Phytoestrogens for vasomotor menopausal symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms, such as hot flushes and night sweats, are very common during the menopausal transition. Hormone replacement therapy has traditionally been used as a very effective treatment but concerns over increased risks of some chronic diseases have markedly increased the interest of women in alternatives. Some of the most popular of these are treatments based on foods or supplements enriched with phytoestrogens, plant-derived chemicals that have oestrogenic action. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, safety and acceptability of foods and supplements based on high levels of phytoestrogens for reducing hot flushes and night sweats in postmenopausal women. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were undertaken of the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of randomised trials, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (March 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2007), EMBASE (1980 to March 2007), AMED (1985 to March 2007), PsycINFO (1986 to March 2007) and CINAHL (1982 to March 2007). Attempts were made to access grey literature by letters to pharmaceutical companies and searches of ongoing trial registers. Reference lists of included trials were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were randomised, had peri- or postmenopausal participants with vasomotor symptoms, a duration of at least 12 weeks and where the intervention was a food or supplement with high levels of phytoestrogens (and not combined with other herbal treatments). Trials of women who had breast cancer or a history of breast cancer were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Selection of trials, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by at least two authors. Most of the trials were too dissimilar to combine in meta-analysis and their results are provided in table format. Studies were grouped into broad categories: dietary soy, soy extracts, red clover extracts and other types of phytoestrogen. Five trials used Promensil, a red clover extract; these trials were combined in a meta-analysis and summary effect measures were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty trials comparing phytoestrogens with control met the inclusion criteria. Very few trials had data suitable for combining in meta-analysis. Of the five trials with data suitable for pooling that assessed daily frequency of hot flushes, there was no significant difference overall in the frequency of hot flushes between Promensil (a red clover extract) and placebo (WMD=-0.6, 95% CI -1.8 to 0.6). There was no evidence of a difference in percentage reduction in hot flushes in two trials between Promensil and placebo (WMD=20.2, 95% CI -12.1 to 52.4). Individual results from the remaining trials were compared. Some of the trials found that phytoestrogen treatments alleviated the frequency and severity of hot flushes and night sweats when compared to placebo but many of the trials were of low quality and were underpowered. There was a strong placebo effect in most trials with a reduction in frequency ranging from 1% to 59% with placebo. There was no indication that the discrepant results were due to the amount of isoflavone in the active treatment arm, the severity of vasomotor symptoms or trial quality factors. There was also no evidence that the treatments caused oestrogenic stimulation of the endometrium (an adverse effect) when used for up to two years. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of effectiveness in the alleviation of menopausal symptoms with the use of phytoestrogen treatments.

Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause of ill health in women and it accounts for 12% of all gynaecology referrals in the UK. Heavy menstrual bleeding is clinically defined as greater than or equal to 80 ml of blood loss per menstrual cycle. However, women may complain of excessive bleeding when their blood loss is less than 80 ml. Hysterectomy is often used to treat women with this complaint but medical therapy may be a successful alternative. The intrauterine coil device was originally developed as a contraceptive but the addition of uterine relaxing hormones, progestogens, to these devices resulted in a large reduction in menstrual blood loss. Case studies of two types of progesterone or progestogen-releasing systems, Progestasert and Mirena, reported reductions of up to 90% and that dysmenorrhoea may be improved. Insertion, however, may be regarded as invasive by some women, which affects its acceptability as a treatment. Frequent intermenstrual bleeding and spotting is also likely during the first few months. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and acceptability of progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine devices in achieving a reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY: All studies which might describe randomised controlled trials of progesterone or progestagen-releasing intrauterine devices for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding were obtained by electronic searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to 2005). Companies producing progestogen-releasing intrauterine devices and experts in the field were contacted for information on published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in women of reproductive age treated with progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine devices versus no treatment, placebo, or other medical or surgical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding within primary care, family planning or specialist clinic settings were eligible for inclusion. Women with postmenopausal bleeding, intermenstrual or irregular bleeding, or pathological causes of heavy menstrual bleeding were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Potential trials were independently assessed by three review authors and nine trials met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The reviewers extracted the data independently and data were pooled where appropriate. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated from the data for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes. The primary outcome was reduction in menstrual blood loss but incidence of side effects, changes in quality of life, satisfaction and acceptability measures were also assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems have not been compared to placebo or no treatment. Progestasert has been compared to a number of different medical therapies in one small study but no conclusions can be made about its effectiveness. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG IUS) has been compared to oral cyclical norethisterone (NET) administered on days 5 to 26 of the menstrual cycle in one trial and was significantly more effective although there was a large reduction in loss from baseline in both groups. Some short term side effects were more common in the LNG IUS group but a significantly greater proportion of women in this group were satisfied and willing to continue with their treatment. In one trial of women awaiting hysterectomy, where the LNG IUS was compared with a control group taking their existing medical therapy, a higher proportion of the women in the intrauterine device group cancelled their planned surgery after six months of treatment. The LNG IUS has been compared to an endometrial ablation: either transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) (two trials) or balloon ablation (three trials). There was a significantly greater mean reduction in menstrual bleeding in one trial in those undergoing balloon ablation (WMD -45.2 units, 95% CI -56.9 to -33.5), a lower score on the pictorial blood loss chart (PBAC) (WMD 33.2 units, 95% CI 27.2 to 39.2) and higher rates of successful treatment in 3 trials including both balloon and TCRE (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.58) but the rates of satisfaction with treatment was were similar. There was no conclusive evidence of changes in quality of life between groups but women with the LNG IUS had a greater incidence of progestogenic side effects within one year. The LNG IUS has been compared to hysterectomy in one trial. There was no evidence of a change in quality of life scores but the LNG IUS treatment had lower costs than with hysterectomy, both at one and five-years follow up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG IUS) is more effective than cyclical norethisterone (for 21 days) as a treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. Women with an LNG IUS are more satisfied and willing to continue with treatment but experience more side effects, such as intermenstrual bleeding and breast tenderness. The LNG IUS results in a smaller mean reduction in menstrual blood loss (as assessed by the PBAC chart) than endometrial ablation but there is no evidence of a difference in the rate of satisfaction with treatment. Women with an LNG IUS experience more progestogenic side effects compared to women having TCRE for treatment of their heavy menstrual bleeding but there is no evidence of a difference in their perceived quality of life. The LNG IUS treatment costs less than hysterectomy but there is no evidence of a difference in quality of life measures between these groups. There are no data available from randomised controlled trials comparing progesterone-releasing intrauterine systems to either placebo or other commonly used medical therapies for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Progesterone/progestogen releasing intrauterine systems versus either placebo or any other medication for heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause of ill health in women and it accounts for 12% of all gynaecology referrals in the UK. Heavy menstrual bleeding is clinically defined as greater than, or equal to, 80mls blood loss per menstrual cycle but women may complain of excessive bleeding when their blood loss is less than 80ml. Hysterectomy is often used to treat women with this complaint but medical therapy may be a successful alternative. The intrauterine coil device was originally developed as a contraceptive but the addition of uterine relaxing hormones, or progestogens, to these devices resulted in a large reduction in menstrual blood loss. Case studies of 2 types of progesterone/progestogen releasing systems, Progestasert and Mirena, report reductions of up to 90% and dysmenorrhoea may be improved. Insertion, however, may be regarded as invasive by some women affecting its acceptability as a treatment and frequent intermenstrual bleeding and spotting is likely during the first few months. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and acceptability of progesterone/progestogen-releasing intrauterine devices in achieving a reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY: All studies which might describe randomised controlled trials of progesterone/progestagen-releasing intrauterine devices for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding were obtained by electronic searches of the MEDLINE 1966-1999, EMBASE 1980-1999 databases and the Cochrane Library. Companies producing progestogen releasing intrauterine devices and experts in the field were contacted for information on published and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in women of reproductive age treated with progesterone/progestogen-releasing intrauterine devices versus no treatment, placebo, or other medical or surgical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding within either the primary care, family planning or specialist clinic setting were eligible for inclusion. Women with postmenopausal bleeding, intermenstrual or irregular bleeding, or pathological causes of heavy menstrual bleeding were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Potential trials were independently assessed by three reviewers and five trials met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The reviewers extracted the data independently and data were pooled where appropriate. Odds ratios for dichtomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the data. The primary outcome was reduction in menstrual blood loss but incidence of side effects, changes in quality of life and satisfaction and acceptability measures were also assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Progesterone/progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems have not been compared to placebo or no treatment. Progestasert has been compared to a number of different medical therapies in one small study but no conclusions can be made about effectiveness. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG IUS) has been compared to oral cyclical norethisterone (NET) administered on days 5-26 in one trial and was significantly more effective although there was a large reduction from baseline in both groups and these differences were not perceived by the women undergoing the treatment. Some side effects were more common in the LNG IUS group but a significantly greater proportion of women in this group were satisfied and willing to continue with their treatment. In one trial of women awaiting hysterectomy where the LNG IUS was compared with a control group taking their existing medical therapy, a higher proportion of the women in the former group cancelled their planned surgery after 6 months of treatment. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device has been compared to a surgical procedure (transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE)) in two trials. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Age and ethnicity as prognostic factors influencing overall survival in breast cancer patients in the Auckland region. Auckland Breast Cancer Study Group.

AIMS: to assess the effect of age at diagnosis and ethnicity on overall survival from breast cancer. METHODS: information was collected from 2706 breast cancer patients in the Auckland region, diagnosed between 1976 and 1985. Age at diagnosis was categorised into four groups: < 35 years, 35-49 years, 50-74 years and 75 years or older. Ethnicity was self reported in three categories: European, Maori and Pacific Island Polynesian. Independent effects were assessed by controlling for extent of disease, specifically metastases at presentation, nodal status and size of tumour. RESULTS: age and ethnic group were both significantly related to overall survival in univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, age had an independent effect on survival mainly due to a significant survival difference between women aged less than 35 years and those aged 35 to 49 years (p < 0.0001; RR = 2.02). Survival was not significantly different between other age groups when adjustments were made for extent of disease. There was no significant effect of ethnicity on survival in the reduced dataset used for the multivariate analysis. Separate analyses suggested that ethnic differences in the extent of disease at diagnosis may be the cause of the apparent initial effect of ethnicity on survival. CONCLUSIONS: women < 35 years at diagnosis have a significantly poorer prognosis than women aged 35-49 years. Other differences between age groups were not significant when stage of disease was taken into account. Ethnicity was not an independent factor influencing survival after controlling for extent of disease but numbers in the Maori and Pacific Island groups were too small to conclusively evaluate any effect of ethnic group on prognosis.

Survival of women with node negative breast cancer in the Auckland region.

AIMS: To assess the effect of prognostic factors on overall survival from node negative breast cancer. METHODS: Information was collected on 1138 node negative breast cancer patients in the Auckland region, diagnosed between 1976 and 1985. Prognostic variables investigated included oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor status, tumour grade, tumour size, body mass index, lactation history and parity. The effects of these variables on overall survival were assessed separately in pre and postmenopausal groups. RESULTS: Over a median follow up time of 10.2 years, improved survival was seen in premenopausal women with PR+ status (p = 0.0007), ER+ status (p = 0.03), positive lactational history (p = 0.03) and low tumour grade (p = 0.04). In postmenopausal women, only ER+ status (p = 0.01) and PR+ status (p = 0.02) were associated with improved survival. Multivariate analysis suggested that positive PR status combined with tumour size provided the best prognostic discrimination in premenopausal women, whereas ER status was the dominant prognostic variable in postmenopausal patients. CONCLUSIONS: For premenopausal node negative women, progesterone receptor status, considered either alone, or together with tumour size, provides the best prognostic prediction of survival. By comparison, oestrogen receptor status is the most important predictor of overall survival in postmenopausal women.

Overall survival from breast cancer in women pregnant or lactating at or after diagnosis. Auckland Breast Cancer Study Group.

The effect of concurrent or subsequent pregnancy or lactation has been studied in women with breast cancer to determine if these variables influence prognosis. Information was collected from 382 women potentially capable of bearing children, aged less than 45 years, in the Auckland Breast Cancer Study Group data file, a consecutive series of women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1976 to 1985, with a median follow-up of 10.2 years. The prevalence of both pregnancy at diagnosis and lactation at diagnosis was 2.6%. The incidence of pregnancy subsequent to diagnosis was 3.9%. Women pregnant at the time of breast cancer diagnosis had significantly more advanced disease than non-pregnant patients, and there was a similar trend for women lactating at diagnosis. Overall survival in these women was poor compared with the non-pregnant and non-lactating groups; only 2 of 10 pregnant patients and 0 of 10 lactating patients survived more than 12 years. The adverse outcome for women lactating at diagnosis of their breast cancer persisted despite allowance for nodal status, tumour size and age. However, survival was similar between pregnant and non-pregnant patients when these variables were taken into account. No significant differences in survival were found between those women who had pregnancies subsequent to diagnosis of breast cancer and breast cancer patients who did not become pregnant.

Characteristics of the menstrual cycle at the time of surgery for breast cancer.

Hormone measurements during the menstrual cycle were assessed in six premenopausal women undergoing breast cancer surgery and ten controls to determine whether the stress of diagnosis and surgery influenced cycle characteristics. There was hormonal evidence for normal ovulation in all cancer and control women, although the length of the luteal phase of the cycle was prolonged because of a delay in menstruation in two cancer patients. The timing of surgery in the cycle did not influence the hormonal data. The hormonal characteristics of the menstrual cycle thus appear to be normally preserved in women during the month in which breast cancer surgery is performed.

Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in benign and malignant breast disease.

BACKGROUND: The insulin-like growth factors IGF-I and IGF-II and their major binding protein IGFBP-3 influence the growth of breast cancer cells in vitro. Some benign non-breast tumours appear to be associated with increased serum IGFBP-3 levels which would tend to reduce bioactive-free IGF concentrations. The present study investigates whether this pattern also occurs in neoplastic breast disease. METHODS: Serum IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3 were measured by specific radioassay in 12 women with benign breast disease, 31 patients with breast cancer and in age-matched controls. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) serum IGFBP-3 concentration was higher in benign breast disease (3.6+/-0.7 mg/L) than in controls (2.7+/-0.6 mg/L) or in breast cancer patients (2.7+/-0.5 mg/L) (P = 0.001). Serum IGF-I and IGF-II levels were not significantly different among the groups. However, the index of free unbound IGF measured as the molar ratio of IGF-I plus IGF-II divided by IGFBP-3 was significantly lower in benign breast disease than in the other subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Either the production or clearance of IGFBP-3 is altered in benign breast disease so that there is less free IGF available to cells. This may serve to protect against malignant transformation in patients with benign breast disorders.

Effect of breast surgery on serum levels of insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGF binding protein-3) in women with benign and malignant breast lesions.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that insulin-like growth factors play a role in the development of breast cancer. Antiestrogens reduce circulating levels of IGF-I, but the influence of other breast cancer treatments, including surgery, is unknown and is investigated in this study. METHODS: Circulating serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured before and after breast surgery in 31 patients with breast cancer and 12 controls with benign breast lesions. Serum albumin was measured as a marker of the nonspecific metabolic effect of surgery. RESULTS: Serum IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and albumin fell 24 hours after surgery for breast cancer but largely normalized again over the next 7 days. The fall in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 was not significant when the change in serum albumin was used as a covariate, suggesting a nonspecific effect of surgery. However, the reduction in IGF-II remained significant when adjusted for albumin and was greater after lumpectomy of malignant tumors (-8 +/- 2%) compared with benign disease (2 +/- 2%, P = .001). The fall in IGF-II was significantly related to the size of the removed tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer may directly influence the serum concentration of IGF-II, possibly by direct tumor production.