Influence of double rods and interbody cages on range of motion and rod stress after spinopelvic instrumentation: a finite element study.

PURPOSE: To compare instrumentation configurations consisting of bilateral single or double rods and additional interbody cages (IBCs) at different levels in terms of Range of Motion (ROM) and distribution of von Mises stress in rods. METHODS: A previously validated L1-pelvis finite element model was used and instrumented with configurations consisting of single or double bilateral rods and IBCs at multiple levels. Pure moments of 7.5 N.m were applied to L1 in main directions in addition to a follower load of 280 N. Global, segmental ROM and distribution of von Mises stress in rods were studied. RESULTS: All configurations reduced segmental and global ROM from 50 to 100% compared to the intact spine. Addition of IBCs slightly increased ROM at levels adjacent to the IBC placement. The simple rod configuration presented the highest von Mises stress (457 MPa) in principal rods at L5-S1 in flexion. Doubling rods and IBC placement reduced this value and shifted the location of maximum von Mises stress to other regions. Among studied configurations, double rods with IBCs at all levels (L2-S1) showed the lowest ROM. Maximal von Mises stresses in secondary rods were lower in comparison to main rods. CONCLUSIONS: Double rods and IBCs reduced global and segmental ROM as well as von Mises stress in rods. The results suggest a possible benefit in using both strategies to minimize pseudarthrosis and instrumentation failure. However, increased ROM in adjacent levels and the shift of maximal von Mises stress to adjacent areas might cause complications elsewhere.

Development of a flexible instrumented lumbar spine finite element model and comparison with in-vitro experiments.

Surgical corrections of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and sagittal malalignment are associated with significant complications, such as rod fractures and pseudarthrosis, particularly in the lumbosacral junction. Finite element studies can provide relevant insights to improve performance of spinal implants. The aim of the present study was to present the development of non-instrumented and instrumented Finite Element Models (FEMs) of the lumbopelvic spine and to compare numerical results with experimental data available in the literature. The lumbo-pelvic spine FEM was based on a CT-scan from an asymptomatic volunteer representing the 50th percentile male. In a first step a calibration of mechanical properties was performed in order to obtain a quantitative agreement between numerical results and experimental data for defect stages of spinal segments. Then, FEM results were compared in terms of range of motion and strains in rods to in-vitro experimental data from the literature for flexible non-instrumented and instrumented lumbar spines. Numerical results from the calibration process were consistent with experimental data, especially in flexion. A positive agreement was obtained between FEM and experimental results for the lumbar and sacroiliac segments. Instrumented FEMs predicted the same trends as experimental in-vitro studies. The instrumentation configuration consisting of double rods and an interbody cage at L5-S1 maximally reduced range of motion and strains in main rods and thus had the lowest risk of pseudarthrosis and rod fracture. The developed FEMs were found to be consistent with published experimental results; therefore they can be used for further post-operative complication investigations.

Development of a detailed human neck finite element model and injury risk curves under lateral impact.

Advanced neck finite element modeling and development of neck injury criteria are important for the design of optimal neck protection systems in automotive and other environments. They are also important in virtual tests. The objectives of the present study were to develop a detailed finite element model (FEM) of the human neck and couple it to the existing head model, validate the model with kinematic data from legacy human volunteer and human cadaver impact datasets, and derive lateral impact neck injury risk curves using survival analysis from the upper and lower neck forces and moments. The detailed model represented the anatomy of a young adult mid-size male. It included all the cervical and first thoracic vertebrae, intervening discs, upper and lower spinal ligaments, bilateral facet joints, and passive musculature. Material properties were obtained from literature. Frontal, oblique, and lateral impacts to the distal end of the model was applied based on human volunteer and human cadaver experimental data. Corridor and cross-correlation methods were used for validation. The CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) score was used for objective assessments. Forces and moments were obtained at the occipital condyles (OC) and T1, and parametric survival analysis was used to derive injury risk curves to define human neck injury tolerance to lateral impact. The Brier Score Metric (BSM) was used to determine the hierarchical sequence among the injury metrics. The CORA scores for the lateral, frontal, and oblique impact loading conditions were 0.80, 0.91, and 0.87, respectively, for human volunteer data, and the mean score was 0.7 for human cadaver lateral impacts. Injury risk curves along with ±95% confidence intervals are given for all the four biomechanical metrics. The OC shear force was the optimal metric based on the BSM. A force of 1.5 kN was associated with the 50% probability level of AIS3+ neck injury. As a first step, the presented risk curves serve as human tolerance criteria under lateral impact, hitherto not available in published literatures, and they can be used in virtual testing and advancing restraint systems for improving human safety.

Unusual post-traumatic aortic rupture in a paraglide pilot - A case report.

Post-traumatic aortic injuries are more common in victims of aircraft accidents than in motor vehicle accidents, and are a leading cause of on-site and delayed mortality, regardless of cause. In this case report, we present a history of a nearly isolated aortic post-traumatic injury in a victim of a paragliding accident. The rarity of this case lies in 2 factors, that is, the lack of the other life-threatening injuries usually present in high-energy accidents, and an unusual, exfoliative type of injury not matching more closely the typical classifications made use of currently in clinical practice.