Effect of bedside filtration on aggregates from cold-stored whole blood-derived platelet-rich plasma and apheresis platelet concentrates.

BACKGROUND: The current approach to manufacture cold-stored platelets (CSP) replicates that of room temperature-stored platelets (RSP). However, this production method is associated with aggregate formation in CSP, a major pitfall that leads to significant wastage. We hypothesized that isolating platelets from whole blood as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and storing them at a lower concentration reduces aggregates and that conventional bedside transfusion filtration removes CSP aggregates. METHODS: We collected platelets from healthy humans by apheresis (AP) and by phlebotomy, from which we generated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). We split each AP and PRP platelets into two equal aliquots, storing one at 22°C (RT-PRP and RT-AP) and the other at 4°C (4C-PRP and 4C-AP). We evaluated platelets on day 0 and day 7 of storage. After storage, we measured platelet counts, aggregates, and other key characteristics before and after filtration by a bedside filter. RESULTS: After storage, the 4C-AP platelet counts decreased significantly. 4C-PRP preserved glucose better and prevented a significant increase in lactate contrary to 4C-AP. Filtration led to significantly lower platelet counts in both 4C-PRP and 4C-AP but not in their RT counterparts. Post filtration, we observed 50% fewer aggregates only in 4C-AP, whereas 4C-PRP showed an unexpected but significant increase in aggregates. Testing confirmed activation during storage but filtration did not further activate platelets. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that 4C-PRP is an alternative to 4C-AP and that bedside filters reduce aggregates from 4C-AP. Further studies are needed to evaluate the hemostatic potential of 4C-PRP and the management of aggregates.

Do Foley Catheters Adequately Drain the Bladder? Evidence from CT Imaging Studies.

INTRODUCTION: The Foley catheter has been widely assumed to be an effective means of draining the bladder. However, recent studies have brought into question its efficacy. The objective of our study is to further assess the adequacy of Foley catheter for complete drainage of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive catheterized patients were identified from a retrospective review of contrast enhanced and non-contrast enhanced computed tomographic (CT) abdomen and pelvis studies completed from 7/1/2011-6/30/2012. Residual urine volume (RUV) was measured using 5mm axial CT sections as follows: The length (L) and width (W) of the bladder in the section with the greatest cross sectional area was combined with bladder height (H) as determined by multiplanar reformatted images in order to calculate RUV by applying the formula for the volume (V) of a sphere in a cube:V=(π/6)*(L*W*H). RESULTS: RUVs of 167 (mean age 67) consecutively catheterized men (n=72) and women (n=95) identified by CT abdomen and pelvis studies were calculated. The mean RUV was 13.2 mL (range: 0.0 mL-859.1 mL, standard deviation: 75.9 mL, margin of error at 95% confidence:11.6 mL). Four (2.4%) catheterized patients had RUVs of >50 mL, two of whom had an improperly placed catheter tip noted on their CT-reports. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have shown that up to 43% of catheterized patients had a RUV greater than 50 mL, suggesting inadequacy of bladder drainage via the Foley catheter. Our study indicated that the vast majority of patients with Foley catheters (97.6%), had adequately drained bladders with volumes of <50 mL.

Do Foley Catheters Adequately Drain the Bladder? Evidence from CT Imaging Studies

The Foley catheter has been widely assumed to be an effective means of draining the bladder. However, recent studies have brought into question its efficacy. The objective of our study is to further assess the adequacy of Foley catheter for complete drainage of the bladder.