Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 49(1): 60-3; discussion 63-4, 1997 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9000187

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness and morbidity of minilaparotomy (MINILAP) and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LAP) in a community practice setting. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with 44 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who had staging pelvic lymphadenectomy from January 1992 through April 1995 in a general health maintenance organization urology practice. Of this group, 22 men had LAP and 22 men had MINILAP. RESULTS: MINILAP and LAP groups were similar in age (mean 67 years). Gleason score (mean 7.2 and 6.8), prostate-specific antigen level (mean 46 and 49 ng/mL), and clinical stage (T1 to T3). Operative time was statistically significantly shorter for MINILAP (mean 1.2 hours) than for LAP (mean 2.9 hours). Complication rate was 9.1% for MINILAP and 31.8% for LAP. Lymph node metastasis was found in 45% of MINILAP patients and in 27% of LAP patients. Mean initial hospital stay was 1.0 day for MINILAP and 1.6 days for LAP. Total hospital stay including hospital readmission for complications was 1.5 days for MINILAP and 2.6 days for LAP. Cost of MINILAP was at least $1900 less than that of LAP because of shorter total hospital stay, shorter operation time, and lower equipment cost. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LAP, MINILAP was more cost-effective and produced less morbidity. Patient satisfaction with the procedures was similar. MINILAP is an excellent alternative to LAP for prostate cancer staging in general urology practice.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Laparotomia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/economia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
2.
J Biol Chem ; 260(22): 12181-4, 1985 Oct 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2995363

RESUMO

Until now it had been assumed that mammalian skin contains only one provitamin D, 7-dehydrocholesterol, that is eventually converted to vitamin D3 after the skin is exposed to sunlight. Examination by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography of lipid extracts from young rat skin, however, led to the observation that 7-dehydrocholesterol is not the only provitamin D in rat skin. Another provitamin D, accounting for 22 +/- 3% of the total provitamin content of the skin, was resolved from 7-dehydrocholesterol, and, on the basis of ultraviolet spectrophotometry, mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry, was identified as 24-dehydroprovitamin D3 (cholesta-5,7,24-trien-3 beta-ol). This new cutaneous provitamin D is not unique to the rat because it was also detected in the skin of reptiles, amphibians, birds, aquatic mammals, and humans. To be certain that the cutaneous 24-dehydroprovitamin D3 was as susceptible as 7-dehydrocholesterol to ultraviolet photolysis, rat skin was exposed to ultraviolet radiation. A reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic analysis of a lipid extract of rat skin previously exposed to ultraviolet radiation demonstrated the presence of both previtamin D3 and 24-dehydroprevitamin D3. Therefore, these observations demonstrate for the first time that mammalian skin has the capacity to produce not one but at least two different vitamin Ds.


Assuntos
Colecalciferol/metabolismo , Colestadienóis/metabolismo , Desidrocolesteróis/metabolismo , Pele/metabolismo , Animais , Colecalciferol/isolamento & purificação , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Desidrocolesteróis/isolamento & purificação , Cinética , Espectrometria de Massas , Fotólise , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos , Espectrofotometria Ultravioleta
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA