p53 induces the expression of its antagonist p73 Delta N, establishing an autoregulatory feedback loop.

The p53 tumor suppressor protein activates transcription and induces cell death. A close homologue of p53, termed p73, is expressed in transactivating (TA) forms that induce growth arrest and apoptosis much like p53. However, the p73 gene contains a second promoter, giving rise to the expression of p73 Delta N, a species of p73 proteins that lack the N-terminal transactivation domain. We show here that the expression of p73 Delta N is induced by p53 on the mRNA and protein level. The promoter that regulates p73 Delta N expression in human cells was cloned and found to be activated by p53, as well as by p73TA, directly through a specific DNA element. The p73 Delta N proteins, that are thereby expressed, bound to p53-responsive promoter DNA, competed with p53 for DNA binding, antagonized the activation of transcription by p53, and prevented p53-induced cell death. In addition, a transcriptional repressor domain was identified within the splicing variant p73 Delta Nalpha. The combination of p73DeltaNalpha and mdm2 antagonized p53 more strongly than either p73Nalpha or mdm2 alone. Blocking endogenous p73 Delta N by a trans dominant fragment, or its removal by siRNA, increased the activity of a p53-responsive promoter in cells that contain a wild type p53 gene. Thus, the induction of p73 Delta N expression by p53 establishes an autoregulatory feedback loop that keeps the trigger of cell death under tight control.

Adenovirus E1-transformed cells grow despite the continuous presence of transcriptionally active p53.

The E1 region of adenovirus (Ad) type 5 is capable of transforming cells. According to current concepts, the Ad E1B 55 kDa (E1B 55K) protein enables transformed cells to grow by constantly binding and inactivating the p53 tumour suppressor protein. To test this model, the transcriptional activity of p53 was determined in Ad E1-transformed cells. Surprisingly, it was found that a p53-responsive promoter is highly active in Ad E1-transformed cells and further activated only 3- to 4-fold (compared to 200-fold in p53(-/-) cells) by exogenously expressed p53 or p53mt24-28, a p53 mutant that is transcriptionally active but unable to bind the E1B 55K. On the other hand, the transient overexpression of E1B 55K led to a strong downregulation of a p53-responsive promoter relative to its baseline activity in Ad E1-transformed cells but not in p53(-/-) cells. COS-7 cells, transformed by simian virus 40 (SV40), also showed constitutive p53 activity, whereas HeLa cells, transformed with oncogenic human papillomavirus, did not. Upon stable transfection, Ad E1-transformed cells but not p53(-/-) cells gave rise to colonies that expressed exogenous p53 or p53mt24-28 but, nonetheless, grew at near-wild-type rates. It is proposed that E1B 55K or the SV40 tumour antigen are saturated by the p53 protein, which accumulates in virus-transformed cells, leaving a proportion of active p53 molecules. The transformation of cells by the Ad E1 genes confers permissiveness for active p53, conceivably by inactivating the relevant products of p53 target genes that would otherwise prevent cell growth. Thus, Ad-transformed cells contain and tolerate active p53.