Midterm outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after internal hemipelvectomy and iliofemoral arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have reported acceptable outcomes after arthrodesis takedown and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, there are no reports on outcomes after oncologic resection, which are inherently complex and may portend poorer outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent prior hemipelvectomy for tumor resection and were later converted to THA. METHODS: All patients who had prior iliofemoral arthrodesis after oncologic resection that were later converted to THA at a single institution were examined. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, operative information, functional outcomes, and complications/reoperations. RESULTS: All three patients in this study were males who underwent internal hemipelvectomies for chondrosarcoma. Patients were converted to THA at a mean of 26 years after arthrodesis. Mean follow-up after conversion to THA was 7.4 years. During this follow-up period, two of the three patients required revision surgery. At last follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was 81 and the mean Mayo Hip Score was 67, and all patients were ambulatory without significant pain. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients who undergo iliofemoral arthrodesis after oncologic hemipelvectomy and are later converted to THA can expect to have a reasonable outcome, despite a high rate of complications and revision surgery.

What Is the Incidence of and Outcomes After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in the AJRR Population?

BACKGROUND: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is used to manage acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Given the uncertain success of single or multiple DAIR attempts and possible long-term deleterious effects this treatment can create when trying to treat persistent infection, it is important to understand the frequency with which surgeons in the United States are attempting multiple debridements for PJI and whether those procedures are achieving the desired goal. QUESTION/PURPOSES: In the context of the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), we asked: (1) What proportion of patients who undergo DAIR have only one DAIR, and what percentage of those patients have more than one? (2) Of the patients who undergo one or more DAIR procedures, what is the proportion who progress to additional surgical procedures? (3) What is the cumulative incidence of medical or surgical endpoints related to infection on the affected leg (other than additional DAIR procedures)? METHODS: DAIR procedures to treat PJI, defined by ICD-9/10 and CPT (Current Procedural Technology) codes, reported to the AJRR from 2012 to 2020 were merged with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data from 2012 to 2020 to determine the incidence of patients aged 65 and older who underwent additional PJI-related procedures on the same joint. Linking to CMS ensures no loss to follow-up or patient migration to a non-AJRR site. As of 2021, the AJRR captures roughly 35% of all arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States. Of the total 2.2 million procedures in the AJRR, only 0.2% of the procedures were eligible based on our inclusion criteria. Additionally, 61% of the total population is Medicare eligible, and thus, these patients are linked to CMS. Of the 5029 DAIR attempts after a TKA, 46% (2318) were performed in female patients. Similarly, there were a total of 798 DAIR attempts after a THA, and 50% (398) were performed in female patients. For the purposes of decreasing confounding factors, bilateral THAs and TKAs were excluded from the study population. When querying for eligible procedures from 2012 to 2020, the patient population was limited to those 65 years and older, and a subsequent reoperation for infection had to be reported after a primary TJA. This limited the patient population as most infections reported to AJRR resulted in a revision, and we were searching for DAIRs. Although 5827 TJAs were identified as a primary TJA with a subsequent infectious event, more than 65% (3788) of that population did not have a reported event. The following conditions were queried as secondary outcomes after the first DAIR: sepsis, cellulitis, postoperative infection, endocarditis, amputation, knee fusion, resection, drainage, arthrotomy, and debridement. To answer our first and second study questions, we used frequency testing from the available AJRR data. Because of competing risks and issues with incomplete data, we used the cumulative incidence function to evaluate the outcomes specific to study question 3. RESULTS: Of the patients who underwent DAIR, 93% (5406 of 5827) had one DAIR and 8% (421 of 5827) had more than one. Among the DAIR population, at least 35% of TKAs and 38% of THAs were identified as having experienced an additional PJI-related event (an additional surgical procedure on the same joint, sustained an infectious endpoint in the linked CMS-AJRR dataset, or they had died). The cumulative incidence of developing a further medical or surgical condition related to the joint that had the initial DAIR were as follows: 48% (95% CI 42% to 54%) at 8 years after a DAIR following a TKA and 42% (95% CI 37% to 46%) at 4 years after a DAIR following a THA. The timepoints for TKA and THA are different because there are more longitudinal procedure data available for TKAs regarding DAIR procedures than for THAs. CONCLUSION: In this study, we used data from the AJRR to assess the incidences of single and multiple DAIR attempts and additional surgical- and infection-related sequalae. Continued investigation is required to determine the fate of infected joints that undergo DAIR with regard to ultimate patient outcome. Future cross-sectional studies using large datasets are necessary to assess functional outcomes and determine the risk of persistent infection after DAIR more precisely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Whole Blood Metal Levels in the Setting of an Oncologic Endoprosthesis: Is There Cause for Concern?

BACKGROUND: Massive modular endoprostheses have become a primary means of reconstruction after oncologic resection of a lower extremity tumor. These implants are commonly made with cobalt-chromium alloys that can undergo wear and corrosion, releasing cobalt and chromium ions into the surrounding tissue and blood. However, there are few studies about the blood metal levels in these patients. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What is the whole blood cobalt and chromium ion level in patients with massive modular endoprostheses? METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of our total joints registry to identify patients with a history of an endoprosthetic reconstruction performed at our institution. Patients who were alive at the time of our review in addition to those undergoing an endoprosthetic reconstruction after an oncologic resection were included. Whole blood samples were obtained from 27 (14 male and 13 female) patients with a history of a lower extremity oncologic endoprosthesis. The median time from surgery to blood collection was 8 years (range 6 months to 32 years). Blood samples were collected and stored in metal-free ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes. Samples were analyzed on an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer in an International Organization for Standardization seven-class clean room using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated instruments to reduce the risk of metal contamination. The analytical measuring range was 1 to 200 ng/mL for chromium and cobalt. Cobalt and chromium levels were considered elevated when the blood level was ≥ 1 ppb. RESULTS: Cobalt levels were elevated in 59% (16 of 27) of patients, and chromium levels were elevated in 26% (seven of 27). In patients with elevated metal ion values, 15 of 17 patients had a reconstruction using a Stryker/Howmedica Global Modular Replacement System implant. CONCLUSION: Blood metal levels were elevated in patients who received reconstructions using modular oncology endoprostheses Future work is needed to establish appropriate follow-up routines and determine whether and when systemic complications occur because of elevated metal levels and how to potentially address these elevated levels when complications occur. Prospective and retrospective collaboration between multiple centers and specialty societies will be necessary to address these unknown questions in this potentially vulnerable patient group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fracture: A Contemporary Series.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the operation of choice for salvage of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture. While high failure rates have been reported for these procedures, existing literature reports mainly on historical implant designs and techniques. We aimed to describe implant survivorships, complications, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of contemporary THA following prior open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an acetabular fracture. METHODS: We identified 104 patients undergoing THA following prior ORIF of an acetabular fracture from 2000 to 2015 via our institutional total joint registry. Mean age at THA was 50 years (range, 18 to 79 years), 71% were men, and mean body mass index was 27 (range, 18 to 52). All patients were implanted with uncemented acetabular components, and 89% had uncemented stems. Some hardware from prior fixation was retained in 94% of cases. Mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 2 to 21 years). RESULTS: The 10-year survivorships free of any revision and any reoperation were 98% and 97%, respectively. There were 4 revisions: 1 each for psoas tendonitis, dislocation, acetabular aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic joint infection. There were 9 complications that did not lead to reoperation: 5 dislocations, 2 periprosthetic femur fractures, 1 sciatic nerve palsy, and 1 case of symptomatic heterotopic ossification. All unrevised components appeared radiographically well-fixed. Mean Harris Hip Score improved from mean 50 preoperatively to mean 82 at 5 years (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of contemporary THAs following prior acetabular fracture ORIF, revision-free survivorship was excellent with only a single case of acetabular aseptic loosening. These results are encouraging and suggest that contemporary implants and techniques have notably improved on historic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV.

Obesity and Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Absolute versus Relative Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection at 15 Years.

INTRODUCTION: When indicating patients for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons and patients must understand the absolute and relative risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) to make an informed decision. We sought to evaluate the long-term risk of PJI following primary TKA stratified by body mass index (BMI) and PJI-related risk factors. METHODS: We identified 25,160 primary TKAs performed from 2000 to 2021 at a single institution. Patients were stratified as having 0, 1, or ≥ 2 PJI risk factors (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, non-primary osteoarthritis, immunosuppression, or active smoking) and into BMI categories. The 15-year cumulative risk of PJI was evaluated by BMI and PJI risk factors. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 15-year absolute risk of PJI was 3%. For patients who did not have PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 3% in normal weight, 4% in class III obesity, and 4% in class IV obesity. Patients who had class III obesity had a 3-times higher relative risk of PJI when compared to normal-weight patients (P = 0.01). Among patients who had ≥ 2 PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 5% in normal weight and 6% in patients who have class III obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy patients who had class III obesity had a 3-times increased risk of PJI relative to healthy, normal-weight patients; however, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years after primary TKA was 4% in this group. Surgeons and patients must consider both a 3-times increased relative risk of PJI and a 4% absolute risk of PJI at 15 years after primary TKA when considering surgery in otherwise healthy patients who have BMI ≥ 40.

Why Are Contemporary Primary Ceramic-on-Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasties Failing? An Analysis of Over 5,500 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Ceramic-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has become the most common bearing surface utilized in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine the implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of THAs with ceramic-on-HXLPE in a large single-institutional series. METHODS: We identified 5,536 primary THAs performed from 2007 to 2017 using a ceramic-on-HXLPE bearing through our total joint registry. The mean age was 60 years, 51% were women, and the mean body mass index was 30. A cementless femoral component was used in 98% of cases, and a head size of ≥ 36 was used in 75%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were completed to assess survivorship free of any revision or reoperation. Clinical outcomes were assessed via Harris Hip Score. The mean follow-up was four years. RESULTS: The 5-year survivorship free of any revision was 97%. The most common indications for revision were dislocation (41 hips), periprosthetic joint infection (39 hips), and periprosthetic femur fracture (18 hips). The 5-year survivorship free of any reoperation was 96%. There were an additional 70 reoperations, with the most common indications being wound dehiscence (32 hips), iliopsoas impingement (11 hips), and periprosthetic femur fracture (11 hips). There were only two bearing surface failures: one HXLPE liner fractured and one dissociated. There were no ceramic head fractures or failures. The mean Harris Hip Score increased from 57 to 92 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In over 5,500 THAs completed with modern ceramic-on-HXLPE bearings, failures of the bearing surface were nearly eliminated at midterm follow-up, and overall 5-year survivorship free of revision was excellent. Dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, and periprosthetic femur fracture were the most common causes of failure. As bearing surfaces have evolved, traditional failure mechanisms such as polyethylene wear, corrosion and metal reactions, and ceramic fractures have become nearly extinct. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (Case-Control Study), Therapeutic.

Obesity and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Absolute versus Relative Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection at 15 Years.

BACKGROUND: To make an informed decision about total hip arthroplasty (THA), surgeons and patients need to understand the absolute and relative risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to evaluate the long-term risk of PJI following primary THA stratified by body mass index (BMI) and PJI-related risk factors. METHODS: We identified 21,550 primary THAs performed from 2000 to 2021 at a single institution. Patients were stratified as having 0, 1, or ≥ 2 PJI risk factors (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, nonprimary osteoarthritis, immunosuppression, or active smoking) and into BMI categories. The 15-year cumulative risk of PJI was evaluated by BMI and PJI risk factors. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 15-year absolute risk of PJI was 2%. For patients who did not have PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 1% in normal weight, 2% in class III obesity, and 4% in class IV obesity. Patients who had class III and IV obesity had a 3-times and 9-times higher relative risk of PJI, respectively (P = .03, P < .001). Among patients who had ≥ 2 PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 2% in normal weight, 4% in class III obesity, and 18% in class IV obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy patients who had class III and IV obesity had a 3-times and 9-times increased risk of PJI at 15 years relative to normal weight patients. However, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 2 and 4%, respectively. Given emerging data questioning whether BMI modification decreases PJI risk, surgeons and patients must consider both a 3-times to 9-times increased relative risk of PJI and a 2 to 4% absolute risk of PJI at 15 years for healthy patients who had a BMI ≥ 40. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Highly Porous Acetabular Cup and Augment Constructs in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Predicts 10-Year Implant Survivorship?

BACKGROUND: Porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment constructs have demonstrated favorable outcomes up to 5 years postsurgery despite severe bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior literature lacks long-term studies with substantial case numbers. This study aims to assess long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes 10 years postsurgery in patients undergoing revision THA with porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs and determine factors associated with long-term survivorship. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2012, 157 revision THAs were performed in cases with major acetabular defects (mainly Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB) utilizing porous tantalum cup-augment constructs. Pelvic discontinuity was noted intraoperatively in 17 hips (11%). Postoperative radiographs were evaluated at regular intervals for implant stability and radiolucent lines. There were 49 patients who had complete radiographic follow-up at 10 years or longer postsurgery. RESULTS: The 10-year survivorship free of revision of the cup-augment construct for aseptic loosening was 93%, free of any acetabular construct revision was 91%, free of any hip rerevision was 77%, and free of any reoperation was 75%. Pelvic discontinuity was associated with increased risk of reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.8), any hip rerevision (HR = 3.2), any cup-augment construct revision (HR = 11.8), and aseptic construct revision (HR = 10.0). Of unrevised cases with radiographs at 10 years, 4 hips showed radiographic loosening. Mean Harris hip scores improved from 47 preoperatively to 79 at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs used in revision THA with severe acetabular bone loss provide excellent implant survivorship at 10 years when the acetabulum is intact. Due to lower survivorship of cup-augment constructs in cases of pelvic discontinuity, additional construct fixation or stabilization methods are recommended, when a discontinuity is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: Highly porous metal tibial metaphyseal cones (TMCs) are commonly utilized in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to address bone loss and obtain biologic fixation. Mid-term (5 to 10 year) studies have previously demonstrated excellent survivorship and high rates of osseointegration, but longer-term studies are lacking. We aimed to assess long-term (≥ 10 year) implant survivorship, complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes after revision TKA with TMCs. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2011, 228 revision TKAs utilizing porous tantalum TMCs with stemmed tibial components were performed at a single institution and were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age at revision was 65 years, the mean body mass index was 33, and 52% were women. Implant survivorship, complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years. RESULTS: The 10-year survivorship free of aseptic loosening leading to TMC removal was 97%, free of any TMC removal was 88%, free of any re-revision was 66%, and free of any reoperation was 58%. The most common indications for re-revision were periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and aseptic femoral component loosening. The 10-year nonoperative complication rate was 24%. The mean Knee Society scores increased from 38 preoperatively to 69 at 10 years. There were 8 knees that had evidence of partial, progressive tibial radiolucencies at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Porous tantalum TMCs demonstrated persistently durable longer-term survivorship with a low rate of implant removal. The rare implant removals for component loosening or instability were offset by those required for periprosthetic joint infection, which accounted for 80% of cone removals. Porous tantalum TMCs provide an extremely reliable tool to address tibial bone loss and achieve durable long-term fixation in revision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Is the Rise of Medicare Advantage Impacting the Fidelity of Traditional Medicare Claims Data? Implications for Reporting of Long-Term Total Hip Arthroplasty Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty registries often use traditional Medicare (TM) claims data to report long-term total hip arthroplasty (THA) survivorship. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the large number of patients leaving TM for Medicare Advantage (MA) has compromised the fidelity of TM data. METHODS: We identified 10,962 THAs in 9,333 Medicare-eligible patients who underwent primary THA from 2000 to 2020 at a single institution. Insurance type was analyzed, and 83% of patients had TM at the time of THA. Survivorship free from any revision or reoperation was calculated for patients who have TM. The same survivorship end points were recalculated with censoring performed when a patient transitioned to an MA plan after their primary THA to model the impact of losing patients from the TM dataset. Differences in survivorship were compared. The mean follow-up was 7 years. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, there was a decrease in TM insurance (93 to 73%) and a corresponding increase in MA insurance (0 to 19%) among THA patients. Following THA, 23% of TM patients switched to MA. For patients who had TM at the time of surgery, 15-year survivorship free from any reoperation or revision was 90% and 93%, respectively. When censoring patients upon transition from TM to MA, survivorship free from any reoperation became significantly higher (92 versus 90% at 15 years; hazard ratio = 1.16, P = .033), and there was a trend toward higher survivorship free from any revision (95 versus 93% at 15 years; hazard ratio = 1.16, P = .074). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 4 patients left TM for MA after primary THA, effectively making them lost to follow-up within TM datasets. The mass exodus of patients out of TM appears to have led to a slight overestimation of survivorship free from any reoperation and trended toward overestimating survivorship free from any revision. If MA continues to grow, efforts to obtain MA data will become even more important.

Data-Driven Approach to Development of a Risk Score for Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty Using Electronic Health Records.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon, but serious complication in total joint arthroplasty. Personalized risk prediction and risk factor management may allow better preoperative assessment and improved outcomes. We evaluated different data-driven approaches to develop surgery-specific PJI prediction models using large-scale data from the electronic health records. METHODS: A large institutional arthroplasty registry was leveraged to collect data from 58,574 procedures of 41,844 patients who underwent at least one primary and/or revision hip and/or knee arthroplasty between 2000 and 2019. The registry dataset was augmented with additional clinical, procedural, and laboratory data from the electronic health records for more than 100 potential predictor variables. The main outcome was PJI within the first year after surgery. We implemented both traditional and machine learning methods for model development (lasso regression, relaxed lasso regression, ridge regression, random forest, stepwise regression, extreme gradient boosting, neural network) and used 10-fold cross-validation to calculate measures of model performance in terms of discrimination (c-statistic), cross-entropy loss, and calibration. RESULTS: All models performed similarly in predicting PJI risk, with negligible differences of less than 0.08 between the best and worst-performing models. The relaxed and fully relaxed lasso models using the Cox model structure outperformed the other models with concordances of 0.787 in primary hip arthroplasty and 0.722 in revision hip arthroplasty, with the number of predictors ranging from nine to 41. The concordances with the relaxed lasso models were 0.681 in primary and 0.699 in revision knee arthroplasty, with a higher number of predictors in the models. Predictors included in the models varied substantially across the four surgical groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of additional data from the electronic health records offers limited improvement in PJI risk stratification. Furthermore, improvement in PJI risk prediction was modest with the machine learning approaches and may not justify the added complexity.

Long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty in patients with multiple hereditary exostosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple osteochondromas. There is a paucity of literature concerning total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with MHE. The aim of this study is to report long-term outcomes of THA in patients with MHE. METHODS: Fourteen patients undergoing 15 THA's for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the presence of osteochondromas and proximal femoral deformity secondary to MHE were reviewed. Mean age at the time of surgery and follow-up was 56 and 12 years. Seven (47%) had uncemented femoral components. Eleven hips had coxa valga on preoperative imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed with both Harris hip scores (HHS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (MSTS). RESULTS: Following surgery, there was an improvement in the HHS (48-82, p < 0.01) and MSTS scores (41-70%, p < 0.01). Complications occurred in 5 patients leading to reoperation in 3 patients, of which 2 patients underwent a revision procedure at 19 and 20-years postoperative. The 10-year revision free survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: THA in the setting of MHE reliably improves patient function. One in three patients will have a postoperative complication; however, the long-term incidence of revision is low.

Intussusception Allograft Prosthetic Composites in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Salvage Operation for Extensive Femoral Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: Allograft prosthetic composites (APCs) have been used to perform revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for massive femoral bone loss or deformity. Intussusception, or "telescoping", APC techniques have been proposed to enhance the contact area of this interface and provide superior mechanical fixation over conventional methods. The purpose of this study is to present to our knowledge, the largest series of telescoping APC THAs, along with surgical technique details and midterm (average 5-10 years) clinical results. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2015, 46 revision THAs performed with proximal femoral telescoping APCs were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Overall survival, reoperation-free survival, and construct survival rates were calculated via Kaplan-Meier methods. In addition, radiographic analyses were performed to evaluate for component loosening, union at the APC-host interface, and resorption of the allograft. RESULTS: At 10 years, the overall patient survival was 58%, reoperation-free survival was 76%, and construct survival was 95%. Reoperation was performed in 20% (n = 9) and only 2 constructs required resection. Radiographic analyses performed at latest follow-up revealed no instances of radiographic femoral stem loosening, an 86% union rate at the APC-host site, 23% with signs of some allograft resorption, and a 54% trochanteric union. The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 71 points (range, 46-100). CONCLUSION: Telescoping APCs are technically demanding, but provide reliable mechanical fixation for the reconstructing of large proximal femoral bone deficits in revision THA with excellent construct survivorship, acceptable reoperation rates, and good clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

How to Develop and Validate Prediction Models for Orthopedic Outcomes.

Prediction models are common in medicine for predicting outcomes such as mortality, complications, or response to treatment. Despite the growing interest in these models in arthroplasty (and orthopaedics in general), few have been adopted in clinical practice. If robustly built and validated, prediction models can be excellent tools to support surgical decision making. In this paper, we provide an overview of the statistical concepts surrounding prediction models and outline practical steps for prediction model development and validation in arthroplasty research. Please visit the followinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yrit23Rkicfor a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Propensity Scores: Confounder Adjustment When Comparing Nonrandomized Groups in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Many studies in arthroplasty research are based on nonrandomized, retrospective, registry-based cohorts. In these types of studies, patients belonging to different treatment or exposure groups often differ with respect to patient characteristics, medical histories, surgical indications, or other factors. Consequently, comparisons of nonrandomized groups are often subject to treatment selection bias and confounding. Propensity scores can be used to balance cohort characteristics, thus helping to minimize potential bias and confounding. This article explains how propensity scores are created and describes multiple ways in which they can be applied in the analysis of nonrandomized studies. Please visit the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqgxl_nZWS4&t=3s) for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

How to Distinguish Correlation From Causation in Orthopaedic Research.

Correlations in observational studies are commonly misinterpreted as causation. Although correlation is necessary to establish a causal relationship between two variables, correlations may also arise due to chance, reverse causality, or confounding. There are several methods available to orthopaedic researchers to determine whether the observed correlations are causal. These methods depend on the key components of the study including, but not limited to, study design and data availability on confounders. In this article, we illustrate the main concepts surrounding correlation and causation using intuitive real-world examples from the orthopaedic literature. Please visit the following https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW7pFudZbHA&t=52s for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Nuts and Bolts of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Orthopaedics.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly used in orthopaedic clinical practice, comparative effectiveness research (CER), and label claims. In this paper, we provide an overview of PROs, their development, validation, and use in orthopaedic research with examples and conclude with practical guidelines for researchers and reviewers. We discuss considerations for conceptual framework, validity, reliability, factor analysis, and measurement of change with Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS), as an example. We also describe advantages of instruments developed based on item response theory and statistical analyses for data collected using PRO measures. Please visit the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p-DtZgUHOA&t=354s) for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

John N. Insall Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Components: Durable and Reliable at a Mean 10-Years Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation is gaining popularity for primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The prior 5-year results of our randomized clinical trial that included 3 different tibial designs found minimal differences. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the 10-year results in the same cohort. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 389 primary TKAs were randomized: traditional modular cemented tibia (135); hybrid (cemented baseplate with uncemented pegs) monoblock tibia (128); and cementless monoblock tibia (126). Implant survivorships, radiographs, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Mean age at TKA was 68 years (range, 41 to 85), 46% were male, and mean body mass index was 32 (range, 21 to 59). The mean follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS: The 10-year survivorship free of any revision was similar between the hybrid monoblock and cementless monoblock groups at 96%, but lower (89%) for the traditional modular cemented tibia (P = .05). The traditional modular cemented tibia group had significantly more revisions for aseptic tibial loosening than the other 2 groups (7 versus 0%) at 10 years (P = .003). The traditional modular cemented tibia group had significantly more nonprogressive radiolucent lines than the hybrid and cementless monoblock groups (24, 12, and 9%, respectively). Clinical outcomes were similar and excellent between all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Cementless and hybrid monoblock tibial components have excellent implant survivorship (96%) with no cases of aseptic tibial loosening to date. The traditional cemented modular tibial group had a 7% cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening at 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

Can the American Joint Replacement Registry Utilize Administrative Claims Data to Accurately Classify Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Surgical Diagnoses?

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is a valuable tool for studying revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Currently, International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes are utilized by the AJRR for classifying surgical diagnoses. However, the validity of this methodology is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of these codes, as used by AJRR, in classifying rTHA diagnoses. METHODS: We identified 908 rTHAs performed at our institution from 2015 to 2021 using our total joint registry (TJR). Revision diagnoses were obtained from the TJR, which contains prospectively recorded surgical diagnoses collected by trained abstractors, independent from ICD-10 data. The ICD-10 diagnosis codes, as submitted to AJRR, were retrieved for the same procedures. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for classifying rTHA diagnoses as septic versus aseptic, instability, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture was assessed using Cohen's Kappa statistic, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Concordance between AJRR-submitted data and TJR for classifying rTHA as septic or aseptic was excellent (96.9%; k = 0.87). Agreement for aseptic diagnoses varied from very good for instability (k = 0.76) and loosening (k = 0.67) to moderate for periprosthetic fracture (k = 0.54). Specificity was high (>96%) for all 3 aseptic diagnoses, but sensitivity was lower at 74%, 68%, and 44% for instability, loosening, and periprosthetic fracture, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AJRR submitted ICD-10 data correctly classifies the infection status of rTHA procedures with outstanding accuracy, but the accuracy for more granular diagnoses was variable. These data demonstrate the potential for diagnosis specific limitations when utilizing ICD-10 administrative claims for registry reporting.

Is the American Joint Replacement Registry Able to Correctly Classify Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedural Diagnoses?

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is a powerful tool for the study of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The AJRR uses International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10-CM) codes for recording surgical diagnoses. However, the validity of this methodology is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes, as used by AJRR, in classifying rTKA diagnoses. METHODS: There were 988 rTKAs performed from 2015 to 2021 identified in our institutional total joint registry (TJR). Revision diagnoses were obtained from TJR, in which trained abstractors prospectively record diagnoses independent of ICD-10-CM data. The ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes submitted to AJRR were retrieved for the same procedures. The accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes for classifying rTKA diagnoses as septic versus aseptic, aseptic loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture was assessed using Cohen's Kappa statistics, sensitivities, and specificities. RESULTS: Concordance between AJRR-submitted codes and TJR was excellent (97.3%, k = 0.9) for identifying septic versus aseptic revisions. Agreement for aseptic diagnoses varied from very good for loosening (k = 0.65) and instability (k = 0.64) to fair for periprosthetic fracture (k = 0.36). Specificity was high (> 94%) for all three diagnoses, but sensitivity was lower at 71%, 63%, and 28% for loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AJRR submitted ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes correctly classified rTKA cases as septic or aseptic with remarkable accuracy, but accuracy for more granular diagnoses varied. These data demonstrate the potential for diagnosis-specific limitations when using administrative claims data for registry reporting and have important implications for researchers using ICD-10-CM data.