Machine learning-based speech recognition system for nursing documentation - A pilot study.

PURPOSE: Considering the significant workload of nursing tasks, enhancing the efficiency of nursing documentation is imperative. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a machine learning-based speech recognition (SR) system in reducing the clinical workload associated with typing nursing records, implemented in a psychiatry ward. METHODS: The study was conducted between July 15, 2020, and June 30, 2021, at Cheng Hsin General Hospital in Taiwan. The language corpus was based on the existing records from the hospital nursing information system. The participating ward's nursing activities, clinical conversation, and accent data were also collected for deep learning-based SR-engine training. A total of 21 nurses participated in the evaluation of the SR system. Documentation time and recognition error rate were evaluated in parallel between SR-generated records and keyboard entry over 4 sessions. Any differences between SR and keyboard transcriptions were regarded as SR errors. FINDINGS: A total of 200 data were obtained from four evaluation sessions, 10 participants were asked to use SR and keyboard entry in parallel at each session and 5 entries were collected from each participant. Overall, the SR system processed 30,112 words in 32,456 s (0.928 words per second). The mean accuracy of the SR system improved after each session, from 87.06% in 1st session to 95.07% in 4th session. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated our machine learning-based SR system has an acceptable recognition accuracy and may reduce the burden of documentation for nurses. However, the potential error with the SR transcription should continually be recognized and improved. Further studies are needed to improve the integration of SR in digital documentation of nursing records, in terms of both productivity and accuracy across different clinical specialties.

Development and Validity Testing of an Assessment Tool for Oncofertility Barriers in Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers on the Breast Cancer Team.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary healthcare providers, especially clinical nurses, lack a valid tool to assess the comprehensive barriers affecting oncofertility care in breast cancer treatment. PURPOSE: The aims of the research were to develop a self-assessment scale on oncofertility barriers and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: This was a methodological study. The initial 36 items of the developed Oncofertility Barrier Scale (OBS) were generated through qualitative study and a review of the literature. This scale was further refined using expert validity (n = 10), face validity (n = 10), and item analysis (n = 184). Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and direct oblimin rotation was used to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the OBS was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest analyses. RESULTS: The mean item-level and scale-level content validity indices of the initial OBS were higher than .96. The data were shown to be feasible for the factor analysis, and a six-factor solution was chosen that accounted for approximately 57.6% of the total variance. These factors included (a) lack of information and education, (b) rigid thinking toward oncofertility care, (c) cancer patient stereotypes, (d) fertility risk, (e) insufficient support, and (f) interrupted oncofertility care. The Cronbach's alpha of the 27-item OBS was .91, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .55. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The final version of the developed OBS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify the barriers to fertility cancer care that should be resolved by the breast cancer care team.

The prevalence and impact of pain among Taiwanese oncology outpatients.

The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence and impact of pain among Taiwanese oncology outpatients who had experienced moderate pain. Ninety-two cancer outpatients in two teaching hospitals in the Taipei area of Taiwan were enrolled in a descriptive cross-sectional study. Outpatients aged ≥18 years who had been prescribed opioid analgesics for cancer-related pain completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Chinese questionnaire. Results of this study highlighted an important issue: undertreatment of cancer pain in the Taiwanese outpatients. Patients in this study reported that in the preceding 24 hours they had experienced a mean worst pain of 6.91 (SD 2.06, range 0-10). The average pain intensity in the preceding 24 hours was 5.21 (SD 1.69, range 0-10). Around 50% of the patients had pain most of the time and 25% of the patients had pain all of the time. In the preceding 24 hours the average pain relief experienced was 62.6% (SD 22.2%, range 0%-100%). Only 10.9% of patients experienced good pain relief (defined as 90%-100% of pain relief in the past 24 hours), whereas 45.7% experienced poor pain relief (defined as 0%-60% of pain relief in the past 24 hours). The mean pain interference with the patients' daily activities was 5.69 (SD 2.33, range 0-10). The findings of this study indicate the need for better programmatic efforts to improve relief of cancer pain in Taiwanese outpatients.

An Improved Stress-Scale Specifically Designed to Measure Stress of Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

Most breast cancer patients are middle-aged women actively involved in establishing a family, developing a career, or raising children. With the exception of the Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Stress Scale (NDBCSS), few stress scales have been designed for women with breast cancer. This study checked the dimensionality of the NDBCSS by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the results showed a poor fit, indicating an urgent need for improvement. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using the varimax rotation method was performed to improve the model, the revised NDBCSS (NDBCSS-R), which showed a good Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and internal consistency reliability. The NDBCSS-R showed improved indices compared with NDBCSS, including: chi-square fit statistics/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), normed fix index (NFI), relative fit index (RFI), incremental fix index (IFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), comparative fix index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), root mean square residual (RMR), parsimonious goodness-fit-index (PGFI), and parsimonious normed fit index (PNFI). In conclusion, the improved NDBCSS-R can provide health professionals with an early understanding of the stress levels of women with breast cancer so that they can provide immediate medical intervention to prevent vicious cycles in a timely manner.

Neuropathic Pain Experiences of Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a common, severe problem that affects spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Only SCI patients truly understand the impact and extent of this type of pain. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to understand the NP experienced by SCI patients and the influence of this type of pain on their daily life. METHOD: A qualitative design was used. An interview guide including a semistructured questionnaire and in-depth interviews was conducted with SCI patients with NP in a neurorehabilitation department at a medical center in northern Taiwan. The data were collected using a purposive sampling method. Content analysis was performed on the interview data, which were obtained from 13 SCI patients with NP. RESULTS: Three themes and eight subthemes were identified that described the NP experience of the participants and the influence of NP on their daily life. The three themes included elusive pain (changing and individual pain sensations, erratically haunting threat, and phantom limb sensations), complicated feelings about pain (converting depression into an active attitude toward life, having feelings of anticipation and anxiety about future pain relief, and facing and experiencing pain), and renewed hope (bravely fighting pain and seeking pain relief methods). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed three important themes of NP experienced by SCI patients, including elusive pain, complicated feelings about pain, and renewed hope. Nurses should understand the nature of NP, provide a thorough pain assessment, and design a proper pain management plan to care effectively for patients with NP.

Development and Validation of a Fertility Intention Scale in Breast Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that breast cancer survivors with reproductive concerns have a poorer quality of life than survivors without fertility concerns. There is a lack of reliable and valid assessments of fertility intention among breast cancer survivors. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Fertility Intention Scale (FIS) that is sensitive to the fertility intention of women with breast cancer. METHODS: A literature review and a qualitative study were conducted to generate the items in the scale. Content validity was evaluated by 15 experts, and face validity was assessed by 10 patients with cancer. Factor analysis was used to assess construct validity, and criterion validity was evaluated using two percentile items of fertility willingness. We developed and examined the validity and reliability of the FIS using a sample of 178 patients with breast cancer who had completed chemotherapy. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha calculated for the FIS (15 items) was .88. The factor analysis performed for the construct validity of the scale identified four factors that accounted for approximately 68.72% of the total variance. These four factors were pregnancy risk, disease control, social support, and happiness. There was a significant correlation between the total FIS and the level of desiring fertility preservation or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The FIS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to evaluate the risk-benefit perceptions of pregnancy in patients with breast cancer.

Situated teaching improves empathy learning of the students in a BSN program: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Empathy is an important clinical skill for nursing students, but it is a characteristic difficult to teach and assess. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of situated teaching on empathy learning among undergraduate nursing students. DESIGN: A cohort study with pre-post-test quasi-experimental design. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The 2nd-year students were enrolled from two BSN programs. METHODS: The teaching program was completed over 4 months on the basis of experiential learning theory which integrated the following four elements: classroom-based role play, self-reflection, situated learning and acting. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Profession-Student version was administered before and after the program. Objective Structure Clinical Examination (OSCE) was administered at the end of program and a rubrics scale was used to measure empathy. A generalized estimation equation was used to identify the effect of subjective empathy, and an independent t-test was used for the objective assessment between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 103 students were enrolled. The results showed that subjective empathy increased significantly in experimental group. In the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, examiners and standard patients gave significantly higher empathy scores to the situated teaching group than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that situated teaching can improve empathy learning of the nursing students. However different methods of assessment of empathy produce different results. We therefore recommend that multiple measurements from difference perspectives are preferable in the assessment of empathy.

Predicting functional outcomes in patients suffering from ischaemic stroke using initial admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between tree model and multivariate regression analysis.

PURPOSE: This study was aimed to compare the application of a tree model and regression approach for developing data-driven models that identified frisk factors related to functional outcomes among ischaemic stroke patients. METHODS: Data were derived from 271 hospitalised patients with a first-ever ischaemic stroke. The Barthel Index (BI) and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) were used to assess the functional outcomes. The stroke severity at admission and related information from 2006 to December 2007 were extracted retrospectively from a chart review. RESULTS: In the regression approach, including age, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and glucose level were the most significant predictors affecting both the BI and MRS. After applying the tree model, different tree structures were found. For the BI score, the NIHSS score interact with glucose, age and systolic blood pressure to form the tree structure. By contrast, the NIHSS score mainly interact with patients' age to form the tree model for MRS. CONCLUSION: Both models have their pros and cons. The tree model otherwise provides risk interactions, and can effectively discriminate the risk groups for different functional outcomes. Applying both models to specific situations will provide a different angle for functional assessment and intervention in stroke rehabilitation.