Predictors of persistent overactive bladder following surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Reliable risk factors for persistent urgency following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are still unclear. We aimed to identify preoperative parameters related to persistent postoperative urgency in a cohort of women following surgery for POP stage 3-4 with concomitant overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, women with POP stage 3-4 and OAB who underwent POP repair during November 2012-December 2020 were included. Preoperative evaluation included history, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q), multi-channel urodynamic studies and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Surgical procedures included: anterior and posterior colporrhaphy, sacrospinous ligament suspension, anterior vaginal wall mesh repair and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. At the 12-month follow-up, urogynecological history, POP-Q evaluation, cough stress test and the PFDI-20 questionnaire were repeated. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Resolution of urgency was observed in 56% of women. Variables associated with persistent postoperative urgency included body mass index (BMI) (27 kg/m2 vs 25.7 kg/m2, p = 0.04), preoperative increased daytime frequency (46.39% vs 61.84%, p = 0.05), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (51.46% vs 80.26%, p = 0.0001), detrusor overactivity (DO) (40.2% vs 61.84%, p = 0.009) and lower maximum flow rate on UDS (13.9 ml/s vs 15 ml/s, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed preoperative DO (OR: 12.2 [95% CI: 1.4-16.6]; p = 0.01), preoperative UUI (OR 3.8 [95% CI: 1.3-11.0]; p = 0.008) and BMI > 25 kg/m2 (OR 1.8 [95% CI: 1.1-7.2]; p = 0.04) as predictive factor for persistent urgency. CONCLUSIONS: In women with advanced POP and OAB, being overweight, preoperative UUI and DO are related to persistent postoperative urgency. These findings will guide our future preoperative counseling and reinforce the role of UDS in POP management.

The impact of nurses' and physicians' shift change on obstetrical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect around nurses' shift change and on-call physicians' shift change on obstetrical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study of women who had an attempt of labor in a single-medical center, January 2006-December 2017. Obstetrical outcomes were compared between the time around nurses' shift change (6:00-8:00, 14:00-16:00, and 22:00-00:00) to the rest of the day, and between the time around on-call physicians' shift change (6:00-8:00, 14:00-16:00) to the rest of the day. RESULTS: 32,861 women were included, 7826 deliveries occurred during nurses' shift-change, and 25,035 deliveries occurred during the rest of the day. The groups had similar general and obstetrical characteristics, with no statistical difference in cesarean delivery rate (10% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.45) (Table 1). Nurses' shift change had no measurable effect on obstetrical outcomes, including induction of labor, preterm labor, 5-min-Apgar score and cord pH value, except PPH which was less likely to occur during nurses' shift change period (3.8% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.045) (Table 2). From 32,861 deliveries, 5155 deliveries occurred during on-call physicians' shift-change, and 27,706 deliveries occurred during the rest of the day. Induction\augmentation of labor and epidural analgesia were less likely to happen during on-call physicians' shift change (34.4% vs. 38%, P < 0.0001, 59.6% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.003, respectively) (Table 3). The two groups had similar obstetrical outcomes, without statistical difference in cesarean delivery rate (10% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.63) (Table 4). Table 1 General and obstetric characteristics of women giving birth during the time of nurses shift change versus during the rest of the day Variable Change of nurses shifts (n = 7826) All other hours of the day (n = 25,035) P value Maternal age, y 30.3 ± 5.1 30.2 ± 5.2 0.09 Gestational age at birth (weeks) 39.7 ± 1.09 39.8 ± 1.10 0.55 Nulliparity 2077 (35%) 7067 (37%) 0.01 Induction\augmentation of labor 2905 (37) 9368 (38) 0.62 Epidural analgesia 4746 (61) 15,396 (62) 0.16 Neonatal birth weight, g 3340 ± 422 3330 ± 423 0.06 Data is presented as mean ± S.D or N (%) Table 2 Maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes of women giving birth during the time of nurses shift change versus during the rest of the day Variable (%) Change of nurses shifts (n = 7826) All other hours of the day (n = 25,035) P value Vacuum assisted delivery 615 (7.9) 2002 (8.0) 0.69 Cesarean delivery 788 (10) 2443 (9.8) 0.45 Postpartum hemorrhage 294 (3.8) 1089 (4.4) 0.045 Third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration 106 (1.4) 372 (1.5%) 0.51 5-min Apgar score < 7 39 (0.5) 139 (0.6) 0.65 Umbilical pH < 7.2 170 (23) 580 (23) 0.96 Prolonged second stage 190 (2.5) 559 (2.2) 0.22 Maternal and fetal composite adverse outcome* 1309 (16.7%) 4219 (16.9%) 1.00 Data is presented as N (%) *Maternal and fetal composite adverse outcome was defined as the presence of any of the following: vacuum delivery, CD, prolonged second stage, postpartum hemorrhage, third and fourth degree perineal laceration, 5-min Apgar score < 7 and umbilical cord pH < 7.2 Table 3 General and obstetric characteristics of women giving birth during the time of the on-call physicians shift change versus during the rest of the day Variable Change of physicians shifts (n = 5155) All other hours of the day (n = 27,706) P value Maternal age, years 30.3 ± 5.1 30.2 ± 5.2 0.38 Gestational age at birth (weeks) 39.8 ± 1.09 39.8 ± 1.10 0.95 Nulliparity (%) 1303 (33.4) 7841 (37) < 0.0001 Induction\augmentation of labor (%) 1769 (34.3) 10,504 (38) < 0.0001 Epidural analgesia (%) 3067 (59.6) 17,075 (61.8) 0.003 Neonatal birth weight (gr) 3345 ± 416 3330 ± 424 0.019 Data is presented as mean ± S.D or N (%) Table 4 Maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes of women giving birth during the time of physicians on-call shift change versus during the rest of the day Variable (%) Change of physicians shifts (n = 5155) All other hours of the day (n = 27,706) P value Vacuum assisted delivery 397 (7.7) 2220 (8.0) 0.45 Cesarean delivery 517 (10.0) 2714 (9.8) 0.63 Postpartum hemorrhage 209 (4.1) 1174 (4.3) 0.54 Third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration 67 (1.3) 411 (1.5) 0.31 5-min Apgar score < 7 22 (0.5) 156 (0.6) 0.30 Umbilical pH < 7.2 94 (20.3) 656 (23.3) 0.15 Prolonged second stage 127 (2.5%) 622 (2.3%) 0.36 Maternal and fetal composite adverse outcome* 852 (16.5%) 4676 (16.9%) 1.00 Data is presented as N (%) *Maternal and fetal composite adverse outcome was defined as the presence of any of the following: vacuum delivery, CD, prolonged second stage, postpartum hemorrhage, third and fourth degree perineal laceration, 5-min Apgar score < 7 and umbilical cord pH < 7.2 CONCLUSION: Nurses' shift change and on-call physicians' shift change does not appear to be associated with an increase in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Who may accompany the parturient to the delivery room?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of the attendant of the parturient (husband or mother or both), on labor duration, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal complications. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study, over a 4-year period, of women admitted to the delivery room accompanied by their husband, their mother or both. Medical records were reviewed for demographic, medical and obstetrical history. RESULTS: Overall, 3029 patients were included, 2192 were accompanied by their husband; 127 were accompanied by their mother and 710 were accompanied by both. Women accompanied by their husbands were significantly older and more likely to be multiparous than women accompanied by their mother (30.2 years vs. 27.8 years, P < 0.001 and 60% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.02, respectively). Compared to women supported during labor by their mothers, women supported only by their husbands spent less hours in the delivery room (from admission to delivery) (11.1 h vs. 13.7 h, P = 0.02). While the nature of the attendant had no influence on the mode of delivery among nulliparous women (p = 0.13), multiparous women supported by the mothers had a significantly higher rate of cesarean delivery compared to those supported only by their husband or by both (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = [1.317-3.246], P = 0.002, OR = 3.33, 95% CI = [1.623-6.849], P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Women supported by their mothers during labor have a longer second stage of labor, a decreased rate of vaginal delivery and an increased risk for cesarean delivery compared to women supported by their husbands. Future large prospective studies are needed to confirm our observation and to find causative affect.

Supplemental data for the paper "low-complexity detection of small frequency deviations by the generalized LMPU test".

This document contains supplemental material for the paper [2]. The notations in this document are the same as in [2]. In particular, we first present here the proof of Theorem 1 in [2]. This theorem expresses the locally most powerful unbiased (LMPU) test, which is a general method for local detection, in the presence of known nuisance parameters. Second, we present here the Matlab code of the LMPU and the generalized LMPU for the special case of detection of a small deviation in the frequency of sinusoidal signals, which arises in various signal processing applications.

Differences in outcomes between cesarean section in the second versus the first stages of labor.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare maternal morbidity and mortality of cesarean sections (CS) in the second versus first stage of labor. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of all CS at a single, university-affiliated medical center, between January 2010 and December 2014. Eligibility was limited to term, singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation. Maternal outcomes of second-stage CS were compared to those of first-stage CS. The primary outcome was defined as estimated blood loss >1000 ml. RESULTS: Overall, 1004 women met the inclusion criteria, of which 290 (29%) had a second-stage CS and 714 (71%) had a first-stage CS. Women in the second-stage CS group had a higher nulliparity and hypertensive disorders rates and a lower rate of previous CS. Second-stage CS was associated with more than double the rate of estimated blood loss >1000 ml (9.7% versus 3.8%, p<.001), and more prone to unintentional uterine incision extension, uterine atony, hemoglobin decrease >2 g/l and antibiotic treatment for suspected endometritis. In a multivariable logistic regression model, second-stage CS was found to be independently associated with unintentional uterine incision extension (OR 6.8, 95% CI 4.1-11.2), uterine atony (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-8.0) and antibiotic treatment for suspected endometritis (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-5.1), but not with excessive blood loss (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.8). Additionally, failed assisted vaginal delivery prior to second-stage CS was not associated with a higher rate of complications. CONCLUSION: Second-stage CS is associated with higher rates of adverse maternal outcomes, mainly unintentional uterine incision extension, uterine atony, and suspected endometritis.

When should repeat cesarean delivery be scheduled, after two or more previous cesarean deliveries?

BACKGROUND: The optimal gestational age for a planned high-order cesarean delivery (CD) reflects the balance between the risk of neonatal morbidity and the risk of unscheduled cesarean delivery prior to the scheduled date. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 656 women with ≥2 previous CDs were divided in two groups of women based on the gestational age at which the CD was scheduled: "38 group" and "39 group". Medical records were reviewed for demographic, medical and obstetrical history, and for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The rate of unscheduled CDs was significantly higher among the 39 group (23.2% vs. 12.7%). There were no significant differences in the rate of maternal or neonatal composite adverse outcome between the two groups. The rate of neonatal respiratory morbidity, however, was higher among the 38 group (5.8% vs. 2.1%).Compared with planned CD, unscheduled CD was associated with a similar rate of maternal composite adverse outcome, but with increased rate of neonatal composite adverse outcome (23.3% vs. 8%, respectively). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis we found that this latter association was due to the earlier actual gestational age at delivery in cases of unscheduled versus planned CD. CONCLUSIONS: Planned CD at 39 weeks, rather than at 38 weeks, is associated with more unscheduled CDs, a similar rate of maternal and neonatal composite morbidity, but a decreased rate of neonatal respiratory morbidity.