[Prostatic pain]. / Eturauhasen kiputilat--miehen krooninen lantiokipu.

Prostatic pain usually refers to male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), chronic abacterial prostatitis. It has a prevalence of 14% among Finnish men, and it is characterised by chronic pain in the pelvis, genital and inguinal area, lower abdomen and perineum, often accompanied by various urinary symptoms. The aetiology and pathophysiology of CPPS are poorly understood. Most likely, the aetiology is multifactorial and there is evidence of neuroinflammation in the development of the chronic pain associated with CPPS. Alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and possibly extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) are beneficial for treating CPPS. Antibiotics and antiinflammatory agents seem to be beneficial only in short-term treatment.

Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Radiotherapy for Intermediate- or High-risk Prostate Cancer-Results from the Prospective, Randomised, Open-label Phase III SPCG-13 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has improved patient survival for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: This randomised trial aimed to evaluate whether six courses of docetaxel improved biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) after radical radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 376 patients were randomised in this multinational phase III study, and received either six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 wk without continuous prednisone (arm A, n = 188) or surveillance (arm B, n = 188) after RT (NTC006653848). Neoadjuvant/adjuvant ADT was mandatory for all the patients. The primary endpoint was rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥2 ng/ml above the nadir PSA value. Intermediate- or high-risk PCa was defined as T2 with a Gleason score (GS) of 4 + 3, PSA > 10; T2, GS 8-10, ≤ 70 ng/ml; or any T3. The patients were followed for 5 yr by assessing PSA levels every 3 mo for 2 yr and every 6 mo thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The study power was 89% to detect a difference in BDFS between groups, and the sample size calculation accounted for the T2/T3 distribution, where a 12%/15% difference in BDFS was assumed for the T2/T3 patients. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All six cycles were completed in 147 (78%) of the patients in arm A. The median age was 67 yr in both treatment groups, 75% had T3 disease, and 47% had GS 8-10. The median follow-up was 59 mo (range 1-111 mo). The primary endpoint was observed for 58 patients in arm A (docetaxel) and for 57 patients in arm B (surveillance). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in the BDFS curves (p = 0.6) between the treatment groups. The 5-yr estimated biochemical progression rates were 31% for arm A and 28% for arm B. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 16% of the docetaxel patients. No deaths were related to the docetaxel treatment. There were 43 deaths during the trial, including 20 in arm A and 23 in arm B, of which nine and seven, respectively, were due to PCa. The hazard ratio from Cox multivariate analysis for PSA progression of arm A (docetaxel) versus arm B (surveillance) was 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.79-1.64, p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant docetaxel without prednisone did not improve BDFS after radical RT with ADT for intermediate- or high-risk PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel given after radical external radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy to surveillance in intermediate- and high-risk localised prostate cancer. We found no overall benefit in this setting.

Mechanisms of pain in chronic pelvic pain syndrome: influence of prostatic inflammation.

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), is of considerable interest in clinical urology. During the past decade, several new approaches have been made to discover its aetiology and pathophysiological mechanisms and to develop treatment modalities. The aetiology of CPPS has remained unresolved. Bacterial, chemical, urodynamic and immunological aetiologies have been suggested, but none of these has been conclusively proven. The histopathological changes in CP and CPPS are relatively well known, but the pathophysiological changes that lead to chronic inflammation and prolonged symptoms are still poorly understood. This review proposes an additional approach to the pathophysiology of CPPS. The concept of prostate tissue pressure is introduced as an objectively measurable parameter in evaluating the inflammatory process in CPPS. Chronic pain due to neurogenic inflammation and altered mast cell function is also discussed.

Transurethral needle ablation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category III prostatitis): a randomized, sham-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness and durability of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) in the treatment of symptoms of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) in a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms of CPPS were randomized to either TUNA (n = 25) or urethrocystoscopy as a sham treatment (n = 8). The response to therapy was evaluated 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment using the Prostatitis Symptom Severity Index (PSSI), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a visual analogue scale, and prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, urinary flow, and residual urine volume measurements. RESULTS: The PSSI decreased in both groups (TUNA group, P <0.001; sham group, P not significant), but no statistically significant difference was detected between them. Similarly, the IPSS decreased in the two groups (TUNA group, P = 0.002; sham group, P = 0.05), but no difference was found between those treated with TUNA and those who underwent sham treatment. Also the quality of life (IPSS-8) was significantly better at 12 months in both groups, but no difference was detected between them. Changes in pain score (visual analogue scale) were not statistically significant. Peak urinary flow rate, residual urine volume, prostate-specific antigen, and prostate volume were not altered in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of TUNA in CPPS is comparable to sham treatment, and so cannot be recommended as routine treatment of CPPS.

Herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and papillomavirus DNA are not found in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To study the possible involvement of viruses in chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) using polymerase chain reaction. Among other factors, the involvement of viruses in CPPS has been speculated, but few studies have investigated this. METHODS: Consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer for whom radical prostatectomy was considered were evaluated for symptoms of CPPS using the National Institutes of Health Chronic-Prostatitis Symptom Index. Ten patients with moderate to severe symptoms and 10 without symptoms were included in the study. The presence of herpes simplex virus (types 1 and 2), cytomegalovirus, and human papillomavirus DNA was investigated by polymerase chain reaction in prostatic tissue samples obtained at radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: All the samples were negative for the viral sequences tested. CONCLUSIONS: A viral etiology could not be demonstrated in CPPS. In addition, no association of the viruses with prostate cancer could be found.

Negative bacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) findings in prostate tissue from patients with symptoms of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) and localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) remains obscure. Although, bacterial etiology has frequently been suggested, evidence of both bacterial involvement in CPPS and the presence of normal bacterial flora in the prostate remain uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the presence of bacterial DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques on prostatic tissue samples obtained in radical prostatectomy from 10 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of CPPS and 10 nonsymptomatic patients with localized prostate cancer. For symptom evaluation we used the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). RESULTS: All but one sample were negative for bacterial DNA. The PCR from a symptomatic patient was reproducibly positive in 16S rDNA PCR but negative in 23S rDNA PCR. Bacterial DNA was found in only one out of two sample aliquots and cloning yielded different sequences in two PCR products. CONCLUSIONS: A bacterial etiology for CPPS symptoms could not be demonstrated in patients with prostate cancer. The results also suggest that the prostate is unlikely to harbor bacterial normal flora.