase, observational intervention study on hand hygiene during haemodialysis treatments. Optimized hand hygiene standard operating procedures (SOPs) for dialysis connections (Intervention I) and disconnections (Intervention II) were compiled and implemented during two predefined intervention periods. RESULTS: A total of 8897 indications for hand rubs were observed throughout this study. In the course of the study, we identified an increase in the number of hand rubs performed (6-9, mean number per dialysis procedure), parallelled by a decrease in the indications for hand rubs (21-15), resulting in a significant increase of overall hand rub compliance (30-62%). The greatest improvement was seen before aseptic tasks (21-52%), the indication with the greatest impact on preventing healthcare-associated infections. There was no difference between haemodialysis via central venous catheter access or arterio-venous (AV) fistulas. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first detailed data on the number of and indications for hand rubs during dialysis. An >100% increase in overall hand hygiene compliance could be achieved by a comparably moderate increase in hand rubs performed in combination with optimized hand hygiene SOPs.

Antineoplastic chemotherapy in cancer patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major nosocomial pathogen causing serious morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients. Antineoplastic chemotherapy causes immunosuppression, and thus there is concern whether such patients should proceed to therapy without delay or dose reduction. There are presently no guidelines with appropriate provisions for antineoplastic chemotherapy in cancer patients with MRSA colonization or infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome of all 27 patients with known MRSA infection or colonization undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy for solid or hematological malignancies in our institution. RESULTS: In our patients, MRSA was detected at multiple sites. 11 patients were found to be colonized with MRSA, whereas 16 patients had colonization and/or infection. MRSA sepsis occurred in 12 cases. Interestingly, at the time of MRSA sepsis, neutrophil counts were less than 500/µl in 42% of our patients. However, fatal complications due to MRSA occurred in only 2 patients. Among patients with MRSA sepsis, the mortality rate was 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results with a limited number of patients support the contention that antineoplastic chemotherapy may well be administered to patients with MRSA and should not necessarily lead to dose reduction or treatment delay, especially in cases with curative intent.

The Characteristics of 50 Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients With and Without ARDS.

BACKGROUND: The type of pneumonia (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) that is caused by the new coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) is now spreading across the world in a pandemic. Many patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the University Hospital Aachen during an outbreak that first struck the Heinsberg district in February 2020. METHODS: A comparative presentation of the clinical features of the first 50 COVID-19 patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who were hospitalized in the University Hospital Aachen. RESULTS: 24 intubated patients were treated in the intensive care unit for ARDS of varying degrees of severity, while 26 patients who were breathing spontaneously without ARDS, but nevertheless needed supplemental oxygen, were treated in a separate isolation ward. The median age of the patients was 65 (IQR 58-76). The median latency from symptom onset to hospitalization was four days (IQR 1-8). Patients with ARDS had preexisting respiratory diseases more commonly than patients without ARDS (58% [95% confidence interval: 39; 76] versus 42% [26; 61]) and were more commonly overweight or obese (83% [64; 93] versus 42% [26; 61]). The two groups did not differ in viral burden but displayed significant differences in laboratory findings: ARDS patients had persistently elevated values for leukocytes, interleukin-6, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, and D-dimers over the period of observation. Patients without ARDS had persistently elevated inflammatory parameters and fever for at least one week, with an accompanying need for supplemental oxygen. Three of the patients with ARDS died of multiorgan failure, while four in the non-ARDS group died of respiratory insufficiency. CONCLUSION: This initial description of a cohort of COVID-19 patients with and without ARDS in Germany reveals that those with ARDS more commonly have preexisting respiratory diseases and obesity, as well as persistently elevated inflammatory markers. COVID-19 patients without ARDS may likewise require prolonged hospitalization because of persistently elevated inflammatory values with a simultaneous need for supplemental oxygen.

Surveillance of nosocomial infections in a neurologic intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess data on the epidemiology of nosocomial infection (NI) among neurologic intensive care patients. DESIGN: Prospective periodic surveillance study. SETTING: An 8-bed neurologic intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS: All those admitted for more than 24 hours during five 3-month periods between January 1999 and March 2003. METHODS: Standardized surveillance within the German infection surveillance system. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients with a total of 2,867 patient-days and a mean length of stay of 8.5 days were enrolled during the 15-month study period. A total of 71 NIs were identified among 52 patients. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the most frequent NI (36.6%), followed by pneumonia (29.6%) and bloodstream infections (BSIs) (15.5%). The overall incidence and incidence density of NIs were 21.0 per 100 patients and 24.8 per 1,000 patient-days, respectively. Incidence densities were 9.8 UTIs per 1,000 urinary catheter-days (CI95, 6.4-14.4), 5.6 BSIs per 1,000 central venous catheter-days (CI9s, 2.8-10.0), and 12.8 cases of pneumonia per 1,000 ventilation-days (Cl95, 8.0-19.7). Device-associated UTI and pneumonia rates were in the upper range of national and international reference data for medical ICUs, despite the intensive infection control and prevention program in operation in the hospital. CONCLUSION: Neurologic intensive care patients have relatively high rates of device-associated nosocomial pneumonia and UTI. For a valid comparison of surveillance data and implementation of targeted prevention strategies, we would strongly recommend provision of national benchmarks for the neurologic ICU setting.

Evaluation of postdischarge surveillance of surgical site infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Artificial joint replacement of hip (HPRO) and knee (KPRO) are 2 of about 20 categories of operative procedures of the surveillance of surgical site infection (SSI) as stated by nosocomial infections surveillance systems in the United States and in Germany. Periprosthetic SSI can manifest itself after a long period. METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-six orthopedic patients from 2 centers were evaluated after HPRO (n = 508) or KPRO (n = 248). SSI was recorded during hospitalization and for 12 month postdischarge. The surveillance regimen was extended by also sending patients a questionnaire after 12 months postdischarge. All complaints were followed up by contacting the patients and any clinicians and general practitioners (GPs) involved. Stratified infection rates and standardized infection ratio (SIR) were calculated and compared with reference data of the national surveillance system. RESULTS: The total response rate to the postal questionnaire survey was 85.2%. SSI was recorded in 16 patients (3.15%) after HPRO; 12 were detected by predischarge surveillance, and the 4 cases found postdischarge were all organ/space SSI. In total, only 1 SSI was detected after KPRO before discharge and none after discharge (SSI rate 0.40%). Time between discharge and detection of SSI cases ranged from 8 days to 8 months. SIR of HPRO was 1.25 and SIR of KPRO was 0.36. CONCLUSION: Because 25% of SSIs after HPRO occurred after discharge and all were organ/space SSI, highlights the importance of postdischarge surveillance of nosocomial infections (NIs). Because all SSIs were reported already by current surveillance, the extended postdischarge surveillance appears to be unnecessary. The pursuit of shorter hospital stay after surgery may challenge the methods of surveillance systems in future.

Assessment of a selective surveillance method for detecting nosocomial infections in patients in the intensive care department.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of a time- and cost-effective system for the surveillance of the nosocomial infection (NI) is a challenge for infection control practitioners. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and the time reduction using a selective surveillance method (SSM) for the detection of NIs in comparison with a reference surveillance method (RSM). METHODS: During a 12-month period, surveillance was performed prospectively in 4 intensive care departments on a rotating basis. Using the RSM, NIs were identified by prospective chart reviews performed twice a week combined with weekly infectious disease ward rounds. In the SSM, surveillance was reduced to microbiologic data and participation in the weekly infectious disease ward rounds followed by selective chart review. RESULTS: In all, 578 patients amounting to 3597 patient-days were included in the study. In total, 78 NIs among 56 patients were identified. The overall sensitivity of the SSM compared with the RSM was 93.6% (73 of 78 NIs). The sensitivity of the SSM for the most important device-associated NIs (pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and urinary tract infections) was 96.3% (52 of 54 NIs) and 87.5% (21 of 24 NIs) for other NIs. Time required using the SSM was 1.3 hours compared with 4.1 hours per 10 beds per week (P =.0001) with the RSM. CONCLUSIONS: Within our setting, a SSM with restriction to microbiology reports and participation in the infectious disease ward rounds detected NIs with a high sensitivity and a remarkable time reduction.

Simultaneous placement of multiple central lines increases central line-associated bloodstream infection rates.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance for central line (CL)-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is generally advocated. However, the standard definition of this surveillance does not take into account the number of CLs in place and thus the possibility of increased infection risk with multiple CLs in place simultaneously. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneous placement of more than 1 CL is associated with an increased CLABSI rate. METHODS: The number of CLs, CL-days, and CLABSIs and CLABSI rates with regard to the number of CLs in place simultaneously was documented in 2 intensive care units between 2001 and 2011. Standard CLABSI rates, as well as the rates for 1 CL and multiple CLs in place, were calculated. RESULTS: The average CLABSI rate was significantly lower in patients with 1 CL in place compared with those with more than 1 CL in place (3.69 per 1,000 CL-days vs 13.09/1,000 CL-days; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 3.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.61-5.05). Importantly, all differences from the standard rate (5.94/1,000 CL-days) were significant (1 CL vs standard: IRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.74; more than 1 CL vs standard: IRR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.87-2.65; both P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the number of CLs in place had a strong influence on CLABSI rates. Thus, we advocate stratifying patients by the number of CLs in place to take this increased risk of infection into account during surveillance.

Improving hand hygiene compliance in the anesthesia working room work area: More than just more hand rubs.

BACKGROUND: The anesthesia working area represents an environment with a high density of invasive and, thus, infection-prone procedures. The 2 primary goals of this study were (1) to perform a precise analysis of anesthesia-related hand hygiene (HH) procedures and (2) to optimize HH compliance. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, triphase before/after study to determine opportunities for and compliance with hand disinfection (World Health Organization definition) in an anesthesia working area. Standard operating procedures were optimized for invasive procedures during 2 predefined intervention periods to improve work flow practices. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty anesthesia procedures were evaluated with 12,142 indications for HH. Compliance significantly increased from 10% (465/4,636) to 30% (1,202/4,029) and finally to 55% (1,881/3,477; all P < .001) in phases I, II, and III, respectively. We identified a significant increase in the number of hand rubs performed during 1 anesthesia procedure (2 to 8, respectively; P < .001) in parallel with a significant decrease in number of opportunities needing a hand rub (24 to 14, respectively; P < .0001) because of improved work flow practices. Notably, the greatest improvement was seen before aseptic tasks (8% to 55%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first detailed data on anesthesia-related and indication-specific HH. Importantly, HH compliance improved significantly without a noticeable increasing workload.

Hand hygiene in medical students: performance, education and knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Despite several guidelines on hand hygiene (HH), compliance especially in physicians is reported to be low which has huge implications for healthcare-associated infections. To evaluate performance of HH, influence of teaching and influence of monitoring the results in medical students, we conducted an observational study. METHODS: Performance of hand disinfection was evaluated in first (N=28), third (N=193) and fifth (N=45) year medical students using fluorescent hand disinfectant. The influence of teaching and information about result control was assessed. The students perception of the impact of HH was also evaluated by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Presence of disinfectant gaps was observed significantly more often in first year medical students compared to third year ones (82% vs, 60%; p=0.02). In additional, > 3 gaps were seen significantly more often in first year medical students compared to fifth year students (36% vs. 9%; p=0.007). Both information about teaching and monitoring the results improved outcome significantly. For example, gaps were present in 92% without information and without teaching, in 70% (RR: 1.3 (1.0-1.6); p=0.003) with information about result control only, and in only 18% (5.1 (3.0-8.5); p=0.0001) after teaching. Notably, the medical students ascribed HH to be of a great importance regardless of their level of education. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of HH could be improved by practical training as evidenced by best HH performance being documented immediately after teaching and a training effect during the course of medical studies was also observed. Thus, we suggest implementing regular education and practical training on HH from early on in the medical studies curricula to improve overall quality of patient care. regular education and practical training on HH from early on in the medical studies curricula to improve overall quality of patient care.

Hand hygiene in pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit patients: daily opportunities and indication- and profession-specific analyses of compliance.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered to be the single most effective tool to prevent health care-associated infections. Daily hand hygiene opportunities and compliance for pediatric/neonatal intensive care units (ICU) are currently unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in pediatric and neonatal ICU patients with analyses of hand hygiene behavior in relation to profession, indication, and shift and correlation with disinfectant usage. RESULTS: Hand hygiene opportunities were significantly higher for pediatric (321/24 hours) than neonatal (194/24 hours; P = .024) patients. Observed compliance rates were 53% (pediatric) and 61% (neonatal) and found to be significantly higher in nurses (57%; 66%) than in physicians (29%, 52%, respectively; P < .001; P = .017, respectively). For neonates, compliance rates were significantly higher before patient contact and aseptic tasks (78%) than after patient, patient body fluid, or patients' surrounding contact (57%; P < .001). Calculating disinfectant usage revealed a 3-fold lower compliance rate of 17%. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first data on opportunities for and compliance with hand hygiene in pediatric/neonatal patients encompassing the whole day and night activities and including a comparison of observed and calculated compliance rates. Observation revealed high compliance especially in nurses and in situations of greatest impact. The data provide a detailed characterization of hand hygiene performance in the neonatal/pediatric ICU setting.

Compliance with hand hygiene on surgical, medical, and neurologic intensive care units: direct observation versus calculated disinfectant usage.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is considered the single most effective measure to prevent and control health care-associated infections (HAIs). Although there have been several reports on compliance rates (CRs) to HH recommendations, data for intensive care units (ICUs) in general and for shift- and indication-specific opportunities in particular are scarce. METHODS: The aim of this study was to collect data on ICU-, shift-, and indication-specific opportunities, activities and CRs at a surgical ICU (SICU), a medical ICU (MICU), and a neurologic ICU (NICU) at the University Hospital Aachen based on direct observation (DO) and calculated disinfectant usage (DU). RESULTS: Opportunities for HH recorded over a 24-hour period were significantly higher for the SICU (188 per patient day [PD]) and MICU (163 per PD) than for the NICU (124 per PD). Directly observed CRs were 39% (73/188) in the SICU, 72% (117/163) in the MICU, and 73% (90/124) in the NICU. However, CRs calculated as a measure of DU were considerably lower: 16% (29/188) in the SICU, 21% (34/163) in the MICU, and 25% (31/124) in the NICU. Notably, CRs calculated from DO were lowest before aseptic tasks and before patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first data picturing a complete day, including shift- and indication-specific analyses, and comparing directly observed CRs with those calculated based on DU, the latter of which revealed a 2.75-fold difference. Worrisomely, CRs were very low, especially concerning indications of greatest impact in preventing HAIs, such as before aseptic task. Thus, the gathering of additional data on CRs and the reasons for noncompliance is warranted.