Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) in Eyelid and Ocular Surface Tumors: A Review for Treatment of Naïve and Recurrent Malignancies.

The goal of radiotherapy in the treatment of eyelid and ocular surface tumors is to eradicate tumor burden in a manner that maintains visual function and preserve surrounding sensitive ocular tissue. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT-brachytherapy) is a radiotherapy technique associated with a highly focal dose distribution, with the advantage of boosting limited size target volumes to very high dose while sparing normal tissue. The reduction in the ocular and adnexal complications that result from this form of therapy, has led in recent years, to an increase in the use of IRT for the treatment of eyelid and ocular surface tumors. For eyelid malignancies, IRT is used as an independent treatment in small eyelids tumors, in postoperative treatment of high-risk patients and as well as salvage therapy in local recurrences. In the treatment of conjunctival malignancies, due to the high risk of local recurrence, the use of adjuvant therapies as IRT has shown to improve outcomes. In this review, we focus on eyelid and ocular surface IRT techniques and provide an overview of indication, outcomes and toxicity of IRT for the treatment of naïve and recurrent eyelid and conjunctival tumors.

The role of retinal imaging in the management of abusive head trauma cases.

BACKGROUND: As retinal hemorrhage (RH) is the most frequent and reliable finding of abusive head trauma (AHT), an ophthalmology consultation should be systematically required in suspected cases. Full retinal examination through pharmacologically dilated pupil can detect the type and pattern of RHs, helping to distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a case series of 6 infants (aged 0.6-10 months) with AHT who were admitted to the Emergency Department of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS in Rome with severe intracranial hemorrhages. Children underwent full multidisciplinary assessment including dilated fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and digital wide-field fundus photography (DWFFP - in our case RetCam). In our paper we report the clinical presentation, the ocular findings and outcome at discharge. RESULTS: The mean age at the hospital admission was 6.28 months. In all infants, intracranial hemorrhages were found. Preretinal and intraretinal hemorrhages were detected, collecting good-quality retinal images. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging of retinal hemorrhages represents a fundamental moment of AHT diagnosis and documentation. Although RetCam is the gold standard for the acquisition of retinal images in suspected cases, OCT is extremely valuable in forensic evaluation since it can detect even small macular hemorrhages. Therefore, the combination of RetCam and OCT imaging can give relevant hints for the diagnosis of AHT, allowing to evaluate the extent, spread and morphology of RHs.

Effect of Intravitreal Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation on Treatment Success of Retinopathy of Prematurity: The FIREFLEYE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Laser photocoagulation, which is the standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), can have adverse events. Studies of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections have suggested efficacy in the treatment of ROP, but few studies have directly compared them with laser treatments. Objective: To compare intravitreal aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation in infants with ROP requiring treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, phase 3, 24-week, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 27 countries (64 hospital sites) throughout Asia, Europe, and South America. Overall, 118 infants (gestational age ≤32 weeks at birth or birth weight ≤1500 g) with ROP severity (zone I stage 1+ [stage 1 plus increased disease activity], zone I stage 2+, zone I stage 3, zone I stage 3+, zone II stage 2+, or zone II stage 3+) requiring treatment or with aggressive posterior ROP in at least 1 eye were enrolled between September 25, 2019, and August 28, 2020 (the last visit occurred on February 12, 2021). Interventions: Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive a 0.4-mg dose of intravitreal aflibercept (n = 75) or laser photocoagulation (n = 43) at baseline. Additional treatment was allowed as prespecified. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of infants without active ROP and unfavorable structural outcomes 24 weeks after starting treatment (assessed by investigators). The requirement for rescue treatment was considered treatment failure. Intravitreal aflibercept was deemed noninferior if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% bayesian credible interval for the treatment difference was greater than -5%. Results: Among 118 infants randomized, 113 were treated (mean gestational age, 26.3 [SD, 1.9] weeks; 53 [46.9%] were female; 16.8% had aggressive posterior ROP, 19.5% had zone I ROP, and 63.7% had zone II ROP) and 104 completed the study. Treatment (intravitreal aflibercept: n = 75; laser photocoagulation: n = 38) was mostly bilateral (92.9%), and 82.2% of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group received 1 injection per eye. Treatment success was 85.5% with intravitreal aflibercept vs 82.1% with laser photocoagulation (between-group difference, 3.4% [1-sided 95% credible interval, -8.0% to ∞]). Rescue treatment was required in 4.8% (95% CI, 1.9% to 9.6%) of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group vs 11.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 20.7%) of eyes in the laser photocoagulation group. The serious adverse event rates were 13.3% (ocular) and 24.0% (systemic) in the intravitreal aflibercept group compared with 7.9% and 36.8%, respectively, in the laser photocoagulation group. Three deaths, which occurred 4 to 9 weeks after intravitreal aflibercept treatment, were considered unrelated to aflibercept by the investigators. Conclusions and Relevance: Among infants with ROP, intravitreal aflibercept compared with laser photocoagulation did not meet criteria for noninferiority with respect to the primary outcome of the proportion of infants achieving treatment success at week 24. Further data would be required for more definitive conclusions regarding the comparative effects of intravitreal aflibercept and laser photocoagulation in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004208.

International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition.

PURPOSE: The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity is a consensus statement that creates a standard nomenclature for classification of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). It was initially published in 1984, expanded in 1987, and revisited in 2005. This article presents a third revision, the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition (ICROP3), which is now required because of challenges such as: (1) concerns about subjectivity in critical elements of disease classification; (2) innovations in ophthalmic imaging; (3) novel pharmacologic therapies (e.g., anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents) with unique regression and reactivation features after treatment compared with ablative therapies; and (4) recognition that patterns of ROP in some regions of the world do not fit neatly into the current classification system. DESIGN: Review of evidence-based literature, along with expert consensus opinion. PARTICIPANTS: International ROP expert committee assembled in March 2019 representing 17 countries and comprising 14 pediatric ophthalmologists and 20 retinal specialists, as well as 12 women and 22 men. METHODS: The committee was initially divided into 3 subcommittees-acute phase, regression or reactivation, and imaging-each of which used iterative videoconferences and an online message board to identify key challenges and approaches. Subsequently, the entire committee used iterative videoconferences, 2 in-person multiday meetings, and an online message board to develop consensus on classification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consensus statement. RESULTS: The ICROP3 retains current definitions such as zone (location of disease), stage (appearance of disease at the avascular-vascular junction), and circumferential extent of disease. Major updates in the ICROP3 include refined classification metrics (e.g., posterior zone II, notch, subcategorization of stage 5, and recognition that a continuous spectrum of vascular abnormality exists from normal to plus disease). Updates also include the definition of aggressive ROP to replace aggressive-posterior ROP because of increasing recognition that aggressive disease may occur in larger preterm infants and beyond the posterior retina, particularly in regions of the world with limited resources. ROP regression and reactivation are described in detail, with additional description of long-term sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: These principles may improve the quality and standardization of ROP care worldwide and may provide a foundation to improve research and clinical care.

Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): an open-label randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing worldwide use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), there are few data on their ocular efficacy, the appropriate drug and dose, the need for retreatment, and the possibility of long-term systemic effects. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with laser therapy in treatment of ROP. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, superiority multicentre, three-arm, parallel group trial was done in 87 neonatal and ophthalmic centres in 26 countries. We screened infants with birthweight less than 1500 g who met criteria for treatment for retinopathy, and randomised patients equally (1:1:1) to receive a single bilateral intravitreal dose of ranibizumab 0·2 mg or ranibizumab 0·1 mg, or laser therapy. Individuals were stratified by disease zone and geographical region using computer interactive response technology. The primary outcome was survival with no active retinopathy, no unfavourable structural outcomes, or need for a different treatment modality at or before 24 weeks (two-sided α=0·05 for superiority of ranibizumab 0·2 mg against laser therapy). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02375971. INTERPRETATION: Between Dec 31, 2015, and June 29, 2017, 225 participants (ranibizumab 0·2 mg n=74, ranibizumab 0·1 mg n=77, laser therapy n=74) were randomly assigned. Seven were withdrawn before treatment (n=1, n=1, n=5, respectively) and 17 did not complete follow-up to 24 weeks, including four deaths in each group. 214 infants were assessed for the primary outcome (n=70, n=76, n=68, respectively). Treatment success occurred in 56 (80%) of 70 infants receiving ranibizumab 0·2 mg compared with 57 (75%) of 76 infants receiving ranibizumab 0·1 mg and 45 (66%) of 68 infants after laser therapy. Using a hierarchical testing strategy, compared with laser therapy the odds ratio (OR) of treatment success following ranibizumab 0·2 mg was 2·19 (95% Cl 0·99-4·82, p=0·051), and following ranibizumab 0·1 mg was 1·57 (95% Cl 0·76-3·26); for ranibizumab 0·2 mg compared with 0·1 mg the OR was 1·35 (95% Cl 0·61-2·98). One infant had an unfavourable structural outcome following ranibizumab 0·2 mg, compared with five following ranibizumab 0·1 mg and seven after laser therapy. Death, serious and non-serious systemic adverse events, and ocular adverse events were evenly distributed between the three groups. FINDINGS: In the treatment of ROP, ranibizumab 0·2 mg might be superior to laser therapy, with fewer unfavourable ocular outcomes than laser therapy and with an acceptable 24-week safety profile. FUNDING: Novartis.

Follow-up to Age 4 Years of Treatment of Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection versus Laser: Fluorescein Angiographic Findings.

PURPOSE: To compare structural outcome at age 4 years of eyes treated with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab with fellow eyes treated with conventional laser photoablation in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). DESIGN: Single, randomized, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: All inborn babies with type 1 zone 1 ROP at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Catholic University, Rome, from September 1, 2009, to March 31, 2012. METHODS: In 21 infants (42 eyes), 1 eye was randomized to receive an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg bevacizumab; the fellow eye underwent conventional laser photoablation. Digital retinal imaging and fluorescein angiography (FA) were performed at an average of 4 years after treatment in follow-up after these studies performed at treatment and 9 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fluorescein angiograms were examined by 2 experts to document retinal and choroidal findings. RESULTS: Among the 20 bevacizumab-treated eyes available at 4 years of age, all showed abnormalities at the periphery (avascular area, vessel leakage, shunts, abnormal vessel branching, and tangles) or the posterior pole (hyperfluorescent lesions, absence of foveal avascular zone). These lesions were not observed in the majority of the lasered eyes. Among the 19 laser-treated eyes, leakage was noted in 1 eye, shunts and tangles were noted in 3 eyes, and macular abnormalities were noted in 3 eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescein angiography has shown potentially serious and long-term ocular effects that are present more commonly after treatment with bevacizumab for acute-phase ROP than after laser.

Intravitreal bevacizumab versus laser treatment in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity: report on fluorescein angiographic findings.

PURPOSE: To compare the structural outcome at 9 months of eyes treated with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab with fellow eyes treated with conventional laser photoablation in zone I type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). DESIGN: Single randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: All inborn babies with type 1 zone I ROP at a single institution were included in the study. One eye was randomized to receive an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg bevacizumab; the fellow eye received conventional laser photoablation. METHODS: Digital fundus photographs and fluorescein angiography (FA) using the RetCam (Clarity Medical Systems Inc., Pleasanton, CA) were performed before treatment and 9 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of retinal and choroidal abnormalities on FA at 9 months. RESULTS: Thirteen infants were enrolled; 1 died 3 months after birth. One laser-treated eye progressed to stage 5 retinal detachment. The remaining 23 eyes had favorable structural results at the 9-month follow-up and provided FA results. At 9 months of age, all eyes treated with a bevacizumab injection were noted to have abnormalities at the periphery (large avascular area, abnormal branching, shunt) or the posterior pole (hyperfluorescent lesion, absence of foveal avascular zone). These posterior and peripheral lesions were not observed in the majority of the lasered eyes. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents significant vascular and macular abnormalities of eyes in the bevacizumab group. Long-lasting implications of these abnormalities for visual function of the child need to be studied.

Phenylephrine eye drops in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery: incidence, presentation, and management of complications during general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine eye drops are widely used as mydriatic agent to reach the posterior segment of the eye. In literature, many reports suggest a systemic absorption of this agent as a source of severe adverse drug reactions. Hence, we reviewed our experience with topical phenylephrine in ophthalmic surgery. METHODS: In May 2006, following US guidelines publication, a standard operating procedure was issued in our operating rooms to standardize the use of phenylephrine eye drops in our practice. Two years later, after the occurrence of a cluster of serious adverse drug reactions in infants undergoing surgery, a review of phenylephrine safety and systemic complications incidence was performed. RESULTS: We observed 451 pediatric patients, and 187 met the inclusions criteria: Among them, 4 experienced hemodynamic complications due to phenylephrine eye drops. The incidence of major complications was 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Two different patterns of side effects occurred. The first one was a cardiovascular derangement with severe hypertension and heart rate alterations; the other one involved exclusively pulmonary circuit causing early edema. These clinical manifestations, their duration, and treatment responses are all explainable by alfa1-adrenergic action of phenylephrine. This hypothetic pathogenesis has been confirmed also by the usefulness of direct vasodilators (anesthetic agents) and by the negative outcome occurred in the past with the use of beta-blockers.

Taser-Related Ocular Injuries: A Review of the Literature and Medico-Legal Implications.

PURPOSE: Electric weapons have dangers associated with their use, such as burns and trauma related with the impacts of uncontrolled falls, even though they often minimize morbidity and mortality. The exact visual outcome of the damage inflicted is unknown, even though numerous studies have been documented in the literature about the ocular damage induced by the use of these tools. METHODS: We present a narrative review of types of eye damage associated with the use of the Taser. The following search terms were used to identify eligible articles through the PubMed database: "TASER", "Conducted Electric Weapons", "CEWs". RESULTS: A total of 15 articles were included with information about 38 patients with eye damage associated with the use of taser. The majority of patients were males. In most cases the mechanism of injury was the penetration of the probe inside the eye. Clinical manifestations of ocular damage were present in only 18 out of 38 cases and varied according to the type of damage mechanism. Indeed, the cases in which the probe had penetrated the eye showed more severe clinical manifestations with a poor visual outcome. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the introduction of taser use for law enforcement requires serious consideration and adequate training for officers.

Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): five-year outcomes of a randomised trial.

Background: Concerns remain over the long-term safety of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors to treat retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). RAINBOW is an open label randomised trial comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (in 0.2 mg and 0.1 mg doses) with laser therapy in very low birthweight infants (<1500 g) with ROP. Methods: Of 201 infants completing RAINBOW, 180 were enrolled in the RAINBOW Extension Study. At 5 years, children underwent ophthalmic, development and health assessments. The primary outcome was visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. The study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02640664. Findings: Between 16-6-2016 and 21-4-2022, 156 children (87%) were evaluated at 5 years. Of 32 children with no acuity test result, 25 had a preferential looking test, for 4 children investigators reported low vision for each eye, and in 3 further children no vision measurement was obtained. 124 children completed the acuity assessment, the least square mean (95% CI) letter score in the better seeing eye was similar in the three trial arms-66.8 (62.9-70.7) following ranibizumab 0.2 mg, 64.6 (60.6-68.5) following ranibizumab 0.1 mg and 62.1 (57.8-66.4) following laser therapy; differences in means: ranibizumab 0.2 mg v laser: 4.7 (95% CI: -1.1, 10.5); 0.1 mg v laser: 2.5 (-3.4, 8.3); 0.2 mg v 0.1 mg: 2.2 (-3.3, 7.8). High myopia (worse than -5 dioptres) in at least one eye occurred in 4/52 (8%) children following ranibizumab 0.2 mg, 8/55 (15%) following ranibizumab 0.1 mg and 11/45 (24%) following laser therapy (0.2 mg versus laser: odds ratio: 3.99 (1.16-13.72)). Ocular and systemic secondary outcomes and adverse events were distributed similarly in each trial arm. Interpretation: 5-year outcomes confirm the findings of the original RAINBOW trial and a planned interim analysis at 2 years, including a reduced frequency of high myopia following ranibizumab treatment. No effects of treatment on non-ocular outcomes were detected. Funding: Novartis Pharma AG.

Intravitreal Aflibercept vs Laser Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Two-Year Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in the Nonrandomized Controlled Trial FIREFLEYE next.

Importance: Prospective long-term data after retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections vs laser therapy are scarce. The FIREFLEYE (Aflibercept for ROP IVT Injection vs Laser Therapy) next trial is prospectively evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes following ROP treatment with intravitreal aflibercept vs laser therapy. Objective: To evaluate 2-year ophthalmic and safety outcomes after 0.4-mg aflibercept injection or laser therapy in the 24-week randomized (2:1) FIREFLEYE trial (FIREFLEYE outcomes previously reported). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective nonrandomized controlled trial performed in 24 countries in Asia, Europe, and South America (2020-2025) follows up participants treated in the FIREFLEYE randomized clinical trial (2019-2021) through 5 years of age. Participants included children born very or extremely preterm (gestational age ≤32 weeks) or with very or extremely low birth weight (≤1500 g) who were previously treated with a 0.4-mg injection of aflibercept compared with laser therapy for severe acute-phase ROP. Data for the present interim analysis were acquired from March 18, 2020, to July 25, 2022. Interventions: Complications of ROP treated at investigator discretion (no study treatment). Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy end points included ROP status, unfavorable structural outcomes, ROP recurrence, treatment for ROP complications, completion of vascularization, and visual function. Safety end points included adverse events and growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Results: Overall, 100 children were enrolled (median gestational age, 26 [range, 23-31] weeks; 53 boys and 47 girls). Of these, 21 were Asian, 2 were Black, 75 were White, and 2 were of more than 1 race. At 2 years of age, 61 of 63 children (96.8%) in the aflibercept group vs 30 of 32 (93.8%) in the laser group had no ROP. Through 2 years of age, 62 of 66 (93.9%) in the aflibercept group and 32 of 34 (94.1%) in the laser group had no unfavorable structural outcomes. No new retinal detachment occurred during the study. Four children in the aflibercept group (6.1%) were treated for ROP complications before 1 year of age (2 had preexisting end-stage disease and total retinal detachment; 1 had reactivated plus disease; and 1 had recurrent retinal neovascularization not further specified). Most children were able to fix and follow a 5-cm toy (aflibercept group, 118 of 122 eyes [96.7%] among 63 children; laser group, 62 of 63 eyes [98.4%] among 33 children). High myopia was present in 9 of 115 eyes (7.8%) among 5 children in the aflibercept group and 13 of 60 eyes (21.7%) among 9 children in the laser group. No relevant differences in growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing treatment of severe acute-phase ROP with 0.4-mg injection of aflibercept and laser, disease control was stable and visual function was appropriate in children through 2 years of age. No adverse effects on safety, including growth and neurodevelopment, were identified. These findings provide clinically relevant long-term information on intravitreal aflibercept injection therapy for ROP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04015180.

Systemic exposure to aflibercept after intravitreal injection in premature neonates with retinopathy of prematurity: results from the FIREFLEYE randomized phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: There are no data on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of intravitreal aflibercept in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). FIREFLEYE compared aflibercept 0.4 mg/eye and laser photocoagulation in infants with acute-phase ROP requiring treatment. METHODS: Infants (gestational age ≤32 weeks or birthweight ≤1500 g) with treatment-requiring ROP in ≥1 eye were randomized 2:1 to receive aflibercept 0.4 mg or laser photocoagulation at baseline in this 24-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority, phase 3 study. Endpoints include concentrations of free and adjusted bound aflibercept in plasma, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exploration of systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor effects, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Of 113 treated infants, 75 received aflibercept 0.4 mg per eye at baseline (mean chronological age: 10.4 weeks), mostly bilaterally (71 infants), and with 1 injection/eye (120/146 eyes). Concentrations of free aflibercept were highly variable, with maximum concentration at day 1, declining thereafter. Plasma concentrations of adjusted bound (pharmacologically inactive) aflibercept increased from day 1 to week 4, decreasing up to week 24. Six infants experienced treatment-emergent serious adverse events within 30 days of treatment; aflibercept concentrations were within the range observed in other infants. There was no pattern between free and adjusted bound aflibercept concentrations and blood pressure changes up to week 4. A low-titer (1:30), non-neutralizing, treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody response was reported in 1 infant, though was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: 24-week data suggest intravitreal aflibercept for treatment of acute-phase ROP is not associated with clinically relevant effects on blood pressure, further systemic adverse events, or immunogenicity. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04004208.

Cord blood transfusions in extremely low gestational age neonates to reduce severe retinopathy of prematurity: results of a prespecified interim analysis of the randomized BORN trial.

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are at high risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), with potential life-long visual impairment. Low fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels predict ROP. It is unknown if preventing the HbF decrease also reduces ROP. METHODS: BORN is an ongoing multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial investigating whether transfusing HbF-enriched cord blood-red blood cells (CB-RBCs) instead of adult donor-RBC units (A-RBCs) reduces the incidence of severe ROP (NCT05100212). Neonates born between 24 and 27 + 6 weeks of gestation are enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive adult donor-RBCs (A-RBCs, arm A) or allogeneic CB-RBCs (arm B) from birth to the postmenstrual age (PMA) of 31 + 6 weeks. Primary outcome is the rate of severe ROP at 40 weeks of PMA or discharge, with a sample size of 146 patients. A prespecified interim analysis was scheduled after the first 58 patients were enrolled, with the main purpose to evaluate the safety of CB-RBC transfusions. RESULTS: Results in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis are reported. Twenty-eight patients were in arm A and 30 in arm B. Overall, 104 A-RBC units and 49 CB-RBC units were transfused, with a high rate of protocol deviations. A total of 336 adverse events were recorded, with similar incidence and severity in the two arms. By per-protocol analysis, patients receiving A-RBCs or both RBC types experienced more adverse events than non-transfused patients or those transfused exclusively with CB-RBCs, and suffered from more severe forms of bradycardia, pulmonary hypertension, and hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. Serum potassium, lactate, and pH were similar after CB-RBCs or A-RBCs. Fourteen patients died and 44 were evaluated for ROP. Ten of them developed severe ROP, with no differences between arms. At per-protocol analysis each A-RBC transfusion carried a relative risk for severe ROP of 1.66 (95% CI 1.06-2.20) in comparison with CB-RBCs. The area under the curve of HbF suggested that HbF decrement before 30 weeks PMA is critical for severe ROP development. Subsequent CB-RBC transfusions do not lessen the ROP risk. CONCLUSIONS: The interim analysis shows that CB-RBC transfusion strategy in preterm neonates is safe and, if early adopted, might protect them from severe ROP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 29, 2021. Identifier number NCT05100212.

Avascular Peripheral Retina in Infants.

Avascular peripheral retina in an infant is a common characteristic of numerous pediatric retinal vascular disorders and often presents a diagnostic challenge to the clinician. In this review, key features of each disease in the differential diagnosis, from retinopathy of prematurity, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, Coats disease, incontinentia pigmenti, Norrie disease, and persistent fetal vasculature, to other rare hematologic conditions and telomere disorders, will be discussed by expert ophthalmologists in the field.

Telemedicine retinopathy of prematurity severity score (TeleROP-SS) versus modified activity score (mROP-ActS) retrospective comparison in SUNDROP cohort.

Identifying and planning treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using telemedicine is becoming increasingly ubiquitous, necessitating a grading system to help caretakers of at-risk infants gauge disease severity. The modified ROP Activity Scale (mROP-ActS) factors zone, stage, and plus disease into its scoring system, addressing the need for assessing ROP's totality of binocular burden via indirect ophthalmoscopy. However, there is an unmet need for an alternative score which could facilitate ROP identification and gauge disease improvement or deterioration specifically on photographic telemedicine exams. Here, we propose such a system (Telemedicine ROP Severity Score [TeleROP-SS]), which we have compared against the mROP-ActS. In our statistical analysis of 1568 exams, we saw that TeleROP-SS was able to return a score in all instances based on the gradings available from the retrospective SUNDROP cohort, while mROP-ActS obtained a score of 80.8% in right eyes and 81.1% in left eyes. For treatment-warranted ROP (TW-ROP), TeleROP-SS obtained a score of 100% and 95% in the right and left eyes respectively, while mROP-ActS obtained a score of 70% and 63% respectively. The TeleROP-SS score can identify disease improvement or deterioration on telemedicine exams, distinguish timepoints at which treatments can be given, and it has the adaptability to be modified as needed.

Time Course of Retinopathy of Prematurity Regression and Reactivation After Treatment with Ranibizumab or Laser in the RAINBOW Trial.

PURPOSE: To study the time course of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) regression and reactivation after treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab or laser in the ranibizumab compared with laser therapy for the treatment of infants born prematurely with ROP trial. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a randomized, clinical trial. SUBJECTS: A total of 225 infants (448 eyes) were randomized to ranibizumab 0.2 mg (n = 74, 148 eyes), ranibizumab 0.1 mg (n = 77, 152 eyes), and laser (n = 74, 148 eyes). METHODS: Features of disease regression were measured using time-to-event analysis per eye, corrected for within-subject association. Analyses of disease reactivation and additional treatments were descriptive. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Median time to regression of plus disease, stage 3 ROP, aggressive posterior (AP)-ROP to 24-week follow-up and disease reactivation and first additional treatment to 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The median times to regression after ranibizumab 0.2 mg vs. laser were as follows: plus disease, 4 vs. 16 days (P < 0.001); stage 3 ROP, 8 vs. 16 days (P = 0.004); and AP-ROP, 7.3 vs. 22 days (P = 0.03). Results for ranibizumab 0.1 mg were similar to those for 0.2 mg, with a median of 4, 9, and 8 days, respectively. Additional treatments were given in 34 (25%) of 138 eyes after laser and 40 (27%) of 146 and 42 (28%) of 152 eyes after 0.2 mg and 0.1 mg ranibizumab, respectively. Incomplete disease regression requiring additional treatment occurred in 30 (22%) of 138 eyes after laser after a median interval of 15 days compared with 11 (8%) of 146 and 9 (6%) of 152 after 0.2 mg and 0.1 mg ranibizumab after a median interval of 21 and 13 days, respectively. Retinopathy of prematurity reactivation requiring additional treatment occurred in 3 (2%) of 138 eyes after laser after a median interval of 43 days compared with 22 (15%) of 146 and 26 (17%) of 152 after 0.2 and 0.1 mg ranibizumab after a median interval of 53.5 (maximum, 105) and 54.5 days (maximum, 128), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal 0.2 or 0.1 mg ranibizumab induced a faster regression of plus disease, stage 3 ROP, and AP-ROP than laser did. Ranibizumab was associated with fewer additional treatments for incomplete disease regression but more for disease reactivation.

Transfusion-Free Survival Predicts Severe Retinopathy in Preterm Neonates.

Repeated red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are thought to increase the risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), likely due to a critical fetal hemoglobin (HbF) reduction. In this study, we investigated if the postmenstrual age (PMA) of neonates at transfusion influences the risk for ROP. We estimated the cumulative transfusion-free survival (TFS) in a series of 100 preterm neonates receiving one or more RBC units. TFS was calculated by censoring patients at first transfusion and expressing the time between birth and transfusion as either PMA or postnatal day. Then, we investigated if TFS predicted the occurrence of severe ROP, defined as ROP stage 3 or higher. We found that neonates with severe ROP displayed a significantly shorter TFS expressed according to their PMA (p = 0.001), with similar TFS according to postnatal days. At receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, receiving an RBC unit before week 28 of PMA predicted severe ROP with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 78%. In addition, receiving a second RBC unit before the PMA of 29 weeks predicted severe ROP with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 69%. At multivariate analysis, PMA at the second transfusion was even more informative than at first transfusion and outperformed all other variables in predicting severe ROP, with an odds ratio of 4.554 (95% CI 1.332-15.573, p = 0.016). Since HbF decrease is greater after multiple RBC transfusions, it is conceivable that neonates receiving more than one unit before the PMA of 29 weeks may be exposed to a greater disturbance of retinal vascularization. Any strategy aimed at preventing the critical HbF decrease at this low age might potentially reduce the risk for severe ROP.

Atlas of fluorescein angiographic findings in eyes undergoing laser for retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: We sought to examine the clinical features of severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using fluorescein angiography (FA). DESIGN: Retrospective case series of eyes with severe acute-phase ROP that underwent FA at the time of laser photocoagulation. PARTICIPANTS: We included 22 eyes of 11 infants that developed ROP stage 3 in zone 1 with plus disease, 8 eyes of 4 infants classified as ROP stage 3 in zone 1 without plus disease, and 21 eyes of 11 infants that developed ROP stage 3 in zone 2 with plus disease. All eyes underwent laser photocoagulation. A total of 51 sets of digital images including FA were obtained immediately before treatment. METHODS: RetCam (Clarity, Pleasanton, CA) fundus images and video digital FAs were performed under general anesthesia right before laser treatment. A 10% solution of fluorescein was intravenously administered as a bolus at a dose of 0.1 ml/kg, followed by an isotonic saline flush. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Fluorescein angiograms were examined retrospectively to catalog different retinal and choroidal findings RESULTS: In eyes with severe ROP, FA clearly shows extreme variability in both retinal circulation and choroidal filling pattern. Different patterns of vessels branching at the junction between vascular and avascular retina (V-Av junction) are noted. Posterior to the V-Av junction, hypoperfused retinal areas with or without hyperfluorescent "cotton-wool-like" or "popcorn-like" lesions due to dye leakage are documented by FA. Focal dilatation of capillaries, capillary tufts formations, and rosary-bead-like hyperfluorescent lesions inside the vessels were seen; sometimes all 3 are noted. Various macular abnormalities are noted including absence of foveal avascular area and significant exudative component. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescein angiography was useful to distinguish the deceptively featureless zone 1 junction between the vascularized and nonvascularized retina. Further studies are needed to understand the role of vascular abnormalities observed in zone 1 vascularized retina.

2-year outcomes of ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW extension study): prospective follow-up of an open label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors is increasingly used to treat retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the absence of evidence about long-term efficacy or safety. In this prespecified interim analysis of the RAINBOW extension study, we aimed to prospectively assess outcomes at age 2 years. METHODS: RAINBOW was an open-label, randomised trial that compared intravitreal ranibizumab (at 0·1 mg and 0·2 mg doses) with laser therapy for the treatment of ROP in very low birthweight infants (<1500 g). Families of the 201 infants that completed the RAINBOW core study were approached for consent to enter the extension study, which evaluates treatment outcomes prospectively through to 5 years of age. At age 20-28 months corrected for prematurity, participants had ophthalmic, development, and health assessments. The primary outcome was the absence of structural ocular abnormalities; secondary outcomes included vision-related quality of life (reported by parents using the Children's Visual Function Questionnaire), development (assessed with the Mullen Scales of Early Learning), motor function, and health status. Investigator-determined ocular and non-ocular serious and other adverse events were recorded. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02640664. FINDINGS: Between June 16, 2016, and Jan 22, 2018, 180 infants were enrolled in the RAINBOW extension study, and 153 (85%) were evaluated at 20-28 months of age. No child developed new ocular structural abnormalities. Structural abnormalities were present in one (2%) of 56 infants in the ranibizumab 0·2 mg group, one (2%) of 51 infants in the 0·1 mg group, and four (9%) of 44 infants in the laser therapy group. The odds ratio of no structural abnormality was 5·68 (95% CI 0·60-54·0; p=0·10) for ranibizumab 0·2 mg versus laser therapy, 4·82 (0·52-45·0; p=0·14) for ranibizumab 0·1 mg versus laser therapy, and 1·21 (0·07-20; p=0·90) for ranibizumab 0·2 mg vs 0·1 mg. High myopia (-5 dioptres or worse) was less frequent after 0·2 mg ranibizumab (five [5%] of 110 eyes) than with laser therapy (16 [20%] of 82; odds ratio 0·19, 95% CI 0·05-0·69; p=0·012). Composite vision-related quality of life scores seemed higher among the ranibizumab 0·2 mg group (mean 84, 95% CI 80-88) compared with laser therapy (77, 72-83; p=0·063). Mullen Scales T-scores for visual reception, receptive and expressive language were distributed similarly between the three trial groups and there were similar proportions of infants with motor and hearing problems among treatment groups. The proportion of infants with respiratory symptoms and Z scores of standing height, weight, and head circumference were similarly distributed in the treatment groups. There were no adverse events considered by the investigator to be related to the study intervention. INTERPRETATION: 2-year outcomes following ranibizumab 0·2 mg for the treatment of ROP confirm the ocular outcomes of the original RAINBOW trial and show reduced high myopia, with possibly better vision-related quality of life. This treatment did not appear to affect non-ocular infant development. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.