A novel synthetic nucleic acid mixture for quantification of microbes by mNGS.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) provides considerable advantages in identifying emerging and re-emerging, difficult-to-detect and co-infected pathogens; however, the clinical application of mNGS remains limited primarily due to the lack of quantitative capabilities. This study introduces a novel approach, KingCreate-Quantification (KCQ) system, for quantitative analysis of microbes in clinical specimens by mNGS, which co-sequence the target DNA extracted from the specimens along with a set of synthetic dsDNA molecules used as Internal-Standard (IS). The assay facilitates the conversion of microbial reads into their copy numbers based on IS reads utilizing a mathematical model proposed in this study. The performance of KCQ was systemically evaluated using commercial mock microbes with varying IS input amounts, different proportions of human genomic DNA, and at varying amounts of sequence analysis data. Subsequently, KCQ was applied in microbial quantitation in 36 clinical specimens including blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, cerebrospinal fluid and oropharyngeal swabs. A total of 477 microbe genetic fragments were screened using the bioinformatic system. Of these 83 fragments were quantitatively compared with digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.97 between the quantitative results of KCQ and ddPCR. Our study demonstrated that KCQ presents a practical approach for the quantitative analysis of microbes by mNGS in clinical samples.

Etiological diagnostic performance of probe capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing in bloodstream infection.

Background: A rapid and precise etiological diagnosis is crucial for the effective treatment of bloodstream infection (BSI). In this study, the performance of probe capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) was compared to that of blood culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting potential pathogens in patients with BSI. Methods: A total of 80 patients with suspected BSI were prospectively enrolled from 24 November 2023 to 30 December 2023 at Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China. All 80 participants underwent simultaneous blood culture, blood mNGS, and blood tNGS after admission when febrile, and the results were compared. Results: Among the 80 participants, 11 were clinically diagnosed with noninfectious fever, and 69 were diagnosed with BSI. Blood tNGS had a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of BSI than blood culture (91.3% vs. 23.2%, P<0.001) and blood mNGS (91.3% vs. 69.6%, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in specificity between blood mNGS and tNGS (81.8% vs. 100.0%, P=0.13). Blood tNGS demonstrated a faster turnaround time than blood culture and blood mNGS. In 22 (31.9%) patients with BSI, targeted adjustment of the anti-infectious therapy according to the blood tNGS results resulted in clinical improvement. Conclusions: Blood tNGS may be a promising tool for detecting potential pathogens in patients with BSI. The application of blood tNGS for BSI could guide anti-infectious treatment strategies and might improve clinical outcomes.